D3js. Working with classes - class

I am playing around with pie charts in d3.js. I want to have several charts working at the same time, and be able to select one or another by their class. The idea is that there is a main chart, and by clicking in the diferent areas, new charts should emerge displaying sub-categories.
Here's the piece of code that is giving me a headache:
// myPie has been deffined previously as --> var myPie = d3.layout.pie();
// dataPie is an array such as --> [2,3,1,2]
// level2 is just an array of arrays containing the sub-sets of data I want to display in the pie-charts
var myArcs = mySvg.selectAll("g")
.data(myPie(dataPie))
.enter()
.append("g")
.attr("class","arc")
.attr("transform","translate(" + xCenter +"," + yCenter + ")" )
// Appending other arcs
for(i=0; i<allData.length; i++){
var dataLabels_i = [];
var dataPie_i = [];
for(j=0; j<level2[i].length; j++){
dataLabels_i[j] = level2[i][j][0]
dataPie_i[j] = level2[i][j][1]
}
var arcArray =[];
var rectArray =[];
arcArray[i] = mySvg.selectAll("g")
.data(myPie(dataPie_i))
.enter()
.append("g")
.attr("class","arc_"+i)
.attr("transform","translate(" + xCenter +"," + yCenter + ")" )
}
The first piechart is generated nicely (it's ploted later on), but the charts that I generate in the for loop won't. I suspect that it has to do with the fact that I am generating "g's" in an svg that already has some "g's", so there is some sort of conflict and they override? I try to cope with this by assigning different classes to each chart.
Any idea?
Thanks to everyone!

As Mark mentioned, while trying to generating charts for the loop, you should use a more specific selector instead of using the general g selector, such as "arc_" + i if that's the different classes you want to assign.
The reason why using <g> selector doesn't generate a new chart is that when you selectAll("g") and bind data by myPie(dataPie_i) in the loop, d3 will find the previous g generated from the first piechart, therefore the enter() selection won't be updated, it's empty in this case, <g> won't be appended. More details about join data can be found here.

Related

Apps Script: setting one formula for a whole column

I'm working on an Apps Script project for Sheets and I don't know if it's because I just never really worked with Sheets or Excel, but I don't know how to set a formula for a whole column through code.
var cell = sheet.getRange([i], 2);
var cell2 = sheet.getRange([i], 1);
var inhoud = cell2.getValue();
cell.setFormula("=(" + inhoud/86400000 + "DATE(1970,1,1)");
I want every B of a row to do something with the A of that same row. In the sheet self it's easy to just "drag the function down", to make it apply to every row, but I don't know how to get that to work in code as I can't use A2, for example, or A2:A30. Part of the problem may be that it's in a for loop:
var subsie = [];
for (i = 0; i < subscriptions.length; i++) {
var subscription = subscriptions[i];
creationdate = subscription.creationTime;
if (subscription.plan.planName == 'ANNUAL' && subscription.renewalSettings.renewalType == 'AUTO_RENEW') {
subsie.push([creationdate, ' ', subscription.plan.planName]);
Logger.log(subsie);
var cell = sheet.getRange([i], 2);
var cell2 = sheet.getRange([i], 1);
var inhoud = cell2.getValue();
cell.setFormula("=(A1:A100/86400000) + DATE(1970,1,1)");
} }
sheet.getRange(sheet.getLastRow()+1, 1, subsie.length, subsie[0].length).setValues(subsie);
The actual goal is to convert the epoch values of A into dates, which I tried in a lot of different ways but turned out to be more difficult than I expected. This was the only formula that seemed to work for my output, which was like this: 1433235478178. How can I make this code work? Thanks in advance!
Solved it :)
creationdate = (subscription.creationTime/86400000)+25567;

