"Relation does not exist" Postgresql - postgresql

i have this error:
---------------------------
pgAdmin III
---------------------------
An error has occurred:
ERROR: relation "vettura_tariffa" does not exist
LINE 2: from vettura_tariffa
^
QUERY: SELECT ( select valore
from vettura_tariffa
where new.targa=vettura.targa)
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "progettoBD".costout() line 14 at assignment
---------------------------
OK
---------------------------
the code is the following
create or replace function costout()
returns trigger AS
$$
DECLARE
giorno integer;
gg1 integer;
gg2 integer;
tariffa numeric(2,0) ;
costo integer;
BEGIN
gg1=extract (days from new.dataconsegna);
gg2=extract (days from new.dataritiro);
giorno=gg1-gg2;
tariffa=( select valore
from vettura join tariffa on vettura.tipotariffa=tariffa.tipo
where new.targa=vettura.targa);
costo=tariffa * giorni;
new.costoutilizzo=costo;
END;
$$ language plpgsql;
and this one is the trigger's code
create trigger costo_utilizzo
after insert on utilizzo
for each row
execute procedure costout();
It seems like it doesn't find the table vettura, it's the same with other tables, and if I try a simply "select * from vettura" it works fine.
I tried swapping the from with a view but the problem persists.
This error appears after the insert on "utilizzo".
Sorry for my bad english, thank you in advance.

Solution for JAVA problem.
We need to engage in double quotes and bars so that the command is accepted by postgresql.
sql = "INSERT INTO \"SCHEMA\".\"TABLE\"() values(?,?,?)

Ciao Atz34,
The error that is generated indicates that you are calling a function that makes a reference to vettura_tariffa while the code you post refers to vettura JOIN tariffa. Probably a simple mistake somewhere in your code. However, you have a few more issues with your trigger and trigger function.
First of all, you should call a BEFORE INSERT trigger when you modify any fields of NEW; on an AFTER INSERT trigger the changes will not be saved in the table (you can only do side effects like auditing or making changes to other tables).
Second, extract(date from ...) gives problems between months. Assuming your datacosegna and dataritiro are date columns, you can simply subtract them and add 1: NEW.dataritiro - NEW.dataconsegna + 1 (so same-day returns are not gratis).
Third, always RETURN NEW from an insert trigger.
You can then fold all statements into:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION costout() RETURNS trigger AS $$
BEGIN
SELECT valore * (NEW.dataritiro - NEW.dataconsegna + 1) INTO NEW.costoutilizzo
FROM vettura
JOIN tariffa ON vettura.tipotariffa = tariffa.tipo
WHERE NEW.targa = vettura.targa;
RETURN NEW;
END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;

Related

How to get a function to work within a DO statement in Postgresql

I have a long and complex plpgsql function that creates a bunch of temporary tables nested within a while statement to get the optimal result. When the condition has been met I insert the result into an existing table, the function is far to long to post here but this is an example:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.test_function(id_input integer, val_input numeric)
RETURNS VOID AS
$BODY$
DECLARE
id_input numeric = $1;
val_input numeric = $2;
BEGIN
WHILE test_val < 0
LOOP
CREATE TEMP TABLE temp_table AS
SELECT a.existing_val - val_input AS new_val
FROM existing_table a
WHERE a.id = id_input;
test_val := (SELECT new_val FROM temp_table);
val_input := val_input + 1;
END LOOP;
INSERT INTO output_table (id, new_val)
SELECT a.id, a.new_val
FROM temp_table a;
END;
$BODY$
LANGUAGE plpgsql;
The function works if I call it like this SELECT test_function(1, 1000) However I would like run this function on a table with 60,000+ rows, like this:
SELECT test_function(a.id, a.val_input)
FROM data_table a;
It works when I use a subset of the data_table, say 1000 rows. However when I run it on the full table (60,000+ rows) I get the following error "AbortTransaction while in COMMIT state". After some reading I found out COMMITS, so in my case the inserts do not occur until the function has finished running which takes about 4 hours. So does anyone know what is going on?
As a workaround I tried nesting the function in a DO statement so the inserts are committed straight away:
DO
$do$
DECLARE
r data_table%rowtype;
BEGIN
FOR r IN
SELECT * FROM data_table
LOOP
SELECT public.test_function(r.id, r.val_input);
END LOOP;
END
$do$;
However then I get the following error "ERROR: query has no destination for result data", which I guess means I need to rewrite the function to use PERFORM instead of SELECT. However I have not had any luck with this as yet.
Any ideas?
Since you are not interested in the function result, you should use
PERFORM public.test_function(r.id, r.val_input);
instead of
SELECT public.test_function(r.id, r.val_input);
The latter syntax would only work if you add INTO some_variable as a destination for the query result.
Thank you all for your suggestions. I ended up using Jim Jones's suggestion and converting the function to a procedure which allowed me to use COMMIT after I did the INSERT. I also followed Jeremy's suggestion and moved from temp tables to CTE's. This solved the problem for me.

