Having two tables (table1, table2) with the same column names (generation, parent), the desired output would be the combination of all columns of both tables. Thereby the rows of table2 should join table1 so that the rows of table2 are matching those of table1 on generation column. The parent number should be ordered ascending for the entries in table1 as well as in table2. The number of rows of the query results should be equal of those of table1.
Given the following tables
table1:
| generation | parent |
|:----------:|:------:|
| 0 | 1 |
| 0 | 2 |
| 0 | 3 |
| 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 2 |
| 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 3 |
table2:
| generation | parent |
|:----------:|:------:|
| 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 3 |
The following queries are thought for creating and populating two sample tables as shown above:
create table table1(generation integer, parent integer);
insert into table1 (generation, parent) values(0,1),(0,2),(0,3),(1,3),(1,2),(1,1),(2,2),(2,1),(2,3);
create table table2(generation integer, parent integer);
insert into table2 (generation, parent) values(1,3),(1,1),(1,3),(2,1),(2,2),(2,3);
the imagined query should lead to the following desired result:
| table1_generation | table1_parent | table2_generation | table2_parent |
|:-----------------:|:-------------:|:-----------------:|:-------------:|
| 0 | 1 | | |
| 0 | 2 | | |
| 0 | 3 | | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Current query looks as follows:
with
p as (
select
generation,
parent
from
table1
order by
generation,
parent
), o as(
select
generation,
parent
from
table2
order by
generation,
parent
)
select
p.generation as table1_generation,
p.parent as table1_parent,
o.generation as table2_generation,
o.parent as table2_parent
from
p
left join o on
o.generation=p.generation;
Which leads to the following result:
| table1_generation | table1_parent | table2_generation | table2_parent |
|:-----------------:|:-------------:|:-----------------:|:-------------:|
| 0 | 1 | | |
| 0 | 2 | | |
| 0 | 3 | | |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
This link led to the conclusion, that any join command might not what is necessary here ... But union does only append rows... so for me it is absolutely unclear, how the desired result can be achieved o.O
Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
The main misunderstanding on this question arose from the fact that you mentioned join, which is a very precisely mathematically defined concept based on the Cartesian product and can be applied to any two sets. So the current output is clear.
But as you wrote in the title, you want to put two tables side by side. You take advantage of the fact that they have the same number of rows (triples).
This select returns the output you want.
I made artificial join columns, row_number() OVER (order by generation, parent) as rnum, and moved the second table using the addition of three. I hope this helps you:
with
p as (
select
row_number() OVER (order by generation, parent) as rnum,
generation,
parent
from
table1
order by
generation,
parent
), o as(
select
row_number() OVER (order by generation, parent) as rnum,
generation,
parent
from
table2
order by
generation,
parent
)
select
p.generation as table1_generation,
p.parent as table1_parent,
o.generation as table2_generation,
o.parent as table2_parent
from
p
left join o on
o.rnum+3=p.rnum
order by 1,2,3,4;
Output:
table1_generation
table1_parent
table2_generation
table2_parent
0
1
(null)
(null)
0
2
(null)
(null)
0
3
(null)
(null)
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
3
1
3
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
3
I need to select first 2 lines where the store_name is different than one given for a given product
id | store_name | prod_name
----+------------+------
1 | 1 | A
2 | 1 | B
3 | 1 | C
4 | 1 | A
5 | 2 | E
6 | 2 | A
7 | 3 | G
8 | 2 | A
9 | 1 | A
10 | 3 | A
(10 rows)
result should be store_name <> 3 AND prod_name ='A'
id | store_name | prod_name
----+------------+------
1 | 1 | A
4 | 1 | A
6 | 2 | A
8 | 2 | A
Use the row_number() window function to accomplish this.
Query #1
with first_two as (
select *,
row_number() over (partition by store_name
order by id) as rn
from store_product
where store_name <> 3
and prod_name = 'A'
)
select id, store_name, prod_name
from first_two
where rn <= 2;
| id | store_name | prod_name |
| --- | ---------- | --------- |
| 1 | 1 | A |
| 4 | 1 | A |
| 6 | 2 | A |
| 8 | 2 | A |
View on DB Fiddle
I have a database table with:
id | date | position | name
--------------------------------------
1 | 2016-06-29 | 9 | Ben Smith
2 | 2016-06-29 | 1 | Ben Smith
3 | 2016-06-29 | 5 | Ben Smith
4 | 2016-06-29 | 6 | Ben Smith
5 | 2016-06-30 | 2 | Ben Smith
6 | 2016-06-30 | 2 | Tom Brown
7 | 2016-06-29 | 4 | Tom Brown
8 | 2016-06-30 | 2 | Tom Brown
9 | 2016-06-30 | 1 | Tom Brown
How can I query the table efficiently so that I can get a new column using sum().
