My function takes a table of the form dictionary and returns the table after applying the query which the person asked. I have several other methods but I am having trouble with the equal condition method . This is what I've tried.
class Table():
def where_con(self,table,conditions):
for condition in conditions:
if ('='in condition):
print(table.get_dict())
print(condition)
self = table.equal_condition(table,condition)
return(self)
elif('>'in condition):
new_table = table.greater_condition(table, condition)
return(self)
def equal_condition(self,table,condition):
'''(Table, string) -> Table
This Function takes in a table and a condition and applies the
condition and returns a new table with the condition applied
REQ: Table must have the contents of the condition
REQ: The condition must have proper syntax
REQ: The condition must contain the equal sign in string form
'''
number_rows = table.num_rows()
print(number_rows)
dictionary = table.get_dict()
print(dictionary)
condition = condition.split('=')
print(condition)
#new_table = Table()
# Adding Coloums Name in Self
for col in dictionary:
self.add_column({col: []})
# If the Second part is a string
if ("'" in condition[1]):
condition[1] = condition[1].strip("'")
i=0
while(i<number_rows):
print(i)
i=i+1
if (dictionary[condition[0]][i] == condition[1]):
for key in self.get_dict():
self = self.update_column(key,dictionary[key][i])
#i=i+1
else:
i=0
while(i<number_rows):
print(i)
if (dictionary[condition[0]][i] == dictionary[condition[1]][i]):
for key in self.get_dict():
self.update_column(key,dictionary[key][i])
i=i+1
return self
So when I give an input as
>>>a = Table()
>>>a.set_dict({'w.critic_rating': ['5', '5', '5', '5'], 'o.for': ['Directing', 'Acting', 'Directing', 'Acting'], 'w.title': ['Titanic', 'Titanic', 'Avatar', 'Avatar'], 'o.title': ['Avatar', 'Titanic', 'Avatar', 'Titanic'], 'w w.your_rating': ['4.5', '4.5', '5', '5'], 'w.average_rating': ['4.75', '4.75', '5', '5']})
>>>d = Table()
>>>f = where_con(a,"w.title=o.title")
4
{'o.for': ['Directing', 'Acting', 'Directing', 'Acting'], 'o.title': ['Avatar', 'Titanic', 'Avatar', 'Titanic'], 'w.critic_rating': ['5', '5', '5', '5'], 'w.your_rating': ['4.5', '4.5', '5', '5'], 'w.average_rating': ['4.75', '4.75', '5', '5'], 'w.title': ['Titanic', 'Titanic', 'Avatar', 'Avatar']}
['w.title', 'o.title']
0
Traceback (most recent call last):
Python Shell, prompt 2, line 1
File "C:\Users\Abhinav\Desktop\MAde_answer\database.py", line 205, in <module>
if (dictionary[condition[0]][i] == dictionary[condition[1]][i]):
builtins.IndexError: list index out of range
Why is this happening and how can I fix it . Any help is appreciated.
Related
I have list data and try to change the value in position [0] to be value 5.
List<String> imagesVal = ['1', '2', '3', '4'];
Then I have change function
void changeImage(id, file, mediaID) {
setState(() {
imagesVal[0] = '5';
})
print(imagesVal);
});
The result is: ['5', '2', '3', '4']
Then I have save button
Future _save() async {
print(imagesVal);
});
When tap the button, I got result still old value: ['1', '2', '3', '4']
My question, how to get the latest update value? On above example it should be get the value ['5', '2', '3', '4']
You should have declared the list inside the build method of stateful widget by mistake. Please move it outside the build method.
I would like to convert Arabic numbers into english or force the user to enter english numbers only, so how to do so?
i.e 123 = ١٢٣ and so on.
For converting numbers you can simply write a function like this:
Map persianNumberMap = {
'۰': '0',
'۱': '1',
'۲': '2',
'۳': '3',
'۴': '4',
'۵': '5',
'۶': '6',
'۷': '7',
'۸': '8',
'۹': '9'
};
String convertPersianNumberToEnglish(String number) {
String converted = number;
persianNumberMap.forEach((key, value) => converted.replaceAll(key, value));
return converted;
}
But you can also use FilteringTextInputFormatter to restrict inputs of a TextField:
TextField(inputFormatters: [
FilteringTextInputFormatter.allow(RegExp("[0-9]")),
])
This TextField will only accept English number characters.
