I have this situation:
a JBOSS instance
application client.war
application server.war
a jboss module, properly installed, containing only the interfaces.
The server.war application implements the jboss module interfaces, and publishes these implementations with a JNDI bind. The client.war application with a lookup uses implementations server.war.
A runtime client.war can call the implementation exposed by server.war, but as soon as I try to start a transaction hibernate I get the following error:
ERROR [stderr] java.lang.IllegalStateException: JBAS016071: Singleton
not set for ModuleClassLoader for Module "client.war:main" from
Service Module Loader. This means that you are trying to access a weld
deployment with a Thread Context ClassLoader that is not associated
with the deployment.
There I bumped my head for days, but I can not understand what the problem is. Someone can help me?
Set the class loader on the child thread to be the same as the parent.
Get parent class loader:
ClassLoader cl = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();
Set child class loader :
ClassLoader cl = Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(cl);
When the child thread is done, make sure to unset the class loader to null, to avoid leaks in case of thread pools.
Although CDI will work in the child thread other things such as remote EJB invocation and JNDI lookups will not.
A much better approch wuld be to use an async EJB invocations You can just create an EJB that looks something like:
#Singleton
public class AsyncBean {
#Asynchronous
public void performTask(int a, int b) {
// the client doesn't care what happens here
}
This would mean that your async task will have the TCCL set correctly, JNDI will work etc (basically it is a full EE invocation).
You can configure the thread pool used for async invocations in standalone.xml, but it will be used for all #Asynchronous methods in the application.
Root Cause
When an application launches its own threads, the new threads use a classloader which is different than the classloader of the originating thread, therefore injection is failing.
Reference
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/257663
Related
The correct dependencies for my gradle.build are driving me crazy!
In order to access an Apache Geode 1.10 server, I am using:
// Geode client dependency
implementation 'org.springframework.geode:spring-geode-starter:1.2.13.RELEASE'
implementation 'org.springframework.data:spring-data-geode:2.2.12.RELEASE'
implementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-tomcat:2.2.13.RELEASE'
This fails with the error:
org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext 596 refresh:
Exception encountered during context initialization - cancelling refresh attempt:
org.springframework.beans.factory.UnsatisfiedDependencyException:
Error creating bean with name 'ClusteredSpringSessions' defined in class path resource
[org/springframework/session/data/gemfire/config/annotation/web/http/GemFireHttpSessionConfiguration.class]:
Unsatisfied dependency expressed through method 'sessionRegion' parameter 0;
nested exception is org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException:
Error creating bean with name 'org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.ClientCacheConfiguration':
Initialization of bean failed; nested exception is java.lang.IllegalAccessError:
class org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.AbstractCacheConfiguration$$Lambda$703/0x0000000801025d10
tried to access protected method 'boolean org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.support.AbstractAnnotationConfigSupport.hasValue(java.lang.Number)'
(org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.AbstractCacheConfiguration$$Lambda$703/0x0000000801025d10
and org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.support.AbstractAnnotationConfigSupport are in unnamed module of loader 'app')
What is there to tell me the dependency missing for the UnsatisfiedDependencyException for 'ClusteredSpringSessions'?
If I remove the #EnableGemFireHttpSession annotation then I get the error
2021-02-02T19:29:49,011 WARN [main] org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext 596 refresh:
Exception encountered during context initialization - cancelling refresh attempt:
org.springframework.beans.factory.UnsatisfiedDependencyException:
Error creating bean with name 'cacheManager' defined in class path resource [org/springframework/data/gemfire/cache/config/GemfireCachingConfiguration.class]:
Unsatisfied dependency expressed through method 'cacheManager' parameter 0;
nested exception is org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException:
Error creating bean with name 'org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.ClientCacheConfiguration':
Initialization of bean failed; nested exception