What I try to achieve is a routing for example:
http://zuul-host:8080/v1/foo/hello to my service foo-v1, resource hello
I'm trying out the regexmapper example described at http://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-netflix/spring-cloud-netflix.html
My problem is that I see that a service called foo-v1 gets mapped to /v1/foo in the PatternServiceRouteMapper but then I'm not able to call that route. It's also no visible at /mappings. Do I have to activate that route somewhere?
Setup
Foo Service
application.properties
server.port=9092
spring.application.name=foo-v1
eureka.client.serviceUrl.defaultZone=http://localhost:8761/eureka/
eureka.instance.healthcheck.enable=true
Zuul
My configuration class Routings.java. I added some sysout log output for the service mapping and I get foo-v1 -> v1/foo in the log. Therefore this mapping should be active.
#Configuration
public class Routings {
#Bean
public PatternServiceRouteMapper serviceRouteMapper() {
return new PatternServiceRouteMapper(
"(?<name>^.+)-(?<version>v.+$)",
"${version}/${name}") {
#Override
public String apply(final String serviceId) {
String route = super.apply(serviceId);
System.out.println(serviceId + " -> " +route);
return route;
}
};
}
}
My ZuulApplication.java
#SpringBootApplication
#EnableZuulProxy
#ComponentScan
public class ZuulApplication {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(ZuulApplication.class, args);
}
#RefreshScope
#ConfigurationProperties("zuul")
public ZuulProperties zuulProperties() {
return new ZuulProperties();
}
}
Ok, found the solution.
Remove ignoredServices: '*' from the zuul config.
This happens if you work through the examples. They start with explicitly configured routes and ignore dynamic routings. It's in the documentation but made no sense to me at that point :-)
To skip having a service automatically added, set zuul.ignored-services to a list of service id patterns.
When using the regexmapper we start using services that get added automatically and that's the feature we disabled with ignoredServices: '*'
Related
I've read whole documentation, tutorial [1], and spend several hours in sources, but I still do not understand how to configure loadbalancer, especially if I don't use magic annotations.
I have following configuration:
#Configuration
public class AppConfig {
public static final String SERVICE_ID = "service";
#Primary
#Bean
public ServiceInstanceListSupplier serviceInstanceListSupplier() {
return ServiceInstanceListSuppliers.from(SERVICE_ID,
new DefaultServiceInstance(SERVICE_ID + "1", SERVICE_ID, "localhost", 8886, false),
new DefaultServiceInstance(SERVICE_ID + "2", SERVICE_ID, "localhost", 8887, false));
}
#Bean
public LoadBalancerClientFactory loadBalancerClientFactory() {
return new LoadBalancerClientFactory();
}
#Bean
public ReactorLoadBalancerExchangeFilterFunction loadBalancerExchangeFilterFunction(LoadBalancerProperties properties) {
return new ReactorLoadBalancerExchangeFilterFunction(loadBalancerClientFactory(), properties);
}
}
and use bean loadBalancerExchangeFilterFunction as:
WebClient.builder()
.baseUrl("http://service/test-consumer")
.filter(lbFunction)
.build();
and it works. The problem is, that it works regardless of what hostname I use. So if I replace hostname "service" with whatever work I like, I will be still sending data to localhost:8886 or localhost:8887.
Can someone explain what is the role of serviceId and how this is paired to collection of DefaultServiceInstance?
(I want to understand the internals, what are the key components, their purpose and their interplay. I'm not primarily looking for magic annotation, but that one actually explained would be also great. Debugging it is really hard, I have several A4 with class diagrams and it still makes no sense at all).
Question: Is there a misconfiguration? What is the purpose of serviceId? It seems that none, as webclient using ReactorLoadBalancerExchangeFilterFunction will create roundrobin loadbalancer over configured ServiceInstances regardless of what is actual hostname used in given webclient.
Question2: how could I create 2 loadbalanced services and control to which service (not node) will request go? Do I need 2 separate webclients or some url pattern(like using serviceId in place of hostname) will do? If I need 2 webclients, how is pairing to DefaultServiceInstance done?