How to automatically generate sequent numbers when using a form

Ahab stated in 2010: the complex looking number based on the Timestamp has one important property, the number can not change when rows are deleted or inserted.
As long as the submitted data is not changed by inserting deleting rows the simple formula =ArrayFormula(ROW(A2:A) - 1) may be the easiest one to use.
For other situations there is no nice reliable solution. :(
Now we live in 2015. Maybe times have changed?
I need a reliable way to number entries using a form.
Maybe a script can do the trick? A script that can add 1 to each entry?
That certain entry has to keep that number even when rows are deleted or inserted.
I created this simple spreadsheet in which I added 1,2, and 3 manually,please have a look:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1H9EXns8-7m9oLbCrTyIZhLKXk6TGxzWlO9pOvQSODYs/edit?usp=sharing
The script has to find the maximum of the former entries, which is 3, and then add 1 automatically.
Who can help me with this?
Grtz, Bij
Maybe a script can do the trick? A script that can add 1 to each
entry?
Yes, that would be what you need to resort to. I took the liberty of entering this in your example ss:
function onEdit(e) {
var watchColumns = [1, 2]; //when text is entered in any of these columns, auto-numbering will be triggered
var autoColumn = 3;
var headerRows = 1;
var watchSheet = "Form";
var range = e.range;
var sheet = range.getSheet();
if (e.value !== undefined && sheet.getName() == watchSheet) {
if (watchColumns.indexOf(range.getColumn()) > -1) {
var row = range.getRow();
if (row > headerRows) {
var autoCell = sheet.getRange(row, autoColumn);
if (!autoCell.getValue()) {
var data = sheet.getDataRange().getValues();
var temp = 1;
for (var i = headerRows, length = data.length; i < length; i++)
if (data[i][autoColumn - 1] > temp)
temp = data[i][autoColumn - 1];
autoCell.setValue(temp + 1);
}
}
}
}
}
For me the best way is to create a query in a second sheet pulling everything from form responses in to second column and so on. then use the first column for numbering.
In your second sheet B1 you would use:
=QUERY(Form!1:1004)
In your second sheet A2 you would use:
=ARRAYFORMULA(if(B2:B="",,Row(B2:B)-1))
I made a second sheet in your example spreadsheet, have a look at it.

jquery add numbers within one input field

I have found ways to add the numbers of multiple input fields together and output the result. However I am trying to find a way to add numbers within one field, if possible. I basically want it to work as if it was an excel cell and add up numbers using a + in between each one.
So as the user enters =125+11+110 it automatically is adding those numbers to and displaying the total next to the box.
You can split the string:
var expression = "125+11+110";
var operands = expression.split("+");
var sum = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < operands.length; i++) {
sum += parseInt(operands[i]); // use parseFloat if you use decimals as well.
}
But the above example will not know hot to do multiple types of operations in single text box. For example, 100+76-45 will give you incorrect answer.
You can also use eval, but know that it can be harmful if you used it in a wrong way.
var expression = "125+11+110";
var sum = eval(expression);
If you use eval:
do not store the strings user submitted in the database without sanitation.
do not send back the strings user submitted to the browser as JavaScript.
to be safe, just do not even send the user's strings to server at all.
This is the dirty method. It splits the input between the plus signs and adds up the values in the array:
var userinput = "125+11+110";
var userinputarray = userinput.split("+");
var totalamount = 0;
$(userinputarray).each(function(key,value){
totalamount += parseFloat(value);
})
It does not handle subtraction. However you can do a regex match instead:
var userinput = "125+11+110";
var userinputarray = userinput.match(/(\+|\-){0,1}[0-9.]{1,}/g);
var totalamount = 0;
$(userinputarray).each(function(key,value){
totalamount += parseFloat(value);
});
Parsefloat will remove the + symbol, while still using the negative sign.
var data = $('#inputfeildID').text();
var arr = data.split('+');
var total = 0;
for(i=0; i < arr.length ; i ++){
total += arr[i];
}
console.log( total );
When user click enter or submit , first get the value or text in the input field & then split it from + , then add the array elements . you will get the total value of the input box ..
if you want to add those number automatically when user is typing , you have to use jQuery keyup function & when user press + , then add the next number to previous one
You can put a keyup listener on the text box. Then in the code fired by the listener, if "myinput" is the id of your input field:
var exp = document.getElementById('myinput').value;
var result = eval(exp);
"result" will be the value of the expression. You should also really check "exp" to see that it is a valid entry, because the user could put any kind of garbage into the input field, and there could also be security issues.
You should use eval. Like so...
var input = "125+11+110";
var answer = eval(input);
http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/jsref_eval.asp

Multiple tabbed grids but record info only referencing to the grid in the first tab

