I'm experiencing some strange behaviour with a ColdFusion 11 server, which (among other things) publishes some web services accessed via both SOAP and HTTP. The server itself is Windows 2012, running IIS. Actual folder config is as follows:
IIS has two websites configured, 'BOB' and 'BOB_Services'. Both have been configured with the CF Server Config tool so that CF handles .cfc, .cfm files. They share a common CFIDE config.
BOB's root is I:/inetpub/BOB
BOB_Services's root is I:/inetpub/BOB_Services
There is a folder mapping configured in CF Admin from '/' to 'I:/inetpub/BOB'. Don't ask me why, no one seems to know.
Normally there is a services.cfc file in BOB_Services ONLY. Yesterday we accidentally copied that same file into the BOB root folder, and all of our SOAP services using BOB_Services\services.cfc started throwing errors. Yet I can query the same webservice via HTTP (eg. using http://bob/services.cfc?method=function1¶m1=0 ....etc) and get a valid result.
This is a reference answer in case anyone else comes across this strange behaviour.
It appears that when BOB_Services/services.cfc is called using HTTP GET, the folder mapping
'/' -> 'I:/inetpub/BOB'
is ignored and the actual file used to process the request is I:/inetpub/BOB_Services/services.cfc.
When a function in BOB_Services/services.cfc is called using a SOAP client, the folder mapping is invoked and the file used to process the request is I:/inetpub/BOB/services.cfc, IF IT EXISTS. If it does not exist, the file I:/inetpub/BOB_Services/services.cfc is used as expected.
This behaviour appears to be entirely repeatable - I can make a SOAP request, get one result, change the mapping, make another request and get the other result.
Related
I am trying to use JasperReports integration for the first time. I am using the included Jetty server, Oracle database XE 18c and Windows 7.
I am following the quick start guide https://github.com/daust/JasperReportsIntegration/blob/main/src/doc/github/installation-quickstart.md
I downloaded the zip folder, configuired database access through adding schema credentials in application.properties file as follows...
[datasource:default] type=jdbc
url=jdbc:oracle:thin:#localhost:1521:XEPDB1 username=hr password=hr
this parameter is limiting access to the integration for the specified
list of ip addresses, e.g.:
ipAddressesAllowed=127.0.0.1,10.10.10.10,192.168.178.31 if the list is
empty, ALL addresses are allowed.
Then I deployed the jri.war file successfully. Then I started the server successfully as well. But when I tried to test it through http://localhost:8090/, I got the following page, and I do not know if that's the norm or there's something wrong...
I need to know if testing is successful, and what's meant by "context" here?
Thanks
You deployed the jri.war to the context path /jri, this isn't an error, and is quite normal.
Just access your webapp via http://localhost:8080/jri/
Previously I was running ColdFusion 10 configured with Apache on my localhost. I am using a different machine now and I am now using ColdFusion 11's built in web server. I have imported settings from an archived ".car" file. My app uses ColdFusion Rest services which were working on my previous machine. I have setup the rest service on this new machine and I am using the same service name but with a different absolute path to directory.
for example:
previous directory: - D:/foo/bar/api/v2
current directory: - C:/foo/bar/baz/api/v2
The rest service is registered and gets refreshed successfully in the ColdFusion Administrator. But when I try to access the API path on localhost, I get this 500 error :
This page isn’t working
localhost is currently unable to handle this request.
HTTP ERROR 500
Application v2 could not be found. The specific sequence of files included or processed is: ''''
Our problem with ColdFusion 10 is that there is the /rest/ URL binded. In our application we have a rest service ourselves. Since ColdFusion 10 it will not work because the URL is already defined and our requests won't get through. Is there any way to disable /rest/ completely? Or do we have to rename our service?
I also tried to edit the axis2.xml file
<parameter name="disableREST" locked="true">true</parameter>
<parameter name="restPath">restdisabled</parameter>
But that won't effect anything on the server.
Thanks in advance!
Disclaimer: I have not tried this and do not have a ColdFusion 10 installation nearby to verify
There is a servlet mapping defined in the web.xml file that defines how to handle /rest/ requests for ColdFusion. So you should be able to rename that URI to something else for your implementation. The web.xml file is located under the wwwroot\WEB-INF directory on your ColdFusion server.