I have a user model with array of ips field in my flask application. I want to use postgresql array of inet type:
from flask.ext.sqlalchemy import SQLAlchemy
from sqlalchemy.dialects.postgresql import ARRAY, INET, Integer, Unicode, Column
db = SQLAlchemy()
class User(db.Model):
__tablename__ = 'users'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
login = Column(Unicode(15))
password = Column(Unicode(34))
name = Column(Unicode(100))
permitted_ips = Column(ARRAY(INET))
But when i make query i get bad answer:
user = User.query.get(84)
print user.permitted_ips
#['{', '1', '7', '2', '.', '2', '0', '.', '2', '5', '.', '2', ',', '1', '7', '2', '.', '2', '0', '.', '2', '5', '.', '3', '}']
instead of ['172.20.25.2', '172.20.25.3']. Current version of sqlalchemy is 0.9.10. I tried the latest one but result was the same. Is it possible to fix that?
I found that Arrays are not parsed automatically so you need to create a generic type caster with psycopg2 library.
# needed imports
from psycopg2 import STRING
from psycopg2.extensions import register_type, new_array_type
Registering the array type, it will be done one time.
# to see the oid of inet. As pointed out by #univerio the oid should never
# change, so you don't need to fetch it every time your app starts.
tp = db.engine.execute("select typarray from pg_type where typname = 'inet'")
print(tp.fetchone())
# (1041,)
# registering the array type
register_type(new_array_type((1041,), 'INET[]', STRING))
Now you can fetch the array and it will be parsed properly.
# fetch data
ips = db.engine.execute("select permitted_ips from users where id = 1")
print(ips.fetchone()[0])
# ['172.20.25.2', '172.20.25.3'].
Community,
I'm currently facing an issue with the containable-behavior setting conditions based on the datasources expression-builder. I'm using CakePHP 2.6.2 with a PostgreSQL database.
What works so far:
I wrote a behavior that dynamically adds conditions to find-operations to restrict the results based on a privileges table. Im using subqueries with the buildstatement() and expression() functions provided by cake. I followed this article from the CakeBook:
http://book.cakephp.org/2.0/en/models/retrieving-your-data.html
Here is a simplyfied code-snippet, in fact its two OR-statements:
$conditionsSubQueryRecord = array(
'Privilege.objecttable' => $model->table,
'Privilege.objectid = '.$model->alias.'.'.$model->primaryKey,
'Privilege.read' => true,
'Privilege.id' => $this->recordPermissions
);
$dsPrivilege = $this->privilegeModel->getDataSource();
$subQueryRecordPrivs = $dsPrivilege->buildStatement(
array(
'fields' => array('"'.$this->privilegeModel->alias.'"."id"'),
'table' => $dsPrivilege->fullTableName($this->privilegeModel),
'alias' => $this->privilegeModel->alias,
'limit' => null,
'offset' => null,
'joins' => array(),
'conditions' => $conditionsSubQueryRecord,
'order' => null,
'group' => null
),
$this->privilegeModel
);
$subQueryRecordPrivs = ' EXISTS (' . $subQueryRecordPrivs . ') ';
$subQueryRecordPrivsExpression = $dsPrivilege->expression($subQueryRecordPrivs);
I'm adding the statement to my condition array then in my behaviors beforeFind()-hook. This works all very well so far. The condition is added, the results are filtered.
The conditions are ignored for my contained models:
My problem is now to use this condition on contained models. I wrote an recursive algorithm that walks along all the contained modelsand if the model actsAs my behavior I am attaching the same conditions to its conditions-array. But when I execute my search, the condition is ignored on the contained models and only attached to the primary model.
