I have an NSTimer that is set up for 150 seconds, and when it gets down to 0, it should stop counting and end the game I'm creating. But, when I call the invalidate() it will just keep going. I also have it so that it should print "Timer stopped" when the timer is invalidated but no luck. Is there another way to to this?
Here is my code:
import SpriteKit
var countDown: NSTimer()
class GameScene: SKScene {
override func didMoveToView(view:SKView)
countDown = NSTimer.scheduledTimerWithTimeInterval(1.0, target: self, selector: "subtractTime", userInfo: nil, repeats: true)
}
override func update() {
if countDown == 0 {
countDown.invalidate()
print("Timer stopped")
}
This is because you compare countDown with Int value. If you need invalidate timer when it's fired - do it inside subtractTime method.
You also mentioned that you setup your timer for 150 seconds. But in code example it is 1.0. So I suggest you want your selector be called 150 times with one second delay. If so, you could simply add counter variable:
var counter = 0
...
func subtractTime() {
counter += 1
if counter == 150 {
countDown.invalidate()
countDown = nil // also add this line to escape retain cycle
return
}
...
}
Related
I am using a Swift Timer which works fine until I try putting it into a loop. I start the timer and after it reaches zero the selector calls a method to invalidate the timer. I want this to be repeated for 3 times and have a counter that counts the number of iterations this goes through.
func start() {
var interval = 0
repeat {
interval += 1
print ("Interval \(interval)")
timer = Timer.scheduledTimer(timeInterval: 1.0, target: self, selector: #selector(fireTimer), userInfo: nil, repeats: true)
} while (interval <= 3)
}
#objc func fireTimer() {
timeOn -= 1
if timeOn == 0 {
print("timer done")
timer?.invalidate()
}
}
The output is:
Interval 1
Interval 2
Interval 3
timer done
It seems as if 3 timers are started simultaneously and then the timer.invalidate stops all of them. What I want is to have the timers start independently and run sequentially. Notice the repeat/while loop. Any suggestions appreciated.
You said:
It seems as if 3 timers are started simultaneously and then the timer.invalidate stops all of them.
No. All three timers are running and when you call invalidate you're just invalidating the last one. Each time you set timer, you are discarding your reference to the prior one. Because you discarded your references to your first two timers, you now have no way to stop them. (Add a print statement in fireTimer and you will see the other two continue to fire after you cancel the one timer.) And because you invalidated on timer when timeOn was zero, the other two will keep firing, with timeOn now having negative values, and the == 0 test will never succeed again.
Instead, you could let your timer handler routine to accept a parameter, the timer reference. That way each one would be able to invalidate itself.
E.g.
func start() {
for interval in 0..< 3 { // if you really want three timers, then for loop is easiest
print ("Interval \(interval)")
Timer.scheduledTimer(timeInterval: 1, target: self, selector: #selector(fireTimer(_:)), userInfo: nil, repeats: true)
}
}
#objc func fireTimer(_ timer: Timer) {
print(Date(), "tick")
timeOn -= 1
if timeOn <= 0 {
print("timer done")
timer.invalidate()
}
}
Now that is exceedingly confusing have multiple repeating timers all updating the same timeOn property. I changed the if test to be <= 0 to address that problem.
It begs the question why you would want multiple repeating timers firing at basically the same time. E.g. every second, timeOn is being reduced by three. Is that really the intent? Generally you would only want one repeating timer.
This process of scheduling a bunch of timers also begs the question of how you will cancel them when the object in question is deallocated. I guess you could keep an array of them, but it seems very convoluted way of doing it. The other approach is to use the block-based timer with [weak self] reference (to prevent strong reference cycle), and then each can check to see if self is nil and if so, invalidate itself:
func start() {
for interval in 0..< 3 { // if you really want three timers, then for loop is easiest
print ("Interval \(interval)")
Timer.scheduledTimer(withTimeInterval: 1, repeats: true) { [weak self] timer in
guard let self = self else {
timer.invalidate()
return
}
self.fireTimer(timer, interval: interval)
}
}
}
func fireTimer(_ timer: Timer, interval: Int) {
print(Date(), "tick", interval)
timeOn -= 1
if timeOn <= 0 {
print("timer done")
timer.invalidate()
}
}
But I am unclear why you would want multiple repeating timers at all.
