What I'm trying to do:
I'm trying to render a game board for a user using a canvas. The user
will be able to zoom.
Rendering the entire game board is impossible when the user is
zoomed in as the game board is very large. Instead I will render what
is onscreen every 1/30 sec.
I would like to create the illusion of the entire game board beings
inside a gui like the ScrollPane where the user can scroll with a
mouse.
In reality the ScrollPane will be linked to a single canvas exactly
the size of the viewport.
I'm not sure what the right way to go about this is. The scroll pane does not seem to have a property that allows you to pretend it has a large object in it. I could place a large canvas in the scroll pane but large canvases take up memory, as my crashes have suggested. Should I be using an AnchorPane or something? What's the proper way to do this?
It seems like putting an AnchorPane into the ScrollPane, setting that AnchorPane to the correct size (the size of the entire gameboard) works well to let the user scroll freely. From there all you have to do is put a canvas in the AnchorPane at the right place and keep moving it (and redrawing it) makes everything work out. To make it run smoothly I think you should render 100 to 500 pixels outside of the viewport of the ScrollPane. Here's some example code from my project:
public class GridViewPane {
/** ScrollPane that this grid exits in */
private ScrollPane gridScroll;
/** The anchor pane immediately inside of {#link #gridScroll}. The
* dimensions of this equals the dimensions of the {#link #can} if it was to
* render the entire grid at once */
private Pane gridView;
/** Exists in {#link #gridView} and is exactly the size of the viewport of
* {#link #gridScroll} */
private Canvas can;
/** A label the specifies what hex is currently moused-over */
private Label currentHexLabel;
public void update() {
// sets the canvas to the right size if needed
final Bounds viewportSize = gridScroll.getBoundsInLocal();
if (can == null || !can.getBoundsInLocal().equals(viewportSize)) {
can = new Canvas(viewportSize.getWidth(),
viewportSize.getHeight());
gc = can.getGraphicsContext2D();
}
// sets the anchorpane to the right size
final double[] dim = getPixleSizeOfGrid(w.columns(), w.rows(), r);
if (gridView == null) {
gridView = new AnchorPane();
gridScroll.setContent(gridView);
}
Bounds oldDim = gridView.getBoundsInLocal();
if (!(oldDim.getWidth() == dim[0]
&& oldDim.getHeight() == dim[1])) {
gridView.setPrefSize(dim[0], dim[1]);
}
// puts the canvas in the right position
if (!gridView.getChildren().contains(can))
gridView.getChildren().add(can);
double[] x = getXScreenRange();
double[] y = getYScreenRange();
can.relocate(x[0], y[0]);
// *********** Drawing Hexes ***********/
}
}
Related
I am trying to add 100 dynamically created buttons to a scroll view in Unity, but I have a problem letting the scroll view automatically adjust the width of the buttons to match the width of my screen.
When I tried to add the buttons manually it worked fine , but when I do this by code I get another results.
The code I am using :
public GameObject button;
public GameObject scrollviewcontents;
void Start()
{
for (int i =0; i<=100;i++) {
GameObject dbutton = Instantiate(button);
dbutton.name = i.ToString();
dbutton.transform.parent = scrollviewcontents.transform;
}
}
and The results I get :
Results
Results with comments
I just want the buttons to look like as they are added manually, any help ???
By default when instantiating an object the object keeps the same world space position, rotation and scale as before. try this instead:
dbutton.transform.SetParent(scrollviewcontents.transform, false);
In Unity, I created a UI Scroll Rect Object. This object has two children, a Button Handler with different Buttons, and a Background.
Using it, both the Buttons and the Background are scrolling at the same speed. I want the Buttons to scroll faster than the Background, thus creating an effect of depth to the scrolling.
I can not find any options in the Objects or the Scroll Rect for this. Any ideas?
This will require a tiny bit of scripting. The best way in my opinion would involve following steps:
a) for each button, add a component that remembers its start position.
