I have a class called UFDevice, in order to initialise it needs a location string.
I also have a class called UFResponse which among other things provides a location.
As the device only requires a location should I just take that in, so that it could be init'ed in some use case where there is no UFResponse.
Or should I pass in the whole response, in case later on it needs more info than just the location?
in pseudocode:
foundDevice(Data data) {
response = new UFResponse(data);
device = new UFDevice(response);
}
or:
foundDevice(Data data) {
response = new UFResponse(data);
device = new UFDevice(response.location);
}
or even should I encapsulate UFResponse in UFDevice, as currently it's only used to create UFDevices:
foundDevice(Data data) {
device = new UFDevice(data);
}
Future possibilities could include:
//maybe in the future I have saved a favourite location so need to do:
loadFavourite(String location) {
device = new UFDevice(location);
}
//or device needs more info
device = new UFDevice(location, color, ...20 more parameters...);
Where do I draw the line of separation? More importantly how can I decide this for myself in the future?
It sounds like a problem of interface segragation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interface_segregation_principle). UFDevice is constructed from a UFResponse, but it doesn't need everything the UFResponse contains. It only needs a part of it, and you don't want UFDevice to be affected when UFResponse is changing in areas that should not affect UFDevice.
One approach is to have UFResponse inherit from an interface called UFDeviceParams, if this makes sense (might be multiple inheritance), and then UFDevice should get in its constructor a reference to UFDeviceParams.
This allows to initialize UFDevice based on the entire UFResponse, or based on a more light-weight instance of UFFavouriteParams (that also inherits from UFDeviceParams) that contains only the location + color etc...
foundDevice(Data data) {
response = new UFResponse(data);
device = new UFDevice(response);
}
loadFavourite(String location) {
params = new UFFavouriteParams(location);
device = new UFDevice(params);
}
To really know if this is the best approach for your case, one would need to learn more about your system, understand the use cases and the boundaries between modules. I recommend to watch Robert Martin's video on the Interface Segratation Principle and SOLID principles in general (https://cleancoders.com/category/solid-principles)
Related
Trying to understand how to implement simple source control management in my language extension.
I need to show a Quick Diff for a single file (my extension doesn't work with folders) compared with some special one.
Let's say i have this TextDocumentContentProvider and QuickDiffProvider:
class MyLangDocumentContentProvider implements vscode.TextDocumentContentProvider
{
provideTextDocumentContent(uri: vscode.Uri)
{
return getFileText(uri); // returns text of provided file uri
}
}
class MyLangRepository implements vscode.QuickDiffProvider
{
provideOriginalResource(uri: vscode.Uri)
{
return getOriginalFileUri(uri); // returns uri of the special file to compare with
}
}
Then in activate method of extension i initialize them:
const docProvider = new MyLangDocumentContentProvider();
const gitSCM = vscode.scm.createSourceControl('git', 'Git');
gitSCM.quickDiffProvider = new MyLangRepository();
const workingTree = gitSCM.createResourceGroup('workingTree', 'Changes');
workingTree.resourceStates = [
{ resourceUri: vscode.window.activeTextEditor.document.uri }
];
Then i need to call registerTextDocumentContentProvider with some custom uri scheme. So why do i need custom uri scheme? And what else should i do to track changes of current file relative to the special one?
I was looking at vscode-extension-samples/source-control-sample, but it looks more complicated then my case.
Thanks for any advices!
Though my question was rather sily, let me save here some kind of instruction, how I've done this.
to make QuickDif work you don't need neither ResourceGroups nor TextDocumentContentProvider, this is a separate functionality.
SourceControl (and also its quickDiffProvider) will work if you pass some root directory in constructor (I've got no luck without thoug I don't need it for my purpose).
