In coffeescript sz +"text" is different from sz + "text". Note the space after +. Why is that? I can't find mention of it on the coffeescript website. What's a good use for that syntax? Is it a bug?
Coffescript has significant whitespaces. And you don't need to use parentheses to invoke a function if you're passing arguments. a b c means a(b(c)). Not sure if it is good or bad. But this is actually common practice in functional programming languages where "the most important construction" is function call.
The first expression sz +"text" was parsed to
call
sz UnaryPlus
"text"
The second sz + "text" was parsed to
+
sz "text"
BTW do not use + to concat strings. Coffescript supports string interpolation.
sz = 'hello' # single quotes no interpolation
"#{sz}text" # double quotes compiles to `sz + "text";`
Related
Using q’s like function, how can we achieve the following match using a single regex string regstr?
q) ("foo7"; "foo8"; "foo9"; "foo10"; "foo11"; "foo12"; "foo13") like regstr
>>> 0111110b
That is, like regstr matches the foo-strings which end in the numbers 8,9,10,11,12.
Using regstr:"foo[8-12]" confuses the square brackets (how does it interpret this?) since 12 is not a single digit, while regstr:"foo[1[0-2]|[1-9]]" returns a type error, even without the foo-string complication.
As the other comments and answers mentioned, this can't be done using a single regex. Another alternative method is to construct the list of strings that you want to compare against:
q)str:("foo7";"foo8";"foo9";"foo10";"foo11";"foo12";"foo13")
q)match:{x in y,/:string z[0]+til 1+neg(-/)z}
q)match[str;"foo";8 12]
0111110b
If your eventual goal is to filter on the matching entries, you can replace in with inter:
q)match:{x inter y,/:string z[0]+til 1+neg(-/)z}
q)match[str;"foo";8 12]
"foo8"
"foo9"
"foo10"
"foo11"
"foo12"
A variation on Cillian’s method: test the prefix and numbers separately.
q)range:{x+til 1+y-x}.
q)s:"foo",/:string 82,range 7 13 / include "foo82" in tests
q)match:{min(x~/:;in[;string range y]')#'flip count[x]cut'z}
q)match["foo";8 12;] s
00111110b
Note how unary derived functions x~/: and in[;string range y]' are paired by #' to the split strings, then min used to AND the result:
q)flip 3 cut's
"foo" "foo" "foo" "foo" "foo" "foo" "foo" "foo"
"82" ,"7" ,"8" ,"9" "10" "11" "12" "13"
q)("foo"~/:;in[;string range 8 12]')#'flip 3 cut's
11111111b
00111110b
Compositions rock.
As the comments state, regex in kdb+ is extremely limited. If the number of trailing digits is known like in the example above then the following can be used to check multiple patterns
q)str:("foo7"; "foo8"; "foo9"; "foo10"; "foo11"; "foo12"; "foo13"; "foo3x"; "foo123")
q)any str like/:("foo[0-9]";"foo[0-9][0-9]")
111111100b
Checking for a range like 8-12 is not currently possible within kdb+ regex. One possible workaround is to write a function to implement this logic. The function range checks a list of strings start with a passed string and end with a number within the range specified.
range:{
/ checking for strings starting with string y
s:((c:count y)#'x)like y;
/ convert remainder of string to long, check if within range
d:("J"$c _'x)within z;
/ find strings satisfying both conditions
s&d
}
Example use:
q)range[str;"foo";8 12]
011111000b
q)str where range[str;"foo";8 12]
"foo8"
"foo9"
"foo10"
"foo11"
"foo12"
This could be made more efficient by checking the trailing digits only on the subset of strings starting with "foo".
For your example you can pad, fill with a char, and then simple regex works fine:
("."^5$("foo7";"foo8";"foo9";"foo10";"foo11";"foo12";"foo13")) like "foo[1|8-9][.|0-2]"
Assigning an array looks like this:
PS> $x = "a", "b"
PS> $x
a
b
Now, i wanted to add a 'root string' ("r") to any element so I did this (actually i used a variable, but for the sakeness of simplicity let's just use a string here):
PS> $x = "r" + "a" , "r" + "b"
PS> $x
ra rb
Looking at the output, I didn't get the array that I expected, but a single string with a "space" (I checked: it's a 32 ascii char, so a space, not a tab or another character).
