How should errors related to NSCoding be handled in Swift?
When an object is initialized using init?(coder:) it may fail to be initialized if the data is invalid. I'd like to catch these errors and appropriately handle them. Why is init?(coder:) not defined as a throwing function in Swift?
NSCoding defines it as Optional:
init?(coder aDecoder: NSCoder)
So it is certainly possible to detect errors.
90% of "why does Swift...?" questions can be answered with "because Cocoa." Cocoa does not define initWithCoder: as returning an error, so it does not translate to throws in Swift. There would be no way to cleanly bridge it to existing code. (NSCoding goes back NeXTSTEP. We've built a lot of software without returning an NSError there. Doesn't mean it might not be nice sometimes, but "couldn't init" has traditionally been enough.)
Check for nil. That means that something failed. That is all the information that is provided.
I've never in practice had to check too deeply that the entire object graph was correct. If it isn't, you're incredibly likely to get other errors anyway, and remember that NSKeyedUnarchiver will raise an ObjC exception (!!!) if it fails to decode. Unless you wrap this in an ObjC #catch, you're going to crash anyway. (And yes, that's pretty crazy, but still true.)
But if I wanted to be extremely careful and make sure that things I expected to be in the archive were really in the archive (even if they were nil), I might do it this way (untested; it compiles but I haven't made sure it really works):
import Foundation
enum DecodeError: ErrorType {
case MissingProperty(String)
case MalformedProperty(String)
}
extension NSCoder {
func encodeOptionalObject(obj: AnyObject?, forKey key: String) {
let data = obj.map{ NSKeyedArchiver.archivedDataWithRootObject($0) } ?? NSData()
self.encodeObject(data, forKey: key)
}
func decodeRequiredOptionalObjectForKey(key: String) throws -> AnyObject? {
guard let any = self.decodeObjectForKey(key) else {
throw DecodeError.MissingProperty(key)
}
guard let data = any as? NSData else {
throw DecodeError.MalformedProperty(key)
}
if data.length == 0 {
return nil // Found nil
}
// But remember, this will raise an ObjC exception if it's malformed data!
guard let prop = NSKeyedUnarchiver.unarchiveObjectWithData(data) else {
throw DecodeError.MalformedProperty(key)
}
return prop
}
}
class MyClass: NSObject, NSCoding {
static let propertyKey = "property"
let property: String?
init(property: String?) {
self.property = property
}
required init?(coder aDecoder: NSCoder) {
do {
property = try aDecoder.decodeRequiredOptionalObjectForKey(MyClass.propertyKey) as? String
} catch {
// do something with error if you want
property = nil
super.init()
return nil
}
super.init()
}
func encodeWithCoder(aCoder: NSCoder) {
aCoder.encodeOptionalObject(property, forKey: MyClass.propertyKey)
}
}
As I said, I've never actually done this in a Cocoa program. If anything were really corrupted in the archive, you're almost certainly going to wind up raising an ObjC exception, so all this error checking is likely overkill. But it does let you distinguish between "nil" and "not in the archive." I just encode the property individually as an NSData and then encode the NSData. If it's nil, I encode an empty NSData.
Related
I've encountered a problem I can't solve myself. I have tried the Internet without any luck.
I'm still pretty new to Swift and coding, and right now following a guide helping me create an app.
Unfortunately, as I can understand, the app was written for Swift 3, and is giving me some issues since I'm using Swift 4.
I have to lines that gives me this warning:
String interpolation produces a debug description for an optional value; did you mean to make this explicit?
Use 'String(describing:)' to silence this warning Fix
Provide a default value to avoid this warning Fix
However, when I click one of Xcode's solutions I get another problem.
If I use the first fix, the app crashes and I get the following message:
Thread 1: Fatal error: Unexpected Segue Identifier;
If I use the second fix I have to assign a default value. And I don't know what this should be.
The whole passage of code is as follows.
