I have made a Wai web application and it is being run using Warp. However I have one AJAX request that takes quite some time to finish, while that request is pending, no other requests will be accepted by the server. I thought Warp was capable of handling concurrent requests. Am I missing something? The way I run Warp is just by calling run port app where run is imported via import Network.Wai.Handler.Warp (run) and app is my Wai application.
I was trying Happstack Lite to see whether it would solve my problem, and there the -threaded flag was used when compiling the web application, which also solved my concurrent requests problem in the Warp application. I was under the assumption that GHC would have threading support by default, but apparently this have to be specified explicitly during compilation.
Related
I'm doing some stuff using GWT with rpc calls in order to get MySQL queries. These queries can be big (up to 500 entries). When I do the RPC call, the browser freeze ( for example, my loading .gif image is frozen ). I thought using RPC call with asyncallback would avoid this problem but obviously It doesn't.
My tests are made on Eclipse (GWT dev plug in) in development mode so I was also wondering if the problem does not come from the server provided by Google. Moreover, I would like to know if this problem will stay when I will deploy the application to an other server. If no, could give me some advices to avoid this type of problems.
First of all, are you running this query on the load of the application? If it is the case, then it is normal.
From my experience with gwt, elcipse and Tomcat, the freeze only happen in Eclipse. When you deploy your application on a server such as Tomcat, this problem will disappear even if the RPC call is on the load of the application.
I have a perl app which processes text files from the local filesystem (think about it as an overly-complicated grep).
I want to design a webapp which allows remote users to invoke the perl app by setting the required parameters.
Once it's running it would be desirable some sort of communication between the perl app and the webapp about the status of the process (running, % done, finished).
Which would be a recommended way of communication between the two processes? I was thinking in a database table, but I'm not really sure it's a good idea.
any suggestions are appreciated.
Stackers, go ahead and edit this answer to add code examples or links to them.
DrNoone, two approaches come to mind.
callback
Your greppy app needs to offer a callback function that returns the status and which is periodically called by the Web app.
event
This makes sense if you are already using a Web server/app framework which exposes an event loop usable from external applications (rather unlikely in Perl land). The greppy app fires events on status changes and the Web app attaches/listens to them and acts accordingly.
For IPC as you envision it, a plain database is not so suitable. Look into message queues instead. For great interop, pick AMPQ compliant implementation.
If you run the process using open($handle, "cmd |") you can read the results in real time and print them straight to STDOUT while your response is open. That's probably the simplest approach.
Am new to android, am developing application with websevices using json parsing with httpget method,cant use http post method in android actually.
It working fine normally, but many time it shows the error on emulator like activity not responding force close activity.when i put that url in browser it shows the result .but i don't know why this activity not responding error came.
I think the httprequest took more time to retrieve the data from server,but am not sure. any one help me to how to avoid this error or how to minimize this .
I want know what are the possibilities to get this activity not responding error.
Thanks,
Lakshmanan
You need to perform blocking operations such as I/O in a separate thread - see the below linked resource:
http://developer.android.com/guide/practices/design/responsiveness.html:
In Android, the system guards against applications that are insufficiently responsive for a period of time by displaying a dialog to the user, called the Application Not Responding (ANR) dialog, shown at right in Figure 1. The user can choose to let the application continue, but the user won't appreciate having to act on this dialog every time he or she uses your application. It's critical to design responsiveness into your application, so that the system never has cause to display an ANR dialog to the user.
To avoid ANR (Application Not Responding) dialog,
Your business logic code is inside doBackground() of AsyncTask and You may also need to override onPostExecute(),etc. After that it is better to invoke the async task in a Service (bound or normal service).
Service:
(bound service or normal service based on your requirement)
From, android office documentation:
A service is "bound" when an application component binds to it by calling bindService(). A bound service offers a client-server interface that allows components to interact with the service, send requests, get results, and even do so across processes with interprocess communication (IPC). A bound service runs only as long as another application component is bound to it. Multiple components can bind to the service at once, but when all of them unbind, the service is destroyed.
