The code below is defined as algorithm 1 that computes the Pseudo Zernike Radial polynomials:
function R = pseudo_zernike_radial_polynomials(n,r)
if any( r>1 | r<0 | n<0)
error(':zernike_radial_polynomials either r is less than or greater thatn 1, r must be between 0 and 1 or n is less than 0.')
end
if n==0;
R =ones(n +1, length(r));
return;
end
R =ones(n +1, length(r));
rSQRT= sqrt(r);
r0 = ~logical(rSQRT.^(2*n+1)) ; % if any low r exist, and high n, then treat as 0
if any(r0)
m = n:-1:mod(n,2); ss=1:sum(r0);
R0(m +1, ss)=0;
R0(0 +1, ss)=1;
R(:,r0)=R0;
end
if any(~r0)
rSQRT= rSQRT(~r0);
R1 = zernike_radial_polynomials(2*n+1, rSQRT );
m = 2:2: 2*n+1 +1;
R1=R1(m,:);
for m=1:size(R1,1)
R1(m,:) = R1(m,:)./rSQRT';
end
R(:,~r0)=R1;
end
Then, this is algorithm 2 that calculates the moments:
and I translate into the code as follow:
clear all
%input : 2D image f, Nmax = order.
f = rgb2gray(imread('Oval_45.png'));
prompt = ('Input PZM order Nmax:');
Nmax = input(prompt);
Pzm =0;
l = size(f,1);
for x = 1:l;
for y =x;
for n = 0:Nmax;
[X,Y] = meshgrid(x,y);
R = sqrt((2.*X-l-1).^2+(2.*Y-l-1).^2)/l;
theta = atan2((l-1-2.*Y+2),(2.*X-l+1-2));
R = (R<=1).*R;
rad = pseudo_zernike_radial_polynomials(n, R);
for m = 0:n;
%find psi
if mod(m,2)==0
%m is even
newd1 = f(x,y)+f(x,y);
newd2 = f(y,x)+f(y,x);
newd3 = f(x,y)+f(x,y);
newd4 = f(y,x)+f(y,x);
x1 = newd1;
y1 = (-1)^m/2*newd2;
x2 = newd3;
y2 = (-1)^m/2*newd4;
psi = cos(m*theta)*(x1+y1+x2+y2)-(1i)*sin(m*theta)*(x1+y1-x2-y2);
else
newd1 = f(x,y)-f(x,y);
newd2 = f(y,x)-f(y,x);
newd3 = f(x,y)-f(x,y);
newd4 = f(y,x)-f(y,x);
x1 = newd1;
y1 = (-1)^m/2*newd2;
x2 = newd3;
y2 = (-1)^m/2*newd4;
psi = cos(m*theta)*(x1+x2)+sin(m*theta)*(y1-y2)+(1i)*(cos(m*theta)*(y1+y2)-sin(m*theta)*(x1-x2));
end
Pzm = Pzm+rad*psi;
end
end
end
end
However its give me error :
Error using *
Integers can only be combined with integers of the same class, or scalar doubles.
Error in main_pzm (line 44)
Pzm = Pzm+rad*psi;
The detail of the calculation can be seen here
Related
I want to determine the Steepest descent of the Rosenbruck function using Armijo steplength where x = [-1.2, 1]' (the initial column vector).
The problem is, that the code has been running for a long time. I think there will be an infinite loop created here. But I could not understand where the problem was.
Could anyone help me?
n=input('enter the number of variables n ');
% Armijo stepsize rule parameters
x = [-1.2 1]';
s = 10;
m = 0;
sigma = .1;
beta = .5;
obj=func(x);
g=grad(x);
k_max = 10^5;
k=0; % k = # iterations
nf=1; % nf = # function eval.
