Im trying to incorporate TexCount into Tex Studio.
Ive gotten the perl script working in the command line, but I would like it done in TexStudio automatically.
I have adapted a bat file, but it doesnt work:
#echo off
C:\texlive\2015\texmf-dist\scripts\texcount\texcount.pl -html -inc "?ame" > "%".html
"%".html
However I tinker with the syntax it doesnt seem to work and at the very most I can get it to produce a blank html file "_count.html"
Can anybody get this .bat file working please?
I've managed to get it working using the TexStudio User Commands.
In the Menus,
Options > Configure TeXStudio
Then,
Build > User Commands
I created my own user command with the name "texcount".
texcount %.tex -inc -total
This runs the texcount script;
on the current file (that's what the % is for),
it includes the files that use \input{},
it provides a total.
I can now run this command from:
Tools > User > (Number of user command: name of user command) e.g. 1:
texcount
Then the results are output in the messages tab.
Hope that helps.
EDIT: To more specifically produce a html file. I imagine you could use the html commands to produce your html file as shown in Thomas' answer.
You could then pipe the output to something like wkhtmltopdf to produce a pdf from the html file and show it using the default TeXstudio pdf viewer.
I could get this to work on my mac, you may need some adjustments for other OSs and/or other directory structures.
I created a script that calls texcount, as follows:
#!/bin/bash
perl /CorrectPath/texcount.pl -v0 -sum -html "$1*" >tempdoc.html
open tempdoc.html
In TexStudio, my user command looks like this:
"/CorrectPath/count_pdf_words.sh" ?ame"
Related
yesterday I had SumatraPDF and VisualStudioCode with latex-workshop working with forward and reverse-search. Today the reverse-search didn't work any more. With a simple bat file I tried to show the commandline arguments.
echo %*
pause
They seemed correct and when I copied the command and paste it into a new cmd it works. To do further testing I tried to direct command and run it.
"C:\....\Code.exe" -g "%1:%2"
pause
Visual Studio Code responds: bad option -g
In SumatraPDF I set cmd as command.
Now the behavior is that I have two cmd windows. With the cmd directly opened the VSC open's the file. With the cmd launched indirect I got the error message.
I have tried resetting the environment variables, changing the current working directory, and checking the code page currently in use.
How can it be that cmd behaves differently with seemingly the same environment? And what can I do to make a cmd started from an application work like a cmd started by windows?
Update: It appears there were a couple of recent security changes in the way VSCODE.exe is allowed to interact with the command line (especially affecting LaTeX-workshop users) so for recent changes twice this year see the discussion at https://forum.sumatrapdfreader.org/t/inverse-search-not-performed-for-vs-code-exe/4486/27
Within SumatraPDF the reverse syntex command for %1 is replaced by %f for file and (l)L for line
It is triggered by a double click near the line of interest and if the synctex index file was compiled correctly by PdfLaTeX (or similar) it will include the tex %f(ilename) and the nearest %l(ine) reference to the point where double clicked.
Thus your tex syctex enhanced "reverse search" call out of SumatraPDF should historically be
"C:\...path to...\Code.exe" -g "%f:%l"
that's Lower L not 1
Avoid using any depreciated -inverse-search parameter from a LaTeX editor just add it once into SumatraPDF-settings.txt and then it's not disturbed by repeated assignments when running your -forward-search.
It will NOT work if the file.synctex or file.synctex.gz is corrupt by a bad PDF compilation.
HOWEVER It seem Microsoft have added the requirement to add a CLI.js handler and requires another switch setting after that ! (see link to discussion in Update above)
For a small test file download https://github.com/GitHubRulesOK/MyNotes/raw/master/AppNotes/SumatraPDF/LATeX%20and%20Reverse-Search.zip unpack and open sync.pdf in SumatraPDF to test that double click on page opens sync.tex in the editor
If the message is cannot start ... then the command line is not configured correctly. A rough test for a bad synctex is to see what happens if the call is changed by adding cmd /k echo to the start, since that will confirm the reverse command. Here I wrote "wrong" as the path to code.exe, once corrected I can remove cmd /k echo.
For some other systems where the reverse might change
see https://github.com/sumatrapdfreader/sumatrapdf/issues/1197#
However there should be no interference in a valid VsCode call.
I have an exe program I'm running on Windows 10 using PowerShell. When I run it, I get the following output.
