i record routes with my app, mostly for motorbikes, and want to color it depending on the speed at each point of the route.
basically i know how to do it in mapbox and that is the problem. since you can set a color for only one polyline, i have to split up the route in speed sections and print every route sections polyline with it's specific color, which works fine basically. problem is that i have up to 500-2000 polylines for a route. so the map crashes very easily.
i don't have that problem when i set like 5000 image annotations to the map, which i can color individually. this could be a solution but it can take up to 20 seconds to print all image annotations. any other options to make a colored route like the on in the image ?
This is not possible with out of the box mapbox polylines.
You will have to add a new layer, perform the translations and add the gradient lines yourself. This might get you started drawing the lines:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/25034854/4019540
Good luck
Related
I want to label stations on my map, and I would like to clusterize the stops at different zoom levels to filter them down. So as you zoom out all you get is the start and end, and then finally a single label start->end.
How do I render a text label on a vector tile ?
I could fetch the stations as a geojson and reload on zoom change if there's no easy way to do this with tiles.
Is there a reason you need to encode your data differently per-zoom-level in the tiles or are you mainly concerned with displaying data differently per-zoom-level? If the latter, I would recommend looking for an approach that focuses more on styling the vector tiles you already have rather than trying to generate those tiles in a more complex fashion. You could try using a zoom function to style your data. If you're using Mapbox Studio, you can also set zoom-specific style rules in the Studio UI, which is the route you'll probably want to go if you're using Leaflet (I see the Leaflet tag in your post but it's not entirely clear what your implementation looks like).
If the former, you may need to use a tool like Tippecanoe. This route will likely be a bit more complex, but gives you fine-grained control over how your vector tiles are generated. Keep in mind that once you've created your tiles using Tippecanoe, you'll still need to style them somehow.
When should one use a marker instead of a feature layer of points in Mapbox?
Points layers can be updated and styled dynamically using all the styling tools of Mapbox GL JS. Features in points layers can also be clicked, presenting a popup just like with a marker.
Given this, when would one want to use a marker?
As Andrew mentioned there are two sides two this:
Accessibility
Markers are implemented as DOM elements and thus can be included in the tab order and can be given accessibility attributes
Animation
As markers are DOM elements animating them is quite easy with a bit of CSS & JS. You can animate points on a circle layer too, but its much more of a hassle.
Small point count
The number of markers/points you can display at once is somewhat limited by what the DOM can manage. My suggestion is that, if you have more than 500 points to display, you should opt for a circle layer instead of markers (this is a very rough estimates and depends on other parameters as well, animation, point size etc.). Using a circle layer you will hit - depending on the hardware - a limit in the 10s of thounds of points.
I have GPS coordinates, which are coming from cars. I'm trying to display their movement using mapbox. It works mostly fine, but because coordinates are imprecise, sometimes markers displayed inside houses, rivers, etc.
Is there a way to specify that the animation should follow the closest road?
Yes. That's exactly what the Map Matching API does.
Is there a plugin (like OverlappingMarkerSpiderfier-Leaflet) or does anyone know how to account for polyline overlapping with markers? I am basically trying to avoid situation line this
UPDATE1:
I specifically want the polyline to go around the marker (like an arc) so that its clear to the user that the curved polyline is connecting the end-most markers and middle marker's polylines are then visible
What exactly is the issue with the above? If it's a matter of the markers appearing below the lines, you just need to either
add the markers after you add the lines
or better yet, use leaflet's .bringToFront() and .bringToBack() methods.
Reordering the z index of a feature layer is a pretty straightforward use case, so I don't imagine you'd need a plugin for it.
I am new to OpenstreetMap and Leafletjs. I am trying to implement a map displaying journey time information on motorways (also called highways in some part of the world) by using different colors to show road congestion and the problem I'm facing is, once the map tiles are rendered, it comes with all information, like town/city names, road names etc.
On the basis of road information that I receive, I create road colorings in an overlay that sits on top of the tile layer. The problem is, once that happens, the road colorings cover the road names that appear on the tile layer. The problem can be seen in the image displayed below.
Is there a way, I could extract the road names so that I could put it in a layer above the road coloring layer so that road names appear on top of road colorings.
Thanks for any sort of help, Looking forward to some replies.
Thanks
In theory, you could create two sets of tiles: one with the road lines, another with the shields (labels). Render the shields tiles with a transparent background. Then hack Leaflet around to have a second tile layer above the overlay layer.
However... that's a whole bunch of hassle for a fairly simple problem. So: why not render the road numbers alongside the roads, rather than on top of them? That way, your overlay line won't obscure the numbers. Here's an example of a style that does this (disclaimer: my site!).
Assuming you're using Mapnik to render your tiles, you'll want to use TextSymbolizer rather than ShieldSymbolizer. Customising the style is (of course) much easier if you're using TileMill rather than pure Mapnik XML.
As you say, the roadnames (here ref icon symbolizers) are part of the OSM raster map tiles and can't changed easily.
So the easiest solution would be to switch to a mapstyle without labels.
Another idea would be to add more alpha to your cusom GPS track, so it get's more 'hollow' and fits better in the mapstyle. But the default OSM style isn't good for adding informations on top, as this basemap is already to detailed. Maybe it makes sense to use another one:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Featured_tiles