I've written a python script to evaluate a physical quantity and, for some reason, python decided to raise an OverflowError for no justified reason. Here's the script
import numpy as np
from math import sqrt,cos, log, pi
from scipy import integrate as sciint
from scipy import optimize as sciopt
rt=np.inf
ymin=cos(np.radians(0.5))
def func(u,y, D, rt):
return (1.+u)**(-4)/u/sqrt(u*u-D**2*(1-y*y))
def lim_u(y, D, rt):
return [D*sqrt(1-y*y), rt]
def lim_y(D, rt):
return [ymin,1]
def Jfactor(D,rt,r0,rho0,tmax):
ymin=cos(np.radians(tmax))
Dprime=D/r0
rtprime=rt/r0
Msun2kpc5_GeVcm5 = 4463954.894661358
cst = 4*pi*rho0**2*r0*Msun2kpc5_GeVcm5
res = sciint.nquad(func, ranges=[lim_u, lim_y], args=(Dprime,rtprime),
opts=[{'epsabs':1.e-10,'epsrel':1.e-10,'limit':1000},
{'epsabs':1.e-10,'epsrel':1.e-10,'limit':1000}])
return cst*res[0]
def deltaJ(rho0,J,D,rt,r0,tmax):
#return J-Jfactor(D,rt,r0,1.,tmax)*10.**(rho0*2.)
return long(J-Jfactor(D,rt,r0,1.,tmax)*10.**(rho0*2.))
D=104.
rt=np.inf
tmax=0.5
J = 10.**18
for j,r0 in enumerate(np.logspace(-1.,np.log10(5),10)):
results = sciopt.minimize_scalar(deltaJ,bracket=(7.,9.),args=(J,D,rt,r0,tmax))
print r0,results.x,results.fun
Very quickly: I want scipy.optimize.minimize_scalar to minimize deltaJ but here's (part of) the error message I get
File "test2.py", line 26, in deltaJ
return long(J-Jfactor(D,rt,r0,1.,tmax)*10.**(rho0*2.))
OverflowError: (34, 'Numerical result out of range')
Now, if J = 10**18, Jfactor(D,rt,r0,1.,tmax) is ~ 5, I expect minimize_scalar to easily scan over rho0 to find ~ 8.5. Instead I get this error message.
As you can see, I've even bracketed the range and tried using long(), but nothing helped. Using instead another minimizing method, eg. bounded, gives again a weird result (function value of ~ -7e17)...
Does anybody have an idea to have this working? Thank you
Related
I have a code (a code we saw in a class) of a recurrent neural network that reads a given text and tries to produce its own text similar to the example. The code is written in python and uses the pytorch library. I wanted to modify to see whether I could increase its speed by using GPU instead of CPU and I made some tests on google collaboratory. The GPU version of the code runs fine but is about three times slower than the CPU version. I do not know the details of GPU architecture so I can not really understand why it is slower. I know that GPUs can do more arithmetic operations per cycle but have more limited memory so I am curious if I am having a memory issue. I also tried using CUDA with a generative adversarial network and in this case it was almost ten times faster. Any tips on this would be welcome.
The code (CUDA version) is below. I am new at this stuff so sorry if some of the terminology is not correct.
The architecture is input->encoder->recursive network->decoder->output.