It's the line starting with guard let selectedMealCell and the last one after default: that is causing the issues.
override func prepare(for segue: UIStoryboardSegue, sender: Any?) {
super.prepare(for: segue, sender: sender)
switch(segue.identifier ?? "") {
case "AddItem":
os_log("Adding a new meal.", log: OSLog.default, type: .debug)
case "ShowDetail":
guard let mealDetailViewController = segue.destination as? MealViewController else {
fatalError("Unexpected destination: \(segue.destination)")
}
guard let selectedMealCell = sender as? MealTableViewCell else {
fatalError("Unexpected sender: \(sender)")
}
guard let indexPath = tableView.indexPath(for: selectedMealCell) else {
fatalError("The selected cell is not being displayed by the table")
}
let selectedMeal = meals[indexPath.row]
mealDetailViewController.meal = selectedMeal
default:
fatalError("Unexpected Segue Identifier; \(segue.identifier)")
}
}
So, the first suggested fix worked for you. It quieted the compile time warning, although admittedly String(describing:) is a weak solution.
In both cases, you need to unwrap the optional value. For the first case you should use:
guard let selectedMealCell = sender as? MealTableViewCell else {
if let sender = sender {
fatalError("Unexpected sender: \(sender))")
} else {
fatalError("sender is nil")
}
}
and in the second case:
fatalError("Unexpected Segue Identifier; \(segue.identifier ?? "")")
Then you got a runtime error:
"Unexpected Segue Identifier;"
That is telling you that your switch didn't match the first 2 cases and it ran the default case. The crash is caused because your code is explicitly calling fatalError. Your segue.identifier is apparently an empty string.
So your problem is actually in your Storyboard. You need to assign identifiers to your segues. Click on the segue arrows between your view controllers, and assign identifiers "AddItem" and "ShowDetail" to the proper segues. The segue identifier is assigned in the Attributes Inspector on the right in Xcode.
If you are prepared to write an small extension to Optional, it can make the business of inserting the value of an optional variable less painful, and avoid having to write optionalVar ?? "" repeatedly:
Given:
extension Optional: CustomStringConvertible {
public var description: String {
switch self {
case .some(let wrappedValue):
return "\(wrappedValue)"
default:
return "<nil>"
}
}
}
Then you can write:
var optionalWithValue: String? = "Maybe"
var optionalWithoutValue: String?
print("optionalWithValue is \(optionalWithValue.description)")
print("optionalWithoutValue is \(optionalWithoutValue.description)")
which gives:
optionalWithValue is Maybe
optionalWithoutValue is <nil>
You can also write print("value is \(anOptionalVariable)") -- the .description is redundant since print() uses CustomStringConvertible.description anyway -- but although it works you still get the annoying compiler warning.
You can use the following to automatically produce "nil" (or any other String) for nil values and for non-nil values use the description provided by CustomStringConvertible
extension String.StringInterpolation {
mutating func appendInterpolation<T: CustomStringConvertible>(_ value: T?) {
appendInterpolation(value ?? "nil" as CustomStringConvertible)
}
}
For your own types you have to conform to CustomStringConvertible for this to work:
class MyClass: CustomStringConvertible {
var description: String {
return "Whatever you want to print when you use MyClass in a string"
}
}
With this set up, you can simply use your optionals the same way as any other type, without any compiler warnings.
var myClass: MyClass?
myClass = MyClass()
print("myClass is \(myClass)")
The following code archivedTimes() builds successfully in swift4.
And it runs fine on a device with ios10.3 installed.
typealias Time = CMTime
typealias Times = [Time]
static let times: Times = Array<Int64>.init(1...9).map({ CMTime.init(value: $0, timescale: 100) })
static func archivedTimes() -> Data {
return archived(times: times)
}
static func archived(times: Times) -> Data {
let values = times.map({ NSValue.init(time: $0) })
return NSKeyedArchiver.archivedData(withRootObject: values) // ERROR here
// -- ideally would instead be:
// return NSKeyedArchiver.archivedData(withRootObject: times)
// -- but probably not compatible with ios 9.3
}
However, while running it on a device with ios9.3 installed, it crashes saying:
Terminating app due to uncaught exception
'NSInvalidArgumentException', reason: '*** -[NSKeyedArchiver
encodeValueOfObjCType:at:]: this archiver cannot encode structs'
My guess is that it may have something to do with some conflict between the new Codable protocol and the old NSCoder protocol. But I don't know what!