I expect the table output to look like this
id | date | position | name | races | wins | places
--------------------------------------------------------------
1 | 2016-06-29 | 9 | Ben Smith | 1 | 0 | 0
2 | 2016-06-29 | 1 | Ben Smith | 2 | 1 | 0
3 | 2016-06-29 | 5 | Ben Smith | 3 | 1 | 0
4 | 2016-06-29 | 6 | Ben Smith | 4 | 1 | 0
5 | 2016-06-30 | 2 | Ben Smith | 5 | 1 | 1
6 | 2016-06-30 | 2 | Tom Brown | 1 | 0 | 2
7 | 2016-06-29 | 4 | Tom Brown | 1 | 0 | 2
8 | 2016-06-30 | 2 | Tom Brown | 2 | 0 | 3
9 | 2016-06-30 | 1 | Tom Brown | 4 | 1 | 3
Looks like this can easily be done using window functions:
select id, date, position, name,
row_number(*) over (partition by name, date order by id) as races,
count(*) filter (where position = 1) over (partition by name, date) as wins
from the_table;
I don't understand the logic to calculate the places column though.
#FatFreddy #a_horse_with_no_name
Thanks for getting me started, this is what I came up with. Do you think it can be improved on?
WITH runners AS (
SELECT
r.*,
CASE
WHEN position = 1 THEN 1
ELSE 0
END AS win,
CASE
WHEN position = 2 THEN 1
WHEN position = 3 THEN 1
ELSE 0
END AS place
FROM
runners r
ORDER BY id
)
SELECT
date,
r.id,
r.position,
name,
row_number(*) OVER foo AS races,
sum(win) OVER foo AS win,
sum(place) OVER foo AS place
FROM
runners r
LEFT JOIN markets m ON m.id = r.market_id
WINDOW foo AS (PARTITION BY name) ORDER BY r.id)
i need help with counting some data
this what i want
| user_id | action_id | count |
-------------------------------------
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 2 | 2 |
| 4 | 3 | 1 |
| 5 | 3 | 2 |
| 6 | 3 | 3 |
| 7 | 4 | 1 |
| 8 | 5 | 1 |
| 9 | 5 | 2 |
| 10 | 6 | 1 |
this is what i have
| user_id | action_id | count |
-------------------------------
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 2 | 1 |
| 4 | 3 | 1 |
| 5 | 3 | 1 |
| 6 | 3 | 1 |
| 7 | 4 | 1 |
| 8 | 5 | 1 |
| 9 | 5 | 1 |
| 10 | 6 | 1 |
i really need it for create some research about second action from users
how do i do it?
thank you
Using ROW_NUMBER should work here:
SELECT
user_id,
action_id,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY action_id ORDER BY user_id) count
FROM yourTable
ORDER BY
user_id;
Demo
Forgive what may be a silly question, but I'm not much of a database guru.
Here is my table :
id_data | val_no3 | id_prev | id_next
--------+---------+---------+----------
1 | | | 2
2 | 7 | |
3 | | 2 | 4
4 | 5 | |
5 | | 4 | 10
6 | | 4 | 10
7 | | 4 | 10
8 | | 4 | 10
9 | | 4 | 10
10 | 8 | 4 |
In the table below :
id_prev is the value of the id_data which precedes when val_no3 is null
id_next is the value of the id_data which folow when val_no3 is null
And now i would like to have this one :
id_data | val_no3 | id_prev | id_next | val_prev | val_next
--------+---------+---------+----------+----------+----------
1 | | | 2 | | 7
2 | 7 | | | |
3 | | 2 | 4 | 7 | 5
4 | 5 | | | |
5 | | 4 | 10 | 5 | 8
6 | | 4 | 10 | 5 | 8
7 | | 4 | 10 | 5 | 8
8 | | 4 | 10 | 5 | 8
9 | | 4 | 10 | 5 | 8
10 | 8 | | | |
The conditions are as follows:
If val_no3 is null then : val_prev and val_next must be null
If val_no3 is not null then :
val_prev must be equal to the previous value of val_no3 (it should be null if val_no3 which precedes is null too)
val_next must be equal to the following value of val_no3 (it should be null if val_no3 which folows is null too)
I think i might have to use something with lag and lead but i don't know how to do.
I would be very grateful if you could give me your help to resolve this issue, thank you.
No need for analytic functions, just sub-selects. Something like the following (untested) should work:
select
id_data,
val_no3,
id_prev,
id_next,
(select val_no2 from b where id_data = x.id_prev) as val_prev,
(select val_no2 from b where id_data = x.id_next) as val_next
from
b x
order by
id_data;