I found some reference to this here - Getting started with RESTful web services in ColdFusion (under the Accessing a REST Service through HTTP section)
That documentation also mentioned updating the uriworkermap.properties file. Here is an excerpt from that page:
rest in the URL specifies that the request is for a REST service. ColdFusion has a servlet mapping for the same and would direct the request to the servlet that handles REST service. If there is a directory in the server webroot with the same name, you must update the servlet mapping in web.xml file inside wwwroot\WEB-INF directory. Also, you must update the same mapping in the uriworkermap.properties file located under the config\wsconfig\1 of the server directory.
You will need to restart the ColdFusion service after making any changes to these files.
While this will not disable the functionality in ColdFusion it will allow your services to respond under the /rest/ URI because ColdFusion will be listening under a different one that you define.
I'm trying to generate a Perl library to connect to a WebService. This webservice is in an HTTPS server and my user has access to it.
I've executed wsdl2perl.pl several times, with different options, and it always fails with the message: Unauthorized at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/SOAP/WSDL/Expat/Base.pm line 73.
The thing is, when I don't give my user/pass as arguments, it doesn't even asks for them.
I've read [SOAP::WSDL::Manual::Cookbook] (http://search.cpan.org/~mkutter/SOAP-WSDL-2.00.10/lib/SOAP/WSDL/Manual/Cookbook.pod) and done what it says about HTTPS: Crypt::SSLeay is instaleld, and both SOAP::WSDL::Transport::HTTP and SOAP::Transport::HTTP are modified.
Can you give any hint about what may be going wrong?
Can you freely access the WSDL file from your web browser?
Can someone else in your network access it without any problems?
Maybe the web server hosting the WSDL file requires Basic or some other kind of Authentication...
If not necessary ,I don't recommend you to use perl as a web service client .As you know ,perl is a open-source language,although it do support soap protocol,but its support do not seem very standard.At first,its document is not very clear.And also ,its support sometimes is limited.At last,bug always exists here and there.
So ,if you have to use wsdl2perl,you can use komodo to step into the code to find out what happened.This is just what I used to do when using perl as a web service client.You know ,in the back of https is SSL,so ,if your SSL is based on certificate-authorized,you have to set up your cert path and the list of trusted server cert.You'd better use linux-based firefox to have a test.As I know ,you can set up firefox's cert path and firefox's trusted cert list.If firefox can communicated with your web service server succefully,then,it's time to debug your perl client.
To debug situations with Perl and SOAP, interpose a web proxy so you can see exactly what data is being passed and what response comes back from the server. You were getting a 401 Not authorized, I expect, but there may be more detail in the server response.
Both Fiddler http://docs.telerik.com/fiddler and Charles proxy https://www.charlesproxy.com/ can do this.
The error message you quote seems to be from this line :
die $response->message() if $response->code() ne '200';
and in HTTP world, Unauthorized is clearly error code 401, which means your website asks for a username and password (most probably, some website may "hijack" this error code to cater for other conditions like a filter on the source IP).
Do you have them?
If so, you can
after wdsl2perl has run, find in the created files where set_proxy() is called and change the URL in there to include the username and password like that : ...->set_proxy('http://USERNAME:PASSWORD#www.example.com/...')
or your in code, after instantiating the SOAP::WSDL object, call service(SERVICENAME) on it (for each service you have defined in your WSDL file), which gives you a new object, on which you call transport() to access the underlying transport object on which you can call proxy() with the URL as formatted above (yes it is proxy() here and set_proxy() above); or you call credentials() instead of proxy() and you pass 4 strings:
'HOSTNAME:PORT'
the realm, as given by the webserver but I think you can put anything
the username
the password
I have a link on my website to the standard publish page generated by Visual Studio. My concern is that if anybody finds out the URL to that page, they can download my software. Sure, I could password protect the page with the link, but it still would not be protecting the download URL. Are there any ways to secure the click once upload? I have looked around, and it seems like I am stuck in this sense.
