NLC Classifier Limits - ibm-cloud

Regarding NLC service classifiers, when adding a 9th classifier to an NLC service, the following error occurs:
"This user or service instance has the maximum number of classifiers"
I am assuming this means that the limit for the number of classifiers a free user can create is 8.
If we upgraded our account, would that limit be increased?

Kawashima-san, you can get this kind of question answered by contacting Bluemix support (select "Cognitive" for question type). Stack Overflow is the right place for questions about programming with the Bluemix Platform and Services. Questions about the offerings, pricing, getting started, etc. can be asked from Support or at the IBM developerWorks Answers forum.

Related

IBM Watson chatbot complex decision making

I am currently working to build an IBM Watson chatbot and I am running into 2 issues.
Overview: I am building a chatbot that asks questions about the user so the bot can then spit out a "decision" or solution based on how the user answers the questions. Ex. Q1:A Q2:B Q3:D Q4:A CHat bot would spit out the responsibilities associated with collecting A,B,D,A. ABDA = Outcome 5 (out of 16)
Problem 1: Two of my questions lead to the user to input a number as their response. (asking for age and another question asks for years of experience) I do not know how to get Watson to know the difference between them without asking/prompting the user to add "years old" or "years Exp". Has anyone ran into issues of Watson not being able to handle numbers through multiple questions.
Problem 2: Anyone have any suggestions on how to get watson to digest all the questions asked then spit out the correct outcome?

FileMaker Pro Standard/Advanced users connection limits to a FileMaker Server with Team License

Is there a limit in quantity of FileMaker Pro Standard/Advanced users where connection to a FileMaker Server with Team License is involved?
I mean that if a company choose the FileMaker Server with 5 license for User Connection, I may be the sixth to be connected with my standard FileMaker Pro Advanced with no problem (I work this way at my customer sites) but which is the limit for quantity of user connected, if any, at server side?
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is a use/licensing question for a third-party software product and not a programming question as defined in the help center guidelines.
The licensing that's been implemented for FM in the past few years has been constantly changing and difficult to understand.
Typically FM developers don't just "code" they often do EVERYTHING from sales to business analysis, back end data design, front end interface design, server implementation, testing and commissioning, documentation and end-user training. Getting the licensing right is a big part of that.
So while it's not a programming question, it's definitely a "stuff I need to know about FileMaker" question.
The limit of 5 pertains to the ones connecting using the team license. For regular Pro/Advanced licenses there is no limit, other than the physical limits imposed by the server software/hardware combination. Check the FileMaker Server specification at filemaker.com for those limits.

Loopback - API Connect - Licensing [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
My question: Can I use API Connect to develop loopback models for free, similar to how SLC ARC works?
I've been playing around with strongloop's ARC and it is fairly straightforward to discover models from a database schema. IBM is pushing API Connect and SLC ARC has a number of deficiencies (how it handles mssql schemas during discovery, the fact that custom connectors are not picked up and must be baked into ARC's source code, etc. that are unlikely to be addressed as ARC is no longer supported).
The Loopback.io homepage explicitly states that:
A free version of API Connect especially for developers is available
called API Connect Essentials.
However, to run apic edit I am forced to sign up for Bluemix. On the registration page, it appears that I am receiving only a trial.
Your 30-day trial is free, with no credit card required. You get
access to 2 GB of runtime and container memory to run apps, unlimited
IBM services and APIs, and complimentary support.
I don't care about online services or deploying my API to the cloud. I'd like to run loopback on my own servers and am simply planning to use API Connect for model generation. Any help is greatly appreciated!
The trial is for Bluemix itself, which allows you to use a variety of services for free for a period of time.
The API Connect Developer Toolkit is free to use regardless of your Bluemix account type.

Custom datasets in Watson Q&A service

Is there a way to create a custom dataset in Watson for use with services such as Question and Answer?
I tried the service using the 'healthcare' dataset and it was very limited. I could ask it any of the questions that were suggested by the IBM team (ex. What is HIV?) and get satisfactory results but straying from that list produced unreliable results. For example I asked it 'How can I lower my blood sugar' and none of the results even mentioned blood sugar. This makes me wonder how in-depth the healthcare dataset is and if there is a way we can add to it or create new datasets.
While the service is in BETA, there is no way to bring a custom corpus (dataset). This feature is being planned and should be available soon.

Which is better for mobile analytic Localytics or GoogleAnalytics? [closed]

Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I wanna use mobile analytics inside my iPhone app, i have read about both they are similar to each other but some persons say that Localytics is better and others say the GoogleAnalytics is better, advice is highly appreciated.
I am currently using Localytics inside my app , it is good analytics but it has disadvantage compared to google analytics which is you can track limited events per user and if you tried to register more than that number they will remove all your events attributes, so that i will remove my localytis account and start using google analytics because it does not use such limiting , because of the importance of the events and there attributes i will leave localytics and go google analytics , All other analytics things the same
The biggest difference between Localytics and Google Analytics is that Localytics is designed for apps, not websites. Localytics collects a richer data set by default and allows you to create any number of events with any number of attributes (GA limits you to just one). SDKs are available for all leading platforms, are very lightweight and provided in source code.
Localytics has both free and paid versions. The free version, called Community, does have some limits on event occurrences, collecting personal data and data cardinality, but very few customers hit those limits. And unlike Google, Localytics doesn't sample your app usage. Additionally, Localytics Enterprise customers have access to session-level data for integration with other systems.
Much more info is available on our website, including technical docs (http://localytics.com/docs). If you don't find what you need there or you have more questions, please ping me and I would be happy to help.
Just for anyone reading this as of 2015 - Google Analytics allows up to 50 custom dimensions with your events and each event contains three hierarchical fields by default, plus a value field. Google analytics doesn't "Sample App Usage", unless you hit extraordinarily high limits, but does have reporting limits, beyond which the reports will be based on a sample of the data collected. With Google Analytics Premium you can get the unsampled data also. GA also supports tracking users between a website and native apps using a unique member token.