So i'm trying to make a game and i have to generate a row of nodes that accelerates upward. But every time if I add the node I get an error (because the node already has a parent) obviously I added Sprite.removeFromParent()
in the image you can kind of see what I'm trying to implement.
Anyway the blocks also have to register how many times they're touched.
To answer the question that is in the title:
Pretty simple, create an SKTexture and for each SKSpriteNode set the texture to that SKTexture. The code for that would look something like this:
// Create the texture
var boxTexture = SKTexture(imageNamed: "boxImage")
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
// Create box with defined texture
var box = SKSpriteNode(texture: boxTexture);
// Set position of box dynamically
box.position = CGPointMake(CGFloat(i * 20), CGFloat(512));
// Name for easier use (may need to change if you have multiple rows generated)
box.name = "box"+String(i);
// Add box to scene
addChild(box);
}
The problem that you are having in your description appears to be that you are only creating one SKSpriteNode when you need multiple to go across the bottom. Simply use a for loop to create multiple, and add them all to the scene (basically, the same code from above). You may wish to give them all name properties in order to figure out which box is which later on (if you don't store them as global variables). Make sure to change around the naming if you have multiple rows of boxes moving at the same time.
Related
I am trying to display the same game object in a table form of 4 columns and 2 rows so it would look like this:
GO GO GO GO
GO GO GO GO
G0 - gameObject
My gameObject is a button that can be pressed and has a text element on it to display the name of the profile on the button.
I have a List of strings of the names that i need to display on these GO buttons in the table form but i am struggling to position them correctly.
At the moment i have gotten to the point where i can Instantiate them so they all appear on the screen when the game is running, now i just need some advice on how i can position them properly in the format mentioned above.
How do i do this?
This is my code that i used to get the names and add them to the List:
private void GetProfiles()
{
List<string> profileNamesList = new List<string>();
if (Directory.Exists(filePath))
{
string[] files = Directory.GetFiles(filePath);
profileTileTemplate.SetActive(true);
foreach (var file in files)
{
string name;
name = file;
int index = name.IndexOf(filePath + "/", System.StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
if (index >= 0)
{
int pathIndexEnd = index + filePath.Length + 1;
int stringLength = name.Length - pathIndexEnd - 5;
name = name.Substring(pathIndexEnd, stringLength);
}
profileNamesList.Add(name);
}
}
DisplayProfiles(profileNamesList);
}
private void DisplayProfiles(List<string> names)
{
}
I have tried using a for loop with in another for loop but i just end up instantiating multiple of the same game object.
This is what i get now:
And this is what i want it to look like:
This is kind of two questions, and I just realized that Unity has a built in component that will do this automatically, so I'll leave the three answers below.
How do I arrange UI gameobjects in rows?
Since it seems like you want to do this for UI elements there's actually a very easy solution. Add an empty GameObject as a child of your Canvas and add a Vertical LayoutGroup component. Add two children to that with horizontal layoutgroups. Add four placeholder prefabs of your gameobject to each horizontal layout group. Arrange them and configure the settings to get them looking the way you want (and make note of what happens if you add fewer than four items!)
Once you have it all set up, delete the placeholders. Then you can add your gameobjects to the horizontal group using Instantiate(Object original, Transform parent) (link) to parent them to the layout group, which will keep them arranged neatly. You can keep a list of those groups and each time you add four, switch to the next parent.
A neater way that seems to fit your use case (assuming there can potentially be more than 8 profiles) is to make a Scroll View that holds horizontal layout groups, which will each be a row of entries. That way instead of tracking which parent you want to add gameobjects to, you can just instantiate a new row every time you pass four entries.
If you're sure there will only ever be eight or fewer, the easiest thing to do would just be arrange eight blank buttons in the UI however you want them to appear. Then keep a list of the eight buttons and edit the text/image on them, no instantiation or looping necessary.
How do I split up a list of gameobjects into rows?
The actual code to process the list is below. This is just an example and there are plenty of different ways to do it, but I thought this demonstrated the logic clearly without depending on what UI elements you choose. As a rules of thumb, make sure to figure out the layout elements you like in Unity first using placeholders (like scroll view etc) and then figure out the code to fill them in. In other words, instantiating and laying out UI elements at runtime is a great way to give yourself a headache so it's best to only do it when you need to.
