How can I make aliases defined in ~/.config/fish/config.fish and functions defined in ~/.config/fish/functions available for the root user as well?
symlinking to /root/.config/fish didn't do the job. Furthermore, I'd also like to be able to use my functions and aliases via sudo, which is currently not working as well.
How do you guys do that?
I don't have a solution for the first problem (I don't have any functions that are useful for the root user), but the second one (functions not working as an argument for sudo) can be solved with a wrapper function:
function sudo
if functions -q $argv[1]
set argv fish -c "$argv"
end
command sudo $argv
end
The issue is of course that sudo is an external command (usually at /usr/bin/sudo) that cannot know about fish internals like function definitions. So this wrapper will call fish if you give it a function name. Of course, since this launches a new fish session, some things, like cd will not be useful because it won't alter the state of the main fish session.
I use a symlink to my config.fish and works perfectly. Have you checked the permissions?
777 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 Dez 21 2015 /root/.config/fish/config.fish -> /home/lara/.config/fish/config.fish
In newer versions you can also use the directory /etc/fish/ for system-wide configuration
The problem with sudo I solved with an alias:
# -E just preserv env. It's not really
# necessary, but may be useful.
function sudo; command sudo -sE $argv; end
from sudo man page:
-s, --shell
Run the shell specified by the SHELL environment variable if it is set or the shell specified by the invoking user's
password database entry. If a command is specified, it is passed to
the shell for execution via
the shell's -c option. If no command is specified, an interactive shell is executed.
Old question that I came across while attempting to do the same thing myself.
Neither existing solution from #faho or #LaraMaia solves the first part of the question, which is really what I needed for my use-case. Both solutions only handled functions that are defined in ~/.config/fish/functions. In-memory functions and aliases that have not been "saved" do not work.
So here's a version that does work for aliases/in-memory functions:
function sudo
if functions -q -- "$argv[1]"
set cmdline (
for arg in $argv
printf "\"%s\" " $arg
end
)
set -x function_src (string join "\n" (string escape --style=var (functions "$argv[1]")))
set argv fish -c 'string unescape --style=var (string split "\n" $function_src) | source; '$cmdline
command sudo -E $argv
else
command sudo $argv
end
end
Commented and slightly expanded version at this Gist.
Related
I have a script where I need to start a command, then pass some additional commands as commands to that command. I tried
su
echo I should be root now:
who am I
exit
echo done.
... but it doesn't work: The su succeeds, but then the command prompt is just staring at me. If I type exit at the prompt, the echo and who am i etc start executing! And the echo done. doesn't get executed at all.
Similarly, I need for this to work over ssh:
ssh remotehost
# this should run under my account on remotehost
su
## this should run as root on remotehost
whoami
exit
## back
exit
# back
How do I solve this?
I am looking for answers which solve this in a general fashion, and which are not specific to su or ssh in particular. The intent is for this question to become a canonical for this particular pattern.
Adding to tripleee's answer:
It is important to remember that the section of the script formatted as a here-document for another shell is executed in a different shell with its own environment (and maybe even on a different machine).
If that block of your script contains parameter expansion, command substitution, and/or arithmetic expansion, then you must use the here-document facility of the shell slightly differently, depending on where you want those expansions to be performed.
1. All expansions must be performed within the scope of the parent shell.
Then the delimiter of the here document must be unquoted.
command <<DELIMITER
...
DELIMITER
Example:
#!/bin/bash
a=0
mylogin=$(whoami)
sudo sh <<END
a=1
mylogin=$(whoami)
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=$mylogin
END
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=$mylogin
Output:
a=0
mylogin=leon
a=0
mylogin=leon
2. All expansions must be performed within the scope of the child shell.
Then the delimiter of the here document must be quoted.
command <<'DELIMITER'
...
DELIMITER
Example:
#!/bin/bash
a=0
mylogin=$(whoami)
sudo sh <<'END'
a=1
mylogin=$(whoami)
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=$mylogin
END
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=$mylogin
Output:
a=1
mylogin=root
a=0
mylogin=leon
3. Some expansions must be performed in the child shell, some - in the parent.
Then the delimiter of the here document must be unquoted and you must escape those expansion expressions that must be performed in the child shell.