You said:
I don’t really want 3 timers. I want the timer block to run three times, sequentially.
Then just create a repeating timer that will run three times and then invalidate itself:
weak var timer: Timer? // weak because when you schedule the timer, the RunLoop keeps a strong reference
deinit {
timer?.invalidate() // in case the timer is still running after you dismiss this object/controller
}
func start() {
timer?.invalidate() // in case you accidentally called this previously, cancel any prior timer (before you lose a reference to it)
var counter = 0
timer = Timer.scheduledTimer(withTimeInterval: 1, repeats: true) { [weak self] timer in
counter += 1
if counter >= 3 { timer.invalidate() }
self?.doSomething(counter) // do whatever you want here
}
}
Key things to note:
I used single repeating timer.
I used closure based rendition with [weak self] to avoid the strong reference cycle of the selector-based rendition of Timer.
If you’d like to keep a reference to the timer so that you can invalidate it as soon as the parent object is deallocated, keep your own weak reference to it.
In start, I invalidate any prior timer, which is obviously unnecessary if you make sure that you call start once and only once. But, again, it is a solid defensive programming pattern to invalidate any prior timer before you replace any old reference with a new Timer reference.
I have been trying to create a delay of one or two seconds on a self repeating timer. This is how I create the timer:
currentThread = Timer.scheduledTimer(timeInterval: 0.001, target: self, selector: #selector(Movement.updatePosition), userInfo: nil, repeats: true)
So the timer constantly runs the method updatePosition(). However, I have an if statement within that method where I would like to have the timer be delayed for a few seconds:
if distance <= respawnDistance * 0.1 {
// Delay timer for 1 second
}
And I was thinking that I could do this:
currentThread.invalidate()
And then just create another Timer that runs after 1 second, which leads to the reactivation of the previous timer. However, I think that would be inefficient if there is a way to sleep the current Timer?
NSTimer is not that accurate. Its maximum resolution is somewhere around 50 - 100ms. Anyhow, you can add a variable to control the firing of the timer:
var doNotUpdate = false
if distance <= respawnDistance * 0.1 {
doNotUpdate = true
DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter(deadline: .now() + 1.0) {
doNotUpdate = false
}
}
func updatePosition() {
if doNotUpdate { return }
// update your position
}
I am making a game similar to pitfall in Swift and I am trying to make a boolean that shows whether the player is jumping or not. I want the boolean to become false after 3 seconds so that the player moves down again. I have tried using a delay function but it didn't work.
Thanks in advance.
Try this:
let delay = 3 // seconds to wait before firing
DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter(deadline: DispatchTime.now() + .seconds(delay)) {
// set your var here
}
Replace DispatchQueue.main with whichever queue you're using.
The follow code snippet describes Player objects that have a isJumping property. When it's set to true (using didSet), it automatically starts a timer that after 3 seconds resets isJumping to false.
Please not that the snippet makes use of a NSTimer extensions for comfortably starting and handling the timer. Credits to https://gist.github.com/natecook1000/b0285b518576b22c4dc8
class Player {
private var resetJumpingTimer: NSTimer?
var isJumping: Bool = false {
didSet {
resetJumpingTimer?.invalidate() // Stops the timer in case it was already started
if isJumping {
self.resetJumpingTimer = NSTimer.schedule(3.0) { [weak self] _ in
self?.isJumping = false
}
}
}
}
}
extension NSTimer {
class func schedule(delay delay: NSTimeInterval, handler: NSTimer! -> Void) -> NSTimer {
let fireDate = delay + CFAbsoluteTimeGetCurrent()
let timer = CFRunLoopTimerCreateWithHandler(kCFAllocatorDefault, fireDate, 0, 0, 0, handler)
CFRunLoopAddTimer(CFRunLoopGetCurrent(), timer, kCFRunLoopCommonModes)
return timer
}
}
After the player jumps, you create an NSTimer.
