My problem is as described. My script downloads files through an external call to cmd (using the system function and then .NET to make keypresses). The issue is that when it tries to fopen these files I downloaded (filenames from a text file I write as I download), it doesn't find them, causing an error. When I run the script again after seeing it fail, it works but only up to the point where it's trying to download/call new files again, where it runs into the same problem.
Are new files downloaded during when a script is running somehow not visible to the search path? Because the folder is most definitely in my search path (seeing as it works outside of during-script downloads). It's not that it isn't getting the files fast enough either, cause they appear in my folder almost instantly, and I've tried a delay to allow for it to recognize it, but that didn't work either.
I'm not sure if it's important to note that the script calls an external function which tries to read the files from the .txt list I create in the main script.
Any ideas?
The script to download the files looks like so:
NET.addAssembly('System.Windows.Forms');
sendkey = #(strkey) System.Windows.Forms.SendKeys.SendWait(strkey);
system('start cygwinbatch.bat')
pause(.1)
sendkey(callStr1)
sendkey('{ENTER}')
pause(.1)
sendkey(callStr2)
sendkey('{ENTER}')
pause(.1)
sendkey('exit')
pause(2)
sendkey('{ENTER}')
But that is not the main reason I am asking: I am confident that the downloads are occurring when the script calls them, because I see them appearing in my folder as it called. I am more confused as to why MATLAB doesn't seem to know they are there while the script is running, and I have to stop it and run it again for it to recognize the ones I've downloaded already.
Thank you,
Aaron
The answer here is probably to run the 'rehash' function. Matlab does not look for new files while executing an operation, and in some environments misses new files even during interactive activity.
Running the rehash function forces Matlab to search through its full path and determine if there are any new files.
I've never tried to run rehash in the middle of an operation though. ...
My guess is that the MATLAB interpreter is trying to look ahead and is throwing errors based on a snapshot of what the filesystem looked like before the files were downloaded. Do you get different behavior if you run it one line at a time using F9? If that's the case then you may be able to prevent the interpreter from looking ahead by using eval().
Related
I wrote some script called drawCurves.m to draw some curves. Then I called this script via publish function:
publish('drawCurves.m', 'outputDir', destPath, 'showCode', false)
Unfortunately, no any breakpoints set inside drawCurves trigger. If I call script directly by name, breakpoints do trigger.
Is it possible to fix somehow?
The publish command calls a private function evalmxdom to actually run the code in your file. You can find evalmxdom at $matlabroot%\toolbox\matlab\codetools\private\evalmxdom.m, where $matlabroot$ is your MATLAB installation directory.
If you read through it, you'll find a section at around line 60 where it stores the current breakpoints, turns them all off, and then sets things up so that the original breakpoints are restored when publishing is finished.
You'll notice that the code calls a subfunction safeDbclear that clears the breakpoints. Try commenting out the contents of that subfunction, and publishing again.
NB:
I'm on R2017a: if you're on a different version and this file has changed between versions, the line numbers may be different.
Be careful: you will be modifying files that are part of your MATLAB installation here. Take a backup of the file before you make a change to it.
This may well mess up some aspects of publishing - it's turning off breakpoints for a reason.
I'm looking for solution to delete or (preferably directly) overwrite source of an exe file while it is running.
To explain further before you get it all wrong, I'll give an example:
I have an exe file on drive D:\ which I run (with previously posted question's answer, giving params to "Start in" folder on C:\Program Files\MyProgram\" so it finds its dlls.
Now after the file is running, I'd like to rewrite the file's byte stream (just like opening it in hex editor...), or at least delete it so I can copy over new exe file directly using same name.
So far the solution I'm using is that I trigger format D: command for the whole drive D:\ (which, in my case is ramdisk and thumb-drive, as I only have this exe on it, I copy it there as necessary), since that removes the file and let's me copy new file there.
Trying to use del myProgram.exe even with -force flag triggers error that access to the file is denied. Same goes if I try to overwrite the contents of the file.
Is there any alternative to do that without using the format command, as that requires to have partition drive only for the purpose?
Update: Note: MoveFileEx and similar techniques that require termination of the process or system restart/reboot are not qualified as a solution. This should be done while the process is running without further actions that can compromise the process's run state.
On a side note, when formatting the drive using the Powershell's format command, the file is gone, although if viewing the partition using Hex viewer tool, there is full binary (hex) content of the exe visible there and an be restored using just as simple as copy-paste technique. This is one of the points as to where overwriting the file contents would be preferable than deleting the file directly.
Please note: This is a knowledge and skills based question, and would therefore appreciate sparing the moral and security-concerning comments about such actions and behaviour.
For deleting/replacing/overwriting a file at least two conditions must be met:
The user performing the operation must have the required permissions to do so. This can be verified for instance via Get-Acl or icacls.
Windows must not have an open handle to the file. This can be checked for instance with tools like Process Explorer or handle. These tools can also be used to forcibly close open handles, although that's not recommended as it may cause data loss and/or damage to the files in question. I'm not sure, though, if it's actually possible to close handles to an executable without terminating the process.
Note that antivirus software is likely to interfere with this kind of operation.
The basic problem here is that Windows loads from the .EXE upon demand, it's not all read in at once.
If you destroy the original file what happens when it tries to load in a page that no longer exists?
If I had to write something of this sort I would copy the .exe to a temporary location (beware that running code from the temp directory may be prohibited), run the new .exe, terminate the old one and then do what I want to it.
Objective:
I'm trying to use a program called Texmod.exe to start another program (exe) with certain parameters.
