I have a quickfix message and I dont know which tags are trailer.
{8=FIX.4.2 9=61 35=8 34=100 49=FixServer 52=20150916-10:22:23.313 56=CLIENT1 10=192 }
Based on header I understand header includes 8, 49, 56.
But on trailer I dont know which tag are trailer.
Anyone here can give me a brief answer?
FIXimate is the resource you need:
http://www.fixtradingcommunity.org/FIXimate/FIXimate3.0/
This is the standard trailer:
http://www.fixtradingcommunity.org/FIXimate/FIXimate3.0/en/FIX.4.4/body_49485053.html
It's the same in all FIX versions. Usually only tag 10 is used. I've never seen anyone use 93 or 89.
Related
Read only the latest replied email text.
----------
I am good
On Saturday 27 January 2018 10:32 AM, xyz.sms wrote:
----hello sai how are you ?
How to retrieve "i am good" ? Any direct way to retrieve this? Please help.
There's no standard for this. It's just a string. You have to guess what part of the string is an included or referenced message and which part is the reply. Different mailers use different techniques to include the original message in the body of a reply message.
I am using zend-mail (updated very recently). I am using IMAP storage to fetch a list of messages with an inordinate (more than half) of the messages reporting a malformed header.
I have reviewed the bug described at: ZendMail - error in headers but I think I have a different problem. Unlike that error, my failure seems to be occurring around a 'content preview' line I receive in many messages.
I've added the failing line text to the error statement:
2018-01-13T11:44:46-05:00 ERR (3): Error reading message 19 - Malformed header detected Content preview: Pacific Operational Science & Technology Conference - POST
2018-01-13T11:44:46-05:00 ERR (3): #0 /var/www/book2/vendor/zendframework/zend-mime/src/Decode.php(149): Zend\Mail\Headers::fromString('Return-Path: <A...', '\r\n')
#1 /var/www/book2/vendor/zendframework/zend-mail/src/Storage/Part.php(112): Zend\Mime\Decode::splitMessage('Return-Path: <A...', 'Return-Path: <A...', '')
The source code isn't much to look at, the body of the email follows the code snippet
$mP = 1;
$mailServer = new Imap(array("host" => "someHost","user" => "someAccount","password" => "somePassword"));
$eMessage = $mailServer->getMessage($mP);
The text from the email follows:
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root\#localhost for details.
Content preview: =============================================================================
Today's topic summary =============================================================================
Group: canvas-lms-users#googlegroups.com Url: https://groups.google.com/forum/ utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email#!forum/canvas-lms-users/topics
To me, it appears that this issue has more to do with the number of blank lines being interpreted as the end of the header or something involved with the'content preview' line. I think the lines in question have been added by spam detection software. If no 'content preview' - email headers process fine.
Any help?
I believe this is a Bug in Spamassassin. The apparently empty line above the Content preview: actually contains one space. According to RFC5322 section 3.2.2 this is a MUST NOT, presumably because there is buggy software out there (and I have seen some) that treats this empty line as the separator between the Headers and the Body of the message (the correct separator is a blank line with Nothing in it).
So Spamassassin it producing emails that do not comply with the established Internet Standards, and that is a big NO-NO.
I would be interested to hear of other examples caused by this.
I opened source code of my email found an attribute called : X-Message-Delivery. What does it mean? Is it important?
Can I add this attribute to my php mailer, is it modifiable?
You can add any headers you like with PHPMailer. Whether they do or mean anything is an entirely separate matter. Anything starting with X- is used to denote a non-standard, and usually informational, header (defined in RFC822).
Take a look at this question to see what that particular header means - it's informational and added by hotmail.
Hi I need help to understand, if 35=X message should contain Symbol/SecID within the repeating group.
The FIX Specification indicates that under the repeating group both 55 and 48/22 are optional.