Public URL is a security issue in ClickOnce Deployment. However, there is a solution for your problem if your web server has windows and .NET installed. Tell me if you have one ? I will have to come up with another workaround for Linux web server in case you have that.
Brief
Firstly, a bit of information about ClickOnce deployment. When you deploy the application, the GET requests on the server made are (assuming WebDir is the publish directory on the server)
G-1. GET /WebDir/setup.exe (Initial download)
G-2. GET /WebDir/MyApp.Application (setup.exe -url request)
G-3. GET /WebDir/MyApp.Application (.application deployment provider URL request)
G-4. GET /WebDir/Application Files/MyApp_1_0_0_0/MyApp.exe.manifest (Application manifest request)
G-5. GET /WebDir/Application Files/MyApp_1_0_0_0/MyApp.exe.deployand other .deploy files ... (Application file requests)
Implementation
Now, the solution is to intercept these file requests on the server. On IIS, you can attach a custom HTTPHandler and handle the request. On Apache, you can redirect requests to a PHP code using .htaccess files. Apart from this, you will have to generate unique identifier uid for client instances downloaded from the server (can be your license key) and put that in the deployment provider URL query parameters.
Directory Structure
Create an "Application" folder inside your WebDir and restrict access to /WebDir/Application/. Rest everything can be there inside /WebDir/
File Requests
So here's what you do on a Apache web server hosted on a windows machine:
Create a custom download page or use the one created from publishing the application using Visual Studio (but you will have to edit it manually!). Let's assume that page is /WebDir/Download.php
After authenticating user from Download.php, you have to send setup.exe from your code (can do it with readfile() in PHP) to the user. However, the catch is bootstrapper (setup.exe) after installing will do a GET request [G-2]. Don't forget now, that you have to validate this file request. So basically you change the "setup.exe -url" property to include uid before returning the file. For eg: change it to /WebDir/uid/MyApp.Application [G-2]. You can use MsiStuff.exe to change the URL property for the bootstrapper.
Using a .htaccess file, rewrite [G-2] to /WebDir/Handler.php?user=uid. From Handler.php, you can check if it is a valid uid. If it is valid, you will have to include the uid in the deployment provider URL and "Dependent Assemblies Path" in deployment manifest so that if an upgrade request comes (It essentially requests the deployment manifest), you can validate the user there too. Add uid to query string parameters. For eg: change it to /WebDir/MyApp.application?user=uid [G-3]. Don't forget that you will have to resign the manifests once you modify them. Use Mage or write your own code to do that.
So finally, the GET requests on the server will be (assuming uid=1f3rd)
G-1. GET /WebDir/Download.phpAction: return setup.exe with the -url changed
G-2. GET /WebDir/Application/setup.exe/1f3rd/MyApp.ApplicationAction: redirect, validate user, change URL, re-sign and return file
G-3. GET /WebDir/Application/setup.exe/MyApp.Application?user=1f3rdAction: redirect, validate user and return file
G-4. GET /WebDir/Application/1f3rd/Application Files/MyApp_1_0_0_0/MyApp.exe.manifestAction: redirect, validate user and return file
G-5. GET /WebDir/Application/1f3rd/Application Files/MyApp_1_0_0_0/MyApp.exe.deployand other .deploy files ...Action: redirect, validate user and return file
Pros
Application is successfully deployed and upgraded only if all the requests have a valid uid in the URL present.
You can now identify different instances of application on client systems. You can track the update history, do a selective version upgrade/downgrade and much more !
Cons
You will need a windows server to implement the above since you need mage.exe | your-own-.NET-code-signing-application and Msistuff.exe.
You may have minor performance issues since you are performing validation on every file request. You can choose to skip validation on .manifest and .deploy file requests.
You will have to ensure proper security for companies certificate which will be present on the web server for signing (You can store it on the server local file-system if you have the full server to yourself. In that case, it is fine unless somebody breaks into machine itself !)
If you want me to make something clear or explain in detail, feel free to ask. In case you have suggestions for modification to the above, post that too.
I will write a detailed CodeProject article if I have spare time someday.