Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I have to create an application with a permanent connection (I need to send data update from the server) and, in parallel, I need to configure this app. My idea was to use Socket.IO for the connection and use it also for the configuration, with specifics event name.
But someone said that it's better to keep Socket.IO only for sending data from the server and use a REST API to configure the app.
I want to know if using a REST API along with of a Websocket connection is a good practice or not, and if no, why.
You always can provide a REST API along with a WebSocket API for different purposes. It's up to your requirements and it depends on what you want to achieve.
For instance, you can use a WebSocket API to provide real-time notifications while the REST API can be used to manage resources.
There are a few details you should be aware of:
REST is a protocol-independent architectural style frequently implemented over the HTTP protocol and it's meant to be stateless.
In HTTP, the communication is driven by the client: the client requests and the server responds.
WebSocket is a bi-directional, full-duplex and persistent connection protocol, hence it's stateful.
In WebSockets, once the communication is established, both client and server can exchange frames in no particular order.
Just to mention one example of application that provides different APIs: Stack Exchange provides a REST API along with a WebSocket API.
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
I have multiple Java REST microservice APIs and I would like to log their requests and responses to MongoDB. Do I create a separate logging API with an asynchronous service method and call it from all other microservice controller classes using AOP? Or Do I use event brokers like Solace/Kafka where the microservices publish the logs to a topic and a separate service picks and stores in MongoDB?
Which is the better way, I can afford to lose some logs without being stored in MongoDB but I cannot afford to affect the performance of my microservices.
There are definitely advantages to using an event broker to handle log data, since it can serve as a buffer during times when the logging API isn't available or slow. Note that AOP could also be used with an event broker, it would just use a event endpoint, rather than an HTTPS endpoint.
A couple other related points:
Have you considered persistence layers other than MongoDB? OpenTelemetry backends are made to address exactly the sort of use case you have, and provide some very useful tooling for auditing/troubleshooting microservices.
Rather than using REST, how about connecting the microservices themselves through an event broker. It could provide some very nice performance benefits, and make your microservices more agile.
Best,
Jesse
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
So RESTful APIs are stateless wherein the server does not store any state about the client session on the server side.
And consistent hashing in load balancing is used to associate a client with a server, ie, all requests from a given client will be directed to a given server only (amongst a group of servers) because that server has some data stored in it about that client.
So, if our server uses RESTful APIs then is there no need for consistent hashing while load balancing?
Not necessarily. While RESTful APIs are stateless, your server isn't. Server-side caching doesn't violate the constraints of REST. If a server is able to keep information from a client in its cache, it could make a significant difference if future requests are made to that server instead of to another one which may need to perform more work to retrieve the client's data.
It is very situational, however, so I can't speak to your specific server setup!
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
I need to launch an application on a remote system from Java. I know the IP address and the location of the executable batch file on the remote system. I am trying to get it done with PSExec but I can't seem to get it to work due to domain issues.
One suggestion was to use REST API instead. I don't see any info on using REST to launch an application. So anyone who can tell me if this is possible?
REST is about resource state manipulation via their representations on the top of stateless communication between client and server. REST is an architectural style and it's protocol independent but, in practice, it's commonly implemented on the top of the HTTP protocol.
Can I use REST APIs to remotely launch an application?
If you can represent your application state as a resource, so you can probably create a REST API to manage it.
In practice, your server can provide a set of URLs to locate the resources and their state can be manipulated via HTTP verbs and representations such as JSON and/or XML.
HTTP headers can be used to exchange some metadata about the request and response while HTTP status code should be used to inform the client regarding the status of the operation.
Keep it stateless by storing all session context in the client.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I work on system security and i want to know why we need the RPC programming and what is the differences between RPC and simple socket programming? Both of them have a client and server application,tcp/ip based,IP address,port number ,...
Thanks
RPC is one definition of how to send structured data as a call to the server and get structured data as a response back. You could use any of a wide variety of protocols with the same basic goal, like SOAP or WCF.
Any of those protocols builds on top of TCP/IP, and lets the server and the client communicate using predefined strucures. You could do the same without any of those protocols, but then you would have to set up a new set of custom rules for how the server and client should communicate.
You don't need any of those protocols for communication, and sometimes (in realtime online gaming for example) a custom streamlined protocol is used instead, but for most client-server communication a well known protocol is preferable.
Well, there are a lot of different RPC technologies, so it is hard to say what you are refering to. But generally speaking it is a layer on top of network transports (like UDP and TCP) to marshall parameters and call results. You need it to communicate in a structured way with services. Some commonly used applications and system services use well known RPC mechanisms (like Windows DCOM, NFS mount protocol, Kerberos, SAP RFC).
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I want to create a chatting application that enable users that connect via XMPP to chat with another users that connect using web socket (perhaps using Netty or Jetty) or vice versa. So every users that connect using web application can chat with other user that connect using web socket.
I am not sure that websocket currently have a default standard that enable it to communicate with other protocols. Let me know your opinion and suggestion.
Very much like on top of TCP, you can implement rich business protocols over WebSockets as well. Kaazing offers XMPP as one of several protocols over WebSockets (in addition to JMS and AMQP).
You can check out the XMPP edition of the Kaazing WebSocket Gateway here, and find the documentation and tutorials here. The developer version of the product, up to 50 concurrent connections, is a free download. The community edition is open-source licensed under the Apache 2.0 license.
There exists a draft for XMPP over WebSockets. It's a year since it was submitted, but I think work on it will continue once WS itself stabilizes.
There exists experimental implementations of XMPP over WS, but since WS has been a moving target, they aren't implementing the latest versions (AFAIK).