Restrict bandwidth in specific devices [wifi] - bandwidth

I wanted to restrict my wifi's bandwidth in some particular devices (specifically android). I searched up, and found QoS as a solution. But, as far as I have seen, QoS divides bandwidth on basis of priority. Means, if a laptop (with medium priority) and an android (with low priority) are connected to wlan, the android device gets low bandwidth.
But as soon as laptop is disconnected, android again consumes the maximum available bandwidth.
I wish to restrict bandwidth in terms of figures (Eg: 1Mbps for Wlan devices). Is there any way out to achieve this?
I'm using TP-LINK W8961ND modem.

There's no standards-based mechanism to do this. You need your wifi modem/router to provide this function in software. Many do in the enterprise market but not in the residential/SOHO market.
If your "modem" is not your router, you could also do it on your gateway device and only shape traffic going over the internet. For example pfsense is perfect for this.

Related

Can we get high Bandwidth in Cluster strategy as we get in Star strategy of google nearby connections ?

We used nearby connection and tried both star and cluster strategy and noticed that in star strategy bandwidth is very high as compared to the bandwidth in cluster strategy.
The network structure which cluster strategy uses, best matches our requirements but we want to have a high bandwidth as we get in star strategy.
If its possible then how can we achieve this?
tldr; You can get high speeds with P2P_CLUSTER but only if both devices are connected to the same router.
The reason P2P_STAR and P2P_POINT_TO_POINT are more restrictive is so that technologies with the same restrictions can be used. P2P_STAR can do everything P2P_CLUSTER can do, but can additionally use Wifi hotspots (and similar technologies, like Wifi Direct). Likewise, P2P_POINT_TO_POINT can do everything P2P_STAR can do, but also with the inclusion of Wifi Aware. It's a tradeoff between flexibility and bandwidth.
As of today, these are the technologies behind each strategy. (Note: We're constantly adding more, and are open to suggestions).
P2P_CLUSTER:
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)
Bluetooth Classic
Wifi Local Area Network (LAN)
P2P_STAR:
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)
Bluetooth Classic
Wifi Local Area Network (LAN)
Wifi Hotspot
Wifi Direct
P2P_POINT_TO_POINT:
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)
Bluetooth Classic
Wifi Local Area Network (LAN)
Wifi Hotspot
Wifi Direct
Wifi Aware

iOS Bonjour Device Connection Limit?

If I am writing my own networking services via Bonjour (instead of GameKit's implementation), is there any limit to the amount of devices that can connect to a single socket? Meaning, I have one device that is the "host", is there a limit to how many other devices can connect to the host via Bluetooth/Wi-fi?
The maximum number of remote users able to connect to the given host is dictated by the max number of file descriptors iOS allows you to open on a socket. It's not strictly a Bonjour issue. I'm unable to find any documentation for iOS but the default value for OS X is presently around 256 open descriptors per socket (low compared to other UNIXes, although it can easily be bumped).
Given the hardware constraints of an iOS device I would assume this max value is lower, but should still be in the hundreds, comfortably enough for gameplay between users on the same link-local network.
Get above that number of concurrent players and the likelihood is that CPU and network conditions would be the limiting factor anyway.

Bluetooth vs. Wifi for iPhone data transfer

I'm working on adding sharing support to my iPhone app. Right now, I'm using Bonjour to create plain TCP connections over a wifi network. This works great, except that it turns out that many wifi networks in the real world (for example, those at Starbucks and other chains) forbid Bonjour publishing and discovery over their networks.
So that limits the usefulness of sharing, since one of the use cases we imagined was that people could bump into each other where wifi was available and seamlessly share data with each other.
Is Bluetooth a viable alternative for this? We're sending large amounts of data (PNG images) over the wire, so latency and throughput might be one issue.
(I'm also interested in any other ways to make it easy to transfer data between two iPhone apps)

Direct communication between two PCI devices

I have a NIC card and a HDD both connected on PCIe slots in a Linux machine. Ideally, I'd like to funnel incoming packets to the HDD without involving the CPU, or involving it minimally. Is it possible to set up direct communication along the PCI bus like that? Does anyone have pointers as to what to read up on to get started on a project like this?
Thanks all.
Not sure if you are asking about PCI or PCIe. You used both terms, and the answer is different for each.
If you are talking about a legacy PCI bus: The answer is "yes". Board to board DMA is doable. Video capture boards may DMA video frames directly into your graphics card memory for example.
In your example, the video card could DMA directly to a storage device. However, the data would be quite "raw". Your NIC would have no concept of a filesystem for example. You also need to make sure you can program the NIC's DMA engine to sit within the confines of your SATA controller's registers. You don't want to walk off the end of the BAR!
If you are talking about a modern PCIe bus: The answer is "typically no, but it depends". Peer-to-peer bus transactions are a funny thing in the PCI Express Spec. Root complex devices are not required to support it.
In my testing, peer-to-peer DMA will work, if your devices are behind a PCIe switch (not directly plugged into the motherboard). However, if your devices are connected directly to the chipset (Root Complex), peer-to-peer DMA will not work, except in some special cases. The most notable special case would be the video capture example I mentioned earlier. The special cases are mentioned in the chipset datasheets.
We have tested the peer-to-peer PCIe DMA with a few different Intel and AMD chipsets and found consistent behavior. Have not tested the most recent generations of chipsets though. (We have discussed the lack of peer-to-peer PCIe DMA support with Intel, not sure if our feedback has had any impact on their Engineering dept.)
Assuming that both the NIC card and the HDD are End Points (or Legacy Endpoints) you cannot funnel traffic without involving the Root Complex (CPU).
PCIe, unlike PCI or PCI-X, is not a bus but a link, thus any transaction from an Endpoint device (say the NIC) would have to travel through the Root Complex (CPU) in order to get to another branch (HDD).