Declare global variables let timer = NSTimer() and var seconds = 3
Then after the player jumps you set the timer:
timer = NSTimer.scheduledTimerWithTimeInterval(1.0, target: self, selector: #selector(YOUR_CLASS_NAME.updateTimer()), userInfo: nil, repeats: true)
Then the method:
func updateTimer() {
seconds -= 1
if seconds == 0 {
// Do stuff
timer.invalidate() // Stop the timer
seconds == 3 // Reset # of seconds
}
Give it a try.
func update() {
seconds -= 1
if seconds <= 0 {
score = 5
}
}
You may want to make it <= if you don't invalidate the timer. That way it stays the variable, etc.
I am trying to build a reliable solid system to build a metronome in my app using SWIFT.
I Have built what seems to be a solid system using NSTimer so far.. The only issue I am having right now is when the timer starts the first 2 clicks are off time but then it catches into a solid timeframe.
Now after all my research I have seen people mention you should use other Audio tools not relying on NSTimer.. Or if you choose use NSTimer then it should be on its own thread. Now I see many confused by this Including myself and I would love to get down to the bottom of this Metronome business and get this solved and share it with all those who are struggling.
UPDATE
So I have implemented and cleaned up at this point after the feedback I had last recieved. At this point here is how my code is structured. Its playing back. But I am still getting 2 fast clicks in the beginning and then it settles in.
I apologize on my ignorance for this one. I hope I am on the right path.
I currently am prototyping another method as well. Where I have a very small audio file with one click and dead space at the end of it with the correct duration until for a loop point for specific tempos. I am looping this back and works very well. But the only thing Is I dont get to detect the loop points for visual updates so I have my basic NStimer just detecting the timing intervals underneath the audio being processed and it seems to matchup very well throughout and no delay. But I still would rather get it all with this NSTimer. If you can easily spot my error would be great for one more kick in the right direction and I am sure it can work soon! Thanks so much.
//VARIABLES
//AUDIO
var clickPlayer:AVAudioPlayer = AVAudioPlayer()
let soundFileClick = NSBundle.mainBundle().pathForResource("metronomeClick", ofType: ".mp3")
//TIMERS
var metroTimer = NSTimer()
var nextTimer = NSTimer()
var previousClick = CFAbsoluteTimeGetCurrent() //When Metro Starts Last Click
//Metro Features
var isOn = false
var bpm = 60.0 //Tempo Used for beeps, calculated into time value
var barNoteValue = 4 //How Many Notes Per Bar (Set To Amount Of Hits Per Pattern)
var noteInBar = 0 //What Note You Are On In Bar
//********* FUNCTIONS ***********
func startMetro()
{
MetronomeCount()
barNoteValue = 4 // How Many Notes Per Bar (Set To Amount Of Hits Per Pattern)
noteInBar = 0 // What Note You Are On In Bar
isOn = true //
}
//Main Metro Pulse Timer
func MetronomeCount()
{
previousClick = CFAbsoluteTimeGetCurrent()
metroTimer = NSTimer.scheduledTimerWithTimeInterval(60.0 / bpm, target: self, selector: Selector ("MetroClick"), userInfo: nil, repeats: true)
nextTimer = NSTimer(timeInterval: (60.0/Double(bpm)) * 0.01, target: self, selector: "tick:", userInfo: ["bpm":bpm], repeats: true)
}
func MetroClick()
{
tick(nextTimer)
}
func tick(timer:NSTimer)
{
let elapsedTime:CFAbsoluteTime = CFAbsoluteTimeGetCurrent() - previousClick
let targetTime:Double = 60/timer.userInfo!.objectForKey("bpm")!.doubleValue!
if (elapsedTime > targetTime) || (abs(elapsedTime - targetTime) < 0.003)
{
previousClick = CFAbsoluteTimeGetCurrent()
//Play the click here
if noteInBar == barNoteValue
{
clickPlayer.play() //Play Sound
noteInBar = 1
}
else//If We Are Still On Same Bar
{
clickPlayer.play() //Play Sound
noteInBar++ //Increase Note Value
}
countLabel.text = String(noteInBar) //Update UI Display To Show Note We Are At
}
}
A metronome built purely with NSTimer will not be very accurate, as Apple explains in their documentation.
