production build of ember app works, but when using ember serve, cookies not sent to api - rest

I have a rest API running on localhost:8001/my_app/api/, and I have apache setup to reverse proxy it from localhost/my_app/api. That's working fine.
In order to have permissions to do anything with the api, it requires my session cookie, my csrftoken cookie and a X-CSRFToken HTTP header. I've configured adapters/application.js as follows:
adapters/application.js
import Ember from 'ember';
import DRFAdapter from './drf';
export default DRFAdapter.extend({
headers: Ember.computed(function() {
return {
'X-CSRFToken': Ember.get(document.cookie.match(/csrftoken\=([^;]*)/), '1'),
};
}).volatile(),
ajax: function(url, method, hash) {
hash = hash || {}; // hash may be undefined
hash.crossDomain = true;
hash.xhrFields = {withCredentials: true};
return this._super(url, method, hash);
}
});
If I do a ember build -prod and copy the contents of the dist dir to /var/www/myApp/, apache serves my app, and it works just fine.
It's when I try to use ember-cli's builtin development server where I run into problems. I'm getting 403 errors from my api. It turns out that while the X-CSRFToken header is being sent neither of my cookies are. If I look in my chrome developer tools, it shows that I have both cookies - they simply aren't in the request headers. They're both from localhost, so I'm a bit confused.
Also, I currently I have CORS on my rest backend setup. Here are the headers I'm currently receiving:
Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://localhost:4200
I thought that since allow-credentials == true and allow-origin != * that cookies were supposed to be allowed. sigh.
Here's my API_HOST and contentSecurityPolicy:
config/environment.js
if (environment === 'development') {
ENV.APP.LOG_TRANSITIONS = true;
ENV.APP.API_HOST = "http://localhost"
ENV.contentSecurityPolicy = {
'default-src': "'none'",
'script-src': "'self' 'unsafe-eval' localhost",
'font-src': "'self'",
'connect-src': "'self' localhost",
'img-src': "'self'",
'style-src': "'self'",
'media-src': "'self'"
};
}
As you can see above, the api requests are being sent through my reverse proxy. I've played around with ember serve --proxy trying both http://localhost:80/ and http://localhost:8001/ but neither have helped. I've also tried setting my development ENV.API_HOST = 'http://localhost:8001/'; with and without the various proxy values.
This edit, build, deploy, refresh my browser, test, & repeat process is REALLY slow and getting old REALLY fast.
Could someone please explain to me how to get the ember-cli development server to properly access my rest api?

Related

Keycloak : Cross-Origin Request Blocked: The Same Origin Policy disallows reading the remote resource [duplicate]

I'm trying to fetch some data from the REST API of HP Alm. It works pretty well with a small curl script—I get my data.
Now doing that with JavaScript, fetch and ES6 (more or less) seems to be a bigger issue. I keep getting this error message:
Fetch API cannot load . Response to preflight request doesn't
pass access control check: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is
present on the requested resource. Origin 'http://127.0.0.1:3000' is
therefore not allowed access. The response had HTTP status code 501.
If an opaque response serves your needs, set the request's mode to
'no-cors' to fetch the resource with CORS disabled.
I understand that this is because I am trying to fetch that data from within my localhost and the solution should be using Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS). I thought I actually did that, but somehow it either ignores what I write in the header or the problem is something else.
So, is there an implementation issue? Am I doing it wrong? I can't check the server logs unfortunately. I'm really a bit stuck here.
function performSignIn() {
let headers = new Headers();
headers.append('Content-Type', 'application/json');
headers.append('Accept', 'application/json');
headers.append('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', 'http://localhost:3000');
headers.append('Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', 'true');
headers.append('GET', 'POST', 'OPTIONS');
headers.append('Authorization', 'Basic ' + base64.encode(username + ":" + password));
fetch(sign_in, {
//mode: 'no-cors',
credentials: 'include',
method: 'POST',
headers: headers
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(json => console.log(json))
.catch(error => console.log('Authorization failed : ' + error.message));
}
I am using Chrome. I also tried using that Chrome CORS Plugin, but then I am getting another error message:
The value of the 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header in the response
must not be the wildcard '*' when the request's credentials mode is
'include'. Origin 'http://127.0.0.1:3000' is therefore not allowed
access. The credentials mode of requests initiated by the
XMLHttpRequest is controlled by the withCredentials attribute.