import torch
import time
import numpy as np
from torch.autograd import Variable
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from google.colab import files
#uploding text on google collab
uploaded = files.upload()
for fn in uploaded.keys():
print('User uploaded file "{name}" with length {length} bytes'.format(
name=fn, length=len(uploaded[fn])))
#data preprocessing
with open('text.txt','r') as file:
#with open closes the file after we are done with it
rawtxt=file.read()
rawtxt = rawtxt.lower()
#a function that assigns a number to each unique character in the text
def create_map(rawtxt):
letters = list(set(rawtxt))
lettermap = dict(enumerate(letters)) #gives each letter in the list a number
return lettermap
num_to_let = create_map(rawtxt)
#inverse to num_to_let
let_to_num =dict(zip(num_to_let.values(), num_to_let.keys()))
print(num_to_let)
#turns a text of characters into text of numbers using the mapping
#given by the input mapdict
def maparray(txt, mapdict):
txt = list(txt)
for k, letter in enumerate(txt):
txt[k]=mapdict[letter]
txt=np.array(txt)
return txt
X=maparray(rawtxt, let_to_num) #the data text in numeric format
Y= np.roll(X, -1, axis=0) #shifted data text in numeric format
X=torch.LongTensor(X)
Y=torch.LongTensor(Y)
#up to here we are done with data preprocessing
#return a random batch for training
#this reads a random piece inside data text
#with the size chunk_size
def random_chunk(chunk_size):
k=np.random.randint(0,len(X)-chunk_size)
return X[k:k+chunk_size], Y[k:k+chunk_size]
nchars = len(num_to_let)
#define the recursive neural network class
class rnn(torch.nn.Module):
def __init__(self,input_size,hidden_size,output_size, n_layers=1):
super().__init__()
self.input_size = input_size
self.hidden_size = hidden_size
self.output_size = output_size
self.n_layers= n_layers
self.encoder = torch.nn.Embedding (input_size, hidden_size)
self.rnn = torch.nn.RNN(hidden_size, hidden_size, n_layers, batch_first=True)
self.decoder = torch.nn.Linear (hidden_size, output_size)
def forward (self,x,hidden):
x=self.encoder(x.view(1,-1))
output, hidden = self.rnn(x.view(1,1,-1), hidden)
output = self.decoder(output.view(1,-1))
return output, hidden
def init_hidden(self):
return Variable(torch.zeros(self.n_layers , 1 , self.hidden_size)).cuda()
#hyper-params
lr = 0.009
no_epochs = 50
chunk_size = 150
myrnn = rnn(nchars, 150, nchars,1)
myrnn.cuda()
criterion = torch.nn.CrossEntropyLoss()
optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(myrnn.parameters(), lr=lr)
t0 = time.time()
for epoch in range(no_epochs):
totcost=0
generated = ''
for _ in range(len(X)//chunk_size):
h=myrnn.init_hidden()
cost = 0
x, y=random_chunk(chunk_size)
x, y= Variable(x).cuda(), Variable(y).cuda()
for i in range(chunk_size):
out, h = myrnn.forward(x[i],h)
_, outl = out.data.max(1)
letter = num_to_let[outl[0]]
generated+=letter
cost += criterion(out, y[i])
optimizer.zero_grad()
cost.backward()
optimizer.step()
totcost+=cost
totcost/=len(X)//chunk_size
print('Epoch', epoch, 'Avg cost/chunk: ', totcost)
print(generated[0:750],'\n\n\n')
t1 = time.time()
total = t1-t0
print('total',total)
#we encode each word into a vector of fixed size
I am trying to fit data to a function f(x) that is an integral over T. x is the upper boarder of the Integral. I am trying to do it with scipy.curve_fit() but I don't know how to write my integral as a function that can be passed to curve_fit.
I had a look at similar problems but I didn't see anything that fits to my problem.
I cannot provide any guess values for A and Ea since I have no clue at all what they could be as of now.
from scipy import optimize
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from scipy import interpolate
from scipy import integrate
class get_Ton:
def __init__(self):
self.data=np.genfromtxt('test3.csv', delimiter=',', skip_header=8)
def loop(self):
def fit_tangent():
tck = interpolate.splrep(self.x, self.y, k=2, s=0)
dev_1 = interpolate.splev(self.x, tck, der=1)
def integrand(T, A, Ea):
return A*np.exp(-Ea/(8.314*T))
def polyn(x, A, Ea):
return integrate.quad(integrand, 25, x, args=(A, Ea))[0]
vcurve = np.vectorize(polyn)
p, e = optimize.curve_fit(vcurve, self.x, self.y, [2000, 150])
xd = np.linspace(50, 70, 100)
plt.plot(self.x, self.y, "o")
plt.plot(xd, vcurve(xd, *p))
for i in range((list(np.shape(self.data)[1:2]))[0]):
if i % 2 == 0:
self.temp=self.data[:,i]
self.scat=self.data[:,i+1]
self.x=[26.192, 26.861000000000001, 27.510000000000002, 28.178000000000001, 28.856000000000002, 29.515000000000001, 30.183, 30.823, 31.5, 32.158999999999999, 32.856000000000002, 33.515000000000001, 34.145000000000003, 34.823, 35.491, 36.168999999999997, 36.837000000000003, 37.533999999999999, 38.164000000000001, 38.832000000000001, 39.481000000000002, 40.158999999999999, 40.826999999999998, 41.496000000000002, 42.164000000000001, 42.832000000000001, 43.500999999999998, 44.188000000000002, 44.837000000000003, 45.505000000000003, 46.173000000000002, 46.832000000000001, 47.500999999999998, 48.188000000000002, 48.828000000000003, 49.496000000000002, 50.173999999999999, 50.813000000000002, 51.481000000000002, 52.112000000000002, 52.808999999999997, 53.439, 54.116, 54.765999999999998, 55.453000000000003, 56.101999999999997, 56.761000000000003, 57.429000000000002, 58.078000000000003, 58.737000000000002, 59.442999999999998, 60.082999999999998, 60.770000000000003, 61.448, 62.125999999999998, 62.756, 63.414999999999999, 64.082999999999998, 64.742000000000004, 65.420000000000002, 66.087999999999994, 66.747, 67.415000000000006]
self.y=[1553.5, 1595.0, 1497.8, 1695.5999999999999, 1328.7, 1279.0, 1547.8, 1412.8, 1037.0, 1473.5, 1447.4000000000001, 1532.5999999999999, 1484.2, 1169.5, 1395.2, 1183.5999999999999, 949.01999999999998, 1238.0999999999999, 1225.5999999999999, 924.80999999999995, 1650.5999999999999, 803.96000000000004, 1245.7, 1190.0, 1207.0, 1294.0, 1174.9000000000001, 1229.8, 1260.0, 1129.2, 1142.9000000000001, 987.63999999999999, 1389.5999999999999, 1366.0, 1102.0999999999999, 1325.5, 1258.9000000000001, 1285.7, 1217.5, 871.47000000000003, 820.24000000000001, 1388.7, 1391.0, 1400.3, 2482.5999999999999, 3360.5999999999999, 7013.5, 11560.0, 16525.0, 22538.0, 32556.0, 43878.0, 59093.0, 67977.0, 75949.0, 82316.0, 90213.0, 90294.0, 99928.0, 128240.0, 181280.0, 226380.0, 223260.0]
fit_tangent()
plt.ylim((-100,1000000))
plt.show()
def main():
this=get_Ton()
this.loop()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Three issues here. First, the function polyn does not depend on the variable of integration T, since this variable is integrated out. Remove T from its list of parameters. Accordingly, drop one of numerical values in trueydata computation:
trueydata = vcurve(truexdata, 3, 4)
Second, quad returns a tuple (integral_value, integral_error). Use [0] to return only the integral value.
def polyn(x, A, Ea):
return integrate.quad(integrand, 25, x, args=(A, Ea))[0]
Third, provide an initial guess for parameter values to curve_fit. If you don't, it will likely report unable to determine the number of parameters to fit. Even if successful, it will blindly use all-ones for the initial guess. An initial guess supplied by a human with an understanding of the optimization problem is often the difference between success and failure of multivariable optimization.
popt, pcov = optimize.curve_fit(vcurve, xdata, ydata, [2, 3])
I seem to get this error when I am using the callback function modelcheckpoint..
I read from a github issue that the solution would be make use of model.get_weight, but I am implicitly only storing that since i am only storing the one with best weight.
Keras only seem to save weights using h5, which make me question is there any other way to do store them using the eras API, if so how? If not, how do i store it?
Made an example to recreate the problem:
#!/usr/bin/python
import glob, os
import sys
from os import listdir
from os.path import isfile, join
import numpy as np
import warnings
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
from keras.utils import np_utils
from keras import metrics
import keras
from keras import backend as K
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.optimizers import SGD, Adam
from keras.layers.core import Dense, Activation, Lambda, Reshape,Flatten
from keras.layers import Conv1D,Conv2D,MaxPooling2D, MaxPooling1D, Reshape
#from keras.utils.visualize_util import plot
from keras.models import Model
from keras.layers import Input, Dense
from keras.layers.merge import Concatenate, Add
import h5py
import random
import tensorflow as tf
import math
from keras.callbacks import CSVLogger
from keras.callbacks import ModelCheckpoint
if len(sys.argv) < 5:
print "Missing Arguments!"
