How do I prevent error when someone does not choose one of the options in scala. This is using Map to get options and I tried to implement Try and catch blocks in case options but it does not work. I'm not sure if this is the right way to do it, if there is any other way let me know. The error is Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "e".
object main extends menu {
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
var opt = 0
do { opt = readOption }
while (menu(opt))
}
}
class menu extends database {
def menu(option: Int): Boolean = try {
actionMap.get(option) match {
case Some(a) => a()
case None => println("That didn't work.")
false
}
} catch {
case _: NumberFormatException => true
}
val actionMap = Map[Int, () => Boolean](1 -> cWords, 2 -> cCharacters, 3 -> exit)
def readOption: Int = {
println(
"""|Please select one of the following:
| 1 - Count Words
| 2 - Count Characters in words
| 3 - quit""".stripMargin)
StdIn.readInt()
}
Use scala.util.Try on readInt(),
import scala.io._
import scala.util._
Try(StdIn.readInt()).toOption
// returns Some(123) for input 123
Try(StdIn.readInt()).toOption
// returns None for input 1a3
Thus readOption delivers Option[Int]. Then
def menu(option: Option[Int]): Boolean = option match {
case Some(a) => actionMap(a)()
case None => println("Try again..."); false
}
Note
A more concise version of main,
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = while (menu(readOption)) ()
Namely, while menu is true do Unit (or () ).
Here is some working implementation:
import scala.io.StdIn
import scala.util.Try
object Main extends Menu with App {
while (menu(readChoice)) ()
}
class Menu {
val actionMap = Map[Int, () => Boolean](1 -> (() => true), 2 -> (() => true), 3 -> (() => false))
def menu(choice: Option[Int]): Boolean = {
choice.flatMap(actionMap.get)
.map(action => action())
.getOrElse({ println("That didn't work."); false })
}
def readChoice: Option[Int] = {
println(
"""|Please select one of the following:
| 1 - Count Words
| 2 - Count Characters in words
| 3 - quit""".stripMargin)
Try(StdIn.readInt).toOption
}
}
For the first, you can mixin App trait to skip main method boilerplate.
You can simplify your do while loop like this, it has to do nothing inside so you either need some expression or block. A Unit value can be your expression that does nothing.
In scala we name classes using camel case, starting with capital letter.
As readInt throws whenever input is wrong you can catch that using Try, that will return Success(result) of Failure(exception) and change this result to an Option to discard the exception.
what happens in menu is shorthand for
choice match {
case Some(number) =>
actionMap.get(number) match {
case Some(action) =>
action()
case None =>
println("That didn't work.")
false
}
case None =>
println("That didn't work.")
false
}
And could be as well written with for
(for {
number <- choice
action <- actionMap.get(number)
} yield {
action()
}) getOrElse {
println("That didn't work.")
false
}
On as sidenote, you named choice of user an "option" which unfortunately is also a scala class used here extensively, I renamed the variables to avoid confusion.
I would make readOption return a Try[Int], (a Try surrounding StdIn.readInt()), then deal with the possible cases in the menu function
Related
I am trying to come up with a better title.
I am new in Chisel and Scala. Below there is a Chisel code defining and testing an module.
import chisel3._
import chiseltest._
import org.scalatest.flatspec.AnyFlatSpec
class DeviceUnderTest extends Module {
val io = IO(new Bundle {
val a = Input(UInt(2.W))
val b = Input(UInt(2.W))
val out = Output(UInt(2.W))
})
io.out := io.a & io.b
}
class WaveformTestWithIteration extends AnyFlatSpec with ChiselScalatestTester {
"WaveformIteration" should "pass" in {
test(new DeviceUnderTest)
.withAnnotations(Seq(WriteVcdAnnotation)) ( dut => // ???
{
for (a <- 0 until 4; b <- 0 until 4) {
dut.io.a.poke(a.U)
dut.io.b.poke(b.U)
dut.clock.step()
}
}
)
}
}
The code line with comments ??? is where I am quite puzzled. Where does the variable dut is defined? It seems an reference to instance gained by new DeviceUnderTest.
test(new DeviceUnderTest).withAnnotations(Seq(WriteVcdAnnotation)) return an TestBuilder[T] with apply method:
class TestBuilder[T <: Module](...) {
...
def apply(testFn: T => Unit): TestResult = {
runTest(defaults.createDefaultTester(dutGen, finalAnnos))(testFn)
}
...
}
So, dut => {...} is a function (T) => Unit? But it does not look like a standard lambda ((x:T) => {...})? Or it is something else?
What is this syntax in scala exactly?
Consider the following boiled-down version with a similar structure:
def test[A](testedThing: A)(testBody: A => Unit): Unit = testBody(testedThing)
What it's essentially doing is taking a value x: A and a function f: A => Unit, and applying f to x to obtain f(x).