Because of the various input sources a typical run loop manages, the effective resolution of the time interval for a timer is limited to on the order of 50-100 milliseconds. If a timer’s firing time occurs during a long callout or while the run loop is in a mode that is not monitoring the timer, the timer does not fire until the next time the run loop checks the timer.
I would suggest using an NSTimer that fires on the order of 50 times per desired tick (for example, if you would like a 60 ticks per minute, you would have the NSTimeInterval to be about 1/50 of a second.
You should then store a CFAbsoluteTime which stores the "last tick" time, and compare it to the current time. If the absolute value of the difference between the current time and the "last tick" time is less than some tolerance (I would make this about 4 times the number of ticks per interval, for example, if you chose 1/50 of a second per NSTimer fire, you should apply a tolerance of around 4/50 of a second), you can play the "tick."
You may need to calibrate the tolerances to get to your desired accuracy, but this general concept will make your metronome a lot more accurate.
Here is some more information on another SO post. It also includes some code that uses the theory I discussed. I hope this helps!
Update
The way you are calculating your tolerances is incorrect. In your calculations, notice that the tolerance is inversely proportional to the square of the bpm. The problem with this is that the tolerance will eventually be less than the number of times the timer fires per second. Take a look at this graph to see what I mean. This will generate problems at high BPMs. The other potential source of error is your top bounding condition. You really don't need to check an upper limit on your tolerance, because theoretically, the timer should have already fired by then. Therefore, if the elapsed time is greater than the theoretical time, you can fire it regardless. (For example if the elapsed time is 0.1s and and the actual time with the true BPM should be 0.05s, you should go ahead and fire the timer anyways, no matter what your tolerance is).
Here is my timer "tick" function, which seems to work fine. You need to tweak it to fit your needs (with the downbeats, etc.) but it works in concept.
func tick(timer:NSTimer) {
let elapsedTime:CFAbsoluteTime = CFAbsoluteTimeGetCurrent() - lastTick
let targetTime:Double = 60/timer.userInfo!.objectForKey("bpm")!.doubleValue!
if (elapsedTime > targetTime) || (abs(elapsedTime - targetTime) < 0.003) {
lastTick = CFAbsoluteTimeGetCurrent()
# Play the click here
}
}
My timer is initialized like so: nextTimer = NSTimer(timeInterval: (60.0/Double(bpm)) * 0.01, target: self, selector: "tick:", userInfo: ["bpm":bpm], repeats: true)
Ok! You can't get things right basing on time, because somehow we need to deal with DA converters and their frequency - samplerate. We need to tell them the exact sample to start play the sound. Add a single view iOS app with two buttons start and stop and insert this code into ViewController.swift. I keep things simple and it's just an Idea of how we can do this. Sorry for forcing try... This one is made with swift 3. Also check out my project on GitHub https://github.com/AlexShubin/MetronomeIdea
Swift 3
import UIKit
import AVFoundation
class Metronome {
var audioPlayerNode:AVAudioPlayerNode
var audioFile:AVAudioFile
var audioEngine:AVAudioEngine
init (fileURL: URL) {
audioFile = try! AVAudioFile(forReading: fileURL)
audioPlayerNode = AVAudioPlayerNode()
audioEngine = AVAudioEngine()
audioEngine.attach(self.audioPlayerNode)
audioEngine.connect(audioPlayerNode, to: audioEngine.mainMixerNode, format: audioFile.processingFormat)
try! audioEngine.start()
}
func generateBuffer(forBpm bpm: Int) -> AVAudioPCMBuffer {
audioFile.framePosition = 0
let periodLength = AVAudioFrameCount(audioFile.processingFormat.sampleRate * 60 / Double(bpm))
let buffer = AVAudioPCMBuffer(pcmFormat: audioFile.processingFormat, frameCapacity: periodLength)
try! audioFile.read(into: buffer)
buffer.frameLength = periodLength
return buffer
}
func play(bpm: Int) {
let buffer = generateBuffer(forBpm: bpm)
self.audioPlayerNode.play()
self.audioPlayerNode.scheduleBuffer(buffer, at: nil, options: .loops, completionHandler: nil)
}
func stop() {
audioPlayerNode.stop()
}
}
class ViewController: UIViewController {
var metronome:Metronome
required init?(coder aDecoder: NSCoder) {
let fileUrl = Bundle.main.url(forResource: "Click", withExtension: "wav")
metronome = Metronome(fileURL: fileUrl!)