From what I understand, the entire client side of a GWT application is converted to Javascript when you build, therefore I suppose this question is related to both Javascript and the possibilities that GWT offers.
I have a couple of dozen processes that will need to be initiated in my GWT application, each process will then continuously make calls to a server. Does GWT support threading? Does the GWT client side support threading?
EDIT:
This link states:
No JavaScript knowledge required If you’re just a user of the framework,
which I am for the matter of discussion, you do not need to know JavaScript
in order to write dynamic content, be it client-side such as rolling frames,
docking panels or scheduled “multi-threading” tasks, or server-side calls
using XMLHttpRequests (aka AJAX).
or scheduled “multi-threading” tasks, what does this mean?
JavaScript doesn't support multithreading. However, GWT has a class to 'simulate' threading, which is not real multithreading, but in most cases does what you need: com.google.gwt.core.client.Scheduler.ScheduledCommand. The technique is based on the timer class, which executes a method after the given time elapses.
For example, when placing the following code in you own code, the scheduleDeferred method will return directly and your code continues after the command, while the execute() method is executed using the timer:
Scheduler.get().scheduleDeferred(new ScheduledCommand() {
public void execute() {
.. code here is executed using the timer technique.
}
});
You can create a repeating command RepeatingCommand, which can be used to run the command more than once. Start it with Scheduler.get().scheduleIncremental() that will execute the command until the execute method returns false. You can use this to split tasks into sub tasks to get better 'threading' behavior. The Scheduler supports some additional methods to start a scheduled command differently. See the JavaDoc for more details.
Edited and updated with new GWT class instead of the deprecated DeferredCommand.
There is work on Web Workers as part of HTML5 that is implemented in a number of browsers, but not on all (most notably internet explorer). You could use these features where available, but what you should do is look at the javascript programming model.
Javascript generally works asynchronously. Requests are fired off and at some point their answers are received as an event. You can have a large number of pending requests at the same time. This will require a bit of a redesign of your system though.
New way is to use a Scheduler
JavaScript doesn't support multithreading, so whatever GWT does, multithreading has to be done solely on the server side, because GWT can only use features that are already available on the client side.
I have a web application that I am adding workflow functionality to using Windows Workflow Foundation. I have based my solution around K. Scott Allen's Orders Workflow example on OdeToCode. At the start I didn't realise the significance of the caveat "if you use Delay activities with and configure active timers for the manual scheduling service, these events will happen on a background thread that is not associated with an HTTP request". I now need to use Delay activities and it doesn't work as is with his solution architecture. Has anyone come across this and found a good solution to this? The example is linked to from a lot of places but I haven't seen anyone else come across this issue and it seems like a bit of a show stopper to me.
Edit: The problem is that the results from the workflow are returned to the the web application via HttpContext. I am using the ManualWorkflowSchedulerService with the useActiveTimers and this works fine for most situations because workflow events are fired from the web app and HttpContext still exists when the workflow results are returned and the web app can continue processing. When a delay activity is used processing happens on a background thread and when it tries to return results to the web app, there is no valid HttpContext (because there has been no Http Request), so further processing fails. That is, the webapp is trying to process the workflow results but there has been no http request.
I think I need to do all post Delay activity processing within the workflow rather than handing off to the web app.
Cheers.
You didn't describe the problem you are having. But maybe this is of some help.
You can use the ManualWorkflowSchedulerService with the useActiveTimers and the workflow will continue on another thread. Normally this is fine because your HTTP request has already finished and it doesn't really matter.
If however you need full control the workflow runtime will let you get a handle on all loaded workflows using the GetLoadedWorkflows() function. This will return acollection of WorkflowInstance objects. usign these you can can call the GetWorkflowNextTimerExpiration() to check which is expired. If one is you can manually resume it. In this case you want to use the ManualWorkflowSchedulerService with the useActiveTimers=false so you can control the last thread as well. However in most cases using useActiveTimers=true works perfectly well.