Here is how you could use it:
test("foo"){ x =>
println(if x == "foo" then "Success" else "Failure")
} // Success
test("bar"){ x =>
println(if x == "baz" then "Success" else "Failure")
} // Failure
In both cases, the "string under test" is simply passed to the body of the "test".
Now, you could introduce a few more steps between the creation of the value under test and the specification of the body. For example, you could create a TestBuilder[A], which is essentially just a value a with some bells and whistles (in this case, list of "annotations" - plain strings in the following example):
type Annotation = String
case class TestOutcome(annotations: List[Annotation], successful: Boolean)
trait Test:
def run: TestOutcome
// This simply captures the value under test of type `A`
case class TestBuilder[A](
theThingUnderTest: A,
annotations: List[Annotation]
):
// Bells and whistles: adding some metadata
def withAnnotations(moreAnnotations: List[Annotation]): TestBuilder[A] =
TestBuilder(theThingUnderTest, annotations ++ moreAnnotations)
// Combining the value under test with the body of the test produces the
// actual test
def apply(testBody: A => Unit): Test = new Test:
def run =
try {
testBody(theThingUnderTest)
TestOutcome(annotations, true)
} catch {
case t: Throwable => TestOutcome(annotations, false)
}
// This constructs the thing that's being tested, and creates a TestBuilder around it
def test[A](thingUnderTest: A) = TestBuilder(thingUnderTest, Nil)
println(
test("hello")
.withAnnotations(List("size of hello should be 5")){ h =>
assert(h.size == 5)
}
.run
)
println(
test("hello")
.withAnnotations(List("size of hello should be 42")){ h =>
assert(h.size == 42)
}
.run
)
The principle remains the same: test(a) saves the tested value a, then TestBuilder adds some configuration, and once you add a body { thingUnderTest => /* assertStuff */ } to it, you get a full Test, which you can then run to obtain some results (TestOutcomes, in this case). Thus, the above snippet produces
TestOutcome(List(size of hello should be 5),true)
TestOutcome(List(size of hello should be 42),false)
I think I did not notice that sometimes we can omit type declaration in lambda.
class tester{
def apply( fn: (Int) => Int):Int = fn(5)
}
We can write (new tester)(x => {x+1}) instead of (new tester)((x:Int) => {x+1}).
This is a fairly long winded question and a follow up to my last one.
I have the following code for an application being built - I am looking to call the function in handleOne but it is not working in the action map. I think this is due to the unit assigned to statesVotes in the handler. The goal is to create a menu driven application that performs a set of desired functions. The function in question here is: Get all the state values and display suitably formatted.
Potentially have to make the states into a map but looking for the same functionality of the case class.
import scala.io.StdIn.readInt
object myApp3 extends App{
val dataRE = "([^(]+) \\((\\d+)\\),(.+)".r
val pVotes = "([^:]+):(\\d+)".r
case class State(name : String
,code : Int
,parties : Array[(String,Int)])
val states: List[State] =
util.Using(io.Source.fromFile("filename.txt"))(_.getLines().toList)
.get //will throw if read file fails
.collect{case dataRE(name,code,votes) =>
State(name.trim
,code.toInt
,votes.split(",")
.collect{case pVotes(p,v) => (p,v.toInt)}
)
}
val actionMap = Map[Int, () => Boolean](1 -> handleOne)
var opt = 0
do{
opt = readOption
} while (menu(opt))
def readOption: Int = {
println(
"""|Please select one of the following:
| 1 - Show All States and Votes
| 2 - CW Option 2
| 3 - quit""".stripMargin)
readInt()
}
def menu(option: Int): Boolean = {
actionMap.get(option) match {
case Some(f) => f()
case None =>
println("Command not recognized!")
true
}
}
// handle one calls function mnuShowStatesVotes, which invokes function statesVotes
def handleOne(): Boolean = {
mnuShowStatesVotes(statesVotes : List[State])
true
}
def mnuShowStatesVotes(f:() => List[State]) = {
f() foreach(println())
}
def statesVotes = states.sortBy(_.name) //alphabetical order of states
.foreach{ st =>
println(st.name) //show line by split by state name
st.parties
.sortBy(-_._2) //sorts parties by votes in descending order
.map{case (p,v) => f"\t$p%-12s:$v%9d"}
.foreach(println)
}
}
Essentially want the menu option handleOne to correctly invoke the function in statesVotes.
The text file being used can be found below:
Alabama (9),Democratic:849624,Republican:1441170,Libertarian:25176,Others:7312
Alaska (3),Democratic:153778,Republican:189951,Libertarian:8897,Others:6904
Arizona (11),Democratic:1672143,Republican:1661686,Libertarian:51465,Green:1557,Others:475
It seems to me that your code would benefit by adopting a clear and distinct separation/segregation of roles and responsibilities.