Select query by declare variable on postgresql

I am new working postgresql and pgadmin4.I write a very simple query.
I have a table called PgFinalLocationsTable on public schema.In my table there are a few filed.One of these filed is UserName .I want to declare a variable and finally do select on my table according this variable like below:
DO $$
DECLARE myvar text default 'sa';
BEGIN
select * from public."PgFinalLocationsTable" where "UserName" = myvar;
END $$;
But why i got these message:
ERROR: query has no destination for result data
HINT: If you want to discard the results of a SELECT, use PERFORM instead.
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function inline_code_block line 4 at SQL statement
SQL state: 42601
It is a simple query!!!
After googling and see post on stack i have changed my query like this:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION fun(text myvar) RETURNS text AS $$
--DECLARE myvar text;
BEGIN
select * from public."PgFinalLocationsTable" where "UserName" = myvar;
END;
$$ language plpgsql;
select fun('sa');
I want to return all my fields and i do not want to use plpgsql.I want to use PostgreSQL. In any case i got this error:
ERROR: type myvar does not exist
SQL state: 42704
What is the problem on my first query and second query?Should i have make a function for select query when i want to pass a variable?
I do all stuff because i want to create this sql query:
"IF (NOT EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM [dbo].[{0}] WHERE [UserId] = #UserId And [DeviceId] = #DeviceId)) " +
"BEGIN " +
"INSERT INTO [dbo].[{0}]([Id], [Location], [Timestamp], [UserId], [DeviceId], [AllowDomains], [Topic], [UserName], [FirstName], [LastName], [JobLocationName], [LocationId], [AppVersion], [AppName]) " +
"VALUES(#Id, GEOGRAPHY::Point(#X, #Y, 4326), #Timestamp, #UserId, #DeviceId, #AllowDomains, #Topic, #UserName, #FirstName, #LastName, #JobLocationName, #LocationId, #AppVersion, #AppName) " +
"END "
You don't understand to DO command well. DO command is anonymous function without declaration, and because it has not declared an output, then is not possible any other result than debug stream.
so your first example has not sense in PostgreSQL. Result of unbind queries in MSSQL is returned as result of MS SQL procedure. Nothing similar is possible in PostgreSQL. PostgreSQL knows only functions, that can returns scalar value, composite value or relation (only one). When you are coming from MS SQL, the best what you can, try to forgot almost all knowleadge from MS SQL.
ERROR: type myvar does not exist
SQL state: 42704
This bug is clean - you switch variable name and type name - really type myvar doesn't exist.
Some function that returns table can looks like:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION fx1(myvar text)
RETURNS SETOF public."PgFinalLocationsTable" AS $$
BEGIN
RETURN QUERY SELECT * FROM public."PgFinalLocationsTable" WHERE "UserName" = myvar;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
or you can use a SQL language only
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION fx1(myvar text)
RETURNS SETOF public."PgFinalLocationsTable" AS $$
SELECT * FROM public."PgFinalLocationsTable" WHERE "UserName" = $1;
$$ LANGUAGE sql;
Because PostgreSQL doesn't support unbind queries, then doesn't allow it. You should to use RETURN QUERY command - in PLpgSQL language.
Because programming with stored procedures is really different between PostgreSQL and MSSQL (MSSQL is not similar to any other), please, try to read documentation - it is not bad https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/plpgsql.html
Your function can looks in Postgres like (I don't know used types)
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION fx("_UserId" int,
"_DeviceId" int,
"_X" int,
"_Y" int,
...
BEGIN
IF NOT EXISTS(SELECT * FROM /* I don't know what [{0}] means */
WHERE "UserId" = "_UserId" AND "DeviceId" = "_DeviceId")
THEN
INSERT INTO ..
END IF;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
Probably your fragment can be solved without procedural extension by INSERT INTO ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING command https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-insert.html - what is better.
Note - using case sensitive identifiers is short way to hell.