This answer covers a lot of ground, so it’s divided into three parts:
How to use a CORS proxy to avoid “No Access-Control-Allow-Origin header” problems
How to avoid the CORS preflight
How to fix “Access-Control-Allow-Origin header must not be the wildcard” problems
How to use a CORS proxy to avoid “No Access-Control-Allow-Origin header” problems
If you don’t control the server your frontend code is sending a request to, and the problem with the response from that server is just the lack of the necessary Access-Control-Allow-Origin header, you can still get things to work—by making the request through a CORS proxy.
You can easily run your own proxy with code from https://github.com/Rob--W/cors-anywhere/.
You can also easily deploy your own proxy to Heroku in just 2-3 minutes, with 5 commands:
git clone https://github.com/Rob--W/cors-anywhere.git
cd cors-anywhere/
npm install
heroku create
git push heroku master
After running those commands, you’ll end up with your own CORS Anywhere server running at, e.g., https://cryptic-headland-94862.herokuapp.com/.
Now, prefix your request URL with the URL for your proxy:
https://cryptic-headland-94862.herokuapp.com/https://example.com
Adding the proxy URL as a prefix causes the request to get made through your proxy, which:
Forwards the request to https://example.com.
Receives the response from https://example.com.
Adds the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header to the response.
Passes that response, with that added header, back to the requesting frontend code.
The browser then allows the frontend code to access the response, because that response with the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header is what the browser sees.
This works even if the request is one that triggers browsers to do a CORS preflight OPTIONS request, because in that case, the proxy also sends the Access-Control-Allow-Headers and Access-Control-Allow-Methods headers needed to make the preflight succeed.
How to avoid the CORS preflight
The code in the question triggers a CORS preflight—since it sends an Authorization header.
https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTTP/Access_control_CORS#Preflighted_requests
Even without that, the Content-Type: application/json header will also trigger a preflight.
What “preflight” means: before the browser tries the POST in the code in the question, it first sends an OPTIONS request to the server, to determine if the server is opting-in to receiving a cross-origin POST that has Authorization and Content-Type: application/json headers.
It works pretty well with a small curl script - I get my data.
To properly test with curl, you must emulate the preflight OPTIONS the browser sends:
curl -i -X OPTIONS -H "Origin: http://127.0.0.1:3000" \
-H 'Access-Control-Request-Method: POST' \
-H 'Access-Control-Request-Headers: Content-Type, Authorization' \
"https://the.sign_in.url"
…with https://the.sign_in.url replaced by whatever your actual sign_in URL is.
The response the browser needs from that OPTIONS request must have headers like this:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://127.0.0.1:3000
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: POST
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type, Authorization
If the OPTIONS response doesn’t include those headers, the browser will stop right there and never attempt to send the POST request. Also, the HTTP status code for the response must be a 2xx—typically 200 or 204. If it’s any other status code, the browser will stop right there.
The server in the question responds to the OPTIONS request with a 501 status code, which apparently means it’s trying to indicate it doesn’t implement support for OPTIONS requests. Other servers typically respond with a 405 “Method not allowed” status code in this case.
So you’ll never be able to make POST requests directly to that server from your frontend JavaScript code if the server responds to that OPTIONS request with a 405 or 501 or anything other than a 200 or 204 or if doesn’t respond with those necessary response headers.
The way to avoid triggering a preflight for the case in the question would be:
if the server didn’t require an Authorization request header but instead, e.g., relied on authentication data embedded in the body of the POST request or as a query param
if the server didn’t require the POST body to have a Content-Type: application/json media type but instead accepted the POST body as application/x-www-form-urlencoded with a parameter named json (or whatever) whose value is the JSON data
How to fix “Access-Control-Allow-Origin header must not be the wildcard” problems
I am getting another error message:
The value of the 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header in the response
must not be the wildcard '*' when the request's credentials mode is
'include'. Origin 'http://127.0.0.1:3000' is therefore not allowed
access. The credentials mode of requests initiated by the
XMLHttpRequest is controlled by the withCredentials attribute.
For requests that have credentials, browsers won’t let your frontend JavaScript code access the response if the value of the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header is *. Instead the value in that case must exactly match your frontend code’s origin, http://127.0.0.1:3000.
See Credentialed requests and wildcards in the MDN HTTP access control (CORS) article.