Let's get the preliminaries taken care of.
import scala.util.{Try, Success, Failure, Using}
case class State(name : String
,code : Int
,parties : Array[(String,Int)])
Now let's parse the input data.
This code has one job to do: load the data from the input file. It takes one parameter, the input filename, and returns either Success() with the accumulated data, or Failure() with the error exception.
def readFile(filename: String): Try[List[State]] = {
val dataRE = "([^(]+) \\((\\d+)\\),(.+)".r
val pVotes = "([^:]+):(\\d+)".r
Using(io.Source.fromFile(filename)) {
_.getLines()
.toList
.collect{ case dataRE(name, code, votes) =>
State(name.trim
,code.toInt
,votes.split(",")
.collect{case pVotes(p,v) => (p,v.toInt)})
}
}
}
Note that collect() will simply ignore file data the doesn't fit the expected format. If you were to use map() instead then bad input data would cause a Failure().
Now let's put all the output methods, and their descriptions, under one roof. This is most of what the user will see.
class Menu(states: List[State]) {
def apply(key: String): Boolean = {
val (_, op, continue) = lookup(key)
op()
continue
}
private val lookup: Map[String,(String,()=>Unit,Boolean)] =
Map("?" -> ("show this menu", menu _, true)
,"menu" -> ("show this menu", menu _, true)
,"all" -> ("display all voting data", all _, true)
,"st" -> ("vote totals by state", stVotes _, true)
,"x" -> ("exit", done _, false)
,"quit" -> ("exit", done _, false)
).withDefaultValue(("",unknown _, true))
private def done(): Unit = println("bye")
private def unknown(): Unit =
println("unknown selection ('?' for main menu)")
private def menu(): Unit =
lookup.keys.toVector.sorted
.map(k => s"$k\t: ${lookup(k)._1}")
.foreach(println)
private def all(): Unit =
states.sortBy(_.name) //alphabetical
.foreach{ st =>
println(st.name) //state name
st.parties
.sortBy(-_._2) //votes in decreasing order
.map{case (p,v) => f"\t$p%-12s:$v%9d"}
.foreach(println)
}
private def stVotes(): Unit =
states.map(st => (st.name, st.parties.map(_._2).sum))
.sortBy(-_._2) //votes in decreasing order
.map{case (state,total) => f"$state%-9s:$total%8d"}
.foreach(println)
}
Notice that only the apply() method is public. Everything else is private and under wraps.
To create a new data report you just add an entry in the lookup Map and add the new method to produce the output.
Now all we need is the code to tie the pieces together and to take user input.
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit =
args.headOption.map(readFile) match {
case None =>
println(s"usage: ${this.productPrefix} <data_file>")
case Some(Failure(exc)) =>
println(s"Error reading data file: $exc")
case Some(Success(stateData)) =>
val menu = new Menu(stateData)
menu("menu")
Iterator.continually(menu(io.StdIn.readLine(">> ").toLowerCase))
.dropWhile(identity)
.next()
}
Note that this.productPrefix is made available if the surrounding object is a case object.
In this example, I have a stream of Ticker instances, which have a sequence attribute.
I want to drop any messages where the sequence number is lower than the previous one.
I can do something like the following, but it's pretty ugly. Is there a simpler approach? And is there a name for this pattern?
source
.scan(TickerInOrder())((state, ticker) => TickerInOrder(state, ticker))
.collect { case TickerInOrder(Some(ticker), Some(inOrder)) if inOrder => ticker }
// ~~~~~~~~
object TickerInOrder {
def apply(state: TickerInOrder, ticker: Ticker): TickerInOrder = {
val inOrder = state.ticker match {
case Some(prev) => ticker.sequence > prev.sequence
case None => true
}
TickerInOrder(Some(ticker), Some(inOrder))
}
}
case class TickerInOrder(ticker: Option[Ticker] = None, inOrder: Option[Boolean] = None)
You can use statefulMapConcat, see docs https://doc.akka.io/docs/akka/current/stream/operators/Source-or-Flow/statefulMapConcat.html
import akka.actor.ActorSystem
import akka.stream.scaladsl.Source
object Stateful {
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
implicit val system: ActorSystem = ActorSystem("Stateful")
Source(List(1,3,2,4,5,6,0,7)).statefulMapConcat {
() =>
var prev = 0L
element =>
if (element > prev) {
prev = element
element :: Nil
} else {
prev = element
Nil
}
}.runForeach(println)
// 1 3 4 5 6 7
}
}
It is simple to change the code to work with Ticker and sequence.
I have the following snippet I need to complete for an assignment. To fulfill the asignment I have to correctly replace the comments /*fulfill ...*/. However I tried my best and I am still getting an
missing parameter type for expanded function The argument types of an anonymous function must be fully known. (SLS 8.5) error.
I found similar questions related to this error. However I could not derive a solution for my paticular problem of those answers.