[1] https://spring.io/guides/gs/spring-cloud-loadbalancer/
EDIT:
after suggested update, the configuration looks like:
#Configuration
public class AppConfig {
#Bean
public ServiceInstanceListSupplier instanceSupplier(ConfigurableApplicationContext context) {
return ServiceInstanceListSupplier.builder()
.withDiscoveryClient()
.withHealthChecks()
.build(context);
}
#Bean
public LoadBalancerClientFactory loadBalancerClientFactory() {
return new LoadBalancerClientFactory();
}
#Bean
public ReactorLoadBalancerExchangeFilterFunction loadBalancerExchangeFilterFunction(LoadBalancerProperties properties) {
return new ReactorLoadBalancerExchangeFilterFunction(loadBalancerClientFactory(), properties);
}
}
application.properties contains:
spring.cloud.discovery.client.simple.instances.complicated[0].uri=http://localhost:8886
spring.cloud.discovery.client.simple.instances.complicated[1].uri=http://localhost:8887
webclient call to URL: http://localhost:8888/test-consumer (ie. hostname not matching serviceID) produces:
o.s.c.l.core.RoundRobinLoadBalancer : No servers available for service: localhost
eactorLoadBalancerExchangeFilterFunction : LoadBalancer does not contain an instance for the service localhost
webclient call to URL: http://complicated/test-consumer (ie. hostname matching serviceID) produces:
o.s.c.l.core.RoundRobinLoadBalancer : No servers available for service: complicated
eactorLoadBalancerExchangeFilterFunction : LoadBalancer does not contain an instance for the service complicated
The reason for this is that this.serviceId = environment.getProperty(PROPERTY_NAME); in DiscoveryClientServiceInstanceListSupplier(ReactiveDiscoveryClient,Environment) evaluates as null, thus even though I'm looking for some serviceId, delegate.getInstance is called with null, so no ServiceInstances are found. IF I removed #Bean instanceSupplier, and hope for autoconfiguration do it somehow magically, the this.serviceId = environment.getProperty(PROPERTY_NAME); is somehow magically set, serviceId is propagated correctly, and it works. For calls which leads elsewhere than configured serviceId, it fails saying, that this serviceId is not know, instead of making call.
SO it does mean, that if I configure loadbalancer, I cannot call anything else but (auto)configured services???
The LoadBalancer config should not be in a #Configuration-annotated class; instead, it should be a class passed for config via #LoadBalancerClient or #LoadBalancerClients annotation, as described here.
Also, the only bean you need to instantiate is the ServiceInstanceListSupplier (if you add spring-cloud-starter-loadbalancer, LoadBalancerClientFactory, and ReactorLoadBalancerExchangeFilterFunction will be instantiated by the starter).
So your LoadBalancer configuration class will look like so (without #Configuration):
public class AppConfig {
#Bean
public ServiceInstanceListSupplier instanceSupplier(ConfigurableApplicationContext context) {
return ServiceInstanceListSupplier.builder()
.withDiscoveryClient()
.withHealthChecks()
.build(context);
}
}
and your actual #Configuration class (for example, where you configure other webflux-related beans), will have the following annotation: #LoadBalancerClients(defaultConfiguration = AppConfig.class).
Then, if you enable health-checks in the complicated instances, it should work without any problems.
Finally, able to resolve this issue with the below Configuration. not sure why it works only with Non blocking approach and when we pass the new RestTemplate
#Bean
public ServiceInstanceListSupplier instanceSupplier(ConfigurableApplicationContext context) {
return ServiceInstanceListSupplier.builder()
.withDiscoveryClient()
.withBlockingHealthChecks(new RestTemplate())//this change
.build(context);
}
I'm trying to expose a REST service through OSGi (using Apache Felix). I'm using the osgi-jax-rs-connector to publish the resource. Here is the resource interface:
#Path("/bingo")
public interface BingoService {
#GET
#Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
#Path("/lottery")
List<Integer> getLottery();
}
The implementation uses DS annotation to obtain reference to a provided service in container:
#Component(
immediate = true,
service = BingoService.class,
properties = "jersey.properties")
public class Bingo implements BingoService {
#Reference
private RandomNumberGenerator rng;
#Activate
public void activateBingo() {
System.out.println("Bingo Service activated using " +
rng.getClass().getSimpleName());
}
#Override
public List<Integer> getLottery() {
List<Integer> result = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 5; i > 0; i--) {
result.add(rng.nextInt());
}
return result;
}
}
jersey.properties simply contains this line
service.exported.interfaces=*
When I deploy the bundle it starts and register the service correctly. But if I go to http://localhost:8181/services/bingo/lottery I get 404.