If you control the server you’re sending the request to, a common way to deal with this case is to configure the server to take the value of the Origin request header, and echo/reflect that back into the value of the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header; e.g., with nginx:
add_header Access-Control-Allow-Origin $http_origin
But that’s just an example; other (web) server systems have similar ways to echo origin values.
I am using Chrome. I also tried using that Chrome CORS Plugin
That Chrome CORS plugin apparently just simplemindedly injects an Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * header into the response the browser sees. If the plugin were smarter, what it would be doing is setting the value of that fake Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header to the actual origin of your frontend JavaScript code, http://127.0.0.1:3000.
So avoid using that plugin, even for testing. It’s just a distraction. To test what responses you get from the server with no browser filtering them, you’re better off using curl -H as above.
As far as the frontend JavaScript code for the fetch(…) request in the question:
headers.append('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', 'http://localhost:3000');
headers.append('Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', 'true');
Remove those lines. The Access-Control-Allow-* headers are response headers. You never want to send them in requests. The only effect of that is to trigger a browser to do a preflight.
This error occurs when the client URL and server URL don't match, including the port number. In this case you need to enable your service for CORS which is cross origin resource sharing.
If you are hosting a Spring REST service then you can find it in the blog post CORS support in Spring Framework.
If you are hosting service using a Node.js server then
Stop the Node.js server.
npm install cors --save
Add following lines to your server.js
const cors=require("cors");
const corsOptions ={
origin:'*',
credentials:true, //access-control-allow-credentials:true
optionSuccessStatus:200,
}
app.use(cors(corsOptions)) // Use this after the variable declaration
The problem arose because you added the following code as the request header in your front-end:
headers.append('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', 'http://localhost:3000');
headers.append('Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', 'true');
Those headers belong to the response, not request. So remove them, including the line:
headers.append('GET', 'POST', 'OPTIONS');
Your request had 'Content-Type: application/json', hence triggered what is called CORS preflight. This caused the browser sent the request with the OPTIONS method. See CORS preflight for detailed information.
Therefore in your back-end, you have to handle this preflighted request by returning the response headers which include:
Access-Control-Allow-Origin : http://localhost:3000
Access-Control-Allow-Credentials : true
Access-Control-Allow-Methods : GET, POST, OPTIONS
Access-Control-Allow-Headers : Origin, Content-Type, Accept
Of course, the actual syntax depends on the programming language you use for your back-end.
In your front-end, it should be like so:
function performSignIn() {
let headers = new Headers();
headers.append('Content-Type', 'application/json');
headers.append('Accept', 'application/json');
headers.append('Authorization', 'Basic ' + base64.encode(username + ":" + password));
headers.append('Origin','http://localhost:3000');
fetch(sign_in, {
mode: 'cors',
credentials: 'include',
method: 'POST',
headers: headers
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(json => console.log(json))
.catch(error => console.log('Authorization failed: ' + error.message));
}
In my case, I use the below solution.
Front-end or Angular
post(
this.serverUrl, dataObjToPost,
{
headers: new HttpHeaders({
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
})
}
)
back-end (I use PHP)
header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin: http://localhost:4200");
header('Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, OPTIONS');
header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type, Authorization");
$postdata = file_get_contents("php://input");
$request = json_decode($postdata);
print_r($request);
Using dataType: 'jsonp' worked for me.
async function get_ajax_data(){
var _reprojected_lat_lng = await $.ajax({
type: 'GET',
dataType: 'jsonp',
data: {},
url: _reprojection_url,
error: function (jqXHR, textStatus, errorThrown) {
console.log(jqXHR)
},
success: function (data) {
console.log(data);
// note: data is already json type, you
// just specify dataType: jsonp
return data;
}
});
} // function
Just my two cents... regarding How to use a CORS proxy to get around “No Access-Control-Allow-Origin header” problems
For those of you working with php at the backend, deploying a "CORS proxy" is as simple as:
create a file named 'no-cors.php' with the following content:
$URL = $_GET['url'];
echo json_encode(file_get_contents($URL));
die();
on your front end, do something like:
fetch('https://example.com/no-cors.php' + '?url=' + url)
.then(response=>{*/Handle Response/*})`
If your API is written in ASP.NET Core, then please follow the below steps:
Install the Microsoft.AspNetCore.Cors package.