This is the complete condition string I'm executing:
array(
'conditions' => array(
'Requestinstance.id' => (int) 4,
(int) 0 => object(stdClass) {
type => 'expression'
value => ' EXISTS (SELECT "Privilege"."id" FROM "core"."privileges" AS "Privilege" WHERE "Privilege"."objecttable" = 'requestinstances' AND "Privilege"."objectid" = "Requestinstance"."id" AND "Privilege"."read" = 'TRUE' AND "Privilege"."id" = (8)) OR EXISTS (SELECT "Privilege"."id" FROM "core"."privileges" AS "Privilege" WHERE "Privilege"."objecttable" = 'requestinstances' AND "Privilege"."read" = 'TRUE' AND "Privilege"."id" IN (7, 13, 6, 9, 10, 12) AND "Privilege"."objectid" IS NULL) '
}
),
'fields' => null,
'joins' => array(),
'limit' => (int) 1,
'offset' => null,
'order' => array(
(int) 0 => null
),
'page' => (int) 1,
'group' => null,
'callbacks' => true,
'contain' => array(
'Requesttype' => array(
'Steptype' => array(
'order' => array(
(int) 0 => 'RequesttypesSteptype.phase ASC'
),
'conditions' => object(stdClass) {
type => 'expression'
value => ' EXISTS (SELECT "Privilege"."id" FROM "core"."privileges" AS "Privilege" WHERE "Privilege"."objecttable" = 'steptypes' AND "Privilege"."objectid" = "Steptype"."id" AND "Privilege"."read" = 'TRUE' AND "Privilege"."id" = (8)) OR EXISTS (SELECT "Privilege"."id" FROM "core"."privileges" AS "Privilege" WHERE "Privilege"."objecttable" = 'steptypes' AND "Privilege"."read" = 'TRUE' AND "Privilege"."id" IN (7, 13, 6, 9, 10, 12) AND "Privilege"."objectid" IS NULL) '
}
),
(int) 0 => 'RequesttypesSteptype',
'conditions' => object(stdClass) {
type => 'expression'
value => ' EXISTS (SELECT "Privilege"."id" FROM "core"."privileges" AS "Privilege" WHERE "Privilege"."objecttable" = 'requesttypes' AND "Privilege"."objectid" = "Requesttype"."id" AND "Privilege"."read" = 'TRUE' AND "Privilege"."id" = (8)) OR EXISTS (SELECT "Privilege"."id" FROM "core"."privileges" AS "Privilege" WHERE "Privilege"."objecttable" = 'requesttypes' AND "Privilege"."read" = 'TRUE' AND "Privilege"."id" IN (7, 13, 6, 9, 10, 12) AND "Privilege"."objectid" IS NULL) '
}
),
'Stepinstance' => array(
(int) 0 => 'Steptype',
(int) 1 => 'Stepdatainstance',
(int) 2 => 'Sectioninstance'
),
'Requestdatainstance' => array(),
'Taskinstance' => array()
),
'recursive' => (int) 2
)
As you can see, the condition was correctly added to some of the contained models. However, the executed SQL-query, i.e. for the "Steptype"-Model, is generated without the condition:
SELECT "Steptype"."id" AS "Steptype__id", "Steptype"."name" AS "Steptype__name", "Steptype"."description" AS "Steptype__description", "Steptype"."subscribe" AS "Steptype__subscribe", "RequesttypesSteptype"."id" AS "RequesttypesSteptype__id", "RequesttypesSteptype"."phase" AS "RequesttypesSteptype__phase", "RequesttypesSteptype"."endsphase" AS "RequesttypesSteptype__endsphase", "RequesttypesSteptype"."endsrequest" AS "RequesttypesSteptype__endsrequest", "RequesttypesSteptype"."usertype_id" AS "RequesttypesSteptype__usertype_id", "RequesttypesSteptype"."requesttype_id" AS "RequesttypesSteptype__requesttype_id", "RequesttypesSteptype"."steptype_id" AS "RequesttypesSteptype__steptype_id" FROM "core"."steptypes" AS "Steptype" JOIN "core"."requesttypes_steptypes" AS "RequesttypesSteptype" ON ("RequesttypesSteptype"."requesttype_id" = 6 AND "RequesttypesSteptype"."steptype_id" = "Steptype"."id") ORDER BY "RequesttypesSteptype"."phase" ASC
Direct use of the buildStatement does not work either
I also tried to use the statement itself directly, without building an expression from it. This actually creates exactly the SQL-query I want to have, but does not add the quotes of the table alias in the FROM-clause correctly and therefore causes postgreSQL to throw an error:
SELECT "Requestinstance"."id" AS "Requestinstance__id", "Requestinstance"."user_id" AS "Requestinstance__user_id", "Requestinstance"."created" AS "Requestinstance__created", "Requestinstance"."requesttype_id" AS "Requestinstance__requesttype_id", "Requestinstance"."currentphase" AS "Requestinstance__currentphase", "Requestinstance"."selfsolving" AS "Requestinstance__selfsolving", "User"."username" AS "User__username", "User"."id" AS "User__id", "User"."company_id" AS "User__company_id", "User"."usertype_id" AS "User__usertype_id", "Requesttype"."id" AS "Requesttype__id", "Requesttype"."name" AS "Requesttype__name", "Requesttype"."subtitle" AS "Requesttype__subtitle", "Requesttype"."description" AS "Requesttype__description", "Requesttype"."order" AS "Requesttype__order", "Requesttype"."selfsolving" AS "Requesttype__selfsolving" FROM "core"."requestinstances" AS "Requestinstance" LEFT JOIN "core"."users" AS "User" ON ("Requestinstance"."user_id" = "User"."id") LEFT JOIN "core"."requesttypes" AS "Requesttype" ON ("Requestinstance"."requesttype_id" = "Requesttype"."id") WHERE EXISTS (SELECT "Privilege"."id" FROM "core"."privileges" AS Privilege WHERE "Privilege"."objecttable" = 'requestinstances' AND "Privilege"."objectid" = "Requestinstance"."id" AND "Privilege"."read" = 'TRUE' AND "Privilege"."id" = (8)) OR EXISTS (SELECT "Privilege"."id" FROM "core"."privileges" AS Privilege WHERE "Privilege"."objecttable" = 'requestinstances' AND "Privilege"."read" = 'TRUE' AND "Privilege"."id" IN (7, 13, 6, 9, 10, 12) AND "Privilege"."objectid" IS NULL) LIMIT 1
Adding the quotes manually to the alias-string while building the statement does not help either, since the framework strips the quotes.
So finally my question(s):
Does anybody know, if the containable-behavior supports expressions at all? I already digged into the DboSource, PdoSource and Postgresql-datasource but could not find anything wrong here. The Containable behavior looks pretty straight forward as well. Am I doing something wrong here?
Or is there another way I could acchieve what I want?
I'm glad for any help in this matter!
Thanks in advance!
I finally figured it out!
To formally answer the question:
Yes, the containable behavior does support expression-syntax!
My problem was with the processing order: The framework processes the behaviors the configured order, I accidently loaded the containable before my custom behavior, thats why it never received my modified conditions...
Working with the correct order, the manipulated condition-string was processed fine by the containable behavior.
To be absolutely sure about the behaviors order, I moved the behavior-loading to the AppModels __construct() method:
// unload any configured Containable behavior
if($this->Behaviors->loaded('Containable')) {
$this->Behaviors->unload('Containable');
}
// load the PrivilegeItem behavior
if($this->alias !== 'Privilege') {
$this->Behaviors->load('PrivilegeItem');
}
// and finally (re-)attach the Containable behavior
$this->Behaviors->load('Containable');
Maybe it helps others avoiding two days of debugging headache...
I like to use DateTime.UtcNow.ToString("yyyyMMddHHmmss") as a unique-enough salt for padding instead of a random string or GUID in tests for easier debugging and sorting. However I can't use it where validation only allows alpha character strings, e.g. a name (where 'Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Names' is ignored).
Is there a standard or a convention to encode a timestamp as a [A-Z]+ string? Preferably something more efficient than roman numerals but still human readable, i.e. not a base64-like lookup-table-based variant but a logic-based one.
Not that I know of, but if you treat A as 0 and J as 9 you can simply replace all numbers from the yyyyMMddHHmmss string.
I ended up with a lookup using a mix of leet speak and calculator spelling forgoing sorting in lieu of readability.
http://www.wikihow.com/Sample/1337-Cheat-Sheet
http://www.wikihow.com/Sample/Calculator-Letter-List
http://www.inversoft.com/blog/2013/08/28/profanity-filtering-101-character-replacements-leet-speak/
var map = new Dictionary<char, char>
{
{ '0', 'O' },
{ '1', 'I' },
{ '2', 'Z' },
{ '3', 'E' },
{ '4', 'A' },
{ '5', 'S' },
{ '6', 'G' },
{ '7', 'T' },
{ '8', 'B' },
{ '9', 'P' }
};
return string.Concat(value.Select(c => map[c]));