print "python keras_convolutional_feature_extraction.py <workspace> <totale_frames> <fbank-dim> <window-height> <batch_size>"
print "Example:"
print "python keras_convolutional_feature_extraction.py deltas 15 40 5 100"
sys.exit()
total_frames = int(sys.argv[2])
total_frames_with_deltas = total_frames*3
dim = int(sys.argv[3])
window_height = int(sys.argv[4])
inserted_batch_size = int(sys.argv[5])
stride = 1
splits = ((dim - window_height)+1)/stride
#input_train_data = "/media/carl/E2302E68302E443F/"+str(sys.argv[1])+"/fbank/org_train_total_frames_"+str(total_frames)+"_dim_"+str(dim)+"_winheig_"+str(window_height)+"_batch_"+str(inserted_batch_size)+"_fws_input"
#output_train_data ="/media/carl/E2302E68302E443F/"+str(sys.argv[1])+"/fbank/org_train_total_frames_"+str(total_frames)+"_dim_"+str(dim)+"_winheig_"+str(window_height)+"_batch_"+str(inserted_batch_size)+"_fws_output"
#input_test_data = "/media/carl/E2302E68302E443F/"+str(sys.argv[1])+"/fbank/org_test_total_frames_"+str(total_frames)+"_dim_"+str(dim)+"_winheig_"+str(window_height)+"_batch_"+str(1)+"_fws_input"
#output_test_data = "/media/carl/E2302E68302E443F/"+str(sys.argv[1])+"/fbank/org_test_total_frames_"+str(total_frames)+"_dim_"+str(dim)+"_winheig_"+str(window_height)+"_batch_"+str(1)+"_fws_output"
#train_files =[f for f in listdir(input_train_data) if isfile(join(input_train_data, f))]
#test_files =[f for f in listdir(input_test_data) if isfile(join(input_test_data, f))]
#print len(train_files)
np.random.seed(100)
print "hallo"
def train_generator():
while True:
# input = random.choice(train_files)
# h5f = h5py.File(input_train_data+'/'+input, 'r')
# train_input = h5f['train_input'][:]
# train_output = h5f['train_output'][:]
# h5f.close()
train_input = np.random.randint(100,size=((inserted_batch_size,splits*total_frames_with_deltas,window_height,3)))
train_list_list = []
train_input = train_input.reshape((inserted_batch_size,splits*total_frames_with_deltas,window_height,3))
train_input_list = np.split(train_input,splits*total_frames_with_deltas,axis=1)
for i in range(len(train_input_list)):
train_input_list[i] = train_input_list[i].reshape(inserted_batch_size,window_height,3)
#for i in range(len(train_input_list)):
# train_input_list[i] = train_input_list[i].reshape(inserted_batch_size,33,window_height,1,3)
train_output = np.random.randint(5, size = (1,total_frames,5))
middle = int(math.ceil(total_frames/2))
train_output = train_output[:,middle:middle+1,:].reshape((inserted_batch_size,1,5))
#print train_output.shape
#print len(train_input_list)
#print train_input_list[0].shape
yield (train_input_list, train_output)
print "hallo"
def test_generator():
while True:
# input = random.choice(test_files)
# h5f = h5py.File(input_test_data+'/'+input, 'r')
# test_input = h5f['test_input'][:]
# test_output = h5f['test_output'][:]
# h5f.close()
test_input = np.random.randint(100,size=((inserted_batch_size,splits*total_frames_with_deltas,window_height,3)))
test_input = test_input.reshape((inserted_batch_size,splits*total_frames_with_deltas,window_height,3))
test_input_list = np.split(test_input,splits*total_frames_with_deltas,axis=1)
#test_input_list = np.split(test_input,45,axis=3)
for i in range(len(test_input_list)):
test_input_list[i] = test_input_list[i].reshape(inserted_batch_size,window_height,3)
#for i in range(len(test_input_list)):
# test_input_list[i] = test_input_list[i].reshape(inserted_batch_size,33,window_height,1,3)
test_output = np.random.randint(5, size = (1,total_frames,5))
middle = int(math.ceil(total_frames/2))
test_output = test_output[:,middle:middle+1,:].reshape((inserted_batch_size,1,5))
yield (test_input_list, test_output)
print "hallo"
def fws():
#print "Inside"
# Params:
# batch , lr, decay , momentum, epochs
#
#Input shape: (batch_size,40,45,3)
#output shape: (1,15,50)
# number of unit in conv_feature_map = splitd
next(train_generator())
model_output = []
list_of_input = [Input(shape=(8,3)) for i in range(splits*total_frames_with_deltas)]
output = []
#Conv
skip = total_frames_with_deltas
for steps in range(total_frames_with_deltas):
conv = Conv1D(filters = 100, kernel_size = 8)
column = 0
for _ in range(splits):
#print "column " + str(column) + "steps: " + str(steps)
output.append(conv(list_of_input[(column*skip)+steps]))
column = column + 1
#print len(output)
#print splits*total_frames_with_deltas
conv = []
for section in range(splits):
column = 0
skip = splits
temp = []
for _ in range(total_frames_with_deltas):
temp.append(output[((column*skip)+section)])
column = column + 1
conv.append(Add()(temp))
#print len(conv)
output_conc = Concatenate()(conv)
#print output_conc.get_shape
output_conv = Reshape((splits, -1))(output_conc)
#print output_conv.get_shape
#Pool
pooled = MaxPooling1D(pool_size = 6, strides = 2)(output_conv)
reshape = Reshape((1,-1))(pooled)
#Fc
dense1 = Dense(units = 1024, activation = 'relu', name = "dense_1")(reshape)
#dense2 = Dense(units = 1024, activation = 'relu', name = "dense_2")(dense1)
dense3 = Dense(units = 1024, activation = 'relu', name = "dense_3")(dense1)
final = Dense(units = 5, activation = 'relu', name = "final")(dense3)
model = Model(inputs = list_of_input , outputs = final)
sgd = SGD(lr=0.1, decay=1e-1, momentum=0.9, nesterov=True)
model.compile(loss="categorical_crossentropy", optimizer=sgd , metrics = ['accuracy'])
print "compiled"
model_yaml = model.to_yaml()
with open("model.yaml", "w") as yaml_file:
yaml_file.write(model_yaml)
print "Model saved!"
