For a project, I need to write values to an address to display on a screen. This means I need two counters, one for the row value and one for the column value. Usually, when I work with Java, I would use nested for loops. But in Verilog, that logic isn't going to work so well. Any help to figure out how to put a counter inside of a counter?
A set of nested counters can be implemented instead as a series of counters. You have your first counter increment as usual. Then, for some value of the first counter (perhaps when it loops back to 0), you increment the second counter.
(i.e. [0,M-1] -> [1,0], where the first counter ranges {0,M-1})
Related
I can do this using multiple commands in C# for the app I'm creating, but prefer a stored proc to eliminate issues with latency/locks, etc. (hopefully):
I have a table of 10 extensions (important fields):
SortOrder, Extension, IsUsed
First record will be set to IsUsed = true
When calling the stored proc, I need the IsUsed of the NEXT record in sort order to be set to true,the current record that is true set to false. When I hit the last record, rotate back to the first record.
Use Case: I need to rotate through a bank of usable numbers. Multiple people use the app, so cannot reuse. a number within the last 4 minutes (Bank of 10 will suffice, but we can extend if necessary). When the user requests a number, they get the next avail. I can build the table however needed, so any and all options to achieve use case are welcome.
I need to set the flag to true on the 1st record when stored proc is called. All other records should be false.
I have seen this, which is of interest, but doesn't quite answer:
Get "next" row from SQL Server database and flag it in single transaction
If all that you're using this for is to return a number to identify a session, I'd suggest scrapping the whole table idea and letting SQL Server do the work for you.
You can create a SEQUENCE object that will cycle and return the next value for you, without needing to write any code or maintain any tables.
CREATE SEQUENCE dbo.Extension
AS integer
START WITH 5
INCREMENT BY 5
MINVALUE 5
MAXVALUE 50
CYCLE;
This will return the number 5 the first time it's called, up to the number 50 on call number 10, and then start back over. You can adjust the numbers in the code to more or less do whatever you would like, though.
Get the next value like this:
SELECT NEXT VALUE FOR dbo.Extension;
And when/if you need to extend the range:
ALTER SEQUENCE dbo.Extension
MAXVALUE 100;
Play around with the idea on the Rextester demo.
Edit: In light of the comments above and below, I'd still stick with a SEQUENCE, I think.
Every time your code calls the table for an extension, use a query along the lines of this:
SELECT
Extension
FROM
ExtTable
WHERE
SortOrder = NEXT VALUE FOR dbo.Extension;
Functionally, this should do what you're after, again with no code to write or maintain.
Is there a way for me to know if the stream of rows has ended? That is, if the job is on the last row?
What im trying to do is for every 10 rows do something, my problem are the last rows, for example in 115 rows, the last 5 wont happen but i need them to.
There is no built-in functionality in Talend which tells you if you're on the last row. You can work around this using one of the following:
Get the row count beforehand. For instance, if you have a file, you
can use tFileRowCount to count the number of rows, then when you
process your file, you use a variable for your current row
number, and so you can tell if you've reached the last row. If your
data come from a database, you could either issue a query that
returns the total number of rows beforehand, or modify your main
query to return the total number of rows in an additional column and
use that (using ranking functions).
Do some processing after the subjob has ended: There may be situations
where you need a special processing for the last row, you can achieve
this by getting the last row processed by the previous subjob (which
you have already saved, for instance, by putting a tSetGlobalVar
after your target, when your subjob is done, your variable contains the last written value).
Edit
For your use case, what you could do is first store the result of the API call in memory using tHashOutput, then read it with a tHashInput in order to process it, and you'll know then how many rows you have retrieved using tHashOutput's global variable tHashOuput_X_NB_LINE.
I have a row of recurring values and I want to compare them with one another. For example, the first value is compared with the whole row and if there is a match it's saved in one variable; if not, then a new variable is created. Similarly, the second value will be compared, and so on.
I cant seem to work it out. Example:
A=[5.34
1.20
4.54
3.68
5.34
4.54]
I want the same values to be stored in one variable and the next values like 1.20 to be stored in another variable, and so on
Having some problems in a job, and I suspect it is due to a lack of understanding of tJavaFlex. I am generating 10 rows in this test job, and am generating loop inside a tJavaFlex:
So there are 10 rows coming in, and a loop in the Start and End section. I was expecting that for each row coming in, it would generate 10 identical rows coming out. And that I would see iterations 0,1,2,3....9 for each row.
What I got was this. This looks to me like the entire job is running 10 times, and so I have 100 random values coming through the flow from the tRowGenerator.
If I move the for loop into the Main Code section, I get close to the behaviour I was expecting. I am expecting each row when it comes in to be repeated 10 times, and for 1 row coming in to produce 10 output rows. What I get is this.
But even then my tLogRow is only generating one row for each 10 iterations it seems (look at the tLogRow output after iteration 9 above why not 10 items?). I had thought I would be getting 10 rows for each single row coming in and I would see this in the tLogRow.
What I need to do is take a value from a field coming in, do some reg exp parsing and split into an array, and then for each item in the array create lines in the output flow. i.e. 1 row coming in can be turned into x number of rows coming out using a string.split() method.
Can someone explain the behaviour above, and also advise on the best approach to get one value coming in, do some java manipulation and then generate multiple rows coming out?
Any advice appreciated.
Yes you don't use it correctly.
The initial part is for initiate variable. (executed one time before the first tow)
In the principal you put your loop (executed one time at each row)
In the final you store in global variable for example.(executed one time after the last row)
The principal code will be executed at each row in a tjavaflex. So don't put a for loop inside you can do like the example in the screen.
You tjavaflex comportement is normal. you have ten row so each row the for loop wil be executed 10 time (i<10)
You can use it like :
You dont need to create your own loop.
By putting the for loop in the Start code, your main code will be triggered by the loop and by incoming rows, and it will be executed n*r times.
The behaviour of subjob that contains a tJavaFlex, reveils that component before tJavaFlex is included into its starting code, and the after component is included in the ending code, but that may depend to many conditions like data propagation and trigger type.
start code :
System.out.print("tJavaFlex is starting...");
int i = 0;
Main code :
i++;
System.out.print("tJavaFlex inside Main Code...iteration:"+i);
row8.ITEM_NAME = row7.ITEM_NAME;
row8.ITEM_COUNT = row7.ITEM_COUNT;
End code :
System.out.print("tJavaFlex is ending...");
System.out.print(row7.ITEM_NAME);
Instead of main flow in row5, try using iterate flow to connect tJavaFlex
I'm getting info from a GPS service giving an array of addresses, each one containing a duration of time in seconds. So from point A to Point B the time duration is 250 seconds and from Point B to C 100 seconds. It does not add the times together to make a complete route time, I have to do that on my own. In above example I would want to see 250 on the first row and 350 on the 2nd row etc. So I am calculating the values together to get the true total for each address by adding them from row to row right inside my table. I grab each address's value from the route's array based on my table index.path row. I populate that into a table and it works beautifuly as so:
let secondsToAdd = Int(self.thisRoute.ttaForSubleg(UInt(indexPath.row)).duration)
duration += secondsToAdd
However when table is scrolled up and down and cells are dequeued and re-queued values are getting added to again and again. I need to reset the duration somewhere to 0 as so:
duration = 0
but I'm stumped as to where!
Without another solution, my only way to do this I think would be to build and maintain an array separately outside the table instead of building it inside the table as I go along. If somebody has a better solution please post!