Entity framework 7 relationships (friends of person and group of friends) - entity-framework

I'm playing and Learning EntityFramework 7 RC1.
I have
public class Person
{
public long PersonId{get;set;}
public ICollection<Relation> Friends {get;set;}
public ICollection<Group> Groups{get;set;} //Works if commented
}
public class Relation
{
public long RelationId { get; set; }
public long PersonId { get; set; }
public Person FriendWith { get; set; }
public ICollection<RelationType> Status { get; set; }
}
public class Group
{
public long GroupId { get; set; }
public long PersonId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public ICollection<Person> Friends { get; set; }
}
Everything works in my model but not the last property of the Group class.
What i want is that a person can have Friends(Person) and can group his friends in groups (coworkers, friends...).
The top would be to have the possibility to query a Person and get :
- Person.Friends
- Person.Groups
- Person.Groups.FirstOrDefault().Friends
Thank you very for your help.

Related

EF Core: How to organize models/tables and use DBQuery when I have 2 different tables relating to the same common one

Let's say I have a bike shops that sell various types of bikes: pro, kids, youth, leisure and any mixture. So I have a table of shops that refers/relates to a table of possible types. Now these shops also host events with the same types: events for pros, kids etc again any mixture. And so I have another table of events that also need to refer/relate to the same table of types:
I need to be able in a single quick query get a list of all bike types for a shop or event.
So I figured I'd have 3 main tables: Shops, Events, BikeTypes and two intermediate to link shops and events to bike types:
And I organized my models as:
public class BikeShop
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public string name { get; set; }
public string address { get; set; }
public string phone { get; set; }
}
public class BikeEvent
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public string name { get; set; }
public string description { get; set; }
public DateTime date { get; set; }
public string location { get; set; }
}
public class BikeType
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public string name { get; set; }
public string code { get; set; }
}
public class ShopBikeTypes
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public BikeShop shop { get; set; }
public BikeType biketype { get; set; }
}
public class EventBikeTypes
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public BikeEvent bikeevent { get; set; }
public BikeType biketype { get; set; }
}
With DataCotext:
public class DataContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<BikeShop> Shops { get; set; }
public DbSet<BikeEvent> Events { get; set; }
public DbSet<BikeType> BikeTypes { get; set; }
public DbSet<ShopBikeTypes> ShopBikeTypes { get; set; }
public DbSet<EventBikeTypes> EventBikeTypes { get; set; }
}
Migration creates correct database structure just as my diagram. Great!
Now how do I make a straight forward query:
get list of all bike types for a shop
get list of all bike types for an event
Is my structure even correct?
Do I need some List<> in the main object models BikeShop and BikeEvent?
EF's include and theninclude seem to require some list?
This feels like such a typical scenario. What's the right way of doing this?
Thank you.
Those are the linq queries that you are asked but when i look at that your class models, i can say they are wrong. U need to define first which relation theyre having. if all of that relation has based on one-to-one, u wont gonna need any List<> in your class models. but if u have one-to-many relation,u gonna need them.
1- get list of all bike types for a shop
return DbContext.Shops
.Include(x>=x.ShopBikeTypes)
.ThenInclude(x=>x.BikeTypes).ToList();
2- get list of all bike types for an event
return DbContext.Events
.Include(x=>x.EventBikeTypes)
.ThenInclude(x=>x.BikeTypes).ToList();
3- Get all data in that relation
return DbContext.BikeTypes
.Include(x>=x.EventBikeTypes)
.ThenInclude(x=>x.Events).AsSplitQuery()
.Include(x=>x.ShopBikeTypes)
.ThenInclude(x>=x.Shops).AsSplitQuery()
.ToList();
it can be a tough query, do not try to use AsNoTracking() because it can cause Cartesian Explosion.
#BerkGarip: thank you for your help. I ended up with this models structure:
public class AShop
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public string name { get; set; }
public string address { get; set; }
public string phone { get; set; }
public List<AShopType> aTypes { get; set; }
}
public class AEvent
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public string name { get; set; }
public string description { get; set; }
public DateTime date { get; set; }
public string location { get; set; }
public List<AEventType> aTypes { get; set; }
}
public class AType
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public string name { get; set; }
public string code { get; set; }
}
public class AShopType
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public AType aType { get; set; }
}
public class AEventType
{
public long Id { get; set; }
public AType aType { get; set; }
}
In order to achieve what I needed using answer from #BerkGarip I figured out that the trick there was to have lists in the 'shop' and 'event' models to the intermediate objects which in turn have a single reference to 'type'. This way database layout is the same and it is many-to-many relationship and I can use 'include' and 'thenInclude' exactly as expected:
return await _context.AShops.Where(x => x.name == "Z")
.Include(x => x.aTypes)
.ThenInclude(y => y.aType)
.ToListAsync();