super.init(coder: aDecoder)
}
#IBAction func StartPlayback(_ sender: Any) {
metronome.play(bpm: 120)
}
#IBAction func StopPlayback(_ sender: Any) {
metronome.stop()
}
}
Thanks to the great work already done on this question by vigneshv & CakeGamesStudios, I was able to put together the following, which is an expanded version of the metronome timer discussed here.
Some highlights:
It's updated for Swift v5
It uses a Grand Central Dispatch timer to run on a separate queue, rather than just a regular NSTimer (see here for more details)
It uses more calculated properties for clarity
It uses delegation, to allow for any arbitrary 'tick' action to be handled by the delegate class (be that playing a sound from AVFoundation, updating the display, or whatever else - just remember to set the delegate property after creating the timer). This delegate would also be the one to distinguish beat 1 vs. others, but that'd be easy enough to add within this class itself if desired.
It has a % to Next Tick property, which could be used to update a UI progress bar, etc.
Any feedback on how this can be improved further is welcome!
protocol BPMTimerDelegate: class {
func bpmTimerTicked()
}
class BPMTimer {
// MARK: - Properties
weak var delegate: BPMTimerDelegate? // The class's delegate, to handle the results of ticks
var bpm: Double { // The speed of the metronome ticks in BPM (Beats Per Minute)
didSet {
changeBPM() // Respond to any changes in BPM, so that the timer intervals change accordingly
}
}
var tickDuration: Double { // The amount of time that will elapse between ticks
return 60/bpm
}
var timeToNextTick: Double { // The amount of time until the next tick takes place
if paused {
return tickDuration
} else {
return abs(elapsedTime - tickDuration)
}
}
var percentageToNextTick: Double { // Percentage progress from the previous tick to the next
if paused {
return 0
} else {
return min(100, (timeToNextTick / tickDuration) * 100) // Return a percentage, and never more than 100%
}
}
// MARK: - Private Properties
private var timer: DispatchSourceTimer!
private lazy var timerQueue = DispatchQueue.global(qos: .utility) // The Grand Central Dispatch queue to be used for running the timer. Leverages a global queue with the Quality of Service 'Utility', which is for long-running tasks, typically with user-visible progress. See here for more info: https://www.raywenderlich.com/5370-grand-central-dispatch-tutorial-for-swift-4-part-1-2
private var paused: Bool
private var lastTickTimestamp: CFAbsoluteTime
private var tickCheckInterval: Double {
return tickDuration / 50 // Run checks many times within each tick duration, to ensure accuracy
}
private var timerTolerance: DispatchTimeInterval {
return DispatchTimeInterval.milliseconds(Int(tickCheckInterval / 10 * 1000)) // For a repeating timer, Apple recommends a tolerance of at least 10% of the interval. It must be multiplied by 1,000, so it can be expressed in milliseconds, as required by DispatchTimeInterval.