I'm trying to use Pkcs11Interop to sign a message using the private key from a smart card certificate in a C# application. The smart card we are using contain multiple certificates - usually one is for signing, and one is for authentication. If I were using X509Certificate2, I'd filter certificates based on the X509KeyUsageFlags I'm looking for. I'm struggling to figure out how to approach this using PKCS11.
The code I'm starting with is below. When I call session.FindAllObjects, I'm getting 2 certificates in the result (which is expected, since that is how many certificates are on the smart card.)
I've tried using GetAttributeValue to read various attributes and see if I can use those to identify the correct certificate - strangely, they all return null/0 values. Querying the CKA_SENSITIVE attribute returns True (which is, again, expected), but apparently I cannot read other attributes from the objects.
Am I doing something incorrect in my usage of GetAttributeValue? Or is there some other way I should be approaching this problem?
public byte[] SignMessage(byte[] message, string pin)
{
var factories = new Pkcs11InteropFactories();
using (IPkcs11Library pkcs11Library = factories.Pkcs11LibraryFactory.LoadPkcs11Library(factories, DriverPath, AppType.SingleThreaded))
{
ISlot slot = GetSlot(pkcs11Library);
if (slot == null)
{
return null;
}
using (ISession session = slot.OpenSession(SessionType.ReadWrite))
{
session.Login(CKU.CKU_USER, pin);
var searchTemplate = new List<IObjectAttribute> {
factories.ObjectAttributeFactory.Create(CKA.CKA_CLASS, CKO.CKO_PRIVATE_KEY),
factories.ObjectAttributeFactory.Create(CKA.CKA_KEY_TYPE, CKK.CKK_RSA),
factories.ObjectAttributeFactory.Create(CKA.CKA_SIGN, true),
};
List<IObjectHandle> foundObjects = session.FindAllObjects(searchTemplate); // foundObjects.Count = 2!
IObjectHandle privateKey = foundObjects.FirstOrDefault();
var readResult = session.GetAttributeValue(privateKey, new List<CKA>() { CKA.CKA_LABEL });
var label = readResult[0].GetValueAsString(); // label ends up being null!
byte[] result = null;
using (IMechanism signingMechanism = session.Factories.MechanismFactory.Create(CKM.CKM_SHA256_RSA_PKCS))
{
result = session.Sign(signingMechanism, privateKey, message);
}
session.DestroyObject(privateKey);
session.Logout();
return result;
}
}
}
I came up with a solution through trial-and-error that seems to function correctly. I'm not sure if this is the correct approach, since it seems quite convoluted, so any feedback would be appreciated. I discovered that the contents of the card include a variety of objects, and a single key pair consists of three objects: a CKO_CERTIFICATE object (which seems to contain the brunt of the metadata about the certificate/keypair), a CKO_PRIVATE_KEY object and a CKO_PUBLIC_KEY object. Each of these has the CKA_ID property populated, and the objects that are part of the same key pair should have the same CKA_ID.
So I built a CertificateWrapper wrapper class to hold references to each of the three objects. I then looped over all objects on the smart card, and built CertificateWrapper objects for each unique key pair.
Then, I was able to construct an X509Certificate2 object using the CKA_VALUE attribute on the CKO_CERTIFICATE object. From there, I was able to build a X509Certificate2Collection object using an array of all of the X509Certificate2 objects I made. I could then use the .Find method (or any other method I wanted) on X509Certificate2Collection to filter down to the particular certificate I was looking for.
Once I had the X509Certificate2 object I was looking for, I was able to map it back to the CertificateWrapper object by matching the serial number from the X509Certificate2 against the CKA_SERIAL_NUMBER attribute from the CKO_CERTIFICATE object. Finally, I was able to use the CKO_PRIVATE_KEY object associated with that CKO_CERTIFICATE to do the signing operation.
Like I said, this seems very round-about, but seemed to allow me to find the correct certificate/key pair I needed for my specific workflow. Hope this explanation might be useful to someone, and I also welcome any feedback on problems with this approach and/or better ways to handle this.