That is: the comma seems to be interpreted as a string join operator, which I couldn't find any reference to.
Even worst, I get the feeling of not understanding how the parser works here. I had a look at about_Parsing; what I found seems not to apply to this case.
Commas (,) introduce lists passed as arrays, except when the command
to be called is a native application, in which case they are
interpreted as part of the expandable string. Initial, consecutive or
trailing commas are not supported.
The first obvious fix that I came up with is the following:
PS> $x = ("r" + "a") , ("r" + "b")
PS> $x
ra
rb
Maybe there are others, and I am expecially intrested in the ones that reveal how the parser actually works. What I would like to fix the most is my knowledge of the parsing rules.
To flesh out the helpful comments on the answer:
tl;dr
Due to operator precedence, your command is parsed as "r" + ("a" , "r") + "b", causing array "a", "r" to be implicitly stringified to verbatim a r, resulting in two string concatenation operations yielding a single string with verbatim content ra rb.
Using (...) is indeed the correct way to override operator precedence.
"r" + "a" , "r" + "b"
is an expression involving operators.
Expressions are parsed in expression mode, which contrasts with argument mode; the latter applies to commands, i.e. named units of functionality that are called with shell-typical syntax (whitespace-separated arguments, quotes around simple strings optional). Arguments (parameter values) in argument mode are parsed differently from operands in expression mode, as explained in the conceptual about_Parsing help topic. Your quote about , relates to argument mode, not expression mode.
The conceptual about_Operator_Precedence help topic describes the relative precedence among operators, from which you can glean that ,, the array constructor operator has higher precedence than the + operator
Therefore, your expression is parsed as follows (using (...), the grouping operator, to make the implicit rules explicit):
"r" + ("a" , "r") + "b"
+ is polymorphic in PowerShell, and with a [string] instance as the LHS the RHS is coerced to a string too.
Therefore, array "a" , "r" is stringified, which uses PowerShell's custom array stringification, namely joining the (potentially stringified) array elements with a space.[1]
That is, the array stringifies to a string with verbatim content a r.
As an aside: The same stringification is applied in the context of string interpolation via expandable (double-quoted) strings ("..."); that is, "$("a", "r")" also yields verbatim a r
Therefore, the above is equivalent to:
"r" + "a r" + "b"
which yields verbatim ra rb.
(...) is indeed the appropriate way to ensure the desired precedence:
("r" + "a"), ("r" + "b") # -> array 'ra', 'rb'
[1] Space is the default separator character. Technically, you can override it via the $OFS preference variable, though that is rarely used in practice.
Another way to do it. The type of the first term controls what type of operation the plus performs. The first term here is an empty array. If you want the plus to do both kinds of operations, there's no getting around extra parentheses to change the operator precedence.
#() + 'ra' + 'rb'
ra
rb
Or more commonly:
'ra','rb' + 'rc'
ra
rb
rc
I'd like to have a function generate(n) that generates the first n lowercase characters of the alphabet appended in a string (therefore: 1<=n<=26)
For example:
generate(3) --> 'abc'
generate(5) --> 'abcde'
generate(9) --> 'abcdefghi'
I'm new to Matlab and I'd be happy if someone could show me an approach of how to write the function. For sure this will involve doing arithmetic with the ASCII-codes of the characters - but I've no idea how to do this and which types that Matlab provides to do this.
I would rely on ASCII codes for this. You can convert an integer to a character using char.
So for example if we want an "e", we could look up the ASCII code for "e" (101) and write:
char(101)
'e'
This also works for arrays:
char([101, 102])
'ef'
The nice thing in your case is that in ASCII, the lowercase letters are all the numbers between 97 ("a") and 122 ("z"). Thus the following code works by taking ASCII "a" (97) and creating an array of length n starting at 97. These numbers are then converted using char to strings. As an added bonus, the version below ensures that the array can only go to 122 (ASCII for "z").
function output = generate(n)
output = char(97:min(96 + n, 122));
end
Note: For the upper limit we use 96 + n because if n were 1, then we want 97:97 rather than 97:98 as the second would return "ab". This could be written as 97:(97 + n - 1) but the way I've written it, I've simply pulled the "-1" into the constant.
