I have the following line in a WebApi controller;
string Codes = i.Products.FirstOrDefault().Code
As the line states, it gets the code, from the first Product.
But, what I really want it to do is to get all unique codes, and return them as a comma separated string.
So, let's say, there are 6 related products, and they have the following codes:
45
54
45
120
54
45
Right now, the statement just returns "45", given the above data.
But I want the statement above to return "45, 54, 120" (as a string).
How do I do this?
Complete code:
public System.Data.Entity.DbSet<WebAPI.Models.Product> Products { get; set; }
private ApplicationDbContext db = new ApplicationDbContext();
var product = await db.Products.Select(i =>
new ProductDTO()
{
Id = i.Id,
Created = i.Created,
Title = i.Title,
Codes = i.Products.FirstOrDefault().Code
}).SingleOrDefaultAsync(i => i.Id == id);
To convert to a comma separated list:
IEnumerable<string> distinctCodes = i.Products.Select(product => product.Code).Distinct();
return string.Join(",", distinctCodes);
But it's probably better if your controller returns a collection of string instead of a concatenated string.
Edit, after OP code update:
var DBProduct = await db.Products.SingleOrDefaultAsync(i => i.Id == id);
IEnumerable<string> productCodes = DBProduct.Products.Select(p => p.Code).Distinct();
var product = new ProductDTO()
{
Id = DBProduct.Id,
Created = DBProduct.Created,
Title = DBProduct.Title,
Codes = string.Join(",", productCodes)
};
I think Distinctand String.Join works for you.Please try this:
var product = await db.Products.AsEnumerable()//Turn AsEnumarable
.Select(i =>
new ProductDTO()
{
Id = i.Id,
Created = i.Created,
Title = i.Title,
Codes = string.Join(",",
i.Products.Select(l => l.Code).Distinct())
}).SingleOrDefaultAsync(i => i.Id == id);
Related
I am working a asp .net core web API with EF core.
I wrote this query. But this take 20-30seconds to execute.
Anyone have idea to improve this query.
var hotels = await _context.Hotels
.Where(i => (i.DestinationCode == request.Destination))
.Select(i => new HotelListHotelVm
{
Item1 = i.Item1,
Item2 = i.Item2,
Item3 = i.Item3,
Item4Code = i.Item4Code,
Item4Description = i.Item4.TypeDescription,
Item5 = i.Item5.Select(x => new HotelListHotelVm.HotelListItem5Vm
{
Code = x.Item5Code,
Description = x.Item5.Description,
}).Where(x =>(incomingItem5s.Length > 0 ) ? (incomingItem5s.Contains(x.Code)) : (x.Code != "")),
Item6 = i.Item6.Select(x => new HotelListHotelVm.HotelListHotelItem6Vm
{
Id = x.Id,
Item6TypeCode = x.Item6TypeCode,
Order = x.Order,
Path = x.Path,
VisualOrder = x.VisualOrder,
}).Take(3),
HotelFacilities = i.Facilities.ToList().Distinct().Take(6).Select(x => new HotelListHotelVm.HotelListFacilityVm {
Id = x.Id,
FacilityGroupCode = x.FacilityGroupCode,
HotelFacilityGroupDescription = x.FacilityGroup.Description,
FacilityCode = x.FacilityCode
}),
})
.Where( i => ((incomingItem4.Length > 0 ) ? (incomingItem4.Contains(i.Item4Code)) : (i.Item4Code != "")) )
.OrderByDescending(i => i.Code)
.PaginatedListAsync(request.PageNumber, request.PageSize);
foreach( var item in hotels.Items){
foreach(var facility in item.HotelFacilities){
foreach( var fac in _context.Facilities){
if(facility.FacilityCode == fac.Code){
facility.HotelFacilityDescription = fac.Description;
}
}
}
}
I f I remove those foreach code, The query takes 8-10s to execute.
But I need those foreach codes. Because I need the HotelFacilityDescription
Any suggestion for optimize the query ?
