Suppose I have a matrix A, the size of which is 2000*1000 double. Then I apply
Matlab build in function "kmeans"to the matrix A.
k = 8;
[idx,C] = kmeans(A, k, 'Distance', 'cosine');
I get C = 8*1000 double; idx = 2000*1 double, with values from 1 to 8;
According to the documentation, C returns the k cluster centroid locations in the k-by-p (8 by 1000) matrix. And idx returns an n-by-1 vector containing cluster indices of each observation.
My question is:
1) I do not know how to understand the C, the centroid locations. Locations should be represented as (x,y), right? How to understand the matrix C correctly?
2) What are the final centers c1, c2,...,ck? Are they just values or locations?
3) For each cluster, if I only want to get the vector closest to the center of this cluster, how to calculate and get it?
Thanks!
Before I answer the three parts, I'll just explain the syntax that is used in MATLAB's explanation of k-means (http://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/kmeans.html).
A is your data matrix (it's represented as X in the link). There are n rows (in this case, 2000), which represent the number of observations/data points that you have. There are also p columns (in this case, 1000), which represent the number of "features" that each data points has. For example, if your data consisted of 2D points, then p would equal 2.
k is the number of clusters that you want to group the data into. Based on the dimensions of C that you gave, k must be 8.
Now I will answer the three parts:
The C matrix has dimensions k x p. Each row represents a centroid. Centroid locations DO NOT have to be (x, y) at all. The dimensions of the centroid locations are equal to p. In other words, if you have 2D points, you could graph the centroids as (x, y). If you have 3D points, you could graph the centroids as (x, y, z). Since each data point in A has 1000 features, your centroids therefore have 1000 dimensions.
This is sort of difficult to explain without knowing what your data is exactly. Centroids are certainly not just values, and they may not necessarily be locations. If your data A were coordinate points, you could certainly represent the centroids as locations. However, we can view it more generally. If you had a cluster centroid i and the data points v that are grouped with that centroid, the centroid would represent the data point that is most similar to those in its cluster. Hopefully, that makes sense, and I can give a clearer explanation if necessary.
The k-means method actually gives us a good way to accomplish this. The function actually has 4 possible outputs, but I will focus on the 4th, which I will call D:
[idx,C,sumd,D] = kmeans(A, k, 'Distance', 'cosine');
D has dimensions n x k. For a data point i, the row i in the D matrix gives the distance from that point to every centroid. Therefore, for each centroid, you simply need to find the data point closest to this, and return that corresponding data point. I can supply the short code for this if you need it.
Also, just a tip. You should probably use kmeans++ method of initializing the centroids. It's faster and generally better. You can call it using this:
[idx,C,sumd,D] = kmeans(A, k, 'Distance', 'cosine', 'Start', 'plus');
Edit:
Here is the code necessary for part 3:
[~, min_idxs] = min(D, [], 1);
closest_vecs = A(min_idxs, :);
Each row i of closest_vecs is the vector that is closest to centroid i.
OK, before we actually get into the details, let's give a brief overview on what K-means clustering is first.
k-means clustering works such that for some data that you have, you want to group them into k groups. You initially choose k random points in your data, and these will have labels from 1,2,...,k. These are what we call the centroids. Then, you determine how close the rest of the data are to each of these points. You then group those points so that whichever points are closest to any of these k points, you assign those points to belong to that particular group (1,2,...,k). After, for all of the points for each group, you update the centroids, which actually is defined as the representative point for each group. For each group, you compute the average of all of the points in each of the k groups. These become the new centroids for the next iteration. In the next iteration, you determine how close each point in your data is to each of the centroids. You keep iterating and repeating this behaviour until the centroids don't move anymore, or they move very little.
How you use the kmeans function in MATLAB is that assuming you have a data matrix (A in your case), it is arranged such that each row is a sample and each column is a feature / dimension of a sample. For example, we could have N x 2 or N x 3 arrays of Cartesian coordinates, either in 2D or 3D. In colour images, we could have N x 3 arrays where each column is a colour component in an image - red, green or blue.
How you invoke kmeans in MATLAB is the following way:
[IDX, C] = kmeans(X, K);
X is the data matrix we talked about, K is the total number of clusters / groups you would like to see and the outputs IDX and C are respectively an index and centroid matrix. IDX is a N x 1 array where N is the total number of samples that you have put into the function. Each value in IDX tells you which centroid the sample / row in X best matched with a particular centroid. You can also override the distance measure used to measure the distance between points. By default, this is the Euclidean distance, but you used the cosine distance in your invocation.