Add the below line in the ConfigureServices method in file Startup.cs:
services.AddCors();
Add the below line in the Configure method in file startup.cs:
app.UseCors(options =>
options.WithOrigins("http://localhost:8080")
.AllowAnyHeader()
.AllowAnyMethod());
Make sure you add this after - app.UseRouting();
Refer to the below image(from MSDN) to see the middleware order:
https://i.stack.imgur.com/vQ4yT.png
Possible causes of CORS issues
Check your server-side access headers: Refer to this link
Check what request header is received from the server in the browser. The below image shows the headers
If you are using the fetch method and trying to access the cross-origin request make sure mode:cors is there. Refer to this link
Sometimes if there is an issue in the program also you are getting the CORS issue, so make sure your code is working properly.
Make sure to handle the OPTION method in your API.
Adding mode:no-cors can avoid CORS issues in the API.
fetch(sign_in, {
mode: 'no-cors',
credentials: 'include',
method: 'POST',
headers: headers
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(json => console.log(json))
.catch(error => console.log('Authorization failed : ' + error.message));
}
In December 2021, Chrome 97, the Authorization: Bearer ... is not allowed unless it is in the Access-Control-Allow-Headers preflight response (ignores *). It produced this warning:
[Deprecation] authorization will not be covered by the wildcard symbol (*)
See: Chrome Enterprise release notes, Chrome 97
It also appears to enforce the same restriction on * on Access-Control-Allow-Origin. If you want to revive *-like behavior now that it is blocked, you'll likely have to read the requester's origin and return it as the allowed origin in the preflight response.
In some cases, a library may drop the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header when there is some other invalid credential (example: an expired JWT). Then, the browser shows the "No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present" error instead of the actual error (which in this example could be an expired JWT). Be sure that your library doesn't drop the header and confuse the client.
Faced this issue in my react/express app. Adding the below code in server.js (or your server file name) fixed the issue for me. Install cors and then
const cors = require('cors');
app.use(cors({
origin: 'http://example.com', // use your actual domain name (or localhost), using * is not recommended
methods: ['GET', 'POST', 'PUT', 'DELETE', 'PATCH', 'HEAD', 'OPTIONS'],
allowedHeaders: ['Content-Type', 'Origin', 'X-Requested-With', 'Accept', 'x-client-key', 'x-client-token', 'x-client-secret', 'Authorization'],
credentials: true
}))
Now you can make straightforward API calls from your front-end without having to pass any additional parameters.
With Node.js, if you are using routers, make sure to add CORS before the routers. Otherwise, you'll still get the CORS error. Like below:
const cors = require('cors');
const userRouter = require('./routers/user');
expressApp = express();
expressApp.use(cors());
expressApp.use(express.json());
expressApp.use(userRouter);
In case you are using Node.js and Express.js as the back-end and React & Axios as the front-end within a development environment in macOS, you need to run both sides under HTTPS. Below is what finally worked for me (after many hours of deep dive and testing):
Step 1: Create an SSL certificate
Just follow the steps from How to get HTTPS working on your local development environment in 5 minutes.
You will end up with a couple of files to be used as credentials to run the HTTPS server and React web:
server.key & server.crt
You need to copy them in the root folders of both the front and back ends (in a production environment, you might consider copying them in folder ./ssh for the back-end).
Step 2: Back-end setup
I read a lot of answers proposing the use of 'cors' package or even setting ('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', '*'), which is like saying: "Hackers are welcome to my website". Just do like this:
import express from 'express';
const emailRouter = require('./routes/email'); // in my case, I was sending an email through a form in React
const fs = require('fs');
const https = require('https');
const app = express();
const port = 8000;
// CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) headers to support Cross-site HTTP requests
app.all('*', (req, res, next) => {
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "https://localhost:3000");
next();
});
// Routes definition
app.use('/email', emailRouter);
// HTTPS server
const credentials = {
key: fs.readFileSync('server.key'),
cert: fs.readFileSync('server.crt')
};
const httpsServer = https.createServer(credentials, app);
httpsServer.listen(port, () => {
console.log(`Back-end running on port ${port}`);
});
In case you want to test if the https is OK, you can replace the httpsServer constant by the one below:
https.createServer(credentials, (req: any, res: any) => {
res.writeHead(200);
res.end("hello world from SSL\n");
}).listen(port, () => {
console.log(`HTTPS server listening on port ${port}...`);
});
And then access it from a web browser: https://localhost:8000/
Step 3: Front-end setup
This is the Axios request from the React front-end:
await axios.get(`https://localhost:8000/email/send`, {
params: { /* Whatever data you want to send */ },
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
}
})
And now, you need to launch your React web in HTTPS mode using the credentials for SSL we already created. Type this in your macOS terminal:
HTTPS=true SSL_CRT_FILE=server.crt SSL_KEY_FILE=server.key npm start
At this point, you are sending a request from an HTTPS connection at port 3000 from your front-end, to be received by an HTTPS connection at port 8000 by your back-end. CORS should be happy with this ;)
For those using ASP.NET Core:
In my case, I was using JavaScript to make a blob from an image stored on the API (the server), so the URL was pointing to that resource. In that API's program.cs class, I already had a CORS policy, but it didn't work.