Edit The i.Facilities - model
public class HotelFacility
{
// removed some
public int FacilityCode { get; set; }
public int FacilityGroupCode { get; set; }
public FacilityGroup FacilityGroup { get; set; }
public int HotelCode { get; set; }
public Hotel Hotel { get; set; }
}
}
_context.Facilities will be enumerated (i.e. database will be called) for every iteration of previous loops. The quick fix is to call it ones and store results in variable:
var facilities = _context.Facilities.ToList();
foreach( var item in hotels.Items){
foreach(var facility in item.HotelFacilities){
foreach(var fac in facilities){
if(facility.FacilityCode == fac.Code){
facility.HotelFacilityDescription = fac.Description;
}
}
}
}
Next improvement can be converting facilities into Dictionary for searching purposes.
Even better approach can be writing query joining with _context.Facilities on database side (but here more info needed).
I've read this a couple times, but it looks like the relationship for Hotel.Facilities is a Facility, so could you not just do:
HotelFacilities = i.Facilities.ToList().Distinct().Take(6).Select(x => new HotelListHotelVm.HotelListFacilityVm {
Id = x.Id,
FacilityGroupCode = x.FacilityGroupCode,
HotelFacilityGroupDescription = x.FacilityGroup.Description,
FacilityCode = x.FacilityCode,
HotelFacilityDescription = x.Description
}),
If for some reason Hotel.Facilities is not pointing at a Facility, but is a Many-to-Many HotelFacilityGroup entity to a FacilityGroup, that also contains a FacilityCode, if the associated FacilityGroup has access to a set of Facilities beneath it you could leverage that:
Edit: It sounds like multiple Facilities share the same Code where some may have a null description. Provided that the facilities matching the code would be within the same facility group and not consider the same Code within different facility groups. If you need to match the code across all facilities then there probably isn't much of an alternative to loading the entire set of facility codes & descriptions.
HotelFacilities = i.Facilities.ToList().Distinct().Take(6).Select(x => new HotelListHotelVm.HotelListFacilityVm {
Id = x.Id,
FacilityGroupCode = x.FacilityGroupCode,
HotelFacilityGroupDescription = x.FacilityGroup.Description,
FacilityCode = x.FacilityCode,
HotelFacilityDescription = x.FacilityGroup.Facilities.Where(f => f.Code == x.FacilityCode && f.Description != null).Select(f => f.Description).FirstOrDefault()
}),
That would avoid the need to go load all of the facilities to resolve that code. Otherwise, if you do need to fetch across all facilities, pre-loading them would be the way to go, but rather than fetching the entire Facility entity I would recommend just the values you need, the Code and the Description. This cuts down on the amount of memory needed and potentially be a faster query:
var facilities = _context.Facilities
.Select(f => new
{
f.Code,
f.Description
}).ToList();
Edit:
From there, finding a match using:
foreach( var facility in hotels.Items.SelectMany(x => x.HotelFacilities)
{
facility.HotelFaciltyDescription = facilities
.Where(x => x.Code == facility.FacilityCode
&& !string.IsNullOrEmpty(x.Description)
.Select(x => x.Description)
.FirstOrDefault();
}
I would recommend an OrderBy clause to ensure the selection of the facility is predictable as it sounds like there could be multiple matches on a code with a non-null description.
The loop can be eliminated by projecting the value in the LINQ to Entities query.
It would have been quite easy if you had relationship and navigation property like other *Code fields. But as clarified in the comments, there is no such relationship, so you have to resort to old good manual left other join to emulate what navigation property provide automatically, e.g.
HotelFacilities = i.Facilities.ToList().Distinct().Take(6)
// left outer join with Facilities
.SelectMany(x => _context.Facilities
.Where(f => x.FacilityCode == f.Code).DefaultIfEmpty(),
(x, x_Facility) => new HotelListHotelVm.HotelListFacilityVm
{
Id = x.Id,
FacilityGroupCode = x.FacilityGroupCode,
HotelFacilityGroupDescription = x.FacilityGroup.Description,
FacilityCode = x.FacilityCode,
HotelFacilityDescription = x_Facility.Description // <--
}),
Here x_Facility emulates optional reference navigation property x.Facility if existed.
In case you need just single property from the related table, instead of a left join you could also use the original query with single value returning correlated subquery inside the projection, e.g.