You could also make this a simple anonymous function.
generate = #(n)char(97:min(96 + n, 122));
generate(3)
'abc'
To write the most portable and robust code, I would probably not want those hard-coded ASCII codes, so I would use something like the following:
output = 'a':char(min('a' + n - 1, 'z'));
...or, you can just generate the entire alphabet and take the part you want:
function str = generate(n)
alphabet = 'a':'z';
str = alphabet(1:n);
end
Note that this will fail with an index out of bounds error for n > 26, so you might want to check for that.
You can use the char built-in function which converts an interger value (or array) into a character array.
EDIT
Bug fixed (ref. Suever's comment)
function [str]=generate(n)
a=97;
% str=char(a:a+n)
str=char(a:a+n-1)
Hope this helps.
Qapla'
I am developing a simple GUI with MATLAB (guide) with a pop up menu in it. In order to establish a connection through a serial port.
function sendLog_OpeningFcn(hObject, eventdata, handles, varargin)
set(handles.popupmenuSerialPort,'String', {'''COM1''','''COM2''','''COM3''','''COM4'''});
...
I would like to get the selected value in this way:
serialPortList = get(handles.popupmenuSerialPort,'String');
serialPortValue = get(handles.popupmenuSerialPort,'Value');
serialPort = serialPortList(serialPortValue);
disp('serialPort ' + serialPortValue);
But I get an error message on disp function:
Undefined function 'plus' for input arguments of type 'cell'.
Invalid PORT specified.
How could I get the chosen value?
I hate to plow through 2 answers that are clearly not bad, but here the devil is in the details. Yes, you cannot concatenate strings in MATLAB with the + operator, but the first red flag in your question is that your error message indicates a cell as one of the arguments to +. Note that disp has not even thrown an error at this point, it was +. This leads me to believe that your code is actually disp('serialPort ' + serialPort); not disp('serialPort ' + serialPortValue); since serialPortList is a cell array. Was this a typo?
So, by indexing it like serialPort = serialPortList(serialPortValue); you get a single cell in serialPort, which would not work with proper string concatenation or disp. The correction here is to use the curly braces ({}).
Together with valid string concatenation,
>> serialPort = serialPortList{serialPortValue};
>> disp(['serialPort ' serialPort])
serialPort 'COM3'
The single quotes are in the string because of how you set the strings with set(handles.popupmenuSerialPort,'String',..., so if you want to strip that, you can use strrep(serialPort,'''','').
Note that you can also use fprintf if you are more comfortable with that style of string formatting.
You can't use '+' to combine strings in matlab.
you can do:
disp(['serialPort',num2str(serialPortValue)]);
Try array concatenation :
disp(['SerialPort : ' serialPortValue]);
I am trying to add '\' before all special characters in a string in MATLAB, could anyone please help me out. Here is the example:
tStr = 'Hi, I'm a Big (Not So Big) MATLAB addict; Since my school days!';
I want this string to be changed to:
'Hi\, I\'m a Big \(Not so Big \) MATLAB addict\; Since my school days\!'
The escape character in Matlab is the single quote ('), not the backslash (\), like in C language. Thus, your string must be like this:
tStr = 'Hi\, I\''m a Big (Not so Big ) MATLAB addict\; Since my school days!'
I took the list of special charecters defined on the Mathworks webpage to do this:
special = '[]{}()=''.().....,;:%%{%}!#';
tStr = 'Hi, I''m a Big (Not So Big) MATLAB addict; Since my school days!';
outStr = '';
for l = tStr
if (length(find(special == l)) > 0)
outStr = [outStr, '\', l];
else
outStr = [outStr, l];
end
end
which will automatically add those \s. You do need to use two single quotes ('') in place of the apostrophe in your input string. If tStr is obtained with the function input(), or something similar, this will procedure will still work.
Edited:
Or using regular expressions:
regexprep(tStr,'([[\]{}()=''.(),;:%%{%}!#])','\\$1')