There are two matrix X and M and I need to obtain the following matrix D
m = 20; n = 10;
X = rand(m,n);
M = rand(m,m);
M = (M + M')/2;
D = zeros(n,n);
for i = 1:n
for j = 1:n
D(i,j) = X(:,i)'*M*X(:,j);
end
end
When n and m are large, the computation of D is very slow. Is there any way to speed up?
The answer would be:
D = 0.5*X.'*(M+M')*X
(This is a slight modification of the solution provided by Divakar, so that the correct matrix D is returned)
Related
I need to do function that works like this :
N1 = size(X,1);
N2 = size(Xtrain,1);
Dist = zeros(N1,N2);
for i=1:N1
for j=1:N2
Dist(i,j)=D-sum(X(i,:)==Xtrain(j,:));
end
end
(X and Xtrain are sparse logical matrixes)
It works fine and passes the tests, but I believe it's not very optimal and well-written solution.
How can I improve that function using some built Matlab functions? I'm absolutely new to Matlab, so I don't know if there really is an opportunity to make it better somehow.
You wanted to learn about vectorization, here some code to study comparing different implementations of this pair-wise distance.
First we build two binary matrices as input (where each row is an instance):
m = 5;
n = 4;
p = 3;
A = double(rand(m,p) > 0.5);
B = double(rand(n,p) > 0.5);
1. double-loop over each pair of instances
D0 = zeros(m,n);
for i=1:m
for j=1:n
D0(i,j) = sum(A(i,:) ~= B(j,:)) / p;
end
end
2. PDIST2
D1 = pdist2(A, B, 'hamming');
3. single-loop over each instance against all other instances
D2 = zeros(m,n);
for i=1:n
D2(:,i) = sum(bsxfun(#ne, A, B(i,:)), 2) ./ p;
end
4. vectorized with grid indexing, all against all
D3 = zeros(m,n);
[x,y] = ndgrid(1:m,1:n);
D3(:) = sum(A(x(:),:) ~= B(y(:),:), 2) ./ p;
5. vectorized in third dimension, all against all
D4 = sum(bsxfun(#ne, A, reshape(B.',[1 p n])), 2) ./ p;
D4 = permute(D4, [1 3 2]);
Finally we compare all methods are equal
assert(isequal(D0,D1,D2,D3,D4))
I would like to generate all the possible adjacency matrices (zero diagonale) of an undirected graph of n nodes.
For example, with no relabeling for n=3 we get 23(3-1)/2 = 8 possible network configurations (or adjacency matrices).
One solution that works for n = 3 (and which I think is quite stupid) would be the following:
n = 3;
A = [];
for k = 0:1
for j = 0:1
for i = 0:1
m = [0 , i , j ; i , 0 , k ; j , k , 0 ];
A = [A, m];
end
end
end
Also I though of the following which seems to be faster but something is wrong with my indexing since 2 matrices are missing:
n = 3
C = [];
E = [];
A = zeros(n);
for i = 1:n
for j = i+1:n
A(i,j) = 1;
A(j,i) = 1;
C = [C,A];
end
end
B = ones(n);
B = B- diag(diag(ones(n)));
for i = 1:n
for j = i+1:n
B(i,j) = 0;
B(j,i) = 0;
E = [E,B];
end
end
D = [C,E]
Is there a faster way of doing this?
I would definitely generate the off-diagonal elements of the adjacency matrices with binary encoding:
n = 4; %// number of nodes
m = n*(n-1)/2;
offdiags = dec2bin(0:2^m-1,m)-48; %//every 2^m-1 possible configurations
If you have the Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox, then squareform will easily create the matrices for you, one by one:
%// this is basically a for loop
tmpcell = arrayfun(#(k) squareform(offdiags(k,:)),1:size(offdiags,1),...
'uniformoutput',false);
A = cat(2,tmpcell{:}); %// concatenate the matrices in tmpcell
Although I'd consider concatenating along dimension 3, then you can see each matrix individually and conveniently.