After I read the Microsoft documentation (read the first paragraph) about this issue, it is said that if you want to access a resource on the server, by using JavaScript (which is what I was trying to do), then you must call the app.UseCors(); before the app.UseStaticFiles(); which is typically the opposite.
My program.cs file:
const string corsPolicyName = "ApiCORS";
builder.Services.AddCors(options =>
{
options.AddPolicy(corsPolicyName, policy =>
{
policy.WithOrigins("https://localhost:7212");
});
});
...
var app = builder.Build();
app.UseSwagger();
app.UseSwaggerUI(settings =>
{
settings.DisplayRequestDuration();
settings.EnableTryItOutByDefault();
});
app.UseHttpsRedirection();
app.UseCors(corsPolicyName); // 👈 This should be above the UseStaticFiles();
app.UseStaticFiles(); // 👈 Below the UseCors();
app.UseAuthentication();
app.UseAuthorization();
app.UseApiCustomExceptionHandler();
app.MapControllers();
app.Run();
Remove this:
credentials: 'include',
For a Node.js and Express.js backend I use this :)
app.use(function(req, res, next) {
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "YOUR-DOMAIN.TLD"); // Update to match the domain you will make the request from
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers", "Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept");
next();
});
For more details: CORS on ExpressJS
I have encountered this error several times over the past few years -- seemingly showing up out of the blue in a previously functioning website.
I determined that Chrome (and possibly other browsers) can return this error when there is some unrelated error that occurs on the server that prevents it from processing the CORS request (and prior to returning an HTTP 500 error).
These all occurred in a .NET Core environment, and I am not sure if it would happen in other environments.
Anyway, if your code has functioned before, and seems correct, consider debugging to find if there is some other error that is firing before you go crazy trying to solve an error that isn't really there.
In my case, the web server prevented the "OPTIONS" method
Check your web server for the options method
Apache: https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ibm10735209
web tier: 4.4.6 Disabling the Options Method https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23943_01/web.1111/e10144/getstart.htm#HSADM174
nginx: https://medium.com/#hariomvashisth/cors-on-nginx-be38dd0e19df
I'm using "webtier"
/www/webtier/domains/[domainname]/config/fmwconfig/components/OHS/VCWeb1/httpd.conf
<IfModule mod_rewrite.c>
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^OPTIONS
RewriteRule .* . [F]
</IfModule>
change to
<IfModule mod_rewrite.c>
RewriteEngine off
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^OPTIONS
RewriteRule .* . [F]
</IfModule>
In my case, the solution was dumb as hell... Your allowed origin shouldn't have a slash at the end.
E.g., https://example.com/ -> https://example.com
In my case, I had to add a custom header middleware below all the existing middleware. I think some middleware might conflict with the Access-Control-Allow-Origin Header and try to set it according to their needs.
So the code would be something like this:
app.use(cors());
....all other middleware here
app.use(function (req, res, next) {
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Origin", "http://localhost:3000");
res.header("Access-Control-Allow-Headers", "Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept");
next();
});
...your routes
I make this mistake a lot of times, and because of it, I've made a "check-list" to all of you.
Enable CORS on your project: If you're using Node.js (by example) you can use:
npm install cors;
import cors from 'cors';
app.use(cors());
You can manually set the headers like this (if you want it):
app.use((req, res, next) => {
res.setHeader('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', '*');
res.setHeader('Access-Control-Allow-Headers', 'Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept, Authortization');
res.setHeader('Acces-Control-Allow-Methods', 'GET, POST, PATCH, DELETE');
Remember to add http:// to your API link in your frontend project, some browsers like Chrome do not accept a request using CORS if the request URL isn't HTTP or HTTPS:
http://localhost:3000/api
Check if your project is using a proxy.config.js file. See Fixing CORS errors with Angular CLI proxy.