Postgresql9-4 - User define function that uses a join - ERROR: missing FROM-clause entry for table

I am venturing into pg/sql for the first time and I wrote this function that (attempts) to return results from a query that uses a JOIN.
The query works when I run on it self. However, when it is running within the function I wrote it complains about a missing "FROM". I also used table aliases hoping that it may fix the problem but it did not.
I am getting information from the following tables and rows.
TABLE | ROW
---------------------------------------
banned_users | banned_lcl_account
---------------------------------------
rhost_active_users | active_users
Here is the error when I run my function
ERROR: missing FROM-clause entry for table "a_u"
LINE 1: SELECT LOOP_V.a_u.ipaddress
And here is the function I wrote.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION GET_BANNED_ACTIVE_USERS()
RETURNS TABLE
(
SRC_HOST TEXT,
DST_HOST TEXT
)
AS $$
DECLARE
LOOP_V RECORD;
BEGIN
FOR LOOP_V IN (
select
b_u.banned_lcl_account,
a_u.ipaddress,
a_u.hostip,
date_trunc ('second', a_u.time_captured)
from banned_users as b_u
inner join rhost_active_users as a_u
on b_u.banned_lcl_account = a_u.active_users
and a_u.hostip <> 'TTY Login'
or a_u.hostip <> 'Local PTS Login'
)
LOOP
SRC_HOST := LOOP_V.a_u.ipaddress;
DST_HOST := LOOP_V.a_u.hostip;
END LOOP;
END; $$
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
--select CHECK_BANNED_ACCOUNTS()
your problem is this:
SRC_HOST := LOOP_V.a_u.ipaddress;
DST_HOST := LOOP_V.a_u.hostip;
The record that is used for the loop variable only contains column names, not their table aliases. So the record only has the fields: ipaddress and hostip. So your immediate problem can be fixed using:
SRC_HOST := LOOP_V.ipaddress;
DST_HOST := LOOP_V.hostip;
However the whole function is overly complex. You don't need the loop nor do you need PL/pgSQL. This can be written as a simple SQL function:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION GET_BANNED_ACTIVE_USERS()
RETURNS TABLE (SRC_HOST TEXT,DST_HOST TEXT)
AS $$
select a_u.ipaddress,
a_u.hostip,
from banned_users as b_u
join rhost_active_users as a_u
on b_u.banned_lcl_account = a_u.active_users
and (a_u.hostip <> 'TTY Login' or a_u.hostip <> 'Local PTS Login')
$$
LANGUAGE sql;
Note that I also removed the unused columns from the SELECT statement in order to match the function's signature of returning two columns
Some additional notes:
--select CHECK_BANNED_ACCOUNTS()
This is wrong, you need to use a set returning function like a table:
select *
from CHECK_BANNED_ACCOUNTS();
And finally:
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
The language name is an identifier, do not enclose it in single quotes:
LANGUAGE plpgsql;
or
LANGUAGE sql;