Could someone point me to the issue or give me some advice on where to look?
On reading the documentation for OSGi - JAX-RS Connector, it expects to find the annotations #Path or #Provider on the service instance object. You have placed them instead on an interface implemented by the component.
I'm not sure what the purpose of the BingoService interface is. This is not required for JAX-RS services. Normally you would register the resource class using its own type (e.g. service=Bingo.class) or simply java.lang.Object.
I'm testing an upgrade of my Spring Cloud DataFlow services from Spring Cloud Dalston.SR4/Spring Boot 1.5.9 to Spring Cloud Edgware/Spring Boot 1.5.9. Some of my services extend source (or sink) components from the app starters. I've found this does not work with Spring Cloud Edgware.
For example, I have overridden org.springframework.cloud.stream.app.rabbit.source.RabbitSourceConfiguration and bound my app to my overridden version. This has previously worked with Spring Cloud versions going back almost a year.
With Edgware, I get the following (whether the app is run standalone or within dataflow):
***************************
APPLICATION FAILED TO START
***************************
Description:
Field channels in org.springframework.cloud.stream.app.rabbit.source.RabbitSourceConfiguration required a bean of type 'org.springframework.cloud.stream.messaging.Source' that could not be found.
Action:
Consider defining a bean of type 'org.springframework.cloud.stream.messaging.Source' in your configuration.
I get the same behaviour with the 1.3.0.RELEASE and 1.2.0.RELEASE of spring-cloud-starter-stream-rabbit.
I override RabbitSourceConfiguration so I can set a header mapper on the AmqpInboundChannelAdapter, and also to perform a connectivity test prior to starting up the container.
My subclass is bound to the Spring Boot application with #EnableBinding(HeaderMapperRabbitSourceConfiguration.class). A cutdown version of my subclass is:
public class HeaderMapperRabbitSourceConfiguration extends RabbitSourceConfiguration {
public HeaderMapperRabbitSourceConfiguration(final MyHealthCheck healthCheck,
final MyAppConfig config) {
// ...
}
#Bean
#Override
public AmqpInboundChannelAdapter adapter() {
final AmqpInboundChannelAdapter adapter = super.adapter();
adapter.setHeaderMapper(new NotificationHeaderMapper(config));
return adapter;
}
#Bean
#Override
public SimpleMessageListenerContainer container() {
if (config.performConnectivityCheckOnStartup()) {
if (LOGGER.isInfoEnabled()) {
LOGGER.info("Attempting connectivity with ...");
}
final Health health = healthCheck.health();
if (health.getStatus() == Status.DOWN) {
LOGGER.error("Unable to connect .....");
throw new UnableToLoginException("Unable to connect ...");
} else if (LOGGER.isInfoEnabled()) {
LOGGER.info("Connectivity established with ...");
}
}
return super.container();
}
}
You really should never do stuff like healthCheck.health(); within a #Bean definition. The application context is not yet fully baked or started; it may, or may not, work depending on the order that beans are created.
If you want to prevent the app from starting, add a bean that implements SmartLifecycle, put the bean in a late phase (high value) so it's started after everything else. Then put your code in start(). autStartup must be true.
In this case, it's being run before the stream infrastructure has created the channel.
Some ordering might have changed from the earlier release but, in any case, performing activity like this in a #Bean definition is dangerous.
You just happened to be lucky before.
EDIT
I just noticed your #EnableBinding is wrong; it should be Source.class. I can't see how that would ever have worked - that's what creates the bean for the channels field of type Source.
This works fine for me after updating stream and the binder to 1.3.0.RELEASE...
#Configuration
public class MySource extends RabbitSourceConfiguration {
#Bean
#Override
public AmqpInboundChannelAdapter adapter() {
AmqpInboundChannelAdapter adapter = super.adapter();
adapter.setHeaderMapper(new MyMapper());
return adapter;
}
}
and
#SpringBootApplication
#EnableBinding(Source.class)
public class DemoApplication {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(DemoApplication.class, args);
}
}
If that doesn't work, please edit the question to show your POM.