When the client used to call our backend service from his host username.companyname.com, he used to get the above error
Two things are required:
while sending back the response, send the header whose key is Access-Control-Allow-Origin and value is *:
context.Writer.Header()["Access-Control-Allow-Origin"] = []string{"*"} // Important to avoid a CORS error
Use the Go CORS library to set AllowCredentials to false and AllowAllOrigins to true.
Use the below npm module. This has virtually saved lives.
https://www.npmjs.com/package/local-cors-proxy
You're getting a CORS error, for example like the below URL
https://www.google.co.in/search/list
After successfully installed(local-cors-proxy) global npm install -g local-cors-proxy and set proxy URL that CORS URL.
For example, here the below CORS issue getting in localhost. So you need to add the domain name(https://www.google.co.in) and port(--port 8010) for the CORS issue domain.
For more please check the link
https://www.npmjs.com/package/local-cors-proxy
lcp --proxyUrl https://www.google.co.in --port 8010
After successfully set, it will generate the local proxy URL like below.
http://localhost:8010/proxy
Use that domain name in your project API URL.
API full URL:
http://localhost:8010/proxy/search/list
To get without a CORS issue response in your local project.
Using WebAPI build in .Net Core 6.0
None of the above worked for me... This did it
// global cors policy
app.UseCors(x => x
.AllowAnyMethod()
.AllowAnyHeader()
.SetIsOriginAllowed(origin => true) // allow any origin
.AllowCredentials());
credit: https://stackoverflow.com/a/70660054/8767516
Try adding all these headers in this code below Before every route, you define in your app, not after the routes
app.use((req, res, next) =>{
res.setHeader('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', '*');
res.setHeader('Access-Control-Allow-Headers','Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type,Accept, Authortization');
res.setHeader('Acces-Control-Allow-Methods','GET, POST, PATCH, DELETE');
If you are getting this error while deploying React app to netlify, use these steps.
step 1: Create netlify.toml file in the root folder of your react app.
step 2: Copy paste this code:
`[[redirects]]
from = "/cors-proxy/*"
to = ":splat"
status = 200
force = true`
step3: update your fetch/axios api this way:
It took me a while to figure this out.

Playframework 2.8 setSession works on Postman, but not on browser

I've been working on an api project on Scala Playframework 2.8.
Everything seems to work fine on Postman, but when trying to connect it to my frontend project, .withSession doesn't create any cookie in the browser although it does create one in Postman.
I thought it had something to do with the csrf and cors definitions on the api's application.conf but I've edited it a lot and nothing works.
I'm getting no errors, just don't get the session to be set in the client, so i can't log-in anyone to the api :\
I'm sharing my application.conf code:
# https://www.playframework.com/documentation/latest/Configuration
# Default database configuration using MySQL database engine
# Connect to playdb as playdbuser
db.default.driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
db.default.url="blabla"
db.default.username="blalba"
db.default.password="blabla"
play.http.session.secure = false
play.http.session.cookieName = "PLAY_SESSION"
play.http.session.httpOnly = true
play.filters.disabled+=play.filters.csrf.CSRFFilter
play.cache.bindCaches = ["db-cache"]
play.filters.hosts {
allowed = ["."]
}
play.filters.enabled += "play.filters.cors.CORSFilter"
play.filters.cors {
allowedHttpMethods = ["GET", "HEAD", "POST", "PUT", "OPTIONS"]
allowedHttpHeaders = ["Accept", "Content-Type"]
}
play.http.secret.key = "blablabla"
Anyone has an idea why the browser blocks me from creating the session from the Scala playframework 2.8 api?
Got it. (I feel so stupid :/)
The problem wasn't with the backend, Play was working as expected.
The problem was with the frontend (react.js).
Once I added credentials: 'include' to the fetch call, it worked.
Started realising the problem is not in the backend thanks to #cbley's response, so thank you for that.

CSRF Token not updated properly (Ionic + Spring Security)

I'm developing an app using Ionic Framework and generated a JHipster project for my backend. My JHipster project runs on an extra Server and is called via REST requests from my App. So my problem now is handling the CORS and CSRF configuration.
My JHipster project has its own frontend, which runs on the same domain and while testing I can reach my backend without any issues. However, when I want to call my backend on the server from my Ionic app my xsrf tokens wont update properly and, therefore, I cannot access my backend. I already tried several solutions from different stack overflow posts, but none of them worked for me.