Note that the issue has nothing to do with the array. As archiving a simple CMTime also leads to such error. However, I posted it like this, because archiving the array of CMTime is ultimately my objective.
I believe Codable protocol is only available in ios10, therefore on ios9, CMTime does not implement Codable.
So for ios9, I went with a wrapper class for a CMTime, which implements the NSCoding protocol.
This can be done by importing AVFoundation which declares both the extension to NSValue and to NSCoder so as to encode CMTime.
So then I went with an array of WrappedTime.init($0), instead of an array of NSValue.init(time: $0).
class WrappedTime: NSObject, NSCoding {
enum EncodeKey: String {
case time = "time"
}
let time: CMTime
// ...
func encode(with aCoder: NSCoder) {
aCoder.encode(time, forKey: EncodeKey.time.rawValue)
}
required init?(coder aDecoder: NSCoder) {
time = aDecoder.decodeTime(forKey: EncodeKey.time.rawValue)
}
init(_ time: Time) {
self.time = time
}
}
I am a fan of the guard statements using Swift.
One thing I haven't fully understand is how (or even if) to use it inside a function that expect return value.
Simple example:
func refreshAudioMix() -> AVPlayerItem? {
guard let originalAsset = rootNC.lastAssetLoaded else {
return nil
}
let asset = originalAsset.copy() as! AVAsset
..... return AVPlayerItem ....
}
The issue with this approach is that I need to check the returned value each time. I am trying to understand if am I approaching this correctly or maybe even guard not needed here at all.
Thank you!
I'd say the use of guard isn't wrong. When the objects you're manipulating have a probability of being nil, it seems fair that you return an optional value.
There's one other way (at least, but I don't see others right now) to handle that: write that your function can throw an error and throw it when you find nil in an optional value in a guard statement. You can even create errors so it's easily readable. You can read more about it here
sample :
enum CustomError: Error {
case errorOne
case errorTwo
case errorThree
}
func refreshAudioMix() throws -> AVPlayerItem {
guard let originalAsset = rootNC.lastAssetLoaded else {
throw CustomError.errorOne
}
let asset = originalAsset.copy() as! AVAsset
..... return AVPlayerItem ....
}
I am using NSKeyedUnarchiver to unarchive an object and would like to use the delegates (NSKeyedUnarchiverDelegate), but my delegates are not called. Archiving and Unarchiving is working fine, but the Delegates (unarchiver & unarchiverDidFinish) are not called. Can someone help?
I have the following implementation:
class BlobHandler: NSObject , NSKeyedUnarchiverDelegate{
func load() -> MYOBJECTCLASS{
let data:NSData? = getBlob();
var mykeyedunarchiver:NSKeyedUnarchiver=NSKeyedUnarchiver(forReadingWithData: data!);
mykeyedunarchiver.delegate = self;
let temp=mykeyedunarchiver.decodeObjectForKey("rootobject")
// No delegates are called
if temp==nil {
blobsexists=false;
}else{
objectreturn = temp! as! MYOBJECTCLASS;
return objectreturn;
}
}
func save1(myobject:MYOBJECTCLASS){
let data = NSMutableData()
var keyedarchiver:NSKeyedArchiver=NSKeyedArchiver(forWritingWithMutableData: data);
keyedarchiver.encodeObject(maptheme, forKey: "rootobject");
let bytes = data.bytes;
let len=data.length;
saveblob(bytes);
}
The following delegates, which are also implemented in my Blobhandler, are never called:
func unarchiver(unarchiver: NSKeyedUnarchiver, cannotDecodeObjectOfClassName name: String, originalClasses classNames: [String]) -> AnyClass? {
print("I am in unarchiver !");
return nil;
}
func unarchiverDidFinish(_ unarchiver: NSKeyedUnarchiver){
print("I am in unarchiverDidFinish ! ");
}
I don't know what it was, but its working after a clean and rebuild of the project.