Example:
#!/bin/bash
a=0
mylogin=$(whoami)
sudo sh <<END
a=1
mylogin=\$(whoami)
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=\$mylogin
END
echo a=$a
echo mylogin=$mylogin
Output:
a=0
mylogin=root
a=0
mylogin=leon
A shell script is a sequence of commands. The shell will read the script file, and execute those commands one after the other.
In the usual case, there are no surprises here; but a frequent beginner error is assuming that some commands will take over from the shell, and start executing the following commands in the script file instead of the shell which is currently running this script. But that's not how it works.
Basically, scripts work exactly like interactive commands, but how exactly they work needs to be properly understood. Interactively, the shell reads a command (from standard input), runs that command (with input from standard input), and when it's done, it reads another command (from standard input).
Now, when executing a script, standard input is still the terminal (unless you used a redirection) but the commands are read from the script file, not from standard input. (The opposite would be very cumbersome indeed - any read would consume the next line of the script, cat would slurp all the rest of the script, and there would be no way to interact with it!) The script file only contains commands for the shell instance which executes it (though you can of course still use a here document etc to embed inputs as command arguments).
In other words, these "misunderstood" commands (su, ssh, sh, sudo, bash etc) when run alone (without arguments) will start an interactive shell, and in an interactive session, that's obviously fine; but when run from a script, that's very often not what you want.
All of these commands have ways to accept commands by ways other than in an interactive terminal session. Typically, each command supports a way to pass it commands as options or arguments:
su root -c 'who am i'
ssh user#remote uname -a
sh -c 'who am i; echo success'
Many of these commands will also accept commands on standard input:
printf 'uname -a; who am i; uptime' | su
printf 'uname -a; who am i; uptime' | ssh user#remote
printf 'uname -a; who am i; uptime' | sh
which also conveniently allows you to use here documents:
ssh user#remote <<'____HERE'
uname -a
who am i
uptime
____HERE
sh <<'____HERE'
uname -a
who am i
uptime
____HERE
For commands which accept a single command argument, that command can be sh or bash with multiple commands:
sudo sh -c 'uname -a; who am i; uptime'
As an aside, you generally don't need an explicit exit because the command will terminate anyway when it has executed the script (sequence of commands) you passed in for execution.
If you want a generic solution which will work for any kind of program, you can use the expect command.
Extract from the manual page:
Expect is a program that "talks" to other interactive programs according to a script. Following the script, Expect knows what can be expected from a program and what the correct response should be. An interpreted language provides branching and high-level control structures to direct the dialogue. In addition, the user can take control and interact directly when desired, afterward returning control to the script.
Here is a working example using expect:
set timeout 60
spawn sudo su -
expect "*?assword" { send "*secretpassword*\r" }
send_user "I should be root now:"
expect "#" { send "whoami\r" }
expect "#" { send "exit\r" }
send_user "Done.\n"
exit
The script can then be launched with a simple command:
$ expect -f custom.script
You can view a full example in the following page: http://www.journaldev.com/1405/expect-script-example-for-ssh-and-su-login-and-running-commands
Note: The answer proposed by #tripleee would only work if standard input could be read once at the start of the command, or if a tty had been allocated, and won't work for any interactive program.
Example of errors if you use a pipe
echo "su whoami" |ssh remotehost
--> su: must be run from a terminal
echo "sudo whoami" |ssh remotehost
--> sudo: no tty present and no askpass program specified
In SSH, you might force a TTY allocation with multiple -t parameters, but when sudo will ask for the password, it will fail.
Without the use of a program like expect any call to a function/program which might get information from stdin will make the next command fail:
ssh use#host <<'____HERE'
echo "Enter your name:"
read name
echo "ok."
____HERE
--> The `echo "ok."` string will be passed to the "read" command
I am having a trial of fishshell, currently using zsh
When I set an alias in fishshell config, e.g.
alias aa="abc -d -e -f"
Fishshell replaces the command with the actual command while I am typing the command. It is possibile to config it to work seamlessly without replacing the command?
What you're describing is abbreviations, not aliases. Abbreviations are commands that expand as you type them.