HotelFacilities = i.Facilities.ToList().Distinct().Take(6)
.Select(x => new HotelListHotelVm.HotelListFacilityVm
{
Id = x.Id,
FacilityGroupCode = x.FacilityGroupCode,
HotelFacilityGroupDescription = x.FacilityGroup.Description,
FacilityCode = x.FacilityCode,
HotelFacilityDescription = _context.Facilities
.Where(f => x.FacilityCode == f.Code)
.Select(f => f.Description)
.FirstOrDefault() // <--
}),
or even
HotelFacilityDescription = _context.Facilities
.FirstOrDefault(f => x.FacilityCode == f.Code).Description
All these will eliminate the need of the post loop executiong additional database queries. You can test them and take the one with best performance (#2 and #3 produce one and the same SQL, so it's a matter of taste - the choice is between #1 and #2/3).
We regularily write extension methods like this that convert from Database objects to DTO objects for use elsewhere in our system.
As you can see in the example below, the actual mapping code is repeated. Is it possible to write a reusable select mapping that can be used in both of these methods?
public static async Task<List<Group>> ToCommonListAsync(this IQueryable<DataLayer.Models.Group> entityGroups)
{
var groups =
await entityGroups.Select(
g =>
new Group()
{
Id = g.Id,
AccountId = g.AccountId,
Name = g.Name,
ParentId = g.ParentId,
UserIds = g.GroupUserMappings.Select(d => d.UserId).ToList()
}).ToListAsync();
return groups;
}
public static async Task<Group> ToCommonFirstAsync(this IQueryable<DataLayer.Models.Group> entityGroups)
{
var group =
await entityGroups.Select(
g =>
new Group()
{
Id = g.Id,
AccountId = g.AccountId,
Name = g.Name,
ParentId = g.ParentId,
UserIds = g.GroupUserMappings.Select(d => d.UserId).ToList()
}).FirstOrDefaultAsync();
return group;
}
You could move your mapping/projection code out into a variable like this:
public static class Extensions
{
private static readonly Expression<Func<DataLayer.Models.Group, Group>> Projection = g =>
new Group
{
Id = g.Id,
AccountId = g.AccountId,
Name = g.Name,
ParentId = g.ParentId,
UserIds = g.GroupUserMappings.Select(d => d.UserId).ToList()
};
public static async Task<List<Group>> ToCommonListAsync(this IQueryable<DataLayer.Models.Group> entityGroups)
{
return await entityGroups.Select(Projection).ToListAsync();
}
public static async Task<Group> ToCommonFirstAsync(this IQueryable<DataLayer.Models.Group> entityGroups)
{
return await entityGroups.Select(Projection).FirstOrDefaultAsync();
}
}
Below find a method that does not work. We fail on the line query.Select(...
Below that find a method with hard coded object property names which does work. But, this method is obviously not dynamic, nor flexible. There may be many properties of a Customer I may wish to search on.
The error string is at bottom. I get it that somehow the LINQ to Entity is unable to deal with conversion of GetValue to some sort of TSQL. Would anyone know of how I might code this up?
public List<Customer> GetForQuery(params Tuple<string, string>[] keyValuePairs) {
using (var db = new DBEntities()) {
var availableProperties = typeof(Customer).GetTypeInfo().DeclaredProperties.ToList();
var query = db.Customers.Select(c => c);
foreach (Tuple<string, string> pair in keyValuePairs) {
PropertyInfo pi = availableProperties.First(p => p.Name.Equals(pair.Item1));
if (pi == null)
continue;
query = query.Where(u => pi.GetValue(u, null).ToString().StartsWith(pair.Item2));
}
var results = query.Select(c => c).ToList();
return results;
}
}
How I might call the above:
CustomerController custController = new CustomerController();
List<Customer> results = custController.GetForQuery(Tuple.Create<string, string>("FName", "Bob" ));
The working fixed method:
public List<Customer> GetForQuery(string firstName = "", string lastName = "", string phoneNumber = "") {
using (var db = new DBEntities()) {
var query = db.Customers.Select(c => c);
if (firstName.HasContent())
query = query.Where(u => u.FName.StartsWith(firstName));
if (lastName.HasContent())
query = query.Where(u => u.LName.StartsWith(lastName));
if (phoneNumber.HasContent())
query = query.Where(u => u.EveningPhone.StartsWith(phoneNumber));
var results = query.Select(c => c).ToList();
return results;
}
}
ERROR:
LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method 'System.Object GetValue(System.Object, System.Object[])' method, and this method cannot be translated into a store expression.