x_new = zeros([],1) ; % empty vector which can be filled if length is not known ;
[X,Y]=meshgrid(-2:0.5:2);
fx = 100*(X.^2 - Y).^2 + (X-1).^2;
contour(X, Y, fx, 20)
while (norm(g)>10^(-3)) && (k<k_max)
d = -g./abs(g); % steepest descent direction
s = 1;
newobj = func(x + beta.^m*s*d);
m = m+1;
if obj > newobj - (sigma*beta.^m*s*g'*d)
t = beta^m *s;
x = x + t*d;
m_new = m;
newobj = func(x + t*d);
nf = nf+1;
else
m = m+1;
end
obj=newobj;
g=grad(x);
k = k + 1;
x_new = [x_new, x];
end
% Output x and k
x_new, k, nf
fprintf('Optimal Solution x = [%f, %f]\n', x(1), x(2))
plot(x_new)
function y = func(x)
y = 100*(x(1)^2 - x(2))^2 + (x(1)-1)^2;
end
function y = grad(x)
y(1) = 100*(2*(x(1)^2-x(2))*2*x(1)) + 2*(x(1)-1);
end
This is my Approximate entropy Calculator in MATLAB. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approximate_entropy
I'm not sure why it isn't working. It's returning a negative value.Can anyone help me with this? R1 being the data.
FindSize = size(R1);
N = FindSize(1);
% N = input ('insert number of data values');
%if you want to put your own N in, take away the % from the line above
and
%insert the % before the N = FindSize(1)
%m = input ('insert m: integer representing length of data, embedding
dimension ');
m = 2;
%r = input ('insert r: positive real number for filtering, threshold
');
r = 0.2*std(R1);
for x1= R1(1:N-m+1,1)
D1 = pdist2(x1,x1);
C11 = (D1 <= r)/(N-m+1);
c1 = C11(1);
end
for i1 = 1:N-m+1
s1 = sum(log(c1));
end
phi1 = (s1/(N-m+1));
for x2= R1(1:N-m+2,1)
D2 = pdist2(x2,x2);
C21 = (D2 <= r)/(N-m+2);
c2 = C21(1);
end
for i2 = 1:N-m+2
s2 = sum(log(c2));
end
phi2 = (s2/(N-m+2));
Ap = phi1 - phi2;
Apen = Ap(1)
Following the documentation provided by the Wikipedia article, I developed this small function that calculates the approximate entropy:
function res = approximate_entropy(U,m,r)
N = numel(U);
res = zeros(1,2);
for i = [1 2]
off = m + i - 1;
off_N = N - off;
off_N1 = off_N + 1;
x = zeros(off_N1,off);
for j = 1:off
x(:,j) = U(j:off_N+j);
end
C = zeros(off_N1,1);
for j = 1:off_N1
dist = abs(x - repmat(x(j,:),off_N1,1));
C(j) = sum(~any((dist > r),2)) / off_N1;
end
res(i) = sum(log(C)) / off_N1;
end
res = res(1) - res(2);
end
I first tried to replicate the computation shown the article, and the result I obtain matches the result shown in the example:
U = repmat([85 80 89],1,17);
approximate_entropy(U,2,3)
ans =
-1.09965411068114e-05
Then I created another example that shows a case in which approximate entropy produces a meaningful result (the entropy of the first sample is always less than the entropy of the second one):
% starting variables...
s1 = repmat([10 20],1,10);
s1_m = mean(s1);
s1_s = std(s1);
s2_m = 0;
s2_s = 0;
% datasample will not always return a perfect M and S match
% so let's repeat this until equality is achieved...