b) grab a scrollrect instance in parent
c) using it to grab an instance of ScrollBar
d) scrollbars have onValueChanged(float) callbacks, you can bind to, to know when the scroll position changes (to avoid doing checks in Update)
e) every time a scrollbar has moved (This will work regardless of whether the user used the scrollbar, or used another mean of scrolling, as the scrollrect will move the scrollbar, which will fire the event anyways), you get a callback with current scrollbar position which will be equal to normalized scrollrect position (0.1)
f) use that value to offset your localposition (something value*parallaxVector2), this should give you a nice cheap depth effect
Here's an example implementation
public class ScrolleRectDepthButton : MonoBehaviour
{
RectTransform content; // we'll grab it for size reference
RectTransform myRect;
public float parallaxAmount = 0.05f;
public Vector2 startPosition;
void Start()
{
myRect = GetComponent<RectTransform>();
startPosition = myRect.anchoredPosition;
ScrollRect scrollRect = GetComponentInParent<ScrollRect>();
content = scrollRect.content;
Scrollbar scrollbar = scrollRect.verticalScrollbar;
scrollbar.onValueChanged.AddListener(OnScrollbarMoved);
}
void OnScrollbarMoved(float f)
{
myRect.anchoredPosition = startPosition - (1 - f) * parallaxAmount * content.rect.height * Vector2.up;
}
}
I hate to ask such a generic question but I'm really stuck and super hoping someone can help me along the way. Here is the situation:
I'm making the GUI for a mobile app, portrait mode. I'm using canvas scalers to scale my canvasses with a reference width of 1080. This means I effectively don't know the height of my screen space.
What I want to create is a menu with a variable amount of items. The menu must be anchored to the bottom (with an offset margin) and grow upwards. So far I've been able to manage this using VerticalLayoutGroup and anchoring the rect transform to the bottom.
But my last requirement is that if the content would grow too big, a scrollbar would appear. The definition of the content being too big is: if it would extend the (unknown) screen height ( minus the offset margin of course). I hope the following image illustrates this much clearer:
I have a unity project here: https://ufile.io/v31br
Did you give a try to scrollView? here it is: https://unity3d.com/learn/tutorials/topics/user-interface-ui/scroll-view
You can use your vertical layout inside it and you will probably want to deactivate horizontal scroll and delete the horizontal slider.
Via script you can check its rectTransform height and compare it to your container's size, when reached maxHeight you can start managing your item's sizes
I assume you use the ScrollRect component as it is the right component to use in your case.
You can check the screen height with the Screen.height property.
Once you know the screen height you can compare it with your rect height and toggle the scrollbar with the ScrollRect.vertical property. You may have to change the ScrollRect.verticalScrollbarVisibility to permanent in order to make it work for you.
The answer Dave posted was close, but the problem is that the scrollview doesn't expand. I fixed it eventually by stretching the scrollview and resizing the parent manually as items are added. I set the anchors to the maximum size and adjust the sizeDelta.
public class MenuScript : MonoBehaviour
{
public int MenuItemCount;
public GameObject MenuItemPrefab;
public Transform MenuItemParent;
private RectTransform _rectTransform;
void Start()
{
_rectTransform = GetComponent<RectTransform>();
for (var i = 0; i <= MenuItemCount; i++)
{
GameObject instance = Instantiate(MenuItemPrefab, MenuItemParent, false);
instance.GetComponent<Text>().text = instance.name = "Item " + i;
float size = instance.transform.GetComponent<RectTransform>().sizeDelta.y;
TryExpandBy(size + 10);
}
}
private void TryExpandBy(float size)
{
var deltaY = _rectTransform.sizeDelta.y + size;
if (deltaY > 0) deltaY = 0;
_rectTransform.sizeDelta = new Vector2(_rectTransform.sizeDelta.x, deltaY);
}
}
I'm trying to create an InputField (TextMesh Pro) with a dynamic (its text content may vary) prefix.
This spectacular image should explain the goal.
https://imgur.com/a/qx1eXOa
So I set a TextMeshPro text to use as Prefix, and by script I was trying to "move" the TextArea accordingly.
The fact is, TextArea is a RectTransform, and I'm operating in a ScreenSpace render mode.
I was trying like this:
private TextMeshProGUI prefix;
private RecTransform textArea;
public void ChangePrefixTo(string newPrefix)
{
float oldWidth = prefix.preferredWidth;
prefix.text = newPrefix;
float newWidth = prefix.preferredWidth;
Vector2 newPos = new Vector2();
newPos.x = textArea.position.x + (newWidth - oldWidth);
newPos.y = textArea.position.y;
textArea.position = newPos;
}
, but the textArea gets shot into the stars.
How can I map the RectTransform position according to the size of a TextMeshPro text?
Thanks for the help and long live the whales
Instead of using a script to resize your prefix, you can group both of your elements in a Horizontal Layout Group, check only Width for Child Controls Size.
Add a Layout Element and set your Preferred Width to define the size of your TextArea.
The Prefix will scale according to his content, and it will push your text area as it grows.