log= CSVLogger('/home/carl/kaldi-trunk/dnn/experimental/yesno_cnn_50_training_total_frames_'+str(total_frames)+"_dim_"+str(dim)+"_window_height_"+str(window_height)+".csv")
filepath='yesno_cnn_50_training_total_frames_'+str(total_frames)+"_dim_"+str(dim)+"_window_height_"+str(window_height)+"weights-improvement-{epoch:02d}-{val_acc:.2f}.hdf5"
checkpoint = ModelCheckpoint(filepath, monitor='val_acc', verbose=1, save_weights_only=True, mode='max')
print "log"
#plot_model(model, to_file='model.png')
print "Fit"
hist_current = model.fit_generator(train_generator(),
steps_per_epoch=444,#len(train_files),
epochs = 10000,
verbose = 1,
validation_data = test_generator(),
validation_steps=44,#len(test_files),
pickle_safe = True,
workers = 4,
callbacks = [log,checkpoint])
fws()
Execute the script by: python name_of_script.py yens 50 40 8 1
which give me a full traceback:
full traceback
Error:
carl#ca-ThinkPad-T420s:~/Dropbox$ python mini.py yesno 50 40 8 1
Using TensorFlow backend.
Couldn't import dot_parser, loading of dot files will not be possible.
hallo
hallo
hallo
compiled
Model saved!
log
Fit
/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/keras/backend/tensorflow_backend.py:2252: UserWarning: Expected no kwargs, you passed 1
kwargs passed to function are ignored with Tensorflow backend
warnings.warn('\n'.join(msg))
Epoch 1/10000
2017-05-26 13:01:45.851125: W tensorflow/core/platform/cpu_feature_guard.cc:45] The TensorFlow library wasn't compiled to use SSE4.1 instructions, but these are available on your machine and could speed up CPU computations.
2017-05-26 13:01:45.851345: W tensorflow/core/platform/cpu_feature_guard.cc:45] The TensorFlow library wasn't compiled to use SSE4.2 instructions, but these are available on your machine and could speed up CPU computations.
2017-05-26 13:01:45.851392: W tensorflow/core/platform/cpu_feature_guard.cc:45] The TensorFlow library wasn't compiled to use AVX instructions, but these are available on your machine and could speed up CPU computations.
443/444 [============================>.] - ETA: 4s - loss: 100.1266 - acc: 0.3138Epoch 00000: saving model to yesno_cnn_50_training_total_frames_50_dim_40_window_height_8weights-improvement-00-0.48.hdf5
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "mini.py", line 205, in <module>
File "mini.py", line 203, in fws
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/keras/legacy/interfaces.py", line 88, in wrapper
return func(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/keras/engine/training.py", line 1933, in fit_generator
callbacks.on_epoch_end(epoch, epoch_logs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/keras/callbacks.py", line 77, in on_epoch_end
callback.on_epoch_end(epoch, logs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/keras/callbacks.py", line 411, in on_epoch_end
self.model.save_weights(filepath, overwrite=True)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/keras/engine/topology.py", line 2503, in save_weights
save_weights_to_hdf5_group(f, self.layers)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/keras/engine/topology.py", line 2746, in save_weights_to_hdf5_group
f.attrs['layer_names'] = [layer.name.encode('utf8') for layer in layers]
File "h5py/_objects.pyx", line 54, in h5py._objects.with_phil.wrapper (/tmp/pip-4rPeHA-build/h5py/_objects.c:2684)
File "h5py/_objects.pyx", line 55, in h5py._objects.with_phil.wrapper (/tmp/pip-4rPeHA-build/h5py/_objects.c:2642)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/h5py/_hl/attrs.py", line 93, in __setitem__
self.create(name, data=value, dtype=base.guess_dtype(value))
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/h5py/_hl/attrs.py", line 183, in create
attr = h5a.create(self._id, self._e(tempname), htype, space)
File "h5py/_objects.pyx", line 54, in h5py._objects.with_phil.wrapper (/tmp/pip-4rPeHA-build/h5py/_objects.c:2684)
File "h5py/_objects.pyx", line 55, in h5py._objects.with_phil.wrapper (/tmp/pip-4rPeHA-build/h5py/_objects.c:2642)
File "h5py/h5a.pyx", line 47, in h5py.h5a.create (/tmp/pip-4rPeHA-build/h5py/h5a.c:1904)
RuntimeError: Unable to create attribute (Object header message is too large)
If you look at the amount of data Keras is trying to save under layer_names attribute (inside the output HDF5 file being create), you will find that it takes more than 64kB.