List<string> profileNamesList = new List<string>();
public int entriesPerRow; //only public so you can edit in the inspector. Otherwise, just use the number per row in your prefab.
public GameObject profileRowPrefab;
public GameObject scrollViewLayout;
private void DisplayProfiles(List<string> names)
{
int i = 0;
while( i < names.Count ) //"while the list has more names"
{
//create a new row as a child of the scroll view content area
//and save a reference for later
GameObject go = Instantiate(profileRowPrefab, scrollViewLayout);
for(j = 0; j < entriesPerRow; j++) //"add this many names"
{
if(i < names.Count)
{
//instantiate a button, or edit one in the row prefab, etc.
//depending on how you're doing it, this is where you'd use the go variable above
YourProfileButtonCreationMethod(names[i]);
i++;
}
else
{
//we've finished the list, so we're done
//you can add empty placeholders here if they aren't in the prefab
break;
}
}
}
}
YourProfileButtonCreationMethod will depend completely on how you want to implement the UI.
I wish I had thought of this an hour ago, but I've never used it myself. Unity has a built in layout feature that will do this for you (minus the scrolling, but you may be able to nest this in a scroll view).
How do I arrange UI elements in a grid?
Instead of making your own grid with horizontal and vertical layout groups, you can use the Grid Layout Group. Then just instantiate each item in the list as a button with the grid layout as their parent (see above). Here's a short video tutorial that shows what the result looks like.
I want to create a blur effect similar to the picture below:
the picture is taken from this site:
https://forum.unity.com/threads/how-to-blur-specific-layers-only.555520/
I tried the post-processing profile and played around with the depth of field in the post-processing volume but it blurs all the scene.
I came across a YouTube Video that explains how to implement similar results to what I am looking for but things have changed drastically in the settings. For example, at 1:57 (minute and 57 seconds) he clicks on Add Additional Camera Data which I am struggling to find in the latest versions of LWRP.
I am using Unity version 2019.2.9f1
How can I achieve the result in the picture above? (Blurring all the scene except for one object)
Your guidance will be appreciated.
NOTE: My project is in VR using SteamVR and VRTK
Though your question is a bit broad I took some time to show you how it can be done.
First of all you will need to import the Post Processing package via the PackageManager
Window → PackageManager
Make sure to be in the All Packages view, search for post, find the Post Processing package and hit Install
Now first of all go to the Layer settings (Layers → Edit Layers)
and add two additional Layers: e.g. PostProcessing and Focused
Now to the cameras. Afaik it makes no difference whether you are in VR or not, usually you have one MainCamera that is moved along with your headset. If there should be two of them in your project setup just repeat the same steps for the second camera.
Make sure the MainCamera doesn't render the two added Layers → remove them from the Culling Mask
Add a new Camera FocusCamera as child to the existing MainCamera. This way it is automatically moved along with the main Camera.
RightClick on MainCamera &rightarrow Camera
It should have all the settings equal to the MainCamera except:
Clear Flags : Don't Clear
If you set it to Depth Only the focused object will always be rendered on top of everything, even if it is actually behind other objects in 3D space. You decide which effect you want here ;)
CullingMask : only Focused
Depth : Anything higher than the MainCamera so this camera is rendered on top of it
Make sure to remove the AudioListener component.
Finally add a new PostProcessingVolume to the scene. I would add it as child to the FocusCamera! Why? - Because this way it is automatically disabled together with the FocusCamera!
RightClick on FocusCamera → 3D Object → Post Processing Volume
Set its Layer to the added PostProcessing
enable Is Global so the distance to the volume doesn't matter and add a new profile by hitting new → Unity → Depth of field
In your case you want to overwrite the Focus Distance so check the box on the left and set a value close to the camera like e.g. 0.5
Until now nothing has really changed in your scene.
Now go to the MainCamera and, a component PostProcessingLayer and set the Layer to our added layer PostProcessing
Now everything should be blurred in your scene!
Almost ready to go! Now Disable the FocusCamera and add this script to it
using UnityEngine;
public class FocusSwitcher : MonoBehaviour
{
public string FocusedLayer = "Focused";
private GameObject currentlyFocused;
private int previousLayer;
public void SetFocused(GameObject obj)
{
// enables this camera and the postProcessingVolume which is the child
gameObject.SetActive(true);
// if something else was focused before reset it
if (currentlyFocused) currentlyFocused.layer = previousLayer;
// store and focus the new object
currentlyFocused = obj;
if (currentlyFocused)
{
previousLayer = currentlyFocused.layer;
currentlyFocused.layer = LayerMask.NameToLayer(FocusedLayer);
}
else
{
// if no object is focused disable the FocusCamera
// and PostProcessingVolume for not wasting rendering resources
gameObject.SetActive(false);
}
}
// On disable make sure to reset the current object
private void OnDisable()
{
if (currentlyFocused) currentlyFocused.layer =previousLayer;
currentlyFocused = null;
}
}
This will allow you to focus a certain GameObject on runtime by changing its layer to the Focused layer we added, the only one that is rendered by the FocusCamera. So this object will be rendered on top of the image without any blur effect!