C has K rows where each row is a centroid. Therefore, for the case of Cartesian coordinates, this would be a K x 2 or K x 3 array. Therefore, you would interpret IDX as telling which group / centroid that the point is closest to when computing k-means. As such, if we got a value of IDX=1 for a point, this means that the point best matched with the first centroid, which is the first row of C. Similarly, if we got a value of IDX=1 for a point, this means that the point best matched with the third centroid, which is the third row of C.
Now to answer your questions:
We just talked about C and IDX so this should be clear.
The final centres are stored in C. Each row gives you a centroid / centre that is representative of a group.
It sounds like you want to find the closest point to each cluster in the data, besides the actual centroid itself. That's easy to do if you use knnsearch which performs K-Nearest Neighbour search by giving a set of points and it outputs the K closest points within your data that are close to a query point. As such, you supply the clusters as the input and your data as the output, then use K=2 and skip the first point. The first point will have a distance of 0 as this will be equal to the centroid itself and the second point will give you the closest point that is closest to the cluster.
You can do that by the following, assuming you already ran kmeans:
out = knnsearch(A, C, 'k', 2);
out = out(:,2);
You run knnsearch, then toss out the closest point as it would essentially have a distance of 0. The second column is what you're after, which gives you the closest point to the cluster excluding the actual centroid. out will give you which points in your data matrix A that was closest to each centroid. To get the actual points, do this:
pts = A(out,:);
Hope this helps!
Related
I want to determine a point in space by geometry and I have math computations that gives me several theta values. After evaluating the theta values, I could get N 1 x 3 dimension matrix where N is the number of theta evaluated. Since I have my targeted point, I only need to decide which of the matrices is closest to the target with adequate focus on the three coordinates (x,y,z).
Take a view of the analysis in the figure below:
Fig 1: Determining Closest Point with all points having minimal error
It can easily be seen that the third matrix is closest using sum(abs(Matrix[x,y,z])). However, if the method is applied on another figure given below, obviously, the result is wrong.
Fig 2: One Point has closest values with 2-axes of the reference point
Looking at point B, it is closer to the reference point on y-,z- axes but just that it strayed greatly on x-axis.
So how can I evaluate the matrices and select the closest one to point of reference and adequate emphasis will be on error differences in all coordinates (x,y,z)?
If your results is in terms of (x,y,z), why don't evaluate the euclidean distance of each matrix you have obtained from the reference point?
Sort of matlab code:
Ref_point = [48.98, 20.56, -1.44];
Curr_point = [x,y,z];
Xd = (x-Ref_point(1))^2 ;
Yd = (y-Ref_point(2))^2 ;
Zd = (z-Ref_point(3))^2 ;
distance = sqrt(Xd + Yd + Zd);
%find the minimum distance
Based on the previous question from here
I have another question. classification accuracy?
I'll address your last point first to get it out of the way. If you don't know what the classification labels were to begin with, then there's no way to assess classification accuracy. How do you know whether the correct label was assigned to the point in C or D if you don't know what label it was to begin with? In that case, we're going to have to leave that alone.
However, what you could do is calculate the percentage of what values get classified as A or B in the matrices C and D to get a sense of the distribution of samples in them both. Specifically, if for example in matrix C, the majority of samples get classified to belong to the group defined by matrix A, then that is probably a good indication that a C is very much like A in distribution.
In any case, one thing I can suggest for you to classify which points in C or D belong to either A or B is to use the k-nearest neighbours algorithm. Concretely, you have a bunch of source data points, namely those that belong in matrices A and B, where A and B have their own labels. In your case, samples in A are assigned a label of 1 and samples in B are assigned a label of -1. To determine where an unknown point belongs to for a group, you can simply find the distance between this point in feature space with all values in A and B. Whichever point in A or B that is the closest with the unknown point, then whatever group that point belonged to in your source points, that's the group you would apply to this unknown point.
As such, simply concatenate C and D into a single N x 1000 matrix, apply k-nearest neighbour to another concatenated matrix with A and B and figure out which point it's the closest to in this other concatenated matrix. Then, read off what the label was and that'll give you what the label of the unknown point can possibly be.