For example:
Ionic using CORS and CSRF
Could not verify token
https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/18859
What I've done so far:
I enabled csrf in my SecurityConfiguration in my JHipster project
http
.csrf()
.csrfTokenRepository(CookieCsrfTokenRepository.withHttpOnlyFalse())
.and()
.addFilterBefore(corsFilter, UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter.class)
.exceptionHandling()
.authenticationEntryPoint(problemSupport)
.accessDeniedHandler(problemSupport)
added CORS configuration
cors:
allowed-origins: 'http://localhost:8100, ionic://localhost, http://localhost'
allowed-methods: 'POST, GET, OPTIONS, DELETE, PUT, HEAD'
allowed-headers: 'Origin, X-Requested-With, Content-Type, Accept, x-auth-token, Authorization, X-CSRF-Token, x-xsrf-token, XSRF-TOKEN'
exposed-headers: 'Authorization,Link,X-Total-Count,XSRF-TOKEN, X-XSRF-TOKEN'
allow-credentials: true
max-age: 86400
wrote an interceptor
#Injectable()
export class HttpXSRFInterceptor implements HttpInterceptor {
constructor(private tokenExtractor: HttpXsrfTokenExtractor, private csrfService:CSRFService, private $sessionStorage: SessionStorageService) {
}
intercept(req: HttpRequest<any>, next: HttpHandler): Observable<HttpEvent<any>> {
const headerName = 'XSRF-TOKEN';
const respHeaderName = 'X-XSRF-TOKEN';
let token = this.tokenExtractor.getToken() as string;
if (token !== null && !req.headers.has(headerName)) {
req = req.clone({ headers: req.headers.set(respHeaderName, token) });
req.clone({
withCredentials: true
});
}
return next.handle(req);
}
}
added HttpClientXsrfModule in my app.module.ts and the interceptor
HttpClientXsrfModule.withOptions({
cookieName: 'XSRF-TOKEN',
headerName: 'X-XSRF-TOKEN',
}),
{
provide: HTTP_INTERCEPTORS,
useClass: HttpXSRFInterceptor,
multi: true
},
My Problem:
I dont get a xsrf token when starting my App in the browser, but after I send a post request the token gets set as a cookie.
For example when logging in, the first attempt fails due to the missing token, but the second login request is successful because now the response header for the xsrf token is not null anymore. Furthermore, the token does not update itself even though the server response has a new token in its header.
From my understanding
the first time I get my token should be immediately after loading the start page of my app
the token should be updated after each response from the server (backend) and the updated token is used for the next request
Therefore my problem is that both these issues do not happen and I don't know how to fix it.
I appreciate any help!
cheers
I'm the author of Ionic for JHipster so hopefully, I can help you with this.
First of all, CSRF shouldn't be an issue unless you're running your apps on the same port. In my experience, when you run them on separate ports, your client can't read the cookie. As for CORS, that's not a problem for me when running locally. I believe it's because the CORS settings for the dev profile are wide open. Can you try using the settings from the dev profile in your prod profile and see if it helps?
For reference, they are:
jhipster:
cors:
allowed-origins: '*'
allowed-methods: '*'
allowed-headers: '*'
exposed-headers: 'Authorization,Link,X-Total-Count'
allow-credentials: true
max-age: 1800
If this works, I'd try changing your allowed origins to an array, or just use one. http://localhost:8100 should be all you need if running locally.

Http request working on ionic serve but doesn't work on "ionic cordova run android --device"

I am using Ionic native http to make server requests. The server is hosted on aws and the apis are up and running (verified by postman).
When i do ionic serve the requests go through and work but when i try to run it on device it doesnt work. On inspection i get "net::ERR_CLEARTEXT_NOT_PERMITTED" and post is sent as OPTIONS
ERROR HttpErrorResponse {headers: HttpHeaders, status: 0, statusText: "Unknown Error", url: "http://18.220.143.133/api/login", ok: false, …}
already tried adding to config.xml
login(user: User): Observable<AuthResponse> {
return this.httpClient.post('http://18.220.143.133/api/login', user, {
headers: new HttpHeaders().set('Content-Type', 'application/json'),
}).pipe(
tap(async (res: AuthResponse) => {
if (res.success == true) {
await this.storage.set('user',res.user);
await this.storage.set('ACCESS_TOKEN', res.token);
this.authSubject.next(true);
}
})
);
}
I expect http requests to go through from mobile devices as well.