np.asarray([layer.name.encode('utf8') for layer in model.layers]).nbytes
>> 77100
I quote from https://support.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/faq/limits.html:
Is there an object header limit and how does that affect HDF5 ?
There is a limit (in HDF5-1.8) of the object header, which is 64 KB.
The datatype for a dataset is stored in the object header, so there is
therefore a limit on the size of the datatype that you can have. (See
HDFFV-1089)
The code above was (almost entirely) copied from the traceback:
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/keras/engine/topology.py", line 2746, in save_weights_to_hdf5_group
f.attrs['layer_names'] = [layer.name.encode('utf8') for layer in layers]
I am using numpy asarray method to get the figure fast but h5py gets similar figure (I guess), see https://github.com/h5py/h5py/blob/master/h5py/_hl/attrs.py#L102 if you want to find exact figure.
Anyway, either you will need to implement your own methods for saving/loading of the weights (or use existing workarounds), or you need to give a really short name to ALL the layers inside your model :), something like this:
list_of_input = [Input(shape=(8,3), name=('i%x' % i)) for i in range(splits*total_frames_with_deltas)]
conv = Conv1D(filters = 100, kernel_size = 8, name='cv%x' % steps)
conv.append(Add(name='add%x' % section)(temp))
output_conc = Concatenate(name='ct')(conv)
output_conv = Reshape((splits, -1), name='rs1')(output_conc)
pooled = MaxPooling1D(pool_size = 6, strides = 2, name='pl')(output_conv)
reshape = Reshape((1,-1), name='rs2')(pooled)
dense1 = Dense(units = 1024, activation = 'relu', name = "d1")(reshape)
dense2 = Dense(units
= 1024, activation = 'relu', name = "d2")(dense1)
dense3 = Dense(units = 1024, activation = 'relu', name = "d3")(dense1)
final = Dense(units = 5, activation = 'relu', name = "fl")(dense3)
You mustn't forget to name all the layers because the (numpy) string array into which the layer names are converted is using the size of the longest string for each individual string in it when it is saved!
After renaming the layers as proposed above (which takes almost 26kB) the model is saved successfully. Hope this elaborate answer helps someone.
Update: I have just made a PR to Keras which should fix the issue without implementing any custom loading/saving methods, see 7508
A simple solution, albeit possibly not the most elegant, could be to run a while loop with epochs = 1.
Get the weights at the end of every epoch together with the accuracy and the loss
Save the weights to file 1 with model.get_weight
if accuracy is greater than at the previous epoch (i.e. loop), store the weights to a different file (file 2)
Run the loop again loading the weights from file 1
Break the loops setting a manual early stopping so that it breaks if the loss does not improve for a certain number of loops
You can use get_weights() together with numpy.save.
It's not the best solution, because it will save several files, but it actually works.
The problem is that you won't have the "optimizer" saved with the current states. But you can perhaps work around that by using smaller learning rates after loading.
Custom callback using numpy.save:
def myCallback(epoch,logs):
global storedLoss
#do your comparisons here using the "logs" var.
print(logs)
if (logs['loss'] < storedLoss):
storedLoss = logs['loss']
for i in range(len(model.layers)):
WandB = model.layers[i].get_weights()
if len (WandB) > 0: #necessary because some layers have no weights
np.save("W" + "-" + str(i), WandB[0],False)
np.save("B" + "-" + str(i), WandB[1],False)
#remember that get and set weights use a list: [weights,biases]
#it may happen (not sure) that there is no bias, and thus you may have to check it (len(WandB)==1).