I received a message from my client without a symbol tag, please help me undersatnd if that was a bad formed message
20150923-15:06:14.976 : 8=FIXT.1.19=33635=X34=19153349=SENDER52=20150923-15:06:14.63756=RECEIVER268=8279=0269=1270=99.609375271=289279=0269=1270=99.6171875271=241279=0269=1270=99.625271=154279=0269=1270=99.6328125271=139279=0269=0270=99.6015625271=268279=0269=0270=99.59375271=244279=0269=0270=99.5859375271=171279=0269=0270=99.578125271=21610=198
You are advised to treat the default FIX message and field definitions as a set of suggested definitions.
In practice, no commercial FIX counterparty uses these definitions as-is. Every counterparty I've connected to makes modifications, adding or removing fields from messages or groups, creating new fields, or sometimes adding entirely new messages. No counterparty supports every message and field.
When connecting to a counterparty, do not assume anything. Your counterparty should provide documentation on how they expect their interface to be used, and which messages and fields they will send and which they expect to receive from you.
You need to read their specs and modify your FIXnn.xml DataDictionary file to match what they will be sending you.
If their spec says they will send you Symbol and/or SecurityID in a 35=X message, you need to make sure your DD file matches that.
This page might be helpful to you. (It's technically for the C# QuickFIX/n, but the DD file is the same for all QF versions.)
http://quickfixn.org/tutorial/custom-fields-groups-and-messages.html
I was wondering if anyone knew how the thread-index field in email headers work?
Here's a simple chain of emails thread indexes that I messaged myself with.
Email 1 Thread-Index: AcqvbpKt7QRrdlwaRBKmERImIT9IDg==
Email 2 Thread-Index: AcqvbpjOf+21hsPgR4qZeVu9O988Eg==
Email 3 Thread-Index: Acqvbp3C811djHLbQ9eTGDmyBL925w==
Email 4 Thread-Index: AcqvbqMuifoc5OztR7ei1BLNqFSVvw==
Email 5 Thread-Index: AcqvbqfdWWuz4UwLS7arQJX7/XeUvg==
I can't seem to say with certainty how I can link these emails together. Normally, I would use the in-reply-to field or references field, but I recently found that Blackberrys do NOT include these fields. The only include Thread-Index field.
They are base64 encoded Conversation Index values. No need to reverse engineer them as they are documented by Microsoft on e.g. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms528174(v=exchg.10).aspx and more detailed on http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee202481(v=exchg.80).aspx
Seemingly the indexes in your example doesn't represent the same conversation, which probably means that the software that sent the mails wasn't able to link them together.
EDIT: Unfortunately I don't have enough reputation to add a comment, but adamo is right that it contains a timestamp - a somewhat esoteric encoded partial FILETIME. But it also contains a GUID, so it is pretty much guarenteed to be unique for that mail (of course the same mail can exist in multiple copies).
There's a good analysis of how exactly this non-standard "Thread-Index" header appears to be used, in this post and links therefrom, including this pdf (a paper presented at the CEAS 2006 conference) and this follow-up, which includes a comment on the issue from the evolution source code (which seems to reflect substantial reverse-engineering of this undocumented header).
Executive summary: essentially, the author eventually gives up on using this header and recommends and shows a different approach, which is also implemented in the c-client library, part of the UW IMAP Toolkit open source package (which is not for IMAP only -- don't let the name fool you, it also works for POP, NNTP, local mailboxes, &c).
I wouldn't be surprised if there are mail clients out there which would not be able to link Blackberry's mails to their threads. The Thread-Index header appears to be a Microsoft extension.
Either way, Novell Evolution implements this. Take a look at this short description of how they do it, or this piece of code that finds the thread parent of a given message.
I assume that, because the lengths of the Thread-Index headers in your example are all the same, these messages were all thread starts? Strange that they're only 22-bytes, though I suppose you could try applying the 5-bytes-per-message rule to them and see if it works for you.
If you are interested in parsing the Thread-Index in C# please take a look at this post
http://forum.rebex.net/questions/3841/how-to-interprete-thread-index-header
The snippet you will find there will let you parse the Thread-Index and retrieve the Thread GUID and message DateTime. There is a problem however, it does not work for all Thread-Indexes out there. Question is why do some Thread-Indexes generate invalid DateTime and what to do to support all of them???