The same happened to me, until in the config.xml file I added:
<preference name = "android-targetSdkVersion" value = "27" />
It has to do with your CORS for the API call. This may help. Also, since you're using Angular HTTP requests, check here HTTP request from angular will send with method OPTIONS instead of POST.

GET request using Azure app services and Intel Edison

I wanted to read data from an azure app service's easy tables using REST API to an Intel Edison. Before I did the same using Azure Mobile Services and my code was this. PS: I'm programming the device by the Arduino IDE.
void send_request()
{
Serial.println("\nconnecting...");
if (client.connect(server, 80)) {
// POST URI
sprintf(buffer, "GET /tables/%s HTTP/1.1", table_name);
client.println(buffer);
// Host header
sprintf(buffer, "Host: %s", server);
client.println(buffer);
// Azure Mobile Services application key
sprintf(buffer, "X-ZUMO-APPLICATION: %s", ams_key);
client.println(buffer);
// JSON content type
client.println("Content-Type: application/json");
client.print("Content-Length: ");
client.println(strlen(buffer));
// End of headers
client.println();
// Request body
client.println(buffer);
}
else {
Serial.println("connection failed");
}
}
where server name was "genesis-iot-control.azure-mobile.net";
but now authentication has changed and mobile service has been replaced by app service. How can I access them using REST API on Intel Edison?
I had followed this lead but with no solutions.
Any kind of help is appreciated.
The Application Key mechanism has been removed from Mobile Apps.
You'll need to implement-your-own-header check.
See this article for more:
https://github.com/Azure/azure-mobile-apps-net-server/wiki/Implementing-Application-Key
In essence, you send a X-YOUR-CUSTOM-HEADER: SeCreT= from your Edison and check its value against an Application Setting (defined in the Portal) in your Node/C# Mobile App backend code.
Yes, they should have kept the old mechanism going, disable it by default but allow us to turn it back on with an application setting.
An alternative to that would be to either get a Bearer token from Azure AD and use that with Authorization: Bearer ToKen= (but that's eventually going to expire anyway unless you also take care of refreshing it), or build another Web App (or API endpoint in your current one) that you send a secret to, goes out to Azure AD and hands you the Bearer token.
OR if you're really in for a very entertaining afternoon, do the OAuth dance from your Edison!
A curl sample here:
https://ahmetalpbalkan.com/blog/azure-rest-api-with-oauth2/
For a tiny 2KB memory device (like Arduino Uno), storing both Bearer token and refresh token in memory is already game over.
I'd be very interested to learn if anyone has a better/more efficient/more secure approach to do authentication from microcontrollers with Mobile Apps.
Example - using X-SECRET as your custom authentication header:
// Todoitem.js
var azureMobileApps = require('azure-mobile-apps');
// Create a new table definition
var table = azureMobileApps.table();
// Execute only if x-secret header matches our secret
table.read(function (context) {
// All header names are in lowercase in context.req.headers
console.info('Got x-secret header with value: ' +
context.req.headers['x-secret']);
if (context.req.headers['x-secret'] == process.env.SECRET) {
console.info('Secret matches value in App Settings.');
return context.execute();
}
});
// Removed CREATE, UPDATE, DELETE definitions for brevity.
// YOU NEED TO PROTECT THOSE METHODS AS WELL!
// Finally, export the table to the Azure Mobile Apps SDK - it can be
// read using the azureMobileApps.tables.import(path) method
module.exports = table;
Behavior as seen from curl (needless to say you should use HTTPS if your Edison can do that):
$ curl -s -i http://{mobileapp}.azurewebsites.net/tables/todoitem \
-H "ZUMO-API-VERSION: 2.0.0"
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
...
X-Powered-By: Express
{"error":"The item does not exist"}
$ curl -s -i http://{mobileapp}.azurewebsites.net/tables/todoitem \
-H "ZUMO-API-VERSION: 2.0.0" \
-H "X-SECRET: SeCr3T="
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
...
X-Powered-By: Express
[
{
"id": "40b996d6-ec7f-4188-a310-0f02808e7093",
"createdAt": "2016-08-31T11:30:11.955Z",
...
"Yo_node":"Sup"
}
]
Using App Service Editor (Monaco / Visual Studio Online Editor) to code and check output - https://{mobileapp}.scm.azurewebsites.net/dev