}
private var elapsedTime: Double {
return CFAbsoluteTimeGetCurrent() - lastTickTimestamp // Determine how long has passed since the last tick
}
// MARK: - Initialization
init(bpm: Double) {
self.bpm = bpm
self.paused = true
self.lastTickTimestamp = CFAbsoluteTimeGetCurrent()
self.timer = createNewTimer()
}
// MARK: - Methods
func start() {
if paused {
paused = false
lastTickTimestamp = CFAbsoluteTimeGetCurrent()
timer.resume() // A crash will occur if calling resume on an already resumed timer. The paused property is used to guard against this. See here for more info: https://medium.com/over-engineering/a-background-repeating-timer-in-swift-412cecfd2ef9
} else {
// Already running, so do nothing
}
}
func stop() {
if !paused {
paused = true
timer.suspend()
} else {
// Already paused, so do nothing
}
}
// MARK: - Private Methods
// Implements timer functionality using the DispatchSourceTimer in Grand Central Dispatch. See here for more info: http://danielemargutti.com/2018/02/22/the-secret-world-of-nstimer/
private func createNewTimer() -> DispatchSourceTimer {
let timer = DispatchSource.makeTimerSource(queue: timerQueue) // Create the timer on the correct queue
let deadline: DispatchTime = DispatchTime.now() + tickCheckInterval // Establish the next time to trigger
timer.schedule(deadline: deadline, repeating: tickCheckInterval, leeway: timerTolerance) // Set it on a repeating schedule, with the established tolerance
timer.setEventHandler { [weak self] in // Set the code to be executed when the timer fires, using a weak reference to 'self' to avoid retain cycles (memory leaks). See here for more info: https://learnappmaking.com/escaping-closures-swift/
self?.tickCheck()
}
timer.activate() // Dispatch Sources are returned initially in the inactive state, to begin processing, use the activate() method
// Determine whether to pause the timer
if paused {
timer.suspend()
}
return timer
}
private func cancelTimer() {
timer.setEventHandler(handler: nil)
timer.cancel()
if paused {
timer.resume() // If the timer is suspended, calling cancel without resuming triggers a crash. See here for more info: https://forums.developer.apple.com/thread/15902
}
}
private func replaceTimer() {
cancelTimer()
timer = createNewTimer()
}
private func changeBPM() {
replaceTimer() // Create a new timer, which will be configured for the new BPM
}
#objc private func tickCheck() {
if (elapsedTime > tickDuration) || (timeToNextTick < 0.003) { // If past or extremely close to correct duration, tick
tick()
}
}
private func tick() {
lastTickTimestamp = CFAbsoluteTimeGetCurrent()
DispatchQueue.main.sync { // Calls the delegate from the application's main thread, because it keeps the separate threading within this class, and otherwise, it can cause errors (e.g. 'Main Thread Checker: UI API called on a background thread', if the delegate tries to update the UI). See here for more info: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45081731/uiapplication-delegate-must-be-called-from-main-thread-only
delegate?.bpmTimerTicked() // Have the delegate respond accordingly
}
}
// MARK: - Deinitialization
deinit {
cancelTimer() // Ensure that the timer's cancelled if this object is deallocated
}
}
I have searched many times on the internet but could not find the answer to this question. I know how to pause and resume NSTimers by using the invalidate functions - timer.invalidate. and I know how to resume them. But I have a SpriteKit game. When I pause my game, I stop everything and the timers. I know that I can stop them using .invalidate but when I invalidate them:
For example lets say I have a 5 second timer that runs continously that spawns one block.
When the timer reaches second 3 of the cycle and when I paused the game, and invalidate the timers. When I resume, Now the timers second goes back to 0 and I must wait another 5 seconds. I want it to continue from where it left off, 3 , and wait 2 seconds for the block to spawn.
blockGenerator.generationTimer?.invalidate()
self.isGamePaused = true
self.addChild(self.pauseText)
self.runAction(SKAction.runBlock(self.pauseGame))
e`
and when I resume it:
blockGenerator.generationTimer = ...
I have to wait another 5 seconds, I want the timer to continue from where it left off
If you can help me, I appreciate it thank you.
There is a way to pause/resume Timer instances, because using repeating timers we know the next fire date.
This is a simple class SRTimer and a protocol SRTimerDelegate
Protocol SRTimerDelegate
protocol SRTimerDelegate : AnyObject {
func timerWillStart(_ timer : SRTimer)
func timerDidFire(_ timer : SRTimer)
func timerDidPause(_ timer : SRTimer)
func timerWillResume(_ timer : SRTimer)
func timerDidStop(_ timer : SRTimer)
}
Class SRTimer
class SRTimer : NSObject {
var timer : Timer?
var interval : TimeInterval
var difference : TimeInterval = 0.0
var delegate : SRTimerDelegate?
init(interval: TimeInterval, delegate: SRTimerDelegate?)