I notice with different cases, that the builds are not in sync sometimes. There is sometimes code, which is in XCode but it is not executed. Sounds unbelievable, but I guess its true.
XCode 7.2
I think the first function is never called since you didn't actually feed a "cannotDecodeObjectOfClassName" at all, since you only did try to unarchive previously archived data. You can try this method(or something requires a class name) to validate your solution(feed a class doesn't conform NSCoding):
unarchiver.decodeObjectOfClass(cls: NSCoding.Protocol, forKey: String)
The second one is a little bit tricky. I've tried this method in a similar situation and it turned out that unarchiverDidFinish only get called when a complete unarchiving job is done and probably before it's destroyed. For example, I had a NSCoding class and the convenience initiator is like
required convenience init?(coder aDecoder: NSCoder) {
let unarchiver = aDecoder as! NSKeyedUnarchiver
let appDelegate = UIApplication.sharedApplication().delegate as! AppDelegate
unarchiver.delegate = appDelegate.uad
let name = unarchiver.decodeObjectForKey(PropertyKey.nameKey) as! String
print(321)
self.init(name: name, photo: photo, rating: rating)
}
uad is an instance of class:
class UAD:NSObject, NSKeyedUnarchiverDelegate {
func unarchiverDidFinish(unarchiver: NSKeyedUnarchiver) {
print(123)
}
}
And in the view controller the loading process is like
func load() -> [User]? {
print(1)
let ret = NSKeyedUnarchiver.unarchiveObjectWithFile(ArchiveURL.path!) as? [User]
print(2)
return ret
}
And the output is like:
1
321
321
321
321
321
123
2
After finishing loading a group of users, the unarchiverDidFinish finally got called once. Notice that this is a class function and an anonymous instance is created to finish this sentence:
NSKeyedUnarchiver.unarchiveObjectWithFile(ArchiveURL.path!) as? [User]
So I really believe that this function only get called before it is destroyed or a group of call back functions is finished.
I am not quite sure if this is the case for you. You may try to make your unarchiver object global and destroy it after your loading is done to see whether this function is called.
Correct me if anything not right.
To make either unarchiverWillFinish: and unarchiverDidFinish: be called properly, we have to invoke finishDecoding when finished decoding.
Once you have the configured decoder object, to decode an object or data item, use the decodeObjectForKey: method. When finished decoding a keyed archive, you should invoke finishDecoding before releasing the unarchiver.
We notify the delegate of the instance of NSKeyedUnarchiver and perform any final operations on the archive through invoking this method. And once this method is invoked, according to Apple's official documentation, our unarchiver cannot decode any further values. We would get following message if we continue to perform any decoding operation after invoked finishDecoding:
*** -[NSKeyedUnarchiver decodeObjectForKey:]: unarchive already finished, cannot decode anything more
It also makes sense for encoding counterparts.
In Swift, I have a custom NSError, I need to get the error userInfo dictionary and add things later, but it is nil in the assign line, but then error.userInfo have an object...
With error.userInfo as nil:
class MyError: NSError {
init(error: NSError) {
var newUserInfo = error.userInfo
...newUserInfo is nil...
super.init(...)
}
}
If I assign it 2 times it works ( I know there's something missing but what?)
init(error: NSError) {
var newUserInfo = error.userInfo
newUserInfo = error.userInfo
...newUserInfo now contains a dictionary...
}
Why?
This looks maybe compiler bug-ey to me, but it's hard to tell without seeing more of your code. At any rate, this sort of thing is easier to debug if you use conditional cast. userInfo in swift is a Dictionary<NSObject: AnyObject>?; if you're getting this from a Cocoa API you can do something like:
if let userInfo = error.userInfo as? [NSObject: NSObject] {
// modify and assign values as necessary
}
this will at least make it clearer where things are breaking.