The logs var brings a dictionary with named metrics, such as "loss", and "accuracy", if you used it.
You can store the losses within the callback in a global var, and compare if each loss is better or worse than the last.
When fitting, use the lambda callback:
from keras.callbacks import LambdaCallback
model.fit(...,callbacks=[LambdaCallback(on_epoch_end=myCallback)])
In the example above, I used the LambdaCallback, which has more possibilities than just on_epoch_end.
For loading, do a similar loop:
#you have to create the model first and then set the layers
def loadModel(model):
for i in range(len(model.layers)):
WandBForCheck = model.layers[i].get_weights()
if len (WandBForCheck) > 0: #necessary because some layers have no weights
W = np.load(Wfile + str(i))
B = np.load(Bfile + str(i))
model.layers[i].set_weights([W,B])
See follow-up at https://github.com/fchollet/keras/issues/6766 and https://github.com/farizrahman4u/keras-contrib/pull/90.
I saw the YAML and the root cause is probably that you have so many Inputs. A few Inputs with many dimensions is preferred to many Inputs, especially if you can use scanning and batch operations to do everything efficiently.
Now, ignoring that entirely, here is how you can save and load your model if it has too much stuff to save as JSON efficiently:
You can pass save_weights_only=True. That won't save optimizer weights, so isn't a great solution.
Just put together a PR for saving model weights and optimizer weights but not configuration. When you want to load, first instantiate and compile the model as you did when you were going to train it, then use load_all_weights to load the model and optimizer weights into that model. I'll try to merge it soon so you can use it from the master branch.
You could use it something like this:
from keras.callbacks import LambdaCallback
from keras_contrib.utils.save_load_utils import save_all_weights, load_all_weights
# do some stuff to create and compile model
# use `save_all_weights` as a callback to checkpoint your model and optimizer weights
model.fit(..., callbacks=[LambdaCallback(on_epoch_end=lambda epoch, logs: save_all_weights(model, "checkpoint-{:05d}.h5".format(epoch))])
# use `load_all_weights` to load model and optimizer weights into an existing model
# if not compiled (no `model.optimizer`), this will just load model weights
load_all_weights(model, 'checkpoint-1337.h5')
So I don't endorse the model, but if you want to get it to save and load anyways this should probably work for you.
As a side note, if you want to save weights in a different format, something like this would work.
pickle.dump([K.get_value(w) for w in model.weights], open( "save.p", "wb" ) )
Cheers
Your model architecture must be too large to be saved.
USE get_weights AND set_weights TO SAVE AND LOAD MODEL, RESPECTIVELY.
Do not use callback model checkpoint. just once the training ends, save its weights with pickle.
Have a look at this link: Unable to save DataFrame to HDF5 ("object header message is too large")
I am doing a project about brain tumor segmentation. And when I apply N4BiasCorrection to my file(.mha), I used slicer and simpleITK methods.
Slicer performs well but is time-consuming because I do not know how to use code to run through all my file, I just use the Slicer-N4ITK module and process each file by hand.
Then I try the simpleITK with python, problems show up. First, it runs very slow on each .mha file and gets a really big file(36.7MB compare with 4.4MB using Slicer) after applying n4biasfieldcorrection. Second, in order to speed up, I set the Shrink parameter to 4 but the whole .mha file becomes really blurred, which will not happen using slicer.
So can anyone tell me whether it is normal ? are there any methods to speed up without blurring my file? Or could you please tell me an example to apply N4BiasFieldCorrection within Slicer python interactor .
Thanks!!
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
"""
Spyder Editor
This is a temporary script file.