Alternatively, you can do the array synthesis yourself in a vectorized way, it's probably even quicker (at the cost of more memory):
A = zeros(n,n,2^m);
%// lazy person's indexing scheme:
[ind_i,ind_j,ind_k] = meshgrid(1:n,1:n,1:2^m);
A(ind_i>ind_j) = offdiags.'; %'// watch out for the transpose
%// copy to upper diagonal:
A = A + permute(A,[2 1 3]); %// n x n x 2^m matrix
%// reshape to n*[] matrix if you wish
A = reshape(A,n,[]); %// n x (n*2^m) matrix
Is there an algorithm that computes the Drazin inverse of a singular matrix? I would like to apply it either in MATLAB or Mathematica.
Read this article:
Fanbin Bu and Yimin Wei, The algorithm for computing the Drazin inverses of two-variable polynomial matrices, Applied mathematics and computation 147.3 (2004): 805-836.
in appendix there are several MATLAB code. The first one is this:
function DrazinInverse1a = DrazinInverse1(a)
%-----------------------------------------
%Compute the Drazin Inverse of a matrix 'a' using the limited algorithm.
%Need computing the index of 'a'.
global q1 q2 s1 s2
[m,n] = size(a);
if m~= n
disp('Matrix is must be square!')
end
%-----------------------------------------
% Computer the index of A and note r = rank(A^k).
[k,r,a1,a] = index(a);
F = eye(n);
g = -trace(a);
g = collect(g);
for i = 1:r-1
G = g*eye(n);
F = a*F+G;
g = -trace(a*F)/(i+1);
g = collect(g);
end
DrazinInverse1a = a1*F;
DrazinInverse1a = -1/g*DrazinInverse1a;
DrazinInverse1a = simplify(DrazinInverse1a);
end
function [k,r,a1,a] = index(a)
%To compute the index of 'a'.
k = 0;
n = length(a);
r = n;
a0 = a;
r1 = rank(a);
a1 = eye(n);
while r ~= r1
r = r1;
a1 = a;
a = a*a0;
r1 = rank(a);
k = k+1;
end
r = sym2poly(r);
end
I have 2 matrices = X in R^(n*m) and W in R^(k*m) where k<<n.
Let x_i be the i-th row of X and w_j be the j-th row of W.
I need to find, for each x_i what is the j that maximizes <w_j,x_i>
I can't see a way around iterating over all the rows in X, but it there a way to find the maximum dot product without iterating every time over all of W?
A naive implementation would be:
n = 100;
m = 50;
k = 10;
X = rand(n,m);
W = rand(k,m);
Y = zeros(n, 1);
for i = 1 : n
max_ind = 1;
max_val = dot(W(1,:), X(i,:));
for j = 2 : k
cur_val = dot(W(j,:),X(i,:));
if cur_val > max_val
max_val = cur_val;
max_ind = j;
end
end
Y(i,:) = max_ind;
end
Dot product is essentially matrix multiplication:
[~, Y] = max(W*X');
bsxfun based approach to speed-up things for you -
[~,Y] = max(sum(bsxfun(#times,X,permute(W,[3 2 1])),2),[],3)
On my system, using your dataset I am getting a 100x+ speedup with this.
One can think of two more "closeby" approaches, but they don't seem to give any huge improvement over the earlier one -
[~,Y] = max(squeeze(sum(bsxfun(#times,X,permute(W,[3 2 1])),2)),[],2)
and
[~,Y] = max(squeeze(sum(bsxfun(#times,X',permute(W,[2 3 1]))))')
I need to evaluate following expression (in pseudo-math notation):
∑ipi⋅n
where p is a matrix of three-element vectors and n is a three-element vector. I can do this with for loops as follows but I can't figure out
how to vectorize this:
p = [1 1 1; 2 2 2];
n = [3 3 3];
s = 0;
for i = 1:size(p, 1)
s = s + dot(p(i, :), n)
end
Why complicate things? How about simple matrix multiplication:
s = sum(p * n(:))
where p is assumed to be an M-by-3 matrix.
I think you can do it with bsxfun:
sum(sum(bsxfun(#times,p,n)))
----------
% Is it the same for this case?
----------
n = 200; % depending on the computer it might be
m = 1000*n; % that n needs to be chosen differently
A = randn(n,m);
x = randn(n,1);
p = zeros(m,1);
q = zeros(1,m);
tic;
for i = 1:m
p(i) = sum(x.*A(:,i));
q(i) = sum(x.*A(:,i));
end
time = toc; disp(['time = ',num2str(time)]);