while ((s1_m ~= s2_m) && (s1_s ~= s2_s))
s2 = datasample([10 20],20,'Replace',true,'Weights',[0.5 0.5]);
s2_m = mean(s2);
s2_s = std(s2);
end
m = 2;
r = 3;
ae1 = approximate_entropy(s1,m,r)
ae2 = approximate_entropy(s2,m,r)
ae1 =
0.00138568170752751
ae2 =
0.680090884817465
Finally, I tried with your sample data:
fid = fopen('O1.txt','r');
U = cell2mat(textscan(fid,'%f'));
fclose(fid);
m = 2;
r = 0.2 * std(U);
approximate_entropy(U,m,r)
ans =
1.08567461184858
My question this time concerns the obtention of the degree distribution of a LDPC matrix through linear programming, under the following statement:
My code is the following:
function [v] = LP_Irr_LDPC(k,Ebn0)
options = optimoptions('fmincon','Display','iter','Algorithm','interior-point','MaxIter', 4000, 'MaxFunEvals', 70000);
fun = #(v) -sum(v(1:k)./(1:k));
A = [];
b = [];
Aeq = [0, ones(1,k-1)];
beq = 1;
lb = zeros(1,k);
ub = [0, ones(1,k-1)];
nonlcon = #(v)DensEv_SP(v,Ebn0);
l0 = [0 rand(1,k-1)];
l0 = l0./sum(l0);
v = fmincon(fun,l0,A,b,Aeq,beq,lb,ub,nonlcon,options)
end
Definition of nonlinear constraints:
function [c, ceq] = DensEv_SP(v,Ebn0)
% It is also needed to modify this function, as you cannot pass parameters from others to it.
h = [0 rand(1,19)];
h = h./sum(h); % This is where h comes from
syms x;
X = x.^(0:(length(h)-1));
R = h*transpose(X);
ebn0 = 10^(Ebn0/10);
Rm = 1;
LLR = (-50:50);
p03 = 0.3;
LLR03 = log((1-p03)/p03);
r03 = 1 - p03;
noise03 = (2*r03*Rm*ebn0)^-1;
pf03 = normpdf(LLR, LLR03, noise03);
sumpf03 = sum(pf03(1:length(pf03)/2));
divisions = 100;
Aj = zeros(1, divisions);
rho = zeros(1, divisions);
xj = zeros(1, divisions);
k = 10; % Length(v) -> Same value as in 'Complete.m'
for j=1:1:divisions
xj(j) = sumpf03*j/divisions;
rho(j) = subs(R,x,1-xj(j));
Aj(j) = 1 - rho(j);
end
c = zeros(1, length(xj));
lambda = zeros(1, length(Aj));
for j = 1:1:length(xj)
lambda(j) = sum(v(2:k).*(Aj(j).^(1:(k-1))));
c(j) = sumpf03*lambda(j) - xj(j);
end
save Almacen
ceq = [];
%ceq = sum(v)-1;
end
This question is linked to the one posted here. My problem is that I need that each element from vectors v and h resulting from this optimization problem is a fraction of x/N and x/(N(1-r) respectively.
How could I ensure that condition without losing convergence capability?
I came up with one possible solution, at least for vector h, within the function DensEv_SP:
function [c, ceq] = DensEv_SP(v,Ebn0)
% It is also needed to modify this function, as you cannot pass parameters from others to it.
k = 10; % Same as in Complete.m, desired sum of h
M = 19; % Number of integers
h = [0 diff([0,sort(randperm(k+M-1,M-1)),k+M])-ones(1,M)];
h = h./sum(h);
syms x;
X = x.^(0:(length(h)-1));
R = h*transpose(X);
ebn0 = 10^(Ebn0/10);
Rm = 1;
LLR = (-50:50);
p03 = 0.3;
LLR03 = log((1-p03)/p03);
r03 = 1 - p03;
noise03 = (2*r03*Rm*ebn0)^-1;
pf03 = normpdf(LLR, LLR03, noise03);
sumpf03 = sum(pf03(1:length(pf03)/2));
divisions = 100;
Aj = zeros(1, divisions);
rho = zeros(1, divisions);
xj = zeros(1, divisions);
N = 20; % Length(v) -> Same value as in 'Complete.m'
for j=1:1:divisions
xj(j) = sumpf03*j/divisions;
rho(j) = subs(R,x,1-xj(j));
Aj(j) = 1 - rho(j);
end
c = zeros(1, length(xj));
lambda = zeros(1, length(Aj));
for j = 1:1:length(xj)
lambda(j) = sum(v(2:k).*(Aj(j).^(1:(k-1))));
c(j) = sumpf03*lambda(j) - xj(j);
end
save Almacen
ceq = (N*v)-floor(N*v);
%ceq = sum(v)-1;
end
As above stated, there is no longer any problem with vector h; nevertheless the way I defined ceq value seemed to be insufficient to make the optimization work out (the problems with v have not diminished at all). Does anybody know how to find the solution?