{
self.interval = interval
self.delegate = delegate
}
#objc func start(_ aTimer : Timer?)
{
if aTimer != nil { fire(self) }
if timer == nil {
delegate?.timerWillStart(self)
timer = Timer.scheduledTimer(timeInterval: interval, target: self, selector: #selector(fire), userInfo: nil, repeats: true)
}
}
func pause()
{
if timer != nil {
difference = timer!.fireDate.timeIntervalSince(Date())
timer!.invalidate()
timer = nil
delegate?.timerDidPause(self)
}
}
func resume()
{
if timer == nil {
delegate?.timerWillResume(self)
if difference == 0.0 {
start(nil)
} else {
Timer.scheduledTimer(timeInterval: difference, target: self, selector: #selector(start), userInfo: nil, repeats: false)
difference = 0.0
}
}
}
func stop()
{
if timer != nil {
difference = 0.0
timer!.invalidate()
timer = nil
delegate?.timerDidStop(self)
}
}
#objc func fire(_ sender : SRTimer)
{
delegate?.timerDidFire(self)
}
}
Make your class conform to the protocol SRTimerDelegate and initialize a SRTimer instance with
var timer : SRTimer!
timer = SRTimer(interval: 5.0, delegate: self)
Methods
start() calls the delegate method timerWillStart and starts the timer.
pause() saves the difference between the current date and the next fire date, invalidates the timer and calls the delegate method timerDidPause.
resume() calls the delegate method timerWillResume, creates a temporary one shot timer with the saved difference time interval. When this timer fires the main timer will be restarted.
stop() calls the delegate method timerDidStop and invalidates the timer.
When the timer fires, the delegate method timerDidFire is called.
First, let me say this - it is not possible to do with just NSTimer, there is no inbuilt function to do that (you can build logic around that as the answer from Vadian suggests). BUT.
Why NSTimer is not good idea
Lets stop and think for a little. For game objects and precise spawning, you should never use NSTimer in the first place. The problem is implementation of NSTimer (quoting the docs):
Because of the various input sources a typical run loop manages, the
effective resolution of the time interval for a timer is limited to on
the order of 50-100 milliseconds. If a timer’s firing time occurs
during a long callout or while the run loop is in a mode that is not
monitoring the timer, the timer does not fire until the next time the
run loop checks the timer. Therefore, the actual time at which the
timer fires potentially can be a significant period of time after the
scheduled firing time.
There are other problems with NSTimer but that is out of scope of that question.
Solution
What you can do instead, you should listen to delta time change in each update call
let delta = currentPreciseTime - previousPreciseTime
Now, when you have that delta, you can have your counter : Double, and on each update, you increase counter by delta.
let counter : Double
counter += delta
Now that your "timer" is running properly, you can check with simple condition if your period of time already passed, or do whatever you want with it:
let SPAWN_OBJECT_AFTER : Double = 5.0
if counter > SPAWN_OBJECT_AFTER {
// Do something on fire event
self.spawn()
// This line effectively restarts timer
counter -= SPAWN_OBJECT_AFTER
}
You can easily build your own, very easy timer class to do it. Also! This way you have control over what happens in your update call, which is where the update logic belongs. Timer breaks that model by allowing method execution outside that - it might be intended, but usually is not).
I built a games running in production every day and this is I'd say most common solution for periodic events, as it saves the most resources when used appropriately. Obviously not fitting for everything but definitely fits your need.
Hope it helps!
I don't believe there is a way to pause/resume a NSTimer in the way you are talking about. You must use timer.invalidate() and timer.fire(). However, perhaps you can use an int (that starts at 5 and goes down every second) to keep track of how many seconds the initial timer has before fires again and once the times fires again, make sure the new int value is passed to start the initial timer from the correct point in time.