With constraints on ranges, we prevent adding any overlapping values in an existing table. For example, in the following room_reservation table, we make sure that no room is reserved in a conflicting time.
CREATE EXTENSION btree_gist;
CREATE TABLE room_reservation (
room text,
during tsrange,
EXCLUDE USING GIST (room WITH =, during WITH &&)
);
What we need here is to also consider another table (rooms) also having room and during fields and consider the records within that table while making a reservation?
Our specific scenario is exam management. We have an invigilation table (room reservation) and also a time table of classes. Once we are adding an invigilation record, we need to make sure that it does not coincide with any other invigilation record and make sure that there is no lecture at that time in that room.
You cannot do that with a single exclusion constraint. Instead, you should use the exclusion constraint on one table, say invigilation, and then use a BEFORE INSERT trigger on that same table that checks if there is a conflict in the second table, say rooms. The trigger function on the first table would do a simple range check on the second table:
CREATE FUNCTION check_no_class() RETURNS trigger AS $$
BEGIN
PERFORM * FROM rooms
WHERE room = NEW.room
AND during && NEW.during;
IF FOUND THEN
RETURN NULL;
ELSE
RETURN NEW;
END IF;
END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE TRIGGER check_rooms
BEFORE INSERT ON invigilation
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE check_no_class();
If a class is scheduled in a room then the insert on invigilation will fail.
Related
If I have this setup:
CREATE TABLE category(
category_id serial PRIMARY KEY,
category_name text UNIQUE NOT NULL -- must be UNIQUE
);
CREATE TABLE parts (
part_id serial PRIMARY KEY,
category_id int REFERENCES product,
part_name text
);
CREATE VIEW partview AS
SELECT com.part_id, cat.category_name, com.part_name
FROM parts com
LEFT JOIN category cat USING (category_id);
How do I create a trigger so that when I insert data into the view, the source tables are updated?
I tried this... but it doesn't work :(
CREATE FUNCTION insert_view_func()
RETURNS trigger as
$func$
BEGIN
INSERT INTO parts (category_name)
select (select category_id from category where category_name = category.category_name)
RETURNING category_id as id
into new.componentid;
return new;
END
$func$ language plpgsql;
create trigger insert_view_trig
INSTEAD of insert on partview
for each row execute procedure insert_view_func();
The big issue with view insert triggers on non-simple views is you do not know what is be inserted.
In this case that could be Category or Parts or both. Your trigger has to handle both. Here that is not much a issue here:
create or replace function insert_view_func()
returns trigger
language plpgsql
as $$
begin
insert into category (category_name) values(new.category_name)
on conflict do nothing;
insert into parts (category_id, part_name)
select category_id, new.part_name
from category
where category_name = new.category_name;
return new;
end ;
$$ ;
That, however, is not the major issue here. Your data model setup a 1:M relationship between Category:Parts.
Not a problem if that is what you really want, but it does open a potential problem. Since the Part_Name is not unique it opens
the possibility of multiple parts with the same name (see fiddle), but each associated to a separate category.
This could become quite confusing. To avoid this you may want to consider a M:M relationship and creating a resolution table. The other option would be modifying the trigger function to check for existing part_name. Better yet make Part_Name unique.
I know in older versions it was impossible, is it the same with version 9.4?
I'm trying to do something like this:
CREATE VIEW products AS
SELECT d1.id AS id, d1.price AS pr FROM dup.freshProducts AS d1
UNION
SELECT d2.id AS id, d2.price AS pr FROM dup.cannedProducts AS d2;
CREATE TABLE orderLines
(
line_id integer PRIMARY KEY,
product_no integer REFERENCES productView.id
);
I'm trying to implement an inheritance relationship where freshProducts and cannedProducts both inherit from products. I implemented it using two different tables and I created a view products that has only the common properties between freshProducts and cannedProducts. In addition, each row in orderLines has a relationship with a product, either a freshProduct or a cannedProduct. See image for clarification.
If referencing to a view is yet not possible, which solution do you think is best? I've thought of eihter a materialized view or implementing the restriction using triggers. Could you recommend any good example of such triggers to use as a basis?
Thank-you very much!