What is the range of bluetooth and is it strictly 1:1?

Does anyone know what kind of range can you get from the iPhone
bluetooth? Also, would the connection be strictly one to one? I know you
can choose from a number of peers to connect to but once the connection
is established, it seems you can only transfer data between one peer? So
basically, is it possible to create some kind of "multiplayer" experience?
Just answering the range part of your question...
The 10 meter figure for class 2 devices (of which the iPhone is an example) is very much a guideline.
The range of a Bluetooth device is limited by many real world factors. The 2.4 GHz radio frequency used by Bluetooth is strongly absorbed by water. For example, consider an iPhone connected to a Bluetooth mono headset. If the headset is in one ear and the iPhone is in your trouser pocket on the opposite side of your body, then there's a lot of water between the two devices. This will often cause a significant amount of packet loss in practice (you can hear this in the audio being carried). So, in this case, the range is about one meter.
At the opposite extreme, two class 2 devices separated by nothing more than clear air can get ranges of hundreds of meters.
Other factors that influence things are:
Interference - Lots of things use 2.4 GHz. WiFi, for example can cause problems.
Antenna design - Space and cost constraints often mean that the antenna design is sub-optimal. I don't know how good the iPhone is in this respect.
Walls - Generally walls attenuate Bluetooth signals. However, sometimes they are useful reflectors.
Quality of hardware - Some chips work better than others. Even different firmware revisions of the same chip may perform differently. Different versions of the iPhone probably have (or will have) different chips in them.
Protocol - It is possible to work around poor signal quality with error correction and retransmission. Even if the iPhone SDK forces you to use a particular protocol, careful design of your application can make a difference.
So, in summary, you should probably do some real world tests.
The connection is one-to-one, but you can create an adhoc network with one of the phones acting as the master/coordinator. The other phones would route all their communication through the master/coordinator.
One device can theoretically connect to 7 devices. according to the master-slave role, the device can multiplex between each of them giving the user an impression that you are connected to all of them simultaneously. Bluetooth specification does not stop you from doing that.This is theory.
Now for the iphone, whether it can connect to to more than one device can only be answered by apple or someone who knows the iphone bluetooth API. But I am pretty sure the bluetooth chip inside iphone should be able to connect to more than one device.
Range is essentially going to be good enough for a normal sized room to be covered. It can be longer or shorter depending on environmental circumstances, but remember that bluetooth was created to implement short range connections.
A bluetooth device can be part of a piconet of eight devices, one master and up to seven slaves. The slaves cannot communicate with each other, they must talk through the master, think of a star topology with the master in the center. The iPhone SDK has a GameKit framework that can be used to create the network for multiplayer games. Go to developer.apple.com at look at the GKTank and GKRocket sample code to see how it's used. These games only support two players, but the GameKit framework supports more. Look at the app store and you will see games that have four or more players.
Hope this helps to get started.
Apple iPhone 3G has a Class 2 bluetooth module. Class 2 Bluetooth devices have a communication range of 10 meters.
At a given instance a device can connect to just one device because it follows a master/slave communication model. But still we can perform a multiplexing. So we can virtually connect to more than 1 device and by rapidly changing the connected device.
I found a good article here. It explains bluetooth very well.
According to the my knowledge, multicasting is not impossible with bluetooth. So gaining a multiplayer experience is NOT impossible.
The bluetooth in the iPhone is Class-2, with a 10-meter range, approximately.
Unfortunately I can't answer the other parts of your question.
One device can be connected up to 8 others. It all depends on the iPhone bluetooth API (which I don't know anything about), but with Bluetooth itself you could then send data to multiple devices.
I tether my iPhone to my laptop over bluetooth every day, and I seem to remember having done that at the same time as using a bluetooth headset. YMMV.
It’s the latest incarnation of Bluetooth, the wireless device-to-device technology that allows your phone to talk to headsets, car stereos, keyboards and other devices directly, without the need for a router or shared wireless network.