I've got a form done in x++ (formBuild) and I managed to display different grids in different tabs. However, when I do a right-click record info on any of the grids other than the first one, the details are that of the first grid. Eg. The second row of grid 2 when I do a record info is actually the second row of grid 1.
One thing is all the grids are actually using the same table, just having different query ranges for each.
Any way to fix this?
Added code snippets
Making the grid:
for (counter = 0; counter < locations.lastIndex(); counter++)
{
formBuildDatasource = form.addDataSource(tableStr(SomeTable));
formBuildTabPageControl = formBuildTabControl.addControl(FormControlType::TabPage, locations.value(counter+1));
formBuildTabPageControl.caption(locations.value(counter+1));
formBuildGridControl = formBuildTabPageControl.addControl(FormControlType::Grid, locations.value(counter+1));
formBuildGridControl.allowEdit(0);
formBuildGridControl.dataSource(formBuildDatasource);
formBuildGridControl.height(500,-1);
formBuildGridControl.width(550,-1);
formBuildGridControl.addDataField(formBuildDatasource.id(), fieldNum(SomeTable, MachineId));
formBuildGridControl.addDataField(formBuildDatasource.id(), fieldNum(SomeTable, MachineStatus));
}
Adding the query:
for (counter = 0; counter < locations.lastIndex(); counter++)
{
fds = formRun.dataSource(counter+1);
qbds = fds.query().dataSourceNo(1);
qbr = Qbds.addRange(fieldnum(SomeTable, MachineLocation));
qbr.value(locations.value(counter+1));
}
This answer to your prior question applies here as well:
Adding view/temporary table records to Form Grid
You will have to use more than one datasource (using the same table). Remember to change the datasource attribute of the grids to match the correct one. My guess would be that they currently all reference the same datasource.
Can you make a query + view of the table, and have that as the 'child' entity?
I don't know why you can't have the same table referenced twice in the same form data sources, however. Ensure that the link between the tables are defined correctly, and you have no confusion with the datasource names that you use for them.
You actually need to set the datasource on the grid object using the id() method on the FormDataSource object, not just the full object.
Change from:
formBuildGridControl.dataSource(formBuildDatasource);
to:
formBuildGridControl.dataSource(formBuildDatasource.id());

Using cell value as reference to sheet in formulas

I have a spreadsheet with three sheets. Two are called 2012 and 2011 and have a bunch of similar data. The last sheet does comparisons between the data.
To be able to choose year, I'm using a cell (D1) where I can I can write either 2011 or 2012. The formulas then use the INDIRECT function to include this cell as part of the reference.
INDIRECT(CHAR(39)&$D$1&CHAR(39)&"!F:F")
This is not a pretty solution and makes the formula quite long and complex.
=IFERROR(SUM(FILTER( INDIRECT(CHAR(39)&$D$1&CHAR(39)&"!M:M") ; (INDIRECT(CHAR(39)&$D$1&CHAR(39)&"!B:B")=$A4)+(INDIRECT(CHAR(39)&$D$1&CHAR(39)&"!B:B")=$A5)+(INDIRECT(CHAR(39)&$D$1&CHAR(39)&"!B:B")=$A6)+(INDIRECT(CHAR(39)&$D$1&CHAR(39)&"!B:B")=$A7)+(INDIRECT(CHAR(39)&$D$1&CHAR(39)&"!B:B")=$A8); MONTH(INDIRECT(CHAR(39)&$D$1&CHAR(39)&"!D:D"))=$B$1 ; INDIRECT(CHAR(39)&$D$1&CHAR(39)&"!F:F")=D$3));0)
Is there a better way of doing this?
I've tried to create a separate spreadsheet for the calculations sheet and importing (IMPORTRANGE) the data from the two sheets together on one sheet with VMERGE (custom function from the script gallery) but there is quite a lot of of data in these two sheets and the import takes a long time. Any changes (like changing year) also take a long time to recalculate.
Database functions tend to be cleaner when doing this kind of thing.
https://support.google.com/docs/bin/static.py?hl=en&topic=25273&page=table.cs&tab=1368827
Database functions take a while to learn, but they are powerful.
Or
You could put INDIRECT(CHAR(39)&$D$1&CHAR(39)&"!B:B") in a cell on its own.
I think that you have two years of information where the schema is identical (column C has the same type of information on both sheets). Also, I'm assuming that column B tracks the year.
If so, consider holding all of your information on one sheet and and use the spreadsheet function "QUERY" to create views.
For instance, this formula returns all the cells between A1:E from a sheet named "DataSheet" where the values in column B = 2010.
=QUERY(DataSheet!A1:E; "SELECT * WHERE B = 2010";1)
Sometimes there is a really good reason to have the data stored on two sheets. If so, use one of the vMerge functions in the script gallery to assemble a working sheet. Then create views and reports from the working sheet.
function VMerge() {
var maxw=l=0;
var minw=Number.MAX_VALUE;
var al=arguments.length ;
for( i=0 ; i<al ; i++){
if( arguments[i].constructor == Array )l =arguments[i][0].length ;
else if (arguments[i].length!=0) l = 1 ; // literal values count as array with a width of one cell, empty cells are ignored!
maxw=l>maxw?l:maxw;
minw=l<minw?l:minw;
}
if( maxw==minw) { /* when largest width equals smallest width all are equal */
var s = new Array();
for( i=0 ; i<al ; i++){
if( arguments[i].constructor == Array ) s = s.concat( arguments[i].slice() )
else if (arguments[i].length!=0) s = s.concat( [[arguments[i]]] )
}
if ( s.length == 0 ) return null ; else return s //s
}
else return "#N/A: All data ranges must be of equal width!"
}
Hope this helps.