> .\Program.exe
Unlocked level 7/10
When trying to redirect all output or just stdout to a file, the program stops giving output. For example
PS > .\Program.exe > .\out.txt
PS > cat .\out.txt
PS >
I did not write the program but what I know is that it was written in C++.
Is there any trick to get the output into a file? I tried running in python and writing output to a file, running in python without fetching the output and redirecting, running from another powershell, and lots of other combinations but they don't seem to be working. Also, when running from Git Bash, I get no output at all.
I was thinking about some checks on the descriptors but I'm not sure since I don't have the source code, only the asm code
It looks like Program.exe is actually generating an error, and not output, first commenter is trying to get you to see that, but not really explaining that part...
(NOTE: You aren't actually using any powershell besides an implied "Invoke-Expression")I think you might be dealing with STDERR vs. STDOUT, when I invoke reg.exe in that fashion from powershell I get no output to the text file. This is because the text I was seeing was an error message ( Contents of STDERR ) from reg.exe, not the output ( contents of STDOUT ) from the command. When I passed proper parameters to it ( reg query HKLM\Software\Microsoft > C:\Users\foo\Documents\foo.txt) it wrote the Contents of STDOUT to the text file instead of the screen.
Here is an article that explains it better than I just did:
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/110930/redirecting-error-messages-from-command-prompt-stderr-stdout
I'm trying to use the inkscape command line interface. I have windows 7.
First I open up command line, and I run these:
cd "C:\Program Files\Inkscape-0.48"
inkscape "C:\Users\me\Desktop\Pic\Class_UML.png" --export-png="C:\Users\me\Desktop\Pic\raster.png" --export-area=0:0:100:100
Then the inkscape popup opens, and I click embed, and then click ok, and then nothing happens, and the file doesn't show up.
Does anyone know what I am doing wrong?
Thanks
As of now, there doesn't seem to be a way to do perfect silent processing in Windows. However, any command using inkscape in Windows triggers an empty window while processing in background.
If you don't want it to open separate inkscape windows everytime, try entering the inkscape interactive shell (using inkscape --shell).
PS: I don't think we can do anything more in interactive shell, more than what we can do using cmd. Hopefully someone solves the aforementioned problem in Windows and adds more functionality inside shell.
Have you tried to open the file C:\Users\me\Desktop\Pic\raster.png and see how it looks like?
Supposedly by using --export-png in the command line, inkscape will not open the interface but simply process what you requested silently.
In this case you should have the cropped image should be saved in C:\Users\me\Desktop\Pic\raster.png.
I use Linux and tried your example to test and I get the same behaviour you described plus the response in the command line
Background RRGGBBAA: ffffff00
Area 0:0:100:100 exported to 100 x 100 pixels (90 dpi)
Bitmap saved as: raster.png
Hope it helps
On Windows, in the C:\Program Files\Inkscape\bin folder, you will see both inkscape.exe and inkscape.com. Use inkscape.com.
Here is an example from PowerShell:
> & "C:\Program Files\Inkscape\bin\inkscape.com" --help
#echo off
REM setup Inskcape File Location
cd /d "C:\Program Files\Inkscape"
inkscape path\filename.svg --export-dpi=120 -e exported_image_name.png --without-gui
I have a executable that when double clicked opens in a command line window.
Now there is a input file (i.e named "sphere_15000.inp") in the same directory where the executable apame_win64.exe is located. So we can inter the file name in the command line.
The question is how this can be done from mathematica front end? With the RunThrough command I tried to do it with no avail.
RunThrough["Executable Location", "sphere_15000"]
Do I need to put this file location in my Windows 7 environment path variable? Hope for some suggestion in this regard.
UPDATE
Found a solution to my problem.
First set the Mathematica directory to the folder where the executable is located.
path="C:\Users\FlowCrusher\Desktop\CUSP solver\Apame_build_2011_01_09\solver";
SetDirectory[path];
Then use the following style of input.
Run["\"\"apame_win64.exe\" \"input\"\""]
Here "apame_win64.exe" is the executable one want to run and "input" is the input file for the executable. This solves the problem. But a new item in the wishlist.
Is there a way to hide the console window in the background?
Here is how it looks on my screen.
As Chris suggested if we use minimized console in the Run command we get a minimized window but the program does not execute.
I hope that a solution exists.
BR
Yes, you might put the folder of you executable into the Path variable, or provide the full path name.
However, RunThrough seems to have been superseeded (on Windows) by
Import["!command ","Text"], which will execute command and read the comaand line output into Matheamtica as a string.