I want to have my pl/pgsql script output to the screen

I have the following script that I want output to the screen from.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION randomnametest() RETURNS integer AS $$
DECLARE
rec RECORD;
BEGIN
FOR rec IN SELECT * FROM my_table LOOP
SELECT levenshtein('mystring',lower('rec.Name')) ORDER BY levenshtein;
END LOOP;
RETURN 1;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
I want to get the output of the levenshein() function in a table along with the rec.Name. How would I do that? Also, it is giving me an error about the line where I call levenshtein(), saying that I should use perform instead.
Assuming that you want to insert the function's return value and the rec.name into a different table. Here is what you can do (create the table new_tab first)-
SELECT levenshtein('mystring',lower(rec.Name)) AS L_val;
INSERT INTO new_tab (L_val, rec.name);
The usage above is demonstrated below.
I guess, you can use RAISE INFO 'This is %', rec.name; to view the values.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION randomnametest() RETURNS integer AS $$
DECLARE
rec RECORD;
BEGIN
FOR rec IN SELECT * FROM my_table LOOP
SELECT levenshtein('mystring',lower(rec.Name))
AS L_val;
RAISE INFO '% - %', L_val, rec.name;
END LOOP;
RETURN 1;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
Note- the FROM clause is optional in case you select from a function in a select like netxval(sequence_name) and don't have any actual table to select from i.e. like SELECT nextval(sequence_name) AS next_value;, in Oracle terms it would be SELECT sequence_name.nextval FROM dual; or SELECT function() FROM dual;. There is no dual in postgreSQL.
I also think that the ORDER BY is not necessary since my assumption would be that your function levenshtein() will most likely return only one value at any point of time, and hence wouldn't have enough data to ORDER.
If you want the output from a plpgsql function like the title says:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION randomnametest(_mystring text)
RETURNS TABLE (l_dist int, name text) AS
$BODY$
BEGIN
RETURN QUERY
SELECT levenshtein(_mystring, lower(t.name)), t.name
FROM my_table t
ORDER BY 1;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
Declare the table with RETURNS TABLE.
Use RETURN QUERY to return records from the function.
Avoid naming conflicts between column names and OUT parameters (from the RETURNS TABLE clause) by table-qualifying column names in queries. OUT parameters are visible everywhere in the function body.
I made the string to compare to a parameter to the function to make this more useful.
There are other ways, but this is the most effective for the task. You need PostgreSQL 8.4 or later.
For a one-time use I would consider to just use a plain query (= function body without the RETURN QUERY above).

Commit, savepoint, rollback to in PostgreSQL?

Can someone please explain to me why does COMMIT in this function returns EXCEPTION ?
DECLARE
XNar CURSOR (forDATE Varchar) IS
SELECT NARUCENO, ISPORUKA_ID FROM XDATA_NARUDZBE
WHERE TO_CHAR(XDATA_NARUDZBE.DATUM, 'DD.MM.YYYY') = forDATE;
LastDate DATE;
OutResult INTEGER;
curNAR NUMERIC;
curISP VARCHAR;
RXNar RECORD;
BEGIN
OutResult := 1;
SELECT MAX(DATUM) INTO LastDate FROM XDATA_NARUDZBE;
FOR RXNar IN XNar(TO_CHAR(LastDate, 'DD.MM.YYYY')) LOOP
IF (RXNar.NARUCENO <> 0) AND (RXNar.ISPORUKA_ID = 'R01') THEN
UPDATE NARUDZBE SET ISPORUCENO = RXNar.NARUCENO
WHERE NARUDZBE.PP_ID = RXNar.PP_ID
AND NARUDZBE.ART_ID = RXNar.ART_ID
AND NARUDZBE.ISPORUKA_ID = 'R01';
END IF;
END LOOP;
COMMIT; <--- ????
RETURN OutResult;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
OUTRESULT := 0;
RAISE;
RETURN OutResult;
END;
and why I can not use ROLLBACK TO SavePoint when EXCEPTION block exists in function?
You can't use COMMIT in a stored procedure, the entire procedure is a transaction of it's own.
You can't commit in a plpgsql stored function/procedure using plpgsql as Frank Heikens answered. You can however work around this issue by using dblink(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/contrib-dblink-connect.html) or another store procedure language such as plperl(untrusted). Check out this link where this talked about.
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Re-GENERAL-Transactions-within-a-function-body-td1992810.html
The high level is you open a new connection using one of these methods and issue a separate transaction on that connection. Works for most cases not ideal because you are opening a new connection, but may work fine for most use cases.
Begin with PostgreSQL11 there is an procedure module.
Demo based on Manual.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE insert_data_drop(_a integer, _b integer)
LANGUAGE plpgsql
AS $$
begin
INSERT INTO tbl(a) VALUES (_a);
INSERT INTO tbl(b) VALUES (_b);
Rollback;
INSERT INTO tbl(a) VALUES (_a);
end
$$;
Now CALL insert_data_drop(1, 2); will insert 1 to column a, 2 will not be saved.
However, SAVEPOINT seems not working. It will show error like:
ERROR: unsupported transaction command in PL/pgSQL
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function insert_data_drop(integer,integer) line 5 at SQL stateme