For demonstration I just added this simple script to every cube object in order to enable focus on mouse enter and disable it on mouse exit:
using UnityEngine;
public class FocusMe : MonoBehaviour
{
[SerializeField] private FocusSwitcher focus;
private void OnMouseEnter()
{
focus.SetFocused(gameObject);
}
private void OnMouseExit()
{
// reset the focus
// in the future you should maybe check first
// if this object is actually the focused one currently
focus.SetFocused(null);
}
}
And here is what it looks like
as said I don't know exactly what your VR setup looks like. If you have to MainCameras simply add two child cameras to them. You still will need only one PostProcessingVolume and only one FocusSwitcher so you would probably move them to another object and handle the camera disabling etc differently but I hope the idea gets clear enough.
Use a separate camera for objects you don't want to blur and set a higher depth value.
Set the ClearFlags to depth only and in the CullingMask select the layer of that one object(or more objects). Obviously you would require to have a different layer for unblurred objects.
I'm reading an imageOverlay URL from an ArcGIS webserver that uses the leaflet getBound() coordinates as part of the URL (we have large maps that are filtered for the current window 'extent'). Apologies for not including the actual path (I'm working with sensitive client data). Eg:
http://myarcgiswebserver.com/MapServer/export/dpi=96&format=png32&bbox=27.119750976562504%2C-31.194007509998823%2C32.39044189453126%2C-29.692824739380754&size=1719%2C434
[bbox] = current imageBounds
When dragging my map the imageOverlay url is updated correctly but my leaflet window is no longer aligned to the imageBound values that were set when first adding the imageOverlay which results in a skewed output (this is my assumption):
The only workaround is to remove the existing imageOverlay and add a new one (which ruins the user experience as the map disappears then reappears each time the window is dragged or zoomed).
Am i approaching this problem incorrectly or would the introduction of a function to update the current imageBounds resolve this? Perhaps not a new function but the expansion of setUrl with additional parameters...?
Many thanks for any feedback...
As #ghybs pointed out, your use case might be better served by using the WMS
interface of your ArcGIS server.
Anyway, you say
The only workaround is to remove the existing imageOverlay and add a new one (which ruins the user experience as the map disappears then reappears each time the window is dragged or zoomed).
Well, that glitch is due to you probably doing something like:
Remove old overlay
Add new overlay
Wait until the image is received from the network
Wait one frame so the new overlay is shown
and instead you should be doing something like:
Add new overlay
Wait until the image is received from the network
Remove old overlay
Wait one frame so the new overlay is shown
The problem is just the async wait and the possible race conditions there, but should be easy to hack together, e.g.:
var activeOverlay = null;
var overlayInRequest = null;
map.on('moveend zoomend', {
// If we are already requesting a new overlay, ignore it.
// This might need some additional debouncing logic to prevent
// lots of concurrent requests
if (overlayInRequest) {
overlayInRequest.off('load', showOverlay);
}
overlayInRequest = L.imageOverlay( computeUrl( map.getBounds() ), myOverlayOptions );
overlayInRequest.on('load', showOverlay);
});
function showOverlay(ev) {
activeOverlay.remove();
activeOverlay = overlayInRequest;
activeOverlay.addTo(map);
overlayInRequest = undefined;
}
If you use an ImageOverlay but change its url dynamically, with a new image that reflects a new bounding box, then indeed that is the reason for the behaviour you describe: you display an image that has been generated using a new bbox, but positioned in the initial bbox, since the image overlay remains at the same geographical position on the map.
Instead, it sounds to me that you should use a TileLayer.WMS.
It would automatically manage the bounding box update for you. You may need to find the correct options to fit your service provider required URL syntax, though.
Example: http://playground-leaflet.rhcloud.com/yel/1/edit?html,output
I have a panel with 8 text field, 4 are used as descriptive field (what a label would do, basically), while the other 4 are modified with values.