I have a flutter application which (simply put) list some data on various screens and can be modified. My current data approach works, but I feel it is not a best practice or optimal.
Currently, when a object is saved, it is converted to JSON (using dart:convert) and stored in a file on the device (using dart.io), overriding the file if it exist. Every screen that needs to display these objects reads the file to get the objects. Every time there is a change that needs to be saved, it exports everything (overwrites) again then imports it again to display it.
The reason I chose JSON over S is because I want to add a web portion later. Does this approach of reading/writing a best practice? I feel this much reading/writing of all the data for most screens could cause some performance issues.
Any advice is appreciated!
This is a possible way to keep data in-memory and write to disk when changes are made to your datamodel/settings.
I use RxDart myself. You don't need it per se, although it does make life easier. I'll be simplifying the examples below, so you get to know the concept and apply it to your own needs.
Let say you keep track of data in your settings class:
#JsonSerializable()
class Settings {
String someData1;
String someData2;
// json seriazable functions
}
You need a "handler"1 or something similar that manages changes made to your Settings and also to read/write data:
class SettingsHandler {
Settings _settings;
StreamController<Settings> _settingsController = BehaviorSubject<Settings>();
StreamController<String> _data1Controller = BehaviorSubject<String>();
StreamSink<String> get data1Input => _data1Controller.sink;
Observable<String> get data1Output => Observable(_data1Controller.stream);
Future<Settings> _readFromDisk() async {
// do your thing
}
Future<Settings> _writeToDisk(Settings settings) async {
// do your thing
}
Future<void> init() async {
// read from disk
_settings = await _readFromDisk();
_settingsController.sink.add(_settings);
// initialize data
data1Input.add(_settings.someData1);
data1Output
.skip(1) // we skip because we just added our initialization data above.
.listen((value) =>
// we must propagate through the update function
// otherwise nothing gets written to disk
update((settings) => settings.someData1 = value)
);
// when changes are made, it needs to notify this stream
// so everything can be written to disk
_settingsSaver.output
// save settings every 2.5 seconds when changes occur.
.debounceTime(const Duration(milliseconds: 2500))
// get the changes and write to disk
.listen((settings) => _writeToDisk(settings));
}
// this function is crucial as it allows changes to be made via the [adjustFunc]
// and then propagates this into the _settingsSaver stream.
void update(void Function(Settings input) adjustFunc) {
adjustFunc(_settings);
_settingsSaver.sink.add(_settings);
}
}
So now you can do something like
var handler = SettingsHandler();
await handler.init();
// this
handler.data1Input.add('NewData');
// or this
handler.update((settings) {
settings.someData1 = 'NewData';
});
Remember, this code only shows how the concept can work. You need to change it for your situation. You could also decide to not expose data1Input or the update(...) function, this is up to your own design.
1 I personally use BloC, your situation might require a different way.
I'd like to have an area called "Products", where I can use routes such as
http://localhost/products/foo
http://localhost/products/bar
I would like to have the views and other assets organized into a folder structure like
/areas/products/views/foo/index.aspx
/areas/products/views/bar/index.aspx
I'd like to keep images, etc specifically related to each product (foo, bar) in their respective /area/products/views/(foo|bar)/ folder.
I also do not want to have to add a controller action for each product.
If I declare a route like
context.MapRoute(
"products-show-product"
, "Products/{id}"
, new { controller = "Products", action = "Index", id=UrlParameter.Optional }
);
and request the url
http://localhost/products/foo
then ProductsController.Index() is called, as I would expect. However, since the view "foo" is not in the views/products or views/shared folder, it isn't being found.
How can I do this so that I can keep each product's pages in a separate folder?
I don't have a concrete answer to your question since I am not sure about my understanding of it. However I have a general feeling for the direction for the solution.
When one starts to change locations of views, the corresponding methods that find those views also need to change. A simple approach would be to override the FindView and FindPartialView methods.