Referencing a (materialized) view wouldn't work and a trigger might look like this:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION reject_not_existing_id()
RETURNS "trigger" AS
$BODY$
BEGIN
IF NEW.product_no NOT IN (SELECT id FROM dup.freshProducts UNION SELECT id FROM dup.cannedProducts) THEN
RAISE EXCEPTION 'The product id % does not exist', NEW.product_no;
END IF;
RETURN NEW;
END;
$BODY$
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE;
CREATE TRIGGER tr_before_insert_or_update
BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE OF product_no
ON orderLines
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE reject_not_existing_id();
(See also http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1116256)
A materialized view might look like a good approach but fails for two reasons: Like a view you simply can't reference it, because it is no table (go ahead and try). Assuming you could, there would still be the problem of preventing two equal ids in freshProducts and cannedProducts. Yes you can define an UNIQUE INDEX on a materialized view, but how to make sure the same id isn't used both in fresh an canned in the first place?
That's something you still have to solve if using the trigger in orderLines.
That brings me to suggest to rethink your model. 'Fresh' and 'canned' might as well be values of an attribute of a single table products, hence making all the trouble superfluous. If fresh and canned product significantly differ in (the number of) their attributes (can't think of any other reason to create two different tables) then reference the product id in two other tables. Like
CREATE TABLE products
(
id ... PRIMARY KEY
, fresh_or_canned ...
, price ...
, another_common_attribute_1 ...
, ...
, another_common_attribute_n ...
);
CREATE TABLE canned_specific_data
(
canned_id ... REFERENCES products (id)
, type_of_can ...
, ...
, another_attribute_that_does_not_apply_to_fresh ...
);
CREATE TABLE fresh_specific_data
(
fresh_id ... REFERENCES products (id)
, date_of_harvest ...
, ...
, another_attribute_that_does_not_apply_to_canned ...
);
The simple answer to preventing ID duplication is to simply use the same sequence as the default value for IDs in both freshProducts and cannedProducts.
Now, there comes the question, why do you need a foreign key at all? Typically this is to prevent deletion of data that another table depends upon, however, you can write a trigger to prevent that. Alsowise, you have updating that value to something that doesn't exist in the keyed-to table, but you can write a trigger for that too.
So basically you can write triggers to implement all the desired functionality of a foreign key without actually needing a foreign key, with the added benefit that they WILL work with such a view.
I'm looking for a way to manipulate rows automatically before adding them to a table in postgreSQL. Say for instance we have the following table:
CREATE TABLE foo (
id serial NOT NULL,
value integer NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT "Foo_pkey" PRIMARY KEY (id),
CONSTRAINT "Foo_value_check" CHECK (value >= 0)
)
Now one can insert rows:
INSERT INTO foo (id,value) VALUES ('0','2')
And when one enters:
INSERT INTO foo (id,value) VALUES ('1','-2')
An error will occur. Is it possible to define a "rewrite rule" that given the value column contains a value less than zero, zero is used (for instance)?
Yes, it is possible. One way is to use triggers. A trigger causes a procedure to be run on particular actions, which can allow you to modify the data to be inserted (amongst other things).
To set up a trigger, you first create a function that will perform the checks and modifications you want. The variable new in your function will be implicitly declared and contain the new row to be inserted / updated so you can check and modify the values before they reach the table.
You then specify that this function is to be called before insert or update on one or more tables.
Example:
CREATE FUNCTION validate_foo_row()
RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
BEGIN
IF new.value<0 THEN
new.value=0;
END IF;
RETURN NEW;
END
$$ LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
CREATE TRIGGER trig_validate_foo BEFORE INSERT ON foo
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE validate_foo_row();
SqlFiddle Here
The above simplistic example only triggers for inserts, you might want to have it trigger for updates as well.
You can read more about triggers in the postgresql manual. They are powerful and are capable of a lot more than this simple example shows.
i have a table "demand_details"
on update or delete i want to store values of each row in another table "demand_details_log"
my functions is as follows
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION water_blogb() RETURNS trigger AS
$BODY$
BEGIN
IF (TG_OP='UPDATE') THEN
INSERT INTO demand_details_log VALUES ('U',now(),OLD.*);
RETURN NEW;
END IF;
IF (TG_OP='DELETE') THEN
INSERT INTO demand_details_log VALUES ('D',now(),OLD.*);
RETURN OLD;
END IF;
END;
$BODY$ LANGUAGE plpgsql
my trigger is as follows
CREATE TRIGGER water_btrg_b
AFTER UPDATE OR DELETE
ON demand_details
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE water_blogb();
MY problem is the same trigger and functions works well on other table (by changing table,trigger and function name) but not working with demand table. I tried with "RAISE NOTICE 'working...'" in both in other table trigger gets fired but in demand table its not fired at all.