I am creating a GameObject variable for every element that I have in the panel, using find to find the specific text element. I can leverage on the fact that each text object has only one text object attached to it, so I can address to it directly with GetComponent
panel_info = GameObject.Find("infopanel");
textfield1 = GameObject.Find("text_name");
textfield2 = GameObject.Find("text_age");
textfield3 = GameObject.Find("text_role");
textfield4 = GameObject.Find("text_field");
textfield1.GetComponent<Text>().text = "joe";
textfield2.GetComponent<Text>().text = "22";
textfield3.GetComponent<Text>().text = "striker";
textfield4.GetComponent<Text>().text = "attack";
While this works, I can't foresee myself creating 20-30 objects if a panel has more info to display.
Since I have the reference to the object Panel, is there a way to address directly the text field which is a child of the panel, using the text field name for example?
So if a panel has 4 text field, I can modify each of it addressing directly by name, and then using GetComponent<Text>().textto change the value.
You MUST NOT call GetComponent<Text>() each time you want to access/modify text.
This is an extremely basic fact about Unity.
It is immediately mentioned in the relevant manual entries.
Since you have 8 textbox and I don't know how long you update each one. It would be good if you cache all of them in the beginning of the game then use them later on without GetComponent<Text>(). This will improve performance a lot and make your frame-rate happy.
Array looks good for something like this. And you need to comment each one too.
public Text[] textBoxArray;
On the editor, Expand the "Text Box Array" and change the array Size to 8.
Now drag each GameObject with the text to the arrays in order. If you do it in order, you can easily remember their names and be able to access them in order.
For example, if the first text gameobecjt you dragged to the array is called text_name, the access it, you use textBoxArray[0]. The second text which is text_age can be accessed with textBoxArray[1]. .....
To make it easier for you later on, you should have multiple line comment that describes which array points to what.You do this so that when you return to modify your code months after, you won't have to look around in the Editor to find what points to what. For example:
/*
textBoxArray[0] = text_name
textBoxArray[1] = text_age
textBoxArray[2] = text_role
textBoxArray[3] = text_field
*/
No performance lost and that decreases the amount of code in your game.
Initializing the arrays by code instead of the Editor
Assuming you want to initialize the arrays by code instead of the Editor. You can do it in the start function like below.
public Text[] textBoxArray;
void Start()
{
//Create arrays of 8
textBoxArray = new Text[8]; //8 texts
//Cache all the Text GameObjects
textBoxArray[0] = GameObject.Find("/infopanel/text_name").GetComponent<Text>();
textBoxArray[1] = GameObject.Find("/infopanel/text_age").GetComponent<Text>();
textBoxArray[2] = GameObject.Find("/infopanel/text_role").GetComponent<Text>();
textBoxArray[3] = GameObject.Find("/infopanel/text_field").GetComponent<Text>();
}
You should notice that GameObject.Find() starts with "/" and that increases performance too as it will only search for Texts under "infopanel" instead of searching in the whole scene.
Assuming that your hierarchy is setup that all your TextMeshes are children of the panel, you could use the Transform.Find method to get each child, then it's TextMesh, and assign a value.
So, for example, if you wanted to assign the value "Joe" to the TextMesh attached to "text_name", which in turn is a child of "infopanel", you could do the following
panel_info = GameObject.Find("infopanel");
panel_info.transform.Find("text_name").GetComponent<TextMesh>().text = "Joe";
I am using KineticJS for implementing a graphical editor. I would like to drag a KineticJS Group and drop it into another shape. So far so good, done binding the "dropend" event to a handler in the group.
But I would like to change color to the potential destination shape while hovering on it during dragging, so as to give evidence that it is a suitable shape for drop.
I can't see a way of doing it and I am not been able to find any help in Kinetic documentation. How could I do?
Thanks,
eca
After some mumbling, I think I have found a solution:
var aShape = new Kinetic.Shape(...);
:
aShape.on("dragmove", function(evt) {
// Detect shapes under mouse position
var pos = aShape.getStage().getUserPosition(evt);
var collidingShapes = aShape.getStage().getIntersections(pos);
:
// If needed, filter out colliding shapes not suitable for drop
:
// Highlight drop target candidates, e.g. simulating a "mouseover"
for (var iTarget = 0; iTarget < collidingShapes.length; ++iTarget)
collidingShapes[iTarget].simulate("mouseover");
// If you need to remove highlighting, keep track of previously
// highlighted shapes and call simulate("mouseout") on those
// not currently in the candidates set.
});
Though what you did is actually working, I find it very slow. What I did, was to replace the line 3142 of kineticjs (v4.0.1):
else if(this.targetShape && !go.drag.moving)
with
else if (this.targetShape)
and it works like a charm. The mouseout and mouseover events are now fired.
Anyway, I don't know why, but there had been a property of the stage object (shapedragging or so) which pointed to a potential target, but it had been removed.