For my studies I had to write a PDE solver for the Poisson equation on a disc shaped domain using the finite difference method.
I already passed the Lab exercise. There is one issue in my code I couldn't fix. Function fun1 with the boundary value problem gun2 is somehow oscillating at the boundary. When I use fun2 everything seems fine...
Both functions use at the boundary gun2. What is the problem?
function z = fun1(x,y)
r = sqrt(x.^2+y.^2);
z = zeros(size(x));
if( r < 0.25)
z = -10^8*exp(1./(r.^2-1/16));
end
end
function z = fun2(x,y)
z = 100*sin(2*pi*x).*sin(2*pi*y);
end
function z = gun2(x,y)
z = x.^2+y.^2;
end
function [u,A] = poisson2(funame,guname,M)
if nargin < 3
M = 50;
end
%Mesh Grid Generation
h = 2/(M + 1);
x = -1:h:1;
y = -1:h:1;
[X,Y] = meshgrid(x,y);
CI = ((X.^2 +Y.^2) < 1);
%Boundary Elements
Sum= zeros(size(CI));
%Sum over the neighbours
for i = -1:1
Sum = Sum + circshift(CI,[i,0]) + circshift(CI,[0,i]) ;
end
%if sum of neighbours larger 3 -> inner note!
CI = (Sum > 3);
%else boundary
CB = (Sum < 3 & Sum ~= 0);
Sum= zeros(size(CI));
%Sum over the boundary neighbour nodes....
for i = -1:1
Sum = Sum + circshift(CB,[i,0]) + circshift(CB,[0,i]);
end
%If the sum is equal 2 -> Diagonal boundary
CB = CB + (Sum == 2 & CB == 0 & CI == 0);
%Converting X Y to polar coordinates
Phi = atan(Y./X);
%Converting Phi R back to cartesian coordinates, only at the boundarys
for j = 1:M+2
for i = 1:M+2
if (CB(i,j)~=0)
if j > (M+2)/2
sig = 1;
else
sig = -1;
end
X(i,j) = sig*1*cos(Phi(i,j));
Y(i,j) = sig*1*sin(Phi(i,j));
end
end
end
%Numberize the internal notes u1,u2,......,un
CI = CI.*reshape(cumsum(CI(:)),size(CI));
%Number of internal notes
Ni = nnz(CI);
f = zeros(Ni,1);
k = 1;
A = spalloc(Ni,Ni,5*Ni);
%Create matix A!
for j=2:M+1
for i =2:M+1
if(CI(i,j) ~= 0)
hN = h;hS = h; hW = h; hE = h;
f(k) = fun(X(i,j),Y(i,j));
if(CB(i+1,j) ~= 0)
hN = abs(1-sqrt(X(i,j)^2+Y(i,j)^2));
f(k) = f(k) + gun(X(i,j),Y(i+1,j))*2/(hN^2+hN*h);
A(k,CI(i-1,j)) = -2/(h^2+h*hN);
else
if(CB(i-1,j) ~= 0) %in negative y is a boundry
hS = abs(1-sqrt(X(i,j)^2+Y(i,j)^2));
f(k) = f(k) + gun(X(i,j),Y(i-1,j))*2/(hS^2+h*hS);
A(k,CI(i+1,j)) = -2/(h^2+h*hS);
else
A(k,CI(i-1,j)) = -1/h^2;
A(k,CI(i+1,j)) = -1/h^2;
end
end
if(CB(i,j+1) ~= 0)
hE = abs(1-sqrt(X(i,j)^2+Y(i,j)^2));
f(k) = f(k) + gun(X(i,j+1),Y(i,j))*2/(hE^2+hE*h);
A(k,CI(i,j-1)) = -2/(h^2+h*hE);
else
if(CB(i,j-1) ~= 0)
hW = abs(1-sqrt(X(i,j)^2+Y(i,j)^2));
f(k) = f(k) + gun(X(i,j-1),Y(i,j))*2/(hW^2+h*hW);
A(k,CI(i,j+1)) = -2/(h^2+h*hW);
else
A(k,CI(i,j-1)) = -1/h^2;
A(k,CI(i,j+1)) = -1/h^2;
end
end
A(k,k) = (2/(hE*hW)+2/(hN*hS));
k = k + 1;
end
end
end
%Solve linear system
u = A\f;
U = zeros(M+2,M+2);
p = 1;
%re-arange u
for j = 1:M+2
for i = 1:M+2
if ( CI(i,j) ~= 0)
U(i,j) = u(p);
p = p+1;
else
if ( CB(i,j) ~= 0)
U(i,j) = gun(X(i,j),Y(i,j));
else
U(i,j) = NaN;
end
end
end
end
surf(X,Y,U);
end
I'm keeping this answer short for now, but may extend when the question contains more info.
My first guess is that what you are seeing is just numerical errors. Looking at the scales of the two graphs, the peaks in the first graph are relatively small compared to the signal in the second graph. Maybe there is a similar issue in the second that is just not visible because the signal is much bigger. You could try to increase the number of nodes and observe what happens with the result.
You should always expect to see numerical errors in such simulations. It's only a matter of trying to get their magnitude as small as possible (or as small as needed).
I'm trying to build make a code where an equation is not calculated for some certain values. I have a meshgrid with several values for x and y and I want to include a for loop that will calculate some values for most of the points in the meshgrid but I'm trying to include in that loop a condition that if the points have a specified index, the value will not be calculated. In my second group of for/if loops, I want to say that for all values of i and k (row and column), the value for z and phi are calculated with the exception of the specified i and k values (in the if loop). What I'm doing at the moment is not working...
The error I'm getting is:
The expression to the left of the equals sign is not a valid target for an assignment.
Here is my code at the moment. I'd really appreciate any advice on this! Thanks in advance
U_i = 20;
a = 4;
c = -a*5;
b = a*10;
d = -20;
e = 20;
n = a*10;
[x,y] = meshgrid([c:(b-c)/n:b],[d:(e-d)/n:e]');
for i = 1:length(x)
for k = 1:length(x)
% Zeroing values where cylinder is
if sqrt(x(i,k).^2 + y(i,k).^2) < a
x(i,k) = 0;
y(i,k) = 0;
end
end
end
r = sqrt(x.^2 + y.^2);
theta = atan2(y,x);
z = zeros(length(x));
phi = zeros(length(x));
for i = 1:length(x)
for k = 1:length(x)
if (i > 16 && i < 24 && k > 16 && k <= length(x))
z = 0;
phi = 0;
else
z = U_i.*r.*(1-a^2./r.^2).*sin(theta); % Stream function
phi = U_i*r.*(1+a^2./r.^2).*cos(theta); % Velocity potential
end
end
end
The original code in the question can be rewritten as seen below. Pay attention in the line with ind(17:24,:) since your edit now excludes 24 and you original question included 24.
U_i = 20;
a = 4;
c = -a*5;
b = a*10;
d = -20;
e = 20;
n = a*10;
[x,y] = meshgrid([c:(b-c)/n:b],[d:(e-d)/n:e]');
ind = find(sqrt(x.^2 + y.^2) < a);
x(ind) = 0;
y(ind) = 0;
r = sqrt(x.^2 + y.^2);
theta = atan2(y,x);
ind = true(size(x));
ind(17:24,17:length(x)) = false;
z = zeros(size(x));
phi = zeros(size(x));
z(ind) = U_i.*r(ind).*(1-a^2./r(ind).^2).*sin(theta(ind)); % Stream function
phi(ind) = U_i.*r(ind).*(1+a^2./r(ind).^2).*cos(theta(ind)); % Velocity potential