How to loadbalance micro services via Ribbon (Not feign). I have 3 micro services "M1", "M2" and "M2_duplication", "M1" is communicating with "M2" via feign. I want if "M2" get too much traffic, the requests will be forwarded to the "M2_duplication". How is this possible via #ribbonclient ?
POM M1:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-starter-ribbon</artifactId>
</dependency>
The feign call in M1:
//name is taken from Eureka(service registry)
#FeignClient(name = "M1")
public interface M1ServiceClient {
#RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET, value = "/getAllM2")
Map<String, String> getAllM2();
}
Application M1:
#EnableConfigurationProperties()
#SpringBootApplication
#EnableEurekaClient
#EnableFeignClients
public class PortefeuilleApplication {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(PortefeuilleApplication.class, args);
}
}
Your question is rather vague ... for example, you specifically state 'not feign' and then show a FeignClient. Nevertheless it looks like you are asking how to implement an availability pattern for your ribbon load balancer. To do this, you create a Ribbon Configuration class and then override the load balancer strategy rule. For example:
#Configuration
public class MyConfiguration {
#Bean
public IRule ribbonRule() {
return new RoundRobinRule();
}
}
There are a number of existing Ribbon Rule strategies around availability e.g. AvailabilityFilteringRule or BestAvailableFilter, but if none of these suit you could also write your own Rule. Once you have your class, amend your RibbonClient annotation to reference it, e.g:
#RibbonClient(name = "myClient", configuration = MyConfiguration.class)
You can find more information here: https://github.com/Netflix/ribbon/wiki/Working-with-load-balancers
I have a number of clients for which a "global" RequestInterceptor has been defined. For one of the clients I need this "global" interceptor to be excluded. Is it possible to override the full set of RequestInterceptors for a particular FeignClient?
#FeignClient(value = "foo", configuration = FooClientConfig.class)
public interface FooClient {
//operations
}
#Configuration
public class FooClientConfig{
//How do I exclude global interceptors from this client configuration?
}
The spring-cloud-netflix version in use is 1.1.0 M5
It seems there is no easy way to override the global interceptor.
I think you could do it like this:
#Configuration
public class FooClientConfig{
#Bean
RequestInterceptor globalRequestInterceptor() {
return template -> {
if (template.url().equals("/your_specific_url")) {
//don't add global header for the specific url
return;
}
//add header for the rest of requests
template.header(AUTHORIZATION, String.format("Bearer %s", token));
};
}
}
Based on the issue stated here. Instead of excluding interceptors, you need to define different feign clients for each API. Add your interceptors based on your needs.
public class ConfigOne {
#Bean
public InterceptorOne interceptorOne(AdditionalDependency ad) {
return new InterceptorOne(ad);
}
}
Just make sure you don't use #Configuration annotation on above class.
Instead, importing this bean on client definition would be a working solution.
#FeignClient(name = "clientOne", configuration = ConfigOne.class)
public interface ClientOne { ... }
An enhanced way of solving this is to pass a custom header to your request like:
#PostMapping("post-path")
ResponseEntity<Void> postRequest(#RequestHeader(HEADER_CLIENT_NAME) String feignClientName, #RequestBody RequestBody requestBody);
I want to set the header in interceptor for only this feign client. Before setting the header, first, the interceptor checks HEADER_CLIENT_NAME header if exists and have the desired value:
private boolean criteriaMatches(RequestTemplate requestTemplate) {
Map<String, Collection<String>> headers = requestTemplate.headers();
return headers.containsKey(HEADER_CLIENT_NAME)
&& headers.get(HEADER_CLIENT_NAME).contains("feign-client-name");
}
Thus, you can check before setting the basic authentication. In interceptor:
#Override
public void apply(RequestTemplate template) {
if (criteriaMatches(template)) {
/*apply auth header*/
}
}
In this way, other feign client's requests won't be manipulated by this interceptor.
Finally, I set the feignClientName to the request:
feignClient.postRequest("feign-client-name", postBody);
One way to do this to remove the #Configuration annotation from the FooClientConfig class as in the current situation it is applied globally.
And then use
#FeignClient(value = "foo", configuration = FooClientConfig.class)
on all of the feign clients you want to use the config with.