As a try, I created a simple groovy class in eclipse and wrote a simple spock test method.
I created one object with #Shared annotation and eclipse is complaining like:
Multiple markers at this line
- Groovy:unable to resolve class Shared , unable to find class
for annotation
- Groovy:class Shared is not an annotation in #Shared
I googled a little but did not find the solution. Does anyone know why this error is occurring? Below is the sample code:
class SimpleSpockTestExampleSpec extends Specification {
#Shared
MyObject obj;
def "length of Spock's and his friends' names"()
{
expect:"Replaces when-then block"
name.size() == length
where:
name << ["zzzzz","xxx","yyy"]
length << [5,6,7]
}
}
Pease ignore the line numbers in the image.
It seems that you haven't imported appropriate package. Do you have the following statement in the code:
import spock.lang.Shared
?
Related
I have scalatest codes like following:
class myTest extends FlatSpec with ParallelTestExecution {
val testSuiteId: String = GenerateSomeRandomId()
it should "print test id" in {
println(testSuiteId)
}
it should "print test id again" in {
println(testSuiteId)
}
}
The two tests cannot print the testSuiteId I generate before them. Instead they regenerate the ID and print it. I understand that because of ParallelTestExecution which extends OneInstancePerTest, each test here runs on its own instance and have a copy of the variable "testSuiteId".
But I do want a fixed Id for this test suite and each test case in this suite have access to this fixed it without modifying it. I tried to create the fixed id in BeforeAll{ } but still it didn't work.
How should I achieve what I want?
One way to work around it would be to put the shared state in some sort of external object:
object SuiteId {
lazy val id: String = GenerateSomeRandomId()
}
Admittedly this is very much a hack, and I wouldn't be surprised if scalatest has a way to handle this built-in which I am unaware of.
I would like to take a screenshot on every fail test in a Spec or Suite using ScalaTest.
The Scala Test website shows how to take screenshots surrounding every code that might fail with this:
withScreenshot {
drive.findElement(By.id("login")).getAttribute("value") should be ("Login")
}
There is this post that tries to explain, but I could not understand what exactly should be done.
I also found the class ScreenshotOnFailure.scala, but could not use it, once it's private and has a package restriction.
Can anyone tell me if there's a way to intercept any failure and then take a screenshot?
Just to have a final answer I'm writing the way I could solve the problem based on the approach from this post mentioned in the question.
In short, the solution ended up like this (pseudo-code).
trait Screenshots extends FunSpec {
...
override def withFixture(test: NoArgTest): Outcome = {
val outcome = test()
// If the test fails, it will hold an exception.
// You can get the message with outcome.asInstanceOf[Failure].exception
if (outcome.isExceptional) {
// Implement Selenium code to save the image using a random name
// Check: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3422262/take-a-screenshot-with-selenium-webdriver
}
outcome
}
}
class MySpec extends Screenshots {
...
describe("Scenario A") {
describe("when this") {
it("the field must have value 'A'") {
// It will save a screenshot either if the selector is wrong or the assertion fails
driver.findElement(By.id("elementA")).getAttribute("value") should be ("A")
}
}
}
}
From this point on, all Specs that extend the Screenshot trait will intercept errors and save a screenshot.
Just to complement, surrounding areas with withScreenshot(), as mentioned in the question, saves only failure on assertions, but it does not save a screenshot when the test fails due an element not found (e.g. wrong selector).
With the code above, all failures will save a screenshot.
In the quest of getting JUnit tests to be part of how we use Ryhtm we came up with the code snippet below. All went well until we added
#Test
which obviously is a java annotation and uses the # marker as a syntax element that is also being used by Rythm. How can the desired effect be achieved to get the #annotation? To simply escape the ## does not work it gives a
Syntax error on token "#", delete this token
error. So How can a Java # annotation be used ?
I have also filed this as a bug report at https://github.com/greenlaw110/Rythm/issues/285
#// This is a rythm template
#import static org.junit.Assert.*
#import org.junit.Test.*
#def static {
class TestMe {
String name;
#Test
public void testMe() {
name="test";
assertEquals("test",name);
}
}
}
#{
TestMe testme=new TestMe();
testme.name="testme";
}
The TestMe has the name #(testme.name)
If you use a fully qualifying annotation it should work:
#org.junit.Test
#import org.junit.Test.* in your template code should be #import org.junit.Test, note that .* needs to be take off
I am using Play Framework 2.3 I am using the scala template engine to create my views and Java elsewhere.