Running a command like you described:
alias aa="abc -d -e -f"
will indeed set an alias that will not expand in-line.
This is a question derives from another post. Based upon the comments and answer from that post, I change the following shebang + eval into another one:
Old works version
#!/bin/perl
eval 'exec perl5 -S $0 ${1+"$#"}'
if 0;
New doesn't work version
#!/bin/sh
eval 'exec perl5 -S $0 ${1+"$#"}'
if 0;
Notice that I change #!/bin/perl to #!/bin/sh and based upon my understanding, the new version should also work because the script is treated like shell script and eval get executed and perl5 is invoked to use perl to execute the same script. However, when I actually run this, I got:
/bin/sh: -S: invalid option
Can anyone explain why this case the script is failed. Do I misunderstand something? I'm using ksh
Also this web page I found online seems suggest that my new version should work as well.
Thanks much!
From the Perl documentation:
If the #! line does not contain the word "perl" nor the word "indir", the program named after the #! is executed instead of the Perl interpreter. This is slightly bizarre, but it helps people on machines that don't do #!, because they can tell a program that their SHELL is /usr/bin/perl, and Perl will then dispatch the program to the correct interpreter for them.
So if you launch the modified version as ./script:
Your shell executes ./script
The kernel actually executes /bin/sh ./script
sh executes perl5 -S ./script
perl5 executes /bin/sh -S ./script because it sees a shebang that doesn't contain perl.
sh dies because it doesn't recognize the -S option.
And if you launch the modified version as perl5 script:
Your shell executes perl5 script
perl5 executes /bin/sh -S script because it sees a shebang that doesn't contain perl.
sh dies because it doesn't recognize the -S option.
Also this web page I found online seems suggest that my new version should work as well.
The code on that page is significantly different than the code you used. In that code, there's an explicit instruction (-x) to ignore the actual shebang line, and to look for one that contains perl later in the file (which is also missing from your code).
Using supervisord, how do I execute a command before running the program?
For example in the code below, I want a file to be created before starting the program. In the code below I am using tail -f /dev/null to simulate the background process but this could be any running program like '/path/to/application'.
I tried '&&' and this doesn't seem to work. The requirement is that the file has to be created first in order for the application to work.
[supervisord]
nodaemon=true
logfile=~/supervisord.log
[program:app]
command:touch ~a.c && tail -f /dev/null
The problem is that supervisor isn't running a shell to interpret command sections, so "&&" is just one of 5 space separated arguments it is passing to the touch command; if this ran successfully, then there should be some unusual filenames in its working directory now.
You can use a shell as your command and pass it the shell logic you would like:
command=/bin/sh -c "touch ~a.c && tail -f /dev/null"
Usually, this type of shell wrapper should be the interface provided and managed by the app and is what supervisord and others just know how to call with paths and options, i.e.:
command=myappswrapper.sh ~a.c
(where myappswrapper.sh is:)
#!/bin/sh
touch $1 && tail -f /dev/null
Here is a trick.
You use a shell script to do that and beyond that
[program:app]
command:sh /path/to/your/script.sh
It's can your script.sh
touch ~a.c
exec tail -f /dev/null
notice exec
I know of system() and qx(), but I need to execute ~15 bash commands. E.g.
mkdir, chown, edquota -p user1 -u user2, cp -r, su - username, git, rm, ln -s
Question
Is there an efficient way to execute many Bash commands in Perl?
I don't care in this case about the output.
First, I'd use the equivalent Perl function for as many of those bash command as I could, which is most of the ones you included in your post. Then, for the rest of them I'd either use system() or qx() or backticks or one of the IPC:: modules (such as IPC::Run or IPC::Open3).
Use bash syntax for many commands. Separate them with ; or && or whatever takes your fancy (man bash).
$ perl -E 'system qq{date; date}'
In Linux, I like POE framework's POE::Wheel::Run module for running system commands (and code blocks) asynchronously. You say you do not care about the output, but if you need it in the future POE::Wheel::Run has an elegant interface allowing us to interact with the process.
my $s = <<END;
echo "1"
echo "2"
echo "3"
END
system("$s");