So the target is to check whether the events fulfill the properties.
I am glad for every hint.
This is the code I need to complete:
import scala.collection.mutable.MutableList
abstract class Event
case class Command(cmdName: String) extends Event
case class Succeed(cmdName: String) extends Event
case class Fail(cmdName: String) extends Event
class Property(val name: String, val func: () => Boolean)
class Monitor[T] {
val properties = MutableList.empty[Property]
// (propName: String)(formula: => Boolean) was inserted by me
def property(propName: String)(formula: => Boolean) /* fulfill declaration here */ {
properties += new Property(propName, formula _)
}
var eventsToBeProcessed = List[T]()
def check(events: List[T]) {
for (prop <- properties) {
eventsToBeProcessed = events
println(prop.func())
}
}
def require(func: PartialFunction[T, Boolean]):Boolean = {
/* Fulfill body */
// This is what I came up with and what throws the compilation error
// case event:T => if (func.isDefinedAt(event)) Some(func(event)) else None
// Edit 1: Now I tried this but it prints that properties evaluate to false
var result = true
for (event <- eventsToBeProcessed){
if (func.isDefinedAt(event)){
result = result && func(event)
}
}
return result
}
}
class EventMonitor extends Monitor[Event] {
property("The first command should succeed or fail before it is received again") {
require {
case Command(c) =>
require {
case Succeed(`c`) => true
case Fail(`c`) => true
case Command(`c`) => false
}
}
}
property("The first command should not get two results") {
require {
case Succeed(c) =>
require {
case Succeed(`c`) => false
case Fail(`c`) => false
case Command(`c`) => true
}
case Fail(c) =>
require {
case Succeed(`c`) => false
case Fail(`c`) => false
case Command(`c`) => true
}
}
}
property("The first command should succeed") {
/* Add a property definition here which requires that the first command does not fail.
* It should yield OK with the events listed in the main method.
*/
// This is what I came up with
require{
case Command(c) =>
require{
case Succeed(`c`)=> true
case Fail(`c`) => false
}
}
}
}
object Checker {
def main(args: Array[String]) {
val events = List(
Command("take_picture"),
Command("get_position"),
Succeed("take_picture"),
Fail("take_picture")
)
val monitor = new EventMonitor
monitor.check(events)
// Desired output should be "true false true"
}
}
You wrote require function that returns T => Option[Boolean] intead of Boolean.
You should rewrite it on something like this:
def require(func: PartialFunction[T, Boolean]):Boolean = {
val left = eventsToBeProcessed.dropWhile(!func.isDefinedAt(_))
left.headOption.forall(head => {
eventsToBeProcessed = left.tail
func(head)
})
}
I got the error
found : scala.concurrent.Future[Option[models.ProcessTemplatesModel]]
required: Option[models.ProcessTemplatesModel]
My function is below
def createCopyOfProcessTemplate(processTemplateId: Int): Future[Option[ProcessTemplatesModel]] = {
val action = processTemplates.filter(_.id === processTemplateId).result.map(_.headOption)
val result: Future[Option[ProcessTemplatesModel]] = db.run(action)
result.map { case (result) =>
result match {
case Some(r) => {
var copy = (processTemplates returning processTemplates.map(_.id)) += ProcessTemplatesModel(None, "[Copy of] " + r.title, r.version, r.createdat, r.updatedat, r.deadline, r.status, r.comment, Some(false), r.checkedat, Some(false), r.approvedat, false, r.approveprocess, r.trainingsprocess)
val composedAction = copy.flatMap { id =>
processTemplates.filter(_.id === id).result.headOption
}
db.run(composedAction)
}
}
}
}
what is my problem in this case?
edit:
my controller function looks like this:
def createCopyOfProcessTemplate(processTemplateId: Int) = Action.async {
processTemplateDTO.createCopyOfProcessTemplate(processTemplateId).map { process =>
Ok(Json.toJson(process))
}
}
Is there my failure?
According to the your code - there are the following issues:
You use two db.run which return futures, but inner future will
not complete. For resolving it you should compose futures with
flatMap or for-comprehension.
You use only one partial-function case Some(_) => for pattern matching
and don't handle another value None.
You can use only one db.run and actions composition.
Your code can be like as:
def createCopyOfProcessTemplate(processTemplateId: Int): Future[Option[ProcessTemplatesModel]] = {
val action = processTemplates.filter(...).result.map(_.headOption)
val composedAction = action.flatMap {
case Some(r) =>
val copyAction = (processTemplates returning processTemplates...)
copyAction.flatMap { id =>
processTemplates.filter(_.id === id).result.headOption
}
case _ =>
DBIO.successful(None) // issue #2 has been resolved here
}
db.run(composedAction) // issue #3 has been resolved here
}
We get rid of issue #1 (because we use actions composition).