My model extends an abstract parameterised object like so... (pseudo code)
Abstract object:
public abstract class MyObject<T> {
// various bits
public class MyInnerObject {
// more stuff
}
}
Model object (singleton)
public class SomeModel extends MyObject<SomeBean> {
public static SomeModel getInstance() {
if (instance == null)
instance = new SomeModel();
return instance;
}
// more bits
}
I then pass the model to the view from another view helper:
#MyHelper(SomeModel.getInstance())
MyHelper scala view template:
#*******************************************
* My helper
*******************************************#
#(myObj: some.namespace.MyObject[_])
#import some.namespace.MyObject
#doSomething(myInnerObj: MyObject[_]#MyInnerObject) = {
#* do some stuff *#
}
#for(myInnerObj <- myObj.getInnerObjects()) {
#doSomething(myInnerObj)
}
However I get an error on the line #doSomething(myInnerObj: MyObject[_]#MyInnerObject) stating
unbound wildcard exception
I am not sure the correct Scala syntax to avoid this error I had naively assumed that I could use the _ to specify arbitrary tyope but it won't let me do this.
What is the correct syntax?
UPDATE 1
Changing the method definition to:
#doSomething[T](myInnerObj: MyObject[T]#MyInnerObject)
gives further errors:
no type parameters for method doSomething: (myInnerObj:[T]#MyInnerObject)play.twirl.api.HtmlFormat.Appendable exist so that it can be applied to arguments (myObj.MyInnerObject)
--- because ---
argument expression's type is not compatible with formal parameter type;
found : myObj.MyInnerObject
required: MyObject[?T]#MyInnerObject
It would seem that the Twirl templating engine does not support this syntax currently, although I'm not 100% sure.
I can solve the problem by removing the doSomething method completely...
#*******************************************
* My helper
*******************************************#
#(myObj: some.namespace.MyObject[_])
#import some.namespace.MyObject
#for(myInnerObj <- myObj.getInnerObjects()) {
<div>#myInnerObj.getSomeProperty()</div>
}
But I am bout 10% happy with the solution... It works at least but it feels very restricting that I cannot delegate to methods to help keep my code maintainable. By the look of the comments the problem seems to be a limitation in Twirl, not allowing type arguments for functions in views.
Note: I have accepted this answer as it removes the original problem of the exception however this is only because the solution I want doesn't exist... yet.
Solved. IntelliJ didn't highlight the fact that my imports were incomplete.
Hi,
I have a simple Scala program that I'm trying to develop using jMock. Setting basic expectations works nicely but for some reason Scala does not understand my attempt to return a value from a mock object. My maven build spews out the following error
TestLocalCollector.scala:45: error: not found: value returnValue
one (nodeCtx).getParameter("FilenameRegex"); will( returnValue(regex))
^
And the respective code snippets are
#Before def setUp() : Unit = { nodeCtx = context.mock(classOf[NodeContext]) }
...
// the value to be returned
val regex = ".*\\.data"
...
// setting the expectations
one (nodeCtx).getParameter("FilenameRegex"); will( returnValue(regex))
To me it sounds that Scala is expecting that the static jMock method returnValue would be a val? What am I missing here?
Are you sure about the ';'?
one (nodeCtx).getParameter("FilenameRegex") will( returnValue(regex))
might work better.
In this example you see a line like:
expect {
one(blogger).todayPosts will returnValue(List(Post("...")))
}
with the following comment:
Specify what the return value should be in the same expression by defining "will" as Scala infix operator.
In the Java equivalent we would have to make a separate method call (which our favorite IDE may insist on putting on the next line!)
one(blogger).todayPosts; will(returnValue(List(Post("..."))))
^
|
-- semicolon only in the *Java* version
The OP explains it himself:
the returnValue static method was not visible, thus the errors.
And the will method just records an action on the latest mock operation, that's why it can be on the next line or after the semicolon :)
import org.jmock.Expectations
import org.jmock.Expectations._
...
context.checking(
new Expectations {
{ oneOf (nodeCtx).getParameter("FilenameRegex") will( returnValue(".*\\.data") ) }
}
)