E.g.:
Export["testit.txt", "bla", "Text"];
Import["!dir" <> " testit* > dir.log", "Text"];
FilePrint["dir.log"]
--
Otherwise, I also had good results in the past using NETLink (not sure if WScript.shell
still works on Windows7/8 or if one should use something else).
Emulating Run (RunThrough is not really needed I think):
Run2[cmd_String] := Module[{shell},
Switch[$OperatingSystem,
"Windows",
Needs["NETLink`"];
shell = NETLink`CreateCOMObject["WScript.shell"];
shell # run[cmd,0,True],
"Unix",
Run # cmd,
"MacOSX",
Run # cmd ] ];
Can you run your application with input from a basic command window instead of the application console? This might be the form of command you would need:
apame_win64 -input sphere_15000.inp
or simply
apame_win64 sphere_15000.inp
You can probably check the available switches by running apame_win64 -help
A multi-part command can be run from Mathematica, e.g.
Run["type c:\\temp\\test.txt"]
Alternatively, also returning output to the Mathematica session:
ReadList["!type c:\\temp\\test.txt", String]
I landed here wanting to run abaqus command line on windows.
The solutions provided here worked out for me (Windows 7, Mathematica 9):
SetDirectory#path;
Run["start /min abaqus job=" <> fileName <> " interactive ask_delete=OFF >> log.txt"]
(Here the abaqus option ask_delete=OFF overwrites an existing simulation results and the >> redirects all the output to a file)
I think, minimizing the window did not run in your case since the executable throws open that window. In that case, this might be of some help
In bash, executables such as mplayer and imagemagick's "convert" have a cool auto-complete functionality on their command line arguments. For instance, if I type
mplayer <tab><tab>
in one of my video folders, then mplayer will list all media files located in that folder, and only the media files.
Similarly, if I type
convert -<tab><tab>
then I will see all the possible options of the convert script, which is great.
My question is how to achieve a similar functionality, using bash, ruby or python scripts?
This is an example of BASH's smart completion. A basic description is here, a guide to writing your own extensions is here and another (Debian-based) guide is here. And here's a fuller featured introduction to the complete command (the command that facilitates this behaviour).
The link to writing your own extension in the accepted answer has gone dead. Quoting here from http://web.archive.org/web/20090409201619/http://ifacethoughts.net/2009/04/06/extending-bash-auto-completion/
Bash provides you a way of specifying your keywords, and using them to
auto complete command line arguments for your application. I use vim
as a wiki, task managemer and contacts. The vim helptags system lets
me index the content instead of searching through it, and the speed
shows it. One feature I wanted to add to this was to access these tags
from outside vim.
This can be done in a straight forward way:
$ vim -t tagname
This takes me directly to specific content marked using this tag. However, this will be more productive if I can provide
auto-completion for the tags.
I first defined a Bash function for the vim commandline. I added the
following code to my .bashrc file:
function get {
vim -t $1
} Now I can use get tagname command to get to the content.
Bash programmable completion is done by sourcing the
/etc/bash-completion script. The script lets us add our
auto-completion script /etc/bash-completion.d/ directory and executes
it whenever it is called. So I added a script file called get with the
following code in that directory.
_get()
{
local cur
COMPREPLY=()
#Variable to hold the current word
cur="${COMP_WORDS[COMP_CWORD]}"
#Build a list of our keywords for auto-completion using
#the tags file
local tags=$(for t in `cat /home/anadgouda/wiki/tags | \
awk '{print $1}'`; do echo ${t}; done)
#Generate possible matches and store them in the
#array variable COMPREPLY
COMPREPLY=($(compgen -W "${tags}" $cur))
}
#Assign the auto-completion function _get for our command get.
complete -F _get get Once the /etc/bash-completion is sourced, you will get auto-completion for the tags when you use the get command.
Along with my wiki I use it for all the documentation work and at
times the code too. I also use the tags file created from my code. The
indexing system lets me remember the context instead of the filenames
and directories.
You can tweak this system for any of the tools you use. All you need
to do is get a list of the keywords for your command and give it to
the Bash programmable completion system.
This functionality in bash is provided by bash-completion and similar functionality is included in zsh. If you want to add support for some program not currently supported by one of these tools, you need to write your own extensions for them.
How do I enable bash completion on Ubuntu?
sudo apt-get install bash-completion
source /etc/profile.d/bash_completion.sh
sudo apt i[TAB]