As you found, triggers are not inherited. This leads to some difficulties in managing triggers in inherited table structures. You may want to read up on some of the issues involved at http://ledgersmbdev.blogspot.com/2012/08/postgresql-or-modelling-part-3-table.html and http://ledgersmbdev.blogspot.com/2012/08/or-modelling-32-setsubset-modelling.html.
Now those do not address table partitioning directly which may be what you are trying to do here. I would recommend that you build in some additional tests that you can run to check and make sure that triggers are properly installed on all subtables. I would suggest taking a look at How to find inherited tables programatically in PostgreSQL? and also the pg_trigger table so that you can build a report of child tables which do not share the triggers of their parents.
I have two tables representing two different types of imagery. I am using PostGIS to represent the boundaries of those images. Here is a simplified example of those tables:
CREATE TABLE img_format_a (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
file_path VARCHAR(1000),
boundary GEOGRAPHY(POLYGON, 4326)
);
CREATE TABLE img_format_p (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
file_path VARCHAR(1000),
boundary GEOGRAPHY(POLYGON, 4326)
);
I also have a cross reference table, which I want to contain all the IDs of the images that overlap each other. Whenever an image of type "A" gets inserted into the database, I want to check to see whether it overlaps any of the existing imagery of type "P" (and vice versa) and insert corresponding entries into the img_a_img_p cross reference table. This table should represent a many-to-many relationship.
My first instinct is to write a trigger to manage thisimg_a_img_p table. I've never created a trigger before, so let me know if this is a silly thing to do, but it seems to make sense to me. So I create the following trigger:
CREATE TRIGGER update_a_p_cross_reference
AFTER INSERT OR DELETE OR UPDATE OF boundary
ON img_format_p FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE check_p_cross_reference();
The part where I am getting stuck is with writing the trigger function. My code is in Java and I see that there are tools like PL/pgSQL, but I'm not sure if that's what I should use or if I even need one of those special add-ons.
Essentially all I need the trigger to do is update the cross reference table each time a new image gets inserted into either img_format_a or img_format_p. When a new image is inserted, I would like to use a PostGIS function like ST_Intersects to determine whether the new image overlaps with any of the images in the other table. For each image pair where ST_INTERSECTS returns true, I would like to insert a new entry into img_a_img_p with the ID's of both images. Can someone help me figure out how to write this trigger function? Here is some pseudocode:
SELECT * FROM img_format_p P
WHERE ST_Intersects(A.boundary, P.boundary);
for each match in selection {
INSERT INTO img_a_img_p VALUES (A.id, P.id);
}
You could wrap the usual INSERT ... SELECT idiom in a PL/pgSQL function sort of like this:
create function check_p_cross_reference() returns trigger as
$$
begin
insert into img_a_img_p (img_a_id, img_p_id)
select a.id, p.id
from img_format_a, img_format_p
where p.id = NEW.id
and ST_Intersects(a.boundary, p.boundary);
return null;
end;
$$ language plpgsql;
Triggers have two extra variables, NEW and OLD:
NEW
Data type RECORD; variable holding the new database row for INSERT/UPDATE operations in row-level triggers. This variable is NULL in statement-level triggers and for DELETE operations.
OLD
Data type RECORD; variable holding the old database row for UPDATE/DELETE operations in row-level triggers. This variable is NULL in statement-level triggers and for INSERT operations.
So you can use NEW.id to access the new img_format_p value that's going in. You (currently) can't use the plain SQL language for triggers:
It is not currently possible to write a trigger function in the plain SQL function language.
but PL/pgSQL is pretty close. This would make sense as an AFTER INSERT trigger:
CREATE TRIGGER update_a_p_cross_reference
AFTER INSERT
ON img_format_p FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE check_p_cross_reference();
Deletes could be handled with a foreign key on img_a_img_p and a cascading delete. You could use your trigger for UPDATEs as well:
CREATE TRIGGER update_a_p_cross_reference
AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE OF boundary
ON img_format_p FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE check_p_cross_reference();
but you'd probably want to clear out the old entries before inserting the new ones with something like:
delete from img_a_img_p where img_p_id = NEW.id;
before the INSERT...SELECT statement.