In MATLAB, use the knnsearch function that's part of the Statistics Toolbox. However, I encourage you to take a look at my previous post on explaining the k-nearest neighbour algorithm here: Finding K-nearest neighbors and its implementation
In any case, here's how you'd apply what I said above with your problem statement, assuming A, B, C and D are already defined:
labels = [ones(size(A,1),1); -ones(size(B,1),1)]; %// Create labels for A and B
%// Create source and query points
sourcePoints = [A; B];
queryPoints = [C; D];
%// Perform knnsearch
IDX = knnsearch(sourcePoints, queryPoints);
%// Extract out the groups per point
groups = labels(IDX);
groups will contain the labels associated with each of the points provided by queryPoints. knnsearch returns the row location of the source point in sourcePoints that best matched with a query point. As such, each value of the output tells you which point in the source point matrix best matched with that particular query point. Ultimately, this returns the location we need in the labels array to figure out what the actual labels are.
Therefore, if you want to see what labels were assigned to the points in C, you can do:
labelsC = groups(1:size(C,1));
labelsD = groups(size(C,1)+1:end);
Therefore, in labelsC and labelsD, they contain the labels assigned for each of the unknown points in both matrices. Any values that are 1 meant that the particular points resembled those from matrix A. Similarly, any values that are -1 meant that the particular points resembled those from matrix B.
If you want to plot all of this together, just combine what you did in the previous question with your new data from this question:
%// Code as before
[coeffA, scoreA] = pca(A);
[coeffB, scoreB] = pca(B);
numDimensions = 2;
scoreAred = scoreA(:,1:numDimensions);
scoreBred = scoreB(:,1:numDimensions);
%// New - Perform dimensionality reduction on C and D
[coeffC, scoreC] = pca(C);
[coeffD, scoreD] = pca(D);
scoreCred = scoreC(:,1:numDimensions);
scoreDred = scoreD(:,1:numDimensions);
%// Plot the data
plot(scoreAred(:,1), scoreAred(:,2), 'rx', scoreBred(:,1), scoreBred(:,2), 'bo');
hold on;
plot(scoreCred(labelsC == 1,1), scoreCred(labelsC == 1,2), 'gx', ...
scoreCred(labelsC == -1,1), scoreCred(labelsC == -1,2), 'mo');
plot(scoreDred(labelsD == 1,1), scoreDred(labelsD == 1,2), 'kx', ...
scoreDred(labelsD == -1,1), scoreDred(labelsD == -1,2), 'co');
The above is the case for two dimensions. We plot both A and B with their dimensions reduced to 2. Similarly, we apply PCA to C and D, then plot everything together. The first line plots A and B normally. Next, we have to use hold on; so we can invoke plot multiple times and append results to the same figure. We have to call plot four times to account for four different combinations:
Matrix C having labels from A
Matrix C having labels from B
Matrix D having labels from A
Matrix D having labels from B
Each case I have placed a different colour, but used the same marker to denote which class each point belongs to: x for group A and o for group B.
I'll leave it to you to extend this to three dimensions.
I have two correlated Nx3 datasets (one is xyz points, the other is the normal vector for those points). I have a point in my first dataset and now I want to find the matching row in the second dataset. What's the best way to do this? I was thinking print out the row number but not sure exactly what the code is to do that?
Given that you have a point in your one dataset that is size 1 x 3, there are two possible ways that you can do this.
Method #1 - Using knnsearch
The easiest way would be to use knnsearch from the Statistics Toolbox.
knnsearch stands for K-Nearest Neighbour search. Given an input query point, knnsearch finds the k closest points to your dataset given the input query point. In your case, k=1. Also, the distance metric is the Euclidean distance, but seeing how your points are in 3D Cartesian space, I don't see this being a problem.
Therefore, assuming your xyz points are stored in X and the query point (normal vector) is in y, just do this:
IDX = knnsearch(X, y);
The above defaults to k=1. If you'd like more than 1 point returned, you'd do this:
IDX = knnsearch(X, y, 'K', n);
n is the number of points you want returned or the n closest points given the query y. IDX contains the index of which point in X is closest to y. I would also like to point out that X is arranged such that each row is a point and each column is a variable.