I'm trying to create a scroll grid view in which every cell object is tapable.
When a cell object is tapped I want to scale and traslate it to the center of the screen and render it above other cells.
I was able to make it tapable and scale it in its position. Now I want to move the cell object to the center of the screen and render it above other cells.
I've tried many solutions but none of them works.
This is my hierarchy:
This is the grid in normal state:
This is the grid when a cell was tapped:
I'm populating the grid from a C# script dynamically.
void Populate()
{
GameObject cardContainerInstance, cardInstance;
foreach (var c in cardsCollection.GetAll())
{
if (c.IsOwned)
{
cardContainerInstance = Instantiate(cardContainer, transform);
cardInstance = cardContainerInstance.transform.Find("Card").gameObject;
var cardManager = cardInstance.GetComponent<CardManager>();
cardManager.card = c;
cardManager.AddListener(this);
}
else
{
Instantiate(cardSlot, transform);
}
}
}
public void OnCardClick(GameObject cardObject, Card card)
{
Debug.Log("OnCardClick " + card.name);
if (openedCard != null) {
if (openedCard.Number == card.Number)
{
CloseCard(openedCardObject);
}
else
{
CloseCard(openedCardObject);
OpenCard(cardObject, card);
}
}
else
{
OpenCard(cardObject, card);
}
}
void OpenCard(GameObject cardObject, Card card)
{
//cardObject.GetComponent<Canvas>().sortingOrder = 1;
var animator = cardObject.GetComponent<Animator>();
animator.SetTrigger("Open");
openedCard = card;
openedCardObject = cardObject;
}
void CloseCard(GameObject cardObject)
{
var animator = cardObject.GetComponent<Animator>();
animator.SetTrigger("Close");
openedCard = null;
openedCardObject = null;
}
I can't figure out how to move the cell to the center and render it above others.
Note that all is animated using an animator attached to the object itself.
Could anyone help me please? Thank you very much!
EDIT: more details
All cell object have the following hierarchy:
where:
CardContainer is an empty object added to use animator on Card child object
Card is the object itself that has a script, a canvas renderer and an animator
StatsImage is the object that slide out when the card is tapped
Image is a calssic UIImage with Image script, Shadow script and canvas renderer
Other component are simple texts.
EDIT: fix in progress
Trying to apply this suggestions I was able to manage the rendering order (as you see on the image below) but it seems that prevent touch events to be detected on the game object.
I've added a GraphicsRaycaster too and now the bottom horizontal scroll view scrolls again but only if I click and drag a card.
Moreover, with the GraphicsRaycaster, the main grid card still are not clickable and it's possible to open the card only if it is behind the bottom panel (if I click on the red spot in the image below the card behind the panel receives che click)
This is the CardContainer at runtime(note that I'm attaching new Canvas and GraphicsRaycaster on the CardContainer, which is the "root" element):
You didn't clarify whether you are using a sprite renderer or some other method but here is an answer for each.
Sprite renderer:
this the simple one. In each sprite renderer, there is a variable called "sortingOrder" in script and "Order in layer" in the inspector. sprite renderer with sorting Orders that are higher is rendered first. All you would need to do is call:
cardObject.GetComponent<SpriteRenderer>().sortingOrder = 1;
when you click the card, and
cardObject.GetComponent<SpriteRenderer>().sortingOrder = 0;
when you unclick it. I hope that makes sense!
Other Method:
this one is a bit harder and I would suggest that you switch to sprite renderers and it will be much easier and more stable down the road, but I can understand if you have already written a lot of scripts and don't want to go back and change them.
Anyway, all you will need to do Is create two layers: cardLower and cardUpper. then create a new camera and call it topCamera. now under the top camera object in the inspector, change the culling mask (it's near the top) and make sure cardUpper is selected. then change the Clear flags (first one) to "Don't Clear" finally change the depth to 0 (if that doesn't work change it to -2). Now objects in the cardUpper will always be rendered above everything else. You can change the layer through script with
cardObject.layer = "cardUpper"
or
cardObject.layer = "cardLower"
I hope that helps!
Ok, so its pretty simple. So you are going to want to add another canvas component to the game object, and check the override sorting to true. Then use
cardObject.GetComponent<Canvas>().sortingOrder = 1;
to place it in the front and
cardObject.GetComponent<Canvas>().sortingOrder = 0;
to put it in the back.
you are also going to need to put a GraphicsRaycaster on to each of the cardObjects
Ignore my other answer about sprite renderers, they are not needed here