Background:
Texmod is program that opens up another exe and extracts/replaces textures that are pulled up in the second program while it is running. I'm trying to start the second exe with the parameters: -AlwaysFocus -ControllerOffset=1 -SaveDataId=2. Starting the second exe with shortcuts/.bat that have these parameters in a command line DOES work. However, I would like to do this in conjunction with Texmod.
Complications:
I'm using Texmod v0.9 b which doesn't support starting an exe with command line parameters. Newer versions, such as the open source reboot known as uMod, does support but it doesn't replace textures as well and crashes often compared to the original version.
Texmod.exe must start the second exe directly. Texmod can't select a shortcut to start the exe. I've tried making Texmod start another exe/.bat that then starts the second desired exe with parameters but this causes Texmod not to function.
Methods I have thought about but not sure if they work or even possible:
Somehow forcing all processes started by Texmod.exe to start with certain parameters
Somehow force the desired exe to always start with certain parameters regardless of start method (via Texmod, shortcuts, .bat, etc)
Add parameters to the process started by the desired exe after it is already running
Obviously I'm open to any ideas. Is what I'm asking even possible? Sorry if it seems unclear or I sound irrational; my knowledge on this is limited.
Edit: #Toby Speight I'm not sure what you mean by an example of the code I'm having trouble with as I'm just wondering if it's possible to perform the scenario I described. This is where I got the Texmod program from (it's the oldest release texmod.zip - Original TexMod 0.9 beta). I've searched the internet for possible solutions but I've found very few so some of the methods I've tried are:
Used Texmod.exe to start a desktop shortcut with target: "directory to exe" -AlwaysFocus -ControllerOffset=1 -SaveDataId=2. The result was Texmod couldn't use the shortcut and just opened the exe without the parameters.
Used Texmod to start an exe named caller.exe which started the exe I desired using the method described here. In command.txt, described by the instructions, I put ""name of exe.exe" -AlwaysFocus -ControllerOffset=1 -SaveDataId=2." The result was the exe started with the parameters but Texmod failed to modify the textures because it was modifying textures pulled up by caller.exe instead.
Used Texmod to open a .bat file with the lines: ""name of exe.exe" -AlwaysFocus -ControllerOffset=1 -SaveDataId=2." The result was the same as attempt described in #2.
Edit2: I also stumbled on this page where someone else claims they managed to achieve what sounds like the objective I desire. However, I do not know enough about code to understand it. If someone could look over this to see if it would work or see if they can modify it to fit the arguments that I desire.
You can use windows registry to force Windows run another app when specific .exe is called. Let me show an example: i'm trying to use TexMod with Remember Me.
Required setup:
Create a copy of game .exe, place it near original with different name, eg RememberMe_copy.exe
Go to windows registry location HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Image File Execution Options
create new key named as original .exe, in my case it's RememberMe.exe. Registry key looks like a folder.
In this key, create new string value named Debugger with full path to copy of .exe with required commandline args. For example: "C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\Remember Me\Binaries\Win32\RememberMe_copy.exe" -ReadPoolSizeFromIni. Note the path to .exe is quoted, commandline arguments are not. String value has type REG_SZ.
Now when you try to run anything called RememberMe.exe, Windows will instead run the RememberMe_copy.exe with specified parameters (and something else but we don't care). This feature is left in Windows for debugging purposes.
Finally, open TexMod, select RememberMe.exe. It will think it's running original file, but instead Windows will silently run another file with another parameters. As there is nothing else in between, TexMod is happy.
Why can't we use single file? Well, Windows will run original .exe instead of original .exe, then instead of it will run original .exe... causing infinite loop.
I am using matlab R2011b. I created a matlab gui that is a simple calculator just make addition. Then I created an .exe file. When I doudle click the .exe file which is in 'distrib' folder, nothing happens. Also, there is no error message.
I don't understand the reason. Is there anybody who has an idea about it?
I encountered 2 problems in the past when I tried to create an exe.
A. The program shut itself down as soon as it was 'finished'. To check whether the program actually runs, consider making a test program like this:
'abcd'
pause(5)
'efg'
If you can make a program like this, at least you know you can make a working exe.
B. You can choose from a few kinds of projects. Several of these make an exe, but you only want 1 of them. Not sure which one but it is not that hard to try all 3 or so options with a simple test program.
I have recently been working with Matlab. My question stems from my usage over a few months and is something that I can't seem to solve. I have an external SVM toolbox (OSU-SVM) that I would like to interface to with my project. I am able to get the entire system to work when I add the path of the toolbox manually (Right click -> Add to Path -> Selected Folders and Subfolders). What I would like to do is add the folder in a script. I've tried the "addpath" command but for some reason I can't get it to find the library relative to the m-file (script) that I run the command from. The following is an example of the code:
% Add OSU SVM system
addpath(genpath('./osu-svm/'));
The reason the I'd like to add the path using a relative folder to the M-file is that the code needs to run in a different environment that will not have the toolbox install. The code is also going to be executed in a different OS to the one I am developing on. That is, I am running a Windows Matlab to develop the code and need to run the finished system on a Linux machine. The process of running my files needs to be as painless as possible and shouldn't require much input from the user. That is why I'm specifically trying to avoid manual addition of the path.
On a side note a similar problem occurs when I wish to use "uigetfile" using a relative path. I believe there is something I am missing that will help me solve both of these simultaneously. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Instead of './osu-svm/' alone use
fullfile('.','osu-svm')
The reason it does not work for you on windows is that you are using forward slash file separators. Full file will make a file string containing the correct file separator for each OS.
The genpath example in the matlab documentation also uses fullfile
http://www.mathworks.co.uk/help/techdoc/ref/genpath.html
Furthermore, the '.' is kinda unnecessary as it just means "relative to the current directory" and can be left out of the command. Perhaps you meant one directory up?
'..'
???