I am trying to insert into a numeric column a decimal but I keep getting an error.
Below is my statement
INSERT INTO blse VALUES (2082.7, 'Total Nonfarm' ,'Alabama','01/31/2020');
it basically says i need to cast this statement. I do not know what I am doing wrong.. I am beginner taking this class.
and this is the error:
It is highly recommended that you specify the columns in an INSERT statement:
INSERT INTO tab (col1, col2, col3)
VALUES (val1, val2, val3);
That way, you can be certain what value is inserted where.
Since you didn't do that, the first value in the VALUES clause gets inserted into the first table column, which is of type date. That causes the error you observe.
I'm getting the error:
ERROR: column "some_col_name" does not exist Hint: There is a column named "some_col_name" in table "usert_test", but it cannot be referenced from this part of the query.
On UPSERT The cause of this error is that the source table (read in from API) doesn't always have the same number of fields as the table I'm looking to UPSERT. Within the UPSERT process is there a way to handle this? So far I've tried the below:
INSERT INTO scratch."usert_test" (many_cols)
SELECT *
FROM scratch.daily_scraper
ON CONFLICT (same_unique_id)
DO UPDATE
SET
many_fields = excluded.many_fields;
Name each column specifically in every instance.
insert into scratch."usert_test" (column_name1, column_name2, column_name3,column_name3)
select cola, colb, colc, colf
from scratch.daily_scraper
on conflict (column_name1, column_name4)
do update
set
column_name3 = excluded.column_name3
, column_name2 = excluded.column_name2;
How ever many columns you have properly name every one. (IMHO) As you should always do.
Imagine you have an Amazon Aurora Postgres DB. You perform an INSERT into one table. You then need do a SELECT to get the auto-generated CompanyId of the newly added record. You determine that there is often a significant enough delay between when the INSERT occurs and when the record is available to run the SELECT on.
I've discussed with my colleagues some possible code patterns to best handle this lag time. What, in your opinion, is the best approach?
You don't need a separate SELECT statement. The best and most efficient option is to just use the returning clause:
insert into some_table (c1, c2, c3)
values (...)
returning *;
Instead of returning * you can also specify the column you want, e.g.: returning company_id
Another other option is to use currval() or lastval() after the insert to the get the value of the sequence directly:
insert into some_table (..)
values (...);
select lastval();
The usage of lastval() requires that no other value is generated by a different sequence between the INSERT and the SELECT. If you can't guarantee that, use currval() and specify the name of the sequence:
insert into some_table (...)
values (...);
select currval('some_table_company_id_seq');
If you want to avoid hardcoding the sequence name, use pg_get_serial_sequence()
select currval(pg_get_serial_sequence('some_table', 'company_id'));
I'm new with SAS and I try to copy my Code from Access vba into SAS.
In Access I use often the SELECT INTO funtion, but it seems to me this function is not in SAS.
I have two tables and I get each day new data and I want to update my table with the new lines. Now I Need to check if some new lines appear -> if yes insert this lines into the old table.
I tried some Code from stackoverflow and other stuff from Google, but I didn't find something which works.
INSERT INTO OLD_TABLE T
VALUES (GRVID = VTGONR)
FROM NEW_TABLE V
WHERE not exists (SELECT V.VTGONR FROM NEW_TABLE V WHERE T.GRVID = V.VTGONR);
Not sure what the purpose of using the VALUES keyword is in your example. PROC SQL uses VALUES() to list static values. Like:
VALUES (100)
SAS just uses normal SQL syntax instead. See for example: https://www.techonthenet.com/sql/insert.php
To specify the observations to insert just use SELECT. You can add a WHERE clause as part of the select to limit the rows that you select to insert. To tell INSERT which columns to insert into list them inside () after the table name. Otherwise it will expect the order that the columns are listed in the select statement to match the order of the columns in the target table.
insert into old_table(GRVID)
select VTGONR from new_table
where VTGONR not in (select GRVID from old_table)
;
Some SQL servers have a feature where INSERT is skipped if it would violate a primary/unique key constraint. For instance, MySQL has INSERT IGNORE.
What's the best way to emulate INSERT IGNORE and ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE with PostgreSQL?
With PostgreSQL 9.5, this is now native functionality (like MySQL has had for several years):
INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING/UPDATE ("UPSERT")
9.5 brings support for "UPSERT" operations.
INSERT is extended to accept an ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE/IGNORE clause. This clause specifies an alternative action to take in the event of a would-be duplicate violation.
...
Further example of new syntax:
INSERT INTO user_logins (username, logins)
VALUES ('Naomi',1),('James',1)
ON CONFLICT (username)
DO UPDATE SET logins = user_logins.logins + EXCLUDED.logins;
Edit: in case you missed warren's answer, PG9.5 now has this natively; time to upgrade!