A simple demo. I created an Area called Blog, a Blog controller with an Index method. In my case I user the controller action as the SubFolder but I am sure that this can be extended to your case for each product folder. I assume that the product will be a request argument. Area http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/85b5306402.gif
The basic idea is to interrogate the controllercontext for the controller, area, action and id and modify the what the default viewengine looks for. The default locations for area views looks like "~/Areas/{2}/Views/{1}/{0}.aspx", so we can basically inject values for the view name and in this case ActionName/Index. The view location will end up being ~/Area/Blog/Views/Blog/Index/Index.aspx.
This is just a rough outline, of the code that can be used. The string comparisons can definitely be updated to more robust methods. As it stands this method will work for the entire app as expected, except for the case when a request is made to the Blog area for the Index action.
public override ViewEngineResult FindView(ControllerContext controllerContext, string viewName, string masterName, bool useCache)
{
if (controllerContext.RouteData.DataTokens ["Area"] == "Blog" )
{
if (String.Compare(controllerContext.RouteData.Values ["Action"].ToString(),"Index",true) == 0)
{
var viewLocation = String.Format("{0}/{1}", controllerContext.RouteData.Values["Action"].ToString(), viewName);
return base.FindView(controllerContext, viewLocation , masterName, useCache);
}
}
return base.FindView(controllerContext, viewName, masterName, useCache);
}
I have a controller that stores various info (Ie. FormID, QuestionAnswerList, etc). Currently I am storing them in the Controller.Session and it works fine.
I wanted to break out some logic into a separate class (Ie. RulesController), where I could perform certain checks, etc, but when I try and reference the Session there, it is null. It's clear that the Session remains valid only within the context of the specific controller, but what is everyone doing regarding this?
I would imagine this is pretty common, you want to share certain "global" variables within the different controllers, what is best practice?
Here is a portion of my code:
In my BaseController class:
public List<QuestionAnswer> QuestionAnswers
{
get
{
if (Session["QuestionAnswers"] == null)
{
List<QuestionAnswer> qAnswers = qaRepository.GetQuestionAnswers(CurrentSection, UserSmartFormID);
Session["QuestionAnswers"] = qAnswers;
return qAnswers;
}
else
{
return (List<QuestionAnswer>)Session["QuestionAnswers"];
}
}
set
{
Session["QuestionAnswers"] = value;
}
}
In my first Controller (derived from BaseController):
QuestionAnswers = qaRepository.GetQuestionAnswers(CurrentSection, UserSmartFormID);
I stepped through the code and the above statement executes fine, setting the Session["QuestionAnswers"], but then when I try to get from another controller below, the Session["QuestionAnswers"] is null!
My second controller (also derived from BaseController):
List<QuestionAnswer> currentList = (List<QuestionAnswer>)QuestionAnswers;
The above line fails! It looks like the Session object itself is null (not just Session["QuestionAnswers"])
does it make a difference if you retrieve your session using
HttpContext.Current.Session("mySpecialSession") ''# note this is VB, not C#
I believe TempData will solve your problem, it operates with in the session and persists across multiple requests, however by default it will clear the stored data once you access it again, if that's a problem you can tell it to keep the info with the newly added Keep() function.
So in your case:
...
TempData["QuestionAnswers"] = qAnswers;
...
There's much more info at:
http://weblogs.asp.net/jacqueseloff/archive/2009/11/17/tempdata-improvements.aspx
Where are you accessing the session in the second controller? The session object is not available in the constructor because it is injected later on in the lifecycle.
Ok, finally got it working, although a bit kludgy. I found the solution from another related SO post.
I added the following to my BaseController:
public new HttpContextBase HttpContext
{
get
{
HttpContextWrapper context =
new HttpContextWrapper(System.Web.HttpContext.Current);
return (HttpContextBase)context;
}
}
Then set/retrieved my Session variables using HttpContext.Session and works fine!