"""
from __future__ import print_function
import SimpleITK as sitk
import sys
import os
#from skimage import io
from glob import glob
import numpy as np
def n4process(inputimage, outpath):
inputImage = sitk.ReadImage( inputimage )
# numberFilltingLevels = 4
maskImage = sitk.OtsuThreshold( inputImage, 0, 1, 200 )
# inputImage = sitk.Shrink( inputImage, [ 2 ] * inputImage.GetDimension() )
# maskImage = sitk.Shrink( maskImage, [ 2 ] * inputImage.GetDimension() )
inputImage = sitk.Cast( inputImage, sitk.sitkFloat32 )
corrector = sitk.N4BiasFieldCorrectionImageFilter();
corrector.SetConvergenceThreshold=0.001
corrector.SetBiasFieldFullWidthAtHalfMaximum=0.15
corrector.SetMaximumNumberOfIterations=50
corrector.SetNumberOfControlPoints=4
corrector.SetNumberOfHistogramBins=200
corrector.SetSplineOrder=3
corrector.SetWienerFilterNoise=0.1
output = corrector.Execute( inputImage,maskImage )
sitk.WriteImage( output, outpath )
input_path = '/Users/chenrui/Desktop/BRATS2015_Training/HGG/'
patientpath = glob('/Users/chenrui/Desktop/BRATS2015_Training/HGG/*')
num = 0
for i in patientpath:
num = num+1
#i = '/Users/chenrui/Desktop/BRATS2015_Training/HGG/brats_2013_pat0001_1'
flair = glob(i + '/*Flair*/*.mha')
flair_outpath = '/Users/chenrui/Desktop/BRATS2015_Training/test/'+'Flair/'+str(num)+'.mha'
n4process(flair[0], flair_outpath)
t2 = glob(i + '/*T2*/*.mha')
t2_outpath = '/Users/chenrui/Desktop/BRATS2015_Training/HGG_n4/'+'T2/'+str(num)+'.mha'
n4process(t2[0], t2_outpath)
t1c = glob(i + '/*_T1c*/*.mha')
t1c_outpath = '/Users/chenrui/Desktop/BRATS2015_Training/HGG_n4/'+'T1c/'+str(num)+'.mha'
n4process(t1c[0], t1c_outpath)
t1 = glob(i + '/*_T1*/*.mha')
t1 = [scan for scan in t1 if scan not in t1c]
t1_outpath = '/Users/chenrui/Desktop/BRATS2015_Training/HGG_n4/'+'T1/'+str(num)+'.mha'
n4process(t1[0],t1_outpath)
From a look at the original implementation http://www.insight-journal.org/browse/publication/640
You can download this and generate the example to then test on your data. The parameters you set appear to be the same as defined in the defaults except for WeinerFilterNoise which should be 0.01 unless you've changed this for a reason - is this the blurring issue?
The size differential (x 8 increase) will be that you've probably saved out the data from 8bit to 64 bit or something. Checking the metaimage header will show this. This can be resolved with casting.
After importing this data file from Matlab with scipy.io.loadmat, things appeared to work fine until we tried to calculate the conditioning number of one of the matrixes within.
Here's the minimum amount of code that reproduces for us:
import scipy
import numpy
stuff = scipy.io.loadmat("dati-esercizio1.mat")
numpy.linalg.cond(stuff["A"])
Here's the extended stacktrace courtesy of iPython:
In [3]: numpy.linalg.cond(A)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LapackError Traceback (most recent call last)
/snip/<ipython-input-3-15d9ef00a605> in <module>()
----> 1 numpy.linalg.cond(A)
/snip/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/linalg/linalg.py in cond(x, p)
1409 x = asarray(x) # in case we have a matrix
1410 if p is None:
-> 1411 s = svd(x,compute_uv=False)
1412 return s[0]/s[-1]
1413 else:
/snip/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/linalg/linalg.py in svd(a, full_matrices, compute_uv)
1313 work = zeros((lwork,), t)
1314 results = lapack_routine(option, m, n, a, m, s, u, m, vt, nvt,
-> 1315 work, -1, iwork, 0)
1316 lwork = int(work[0])
1317 work = zeros((lwork,), t)
LapackError: Parameter a has non-native byte order in lapack_lite.dgesdd
All obvious ideas (like flattening and reshaping the matrix or recreating the matrix from scratch reassigning it element by element) failed. How can I want to massage the data, then, in order to make it more agreeable with numpy?
It's a bug, fixed some time ago: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/235
Workaround:
np.linalg.cond(stuff['A'].newbyteorder('='))
This works for me:
In [33]: stuff = loadmat('dati-esercizio1.mat')
In [34]: a = stuff['A']
In [35]: try: np.linalg.cond(a)
....: except: print "Fail!"
Fail!
In [36]: b = np.array(a, dtype='>d')
In [37]: np.linalg.cond(b)
Out[37]: 62493201976.673141
In [38]: np.all(a == b) # Verify they hold the same data.
Out[38]: True
Apparently it's something wrong with the byte order (endianness?) of each number in the resulting ndarray and not just with the ndarray object itself.
Something like this but more elegant should do the trick:
n, m = A.shape()
B = numpy.empty_like(A)
for i in xrange(n):
for j in xrange(m):
B[i,j] = float(A[i,j])
del A
B = A
print numpy.linalg.cond(A) # 62493210091.354507
(For some reason an in-place replacement still gives that error - so there's something wrong with the byte order of the whole object, too.)