Building on Bill Karwin's answer, to spell out what a rule based approach would look like (transferring from another schema in the same DB, and with a multi-column primary key):
CREATE RULE "my_table_on_duplicate_ignore" AS ON INSERT TO "my_table"
WHERE EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM my_table
WHERE (pk_col_1, pk_col_2)=(NEW.pk_col_1, NEW.pk_col_2))
DO INSTEAD NOTHING;
INSERT INTO my_table SELECT * FROM another_schema.my_table WHERE some_cond;
DROP RULE "my_table_on_duplicate_ignore" ON "my_table";
Note: The rule applies to all INSERT operations until the rule is dropped, so not quite ad hoc.
For those of you that have Postgres 9.5 or higher, the new ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING syntax should work:
INSERT INTO target_table (field_one, field_two, field_three )
SELECT field_one, field_two, field_three
FROM source_table
ON CONFLICT (field_one) DO NOTHING;
For those of us who have an earlier version, this right join will work instead:
INSERT INTO target_table (field_one, field_two, field_three )
SELECT source_table.field_one, source_table.field_two, source_table.field_three
FROM source_table
LEFT JOIN target_table ON source_table.field_one = target_table.field_one
WHERE target_table.field_one IS NULL;
Try to do an UPDATE. If it doesn't modify any row that means it didn't exist, so do an insert. Obviously, you do this inside a transaction.
You can of course wrap this in a function if you don't want to put the extra code on the client side. You also need a loop for the very rare race condition in that thinking.
There's an example of this in the documentation: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/plpgsql-control-structures.html, example 40-2 right at the bottom.
That's usually the easiest way. You can do some magic with rules, but it's likely going to be a lot messier. I'd recommend the wrap-in-function approach over that any day.
This works for single row, or few row, values. If you're dealing with large amounts of rows for example from a subquery, you're best of splitting it into two queries, one for INSERT and one for UPDATE (as an appropriate join/subselect of course - no need to write your main filter twice)
To get the insert ignore logic you can do something like below. I found simply inserting from a select statement of literal values worked best, then you can mask out the duplicate keys with a NOT EXISTS clause. To get the update on duplicate logic I suspect a pl/pgsql loop would be necessary.
INSERT INTO manager.vin_manufacturer
(SELECT * FROM( VALUES
('935',' Citroën Brazil','Citroën'),
('ABC', 'Toyota', 'Toyota'),
('ZOM',' OM','OM')
) as tmp (vin_manufacturer_id, manufacturer_desc, make_desc)
WHERE NOT EXISTS (
--ignore anything that has already been inserted
SELECT 1 FROM manager.vin_manufacturer m where m.vin_manufacturer_id = tmp.vin_manufacturer_id)
)
INSERT INTO mytable(col1,col2)
SELECT 'val1','val2'
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM mytable WHERE col1='val1')
As #hanmari mentioned in his comment. when inserting into a postgres tables, the on conflict (..) do nothing is the best code to use for not inserting duplicate data.:
query = "INSERT INTO db_table_name(column_name)
VALUES(%s) ON CONFLICT (column_name) DO NOTHING;"
The ON CONFLICT line of code will allow the insert statement to still insert rows of data. The query and values code is an example of inserted date from a Excel into a postgres db table.
I have constraints added to a postgres table I use to make sure the ID field is unique. Instead of running a delete on rows of data that is the same, I add a line of sql code that renumbers the ID column starting at 1.
Example:
q = 'ALTER id_column serial RESTART WITH 1'
If my data has an ID field, I do not use this as the primary ID/serial ID, I create a ID column and I set it to serial.
I hope this information is helpful to everyone.
*I have no college degree in software development/coding. Everything I know in coding, I study on my own.
Looks like PostgreSQL supports a schema object called a rule.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/rules-update.html
You could create a rule ON INSERT for a given table, making it do NOTHING if a row exists with the given primary key value, or else making it do an UPDATE instead of the INSERT if a row exists with the given primary key value.
I haven't tried this myself, so I can't speak from experience or offer an example.
This solution avoids using rules:
BEGIN
INSERT INTO tableA (unique_column,c2,c3) VALUES (1,2,3);
EXCEPTION
WHEN unique_violation THEN
UPDATE tableA SET c2 = 2, c3 = 3 WHERE unique_column = 1;
END;
but it has a performance drawback (see PostgreSQL.org):
A block containing an EXCEPTION clause is significantly more expensive
to enter and exit than a block without one. Therefore, don't use
EXCEPTION without need.
On bulk, you can always delete the row before the insert. A deletion of a row that doesn't exist doesn't cause an error, so its safely skipped.
For data import scripts, to replace "IF NOT EXISTS", in a way, there's a slightly awkward formulation that nevertheless works:
DO
$do$
BEGIN
PERFORM id
FROM whatever_table;
IF NOT FOUND THEN
-- INSERT stuff
END IF;
END
$do$;