Therefore, the closest point using IDX would be:
closest_point = X(IDX,:);
Method #2 - Using bsxfun
If you don't have the Statistics Toolbox, you can very easily achieve the same thing using bsxfun. Bear in mind that the code I will write is only for returning the closest point, or k=1:
dists = sqrt(sum(bsxfun(#minus, X, y).^2, 2));
[~,IDX] = min(dists);
The bsxfun call first determines the component-wise distance between y and every point in X. Once we do this, we square each component, add up all of the components together then take the square root. This essentially finds the Euclidean distance with y and all of the points in X. This gives us N distances where N is the total number of points in the dataset. We then find the minimum distance with min and determine the index of where the closest matching point is, which corresponds to the closest point between y and the dataset.
If you'd like to extend this to more than one point, you'd sort the distances in ascending order, then retrieve those number of points with the smallest distances. Remember, smaller Euclidean distances mean that the points are similar, which is why we sort in ascending order. Something like this:
dists = sqrt(sum(bsxfun(#minus, X, y).^2, 2));
[~,ind] = sort(dists);
IDX = ind(1:n);
Just a small step upwards from what we had before. Instead of using min, you'd use sort and get the second output of sort to determine the locations of the minimum distances. We'd then index into ind to get the n closest indices and finally index into X to get our actual points.
You would again do the same thing to retrieve the actual points that are closest:
closest_point = X(IDX,:);
Some Bonus Material
If you'd like to read more about how K-Nearest Neighbour works, I encourage you to read my post about it here:
Finding K-nearest neighbors and its implementation
Good luck!
I have this matrix:
x = [2+2*i 2-2*i -2+2*i -2-2*i];
I want to simulate transmitting it and adding noise to it. I represented the components of the complex number as below:
A = randn(150, 2) + 2*ones(150, 2); C = randn(150, 2) - 2*ones(150, 2);
At the receiver, I received the below vector, where the components are ordered based on what I sent originally, i.e., the components of x).
X = [A A A C C A C C];
Now I want to apply the kmeans(X) to have four clusters, so kmeans(X, 4). I am experiencing the following problems:
I am not sure if I can represent the complex numbers as shown in X above.
I can't plot the result of the kmeans to show the clusters.
I could not understand the clusters centroid results.
How can I find the best error rate, if this example was to represent a communication system and at the receiver, k-means clustering was used in order to decide what the transmitted signal was?
If you don't "understand" the cluster centroid results, then you don't understand how k-means works. I'll present a small summary here.
How k-means works is that for some data that you have, you want to group them into k groups. You initially choose k random points in your data, and these will have labels from 1,2,...,k. These are what we call the centroids. Then, you determine how close the rest of the data are to each of these points. You then group those points so that whichever points are closest to any of these k points, you assign those points to belong to that particular group (1,2,...,k). After, for all of the points for each group, you update the centroids, which actually is defined as the representative point for each group. For each group, you compute the average of all of the points in each of the k groups. These become the new centroids for the next iteration. In the next iteration, you determine how close each point in your data is to each of the centroids. You keep iterating and repeating this behaviour until the centroids don't move anymore, or they move very little.
Now, let's answer your questions one-by-one.
1. Complex number representation
k-means in MATLAB doesn't define how complex data is handled. A common way for people to deal with complex numbered data is to split up the real and imaginary parts into separate dimensions as you have done. This is a perfectly valid way to use k-means for complex valued data.
See this post on the MathWorks MATLAB forum for more details: https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/78306
2. Plot the results
You aren't constructing your matrix X properly. Note that A and C are both 150 x 2 matrices. You need to structure X such that each row is a point, and each column is a variable. Therefore, you need to concatenate your A and C row-wise. Therefore:
X = [A; A; A; C; C; A; C; C];
Note that you have duplicate points. This is actually no different than doing X = [A; C]; as far as kmeans is concerned. Perhaps you should generate X, then add the noise in rather than taking A and C, adding noise, then constructing your signal.
Now, if you want to plot the results as well as the centroids, what you need to do is use the two output version of kmeans like so:
[idx, centroids] = kmeans(X, 4);
idx will contain the cluster number that each point in X belongs to, and centroids will be a 4 x 2 matrix where each row tells you the mean of each cluster found in the data. If you want to plot the data, as well as the clusters, you simply need to do following. I'm going to loop over each cluster membership and plot the results on a figure. I'm also going to colour in where the mean of each cluster is located:
x = X(:,1);
y = X(:,2);
figure;
hold on;
colors = 'rgbk';
for num = 1 : 4
plot(x(idx == num), y(idx == num), [colors(num) '.']);
end
plot(centroids(:,1), centroids(:,2), 'c.', 'MarkerSize', 14);
grid;
The above code goes through each cluster, plots them in a different colour, then plots the centroids in cyan with a slightly larger thickness so you can see what the graph looks like.