Issue with Include in Entity framework

I have Employee, Address and Organization classes. below are the details
public partial class Employees
{
public Employees()
{
AddressDetails = new HashSet<AddressDetails>();
OrganizationDetails = new HashSet<OrganizationDetails>();
}
public string Id { get; set; }
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string MiddleName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public ICollection<AddressDetails> AddressDetails { get; set; }
public ICollection<OrganizationDetails> OrganizationDetails { get; set; }
}
public partial class AddressDetails
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Address { get; set; }
public string Type { get; set; }
public string EmployeeId { get; set; }
public Employees Employee { get; set; }
}
public partial class OrganizationDetails
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Location { get; set; }
public string EmployeeId { get; set; }
public Employees Employee { get; set; }
}
I have used fully defined relationship, you can see Employee has collections of both AddressDetails and OrganizationDetails as navigation properties. And each of them have EmployeeId and Employee in the same way.
My problem is, when i try to fetch Employee details using Include(), both AddressDetails and OrganizationDetails are loaded that's fine, but when i checked both the collections each entity has again loaded Employee information and so on.
for example: if i check AddressDetails collection which is loaded, Address object has information of Employee and again that Employee has collections of both AddressDetails and OrganizationDetails.
Please help me how can i avoid this. I don't want to remove Employee object property from AddressDetails and OrganizationDetails. is there anyway to make it work with Include().
here is the query i'm using to load these navigation properties.
List employees = _context.Employees.Include(emp => emp.AddressDetails).Include(emp => emp.OrganizationDetails).ToList();

Load related entities with a single .Include() in Entity Framework?

Is there a better way to load all the related entities?
Below is the ScholarshipRequest class which also has Scholarship, Status, Student, Program and User.
public class ScholarshipRequest
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int Year { get; set; }
public Status Status { get; set; }
public DateTime ApplicationDate { get; set; }
public DateTime ActionDate { get; set; }
public Scholarship Scholarship { get; set; }
public Program Program { get; set; }
public Student Student { get; set; }
public User User { get; set; }
}
I am just posting Scholarship class here, rest are similar.
public class Scholarship
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
The below code works fine but is there a better way where i can use a single .Include() to load them all or may be some other way?
ScholarshipRequestRepository repo = new ScholarshipRequestRepository(dBContext);
List<ScholarshipRequest> stdList = repo.Collection()
.Include("Status").Include("Student").Include("User").Include("Scholarship")
.Where(x => x.User.Id == userId).ToList();

Can't grasp how to join 2 tables in LINQ extension

I have 2 tables that I need to join with each other but I can't grasp how I can join them using a linq extension.
I can do it easy in SQL, but I'm struggling with linq.
My problem - 2 models:
public class GamesNight
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public virtual ApplicationUser User { get; set; }
public string GamesNightTitle { get; set;}
public string GamesNightDescription { get; set; }
public string GamesNightLocation { get; set; }
public DateTime GamesNightDate { get; set; }
}
and an attendance model:
public class Attendance
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public virtual ApplicationUser User { get; set; }
public virtual GamesNight GamesNight { get; set; }
}
Pretty simple to grasp, the user 'attends' a 'gamesnight'.
I have a view model that reads
public class UpcomingGamesNightViewModel
{
public GamesNight GamesNight { get; set; }
public bool Attending { get; set; }
}
What I am trying to achieve is a built up array of UpcomingGamesNightViewModel where the GamesNight a gamesnight and attending is where the user is attending the games night via the attending table.
Thanking you!

EF Core code first Inheritance of separate table

Say I have a table Company defined in following entity:
public class Company
{
public Guid CompanyId { get; set; }
[Required]
public string Name { get; set; }
[MaxLength(50)]
public string Uid { get; set; }
...
}
And I need another table CompanyHistory what will have all fields of Company extended with CompanyHistoryId, EffectiveDate, DEffectiveDate.
I have tried it like this:
public class CompanyHistory : Company
{
public Guid CompanyHistoryId { get; set; }
public virtual Company { get; set; }
}
But instead of 2 tables migration makes one and combines all the columns.
How can I get same result without writing all the column again as is done here:
public class CompanyHistory
{
public Guid CompanyHistoryId { get; set; }
public Guid CompanyId { get; set; }
public virtual Company Company { get; set; }
[Required]
public string Name { get; set; }
[MaxLength(50)]
public string Uid { get; set; }
...
}