In SQL server union, result is sorted based on primary key column. I want to prevent this behavior in entity framework.
In this post, #praveen has explained how to do this in pure sql. But I want to do this in entity framework.
My code:
public virtual ActionResult Search(string keyword)
{
var products = _db.Products
.Where(x => x.IsActive)
.AsQueryable();
var productExactlyTitle = products.Where(x => x.Title == keyword);
var productStartTitle = products.Where(x => x.Title.StartsWith(keyword));
var productContainsTitle = products.Where(x => x.Title.Contains(keyword)
|| x.Title.Contains(keyword)
|| x.SubTitle.Contains(keyword)
|| x.OtherName.Contains(keyword));
var productList = productExactlyTitle.Union(productStartTitle)
.Union(productContainsTitle)
.Take(10)
.AsEnumerable()
.Select(x => new ProductItemViewModel()
{
Id = x.Id,
Title = x.Title,
Price = x.Price.ToPrice(),
Image = x.Images.FirstOrDefault(y => y.IsCoverPhoto)?.ImageUrl
});
// some code ...
}
I want to show records with below order:
First: records of productExactlyTitle
Second: records of productStartTitle
Third: records of productContainsTitle
But result is sorted with Id column! and I don't want this.
Is there a way for do this?
In SQL all queries without an order by explicitly set is considered unordered. (and EF queries a translated into SQL). So if you want a specific order after your union just specify it.
var result = q1.Union(q2).OrderBy(x => x.?);
For your specific case:
var p1 = productExactlyTitle.Select(x => new { Item = x, Order = 1 });
var p2 = productStartTitle.Select(x => new { Item = x, Order = 2 });
var p3 = productContainsTitle.Select(x => new { Item = x, Order = 3 });
var productList = p1.Union(p2)
.Union(p3)
.OrderBy(x => x.Order)
.Select(x => x.Item)
.Take(10);
I Made a new notMapped class "BuyingHistory", that have some property (not all) of two database tables
how to fill this class with entity? I made the conditions, but how do I select the properties to a list? (I know how to do it for one property but not for a list)
IQueryable<BuyingHistory> _buyingList =
_db.Orders
.Join(_db.EventPages
,o => o.EventID
,e => e.ID
,(o, e) => new { orders = o, events = e })
.Where(o => o.orders.UserID == LS.CurrentUser.ID)
.Select( // I don't know how to continue
it's work in this way bellow, but how can I do it in one command like the example above
var _List =
_db.Orders
.Join(_db.EventPages
, o => o.EventID
, e => e.ID
, (o, e) => new { orders = o, events = e })
.Where(o => o.orders.UserID == LS.CurrentUser.ID).ToList();
List<BuyingHistory> _buyingList = new List<BuyingHistory>();
foreach (var item in _List)
{
_buyingList.Add(new BuyingHistory()
{
CreatedDate = item.orders.CreatedDate,
EventName = item.events.Title,
NumberOfTickets = item.orders.TicketNumber,
OrderID = item.orders.ID,
Status = item.orders.Status.ToString(),
Total = item.orders.TicketNumber
});
}
I'd use query syntax to begin with, and then do the query like so:
from ord in _db.Orders
join evt in _db.EventPages on ord.EventID equals evt.ID
where ord.UserID == LS.CurrentUser.ID
select new BuyingHistory
{
CreatedDate = ord.CreatedDate,
EventName = evt.Title,
NumberOfTickets = ord.TicketNumber,
OrderID = ord.ID,
Status = ord.Status.ToString(),
Total = ord.TicketNumber
})
If you have EF version 6 the ToString() won't throw exceptions. If not, you have to change the type of BuyingHistory.Status into the type coming from the database.