This is what I get:
3. Understanding centroid results
This is probably because you didn't construct X properly. This is what I get for my centroids:
centroids =
-1.9176 -2.0759
1.5980 2.8071
2.7486 1.6147
0.8202 0.8025
This is pretty self-explanatory and I talked about how this is structured earlier.
4. Best representation of the signal
What you can do is repeat the clustering a number of times, then the algorithm will decide what the best clustering was out of these times. You would simply use the Replicates flag and denote how many times you want this run. Obviously, the more times you run this, the better your results may be. Therefore, do something like:
[idx, centroids] = kmeans(X, 4, 'Replicates', 5);
This will run kmeans 5 times and give you the best centroids of these 5 times.
Now, if you want to determine what the best sequence that was transmitted, you'd have to split up your X into 150 rows each (as your random sequence was 150 elements), then run a separate kmeans on each subset. You can try to find the best representation of each part of the sequence by using the Replicates flag each time.... so you can do something like:
for num = 1 : 8
%// Look at 150 points at a time
[idx, centroids] = kmeans(X((num-1)*150 + 1 : num*150, :), 4, 'Replicates', 5);
%// Do your analysis
%//...
%//...
end
idx and centroids would be the results for each portion of your transmitted signal. You probably want to look at centroids at each iteration to determine what symbol was transmitted at a particular time.
If you want to plot the decision regions, then you're probably looking for a Voronoi diagram. All you do is given a set of points that are defined within the domain of your problem, you just have to determine which cluster each point belongs to. Given that our data spans between -5 <= (x,y) <= 5, let's go through each point in the grid and determine which cluster each point belongs to. We'd then colour the appropriate point according to which cluster it belongs to.
Something like:
colors = 'rgbk';
[X,Y] = meshgrid(-5:0.05:5, -5:0.05:5);
X = X(:);
Y = Y(:);
figure;
hold on;
for idx = 1 : numel(X)
[~,ind] = min(sum(bsxfun(#minus, [X(idx) Y(idx)], centroids).^2, 2));
plot(X(idx), Y(idx), [colors(ind), '.']);
end
plot(centroids(:,1), centroids(:,2), 'c.', 'MarkerSize', 14);
The above code will plot the decision regions / Voronoi diagram of the particular configuration, as well as where the cluster centres are located. Note that the code is rather unoptimized and it'll take a while for the graph to generate, but I wanted to write something quick to illustrate my point.
Here's what the decision regions look like:
Hope this helps! Good luck!
I am doing some clustering using K-means in MATLAB. As you might know the usage is as below:
[IDX,C] = kmeans(X,k)
where IDX gives the cluster number for each data point in X, and C gives the centroids for each cluster.I need to get the index(row number in the actual data set X) of the closest datapoint to the centroid. Does anyone know how I can do that?
Thanks
The "brute-force approach", as mentioned by #Dima would go as follows
%# loop through all clusters
for iCluster = 1:max(IDX)
%# find the points that are part of the current cluster
currentPointIdx = find(IDX==iCluster);
%# find the index (among points in the cluster)
%# of the point that has the smallest Euclidean distance from the centroid
%# bsxfun subtracts coordinates, then you sum the squares of
%# the distance vectors, then you take the minimum
[~,minIdx] = min(sum(bsxfun(#minus,X(currentPointIdx,:),C(iCluster,:)).^2,2));
%# store the index into X (among all the points)
closestIdx(iCluster) = currentPointIdx(minIdx);
end
To get the coordinates of the point that is closest to the cluster center k, use
X(closestIdx(k),:)
The brute force approach would be to run k-means, and then compare each data point in the cluster to the centroid, and find the one closest to it. This is easy to do in matlab.
On the other hand, you may want to try the k-medoids clustering algorithm, which gives you a data point as the "center" of each cluster. Here is a matlab implementation.
Actually, kmeans already gives you the answer, if I understand you right:
[IDX,C, ~, D] = kmeans(X,k); % D is the distance of each datapoint to each of the clusters
[minD, indMinD] = min(D); % indMinD(i) is the index (in X) of closest point to the i-th centroid