I have an Play 2.5.3 application which uses Slick for reading an object from DB.
The service classes are built in the following way:
class SomeModelRepo #Inject()(protected val dbConfigProvider: DatabaseConfigProvider) {
val dbConfig = dbConfigProvider.get[JdbcProfile]
import dbConfig.driver.api._
val db = dbConfig.db
...
Now I need some standalone Scala scripts to perform some operations in the background. I need to connect to the DB within them and I would like to reuse my existing service classes to read objects from DB.
To instantiate a SomeModelRepo class' object I need to pass some DatabaseConfigProvider as a parameter. I tried to run:
object SomeParser extends App {
object testDbProvider extends DatabaseConfigProvider {
def get[P <: BasicProfile]: DatabaseConfig[P] = {
DatabaseConfigProvider.get("default")(Play.current)
}
}
...
val someRepo = new SomeModelRepo(testDbProvider)
however I have an error: "There is no started application" in the line with "(Play.current)". Moreover the method current in object Play is deprecated and should be replaced with DI.
Is there any way to initialize my SomeModelRepo class' object within the standalone object SomeParser?
Best regards
When you start your Play application, the PlaySlick module handles the Slick configurations for you. With it you have two choices:
inject DatabaseConfigProvider and get the driver from there, or
do a global lookup via DatabaseConfigProvider.get[JdbcProfile](Play.current), which is not preferred.
Either way, you must have your Play app running! Since this is not the case with your standalone scripts you get the error: "There is no started application".
So, you will have to use Slick's default approach, by instantiating db directly from config:
val db = Database.forConfig("default")
You have lot's of examples at Lightbend's templates.
EDIT: Sorry, I didn't read the whole question. Do you really need to have it as another application? You can run your background operations when your app starts, like here. In this example, InitialData class is instantiated as eager singleton, so it's insert() method is run immediately when app starts.
Related
I am currently on Play 2.4.2 and have successfully created thread pools using the following below:
package threads
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext
import play.api.libs.concurrent.Akka
import play.api.Play.current
object Contexts {
implicit val db: ExecutionContext = Akka.system.dispatchers.lookup("contexts.db-context")
implicit val pdf: ExecutionContext = Akka.system.dispatchers.lookup("contexts.pdf-context")
implicit val email: ExecutionContext = Akka.system.dispatchers.lookup("contexts.email-context")
}
and then in the code with...
Future{....}(threads.Contexts.db)
We are ready to upgrade to Play 2.5 and having trouble understanding the documentation. The documentation for 2.4.2 uses Akka.system.dispatchers.lookup, which we use without issue. The documentation for 2.5.x uses app.actorSystem.dispatchers.lookup. As far as I know, I have to inject the app into a Class, not an Object. Yet the documentation clearly uses an Object for the example!
Has anyone successfully created thread pools in Play 2.5.x that can help out? Is it as simple as changing Contexts to a class, then injecting it wherever I would like to use this threading? Seems odd since to use the default ExecutionContext I just have to make an implicit import.
Also, we are using Play scala.
If you simply change your Contexts to a class, then you will have to deal with how to get an instance of that class.
In my opinion, if you have a number of thread pools that you want to make use of, named bindings are the way to go. In the below example, I will show you how you could accomplish this with guice.
Note that guice injects depedencies at runtime, but it is also possible to inject dependencies at compile time.
I'm going to show it with the db context as an example. First, this is how you will be using it:
class MyService #Inject() (#Named("db") dbCtx: ExecutionContext) {
// make db access here
}
And here's how you could define the binding:
bind[ExecutionContext].qualifiedWith("db").toProvider[DbExecutionContextProvider]
And somewhere define the provider:
class DbExecutionContextProvider #Inject() (actorSystem: ActorSystem) extends Provider[ExecutionContext] {
override def get(): ExecutionContext = actorSystem.dispatchers.lookup("contexts.db-context")
}
You will have to do this for each of your contexts. I understand this may be a little cumbersome and there may actually be more elegant ways to define the bindings in guice.
Note that I have not tried this out. One issue you might stumble upon could be that you'll end up with conflicts, because play already defines a binding for the ExecutionContext in their BuiltinModule. You may need to override the binding to work around that.
I'm not sure if there's something really basic that I'm missing, but I can't figure out how to use WSClient. I've seen all of the examples saying you need to pass the WSClient to a class as a dependency, which I've done, but when I run the program what do I actually pass to my class?
For example, my class signature is:
class myClassName(ws: WSClient)
But when I instantiate the class what do I actually pass to it? I'm also happy to ignore the Play! framework stuff if that makes it easier and just use SBT to run it (which I'm more familiar with).
It's unclear where you might be using a WSClient, but it is recommended that you let the Play framework 'manage' the instance of the client. When you instantiate your application, it gets injected:
class Application #Inject() (ws: WSClient) extends Controller {
...
}
What that means is that inside the ... you have access to ws as a value. You can instantiate myClassName using it:
class Application #Inject() (ws: WSClient) extends Controller {
val myclass = myClassName(ws) // passes the injected WSClient to myClassName
}
Or you can write a function that returns the WSClient, so some other area of your code can call into your Application object to get a object handler for it.
But the key is that the Application object gets that handle because of injection, which is the #Inject annotation.
If you need to generate a WSClient and manage it manually, there are good instructions here. The recommended implementation is reliant on Play! framework libraries, but doesn't depend on the Application.
I used to get the application.conf variable in Play 2.4.x with Play.current.configuration.getString('NAME_HERE'), and it was working good in class, object and companion object too.
Now, I'm using Play 2.5.4 with Scala in a new project, and I won't use this Play.current, because it's deprecated, but there is an alternative using DI, like this :
class HomeController #Inject() (configuration: play.api.Configuration) extends Controller {
def config = Action {
Ok(configuration.underlying.getString("db.driver"))
}
}
This DI Injection works like a charm in class, but in this project, I need to get the variable db.driver in a object? And as far I know, with an object I can't use DI.
Maybe using Guice would help?
You can use #Singleton annotated class instead of object
trait Foo {}
#Singleton
class FooImpl #Inject()(configuration: play.api.Configuration)) extends Foo {
//do whatever you want
}
#Singleton makes the class singleton.It feels bit awkward because Scala itself natively have syntax object to create a singleton, But this is the easiest and probably best solution to DI into a singleton.
You also may create the singleton eagerly like the code below.
bind(classOf[Foo]).to(classOf[FooImpl])asEagerSingleton()
for more detail Info, You can look up Google Guice Wiki and Playframework site
EDIT
How you call it is exactly the same as how you DI in Playframework2.5.
class BarController #Inject()(foo: Foo) extends Controller {
//Do whatever you want with Foo
}
Guice basically generates new instance every time you DI, Once you put #Singleton, Guice use only one instance instead.
DI is for anti-high coupling.So when you want to use a class you defined from another class,You need to DI otherwise the classes are highly coupled which end up making it harder to code your unit test.
FYI, You can use them outside of Play with this technique.
Create an Instance of class which does DI via Playframework Guice Independently in Scala
Have you tried
import com.typesafe.config.ConfigFactory
val myConfig = ConfigFactory.load().getString("myConfig.key")
Above approach doesn't require you to convert your object to singleton class.
You can do
Play.current.configuration
however that will (probably) no longer be possible with Play 2.6.
Ideally, however, you would pass the configuration in as a parameter to that method of the object or, use a class instead of an object.
What I somtimes do to migrate 'from object to class':
class MyComponent #Inject() (config: Configuration) {
// here goes everything nice
def doStuff = ???
}
object MyComponent {
#deprecated("Inject MyComponent")
def doStuff = {
val instance = Play.current.injector.instanceOf[MyComponent]
instance.doStuff
}
}
This way, you're not breaking existing code while all users of your methods can slowly migrate to using classes.
I used the DAO design GitHub Gist by almeidap as an example for my database layer. Unfortunately, current is deprecated since the Play release 2.5, so I can't use:
trait MongoHelper extends ContextHelper{
lazy val db = ReactiveMongoPlugin.db
}
nor
trait MongoHelper extends ContextHelper {
lazy val reactiveMongoApi = current.injector.instanceOf[ReactiveMongoApi]
lazy val db = reactiveMongoApi.db
}
Since I cannot inject reactiveMongoApi into a trait I am wondering how I can solve this issue. Despite the fact that the use of deprecated method is discouraged, I cannot start my application because I get the exception There is no started application caused by my startup code which inserts dummy data into my database on app launch.
I have two different kind of slick.driver.PostgresDriver.simple.Database vals
e.g.
implicit val db : slick.driver.PostgresDriver.simple.Database = ProdDataSource.db
and
implicit val testdb : slick.driver.PostgresDriver.simple.Database = TestDataSource.db
only difference is the database they are pointing to. testdb points to a test db which all the tests use.
I have parameterized all APIs which accept (implicit db:Database)
e.g.
def save(emp: Employee)(implicit db : Database): Employee = db.withSession{implicit session => ...}
reason to have Database as an implicit param so testing becomes easier and tests can pass in test Database.
Now when above save def is called from a Play Controller, it'll have to have an implicit val db =... given play controllers are object what's a better way to make controllers parameterized (e.g. if it's a class we can pass in a class param) to be able to test controllers properly with appropriate Database?
Current controller looks as below, which isn't tastable given implicit val db is using prod db. for test need to inject implicit val testdb.
object MyController extends Controller {
implicit val db = ProdDataSource.db
I don't want to use cake pattern which really makes code hard to work and ugly. what's the best way to achieve this?
If the controller was a class you could make it an implicit argument, but I doubt that you can tell play to pass the database into the controller as an argument. So either use mixin composition to have different controller instances for test and production. Or use play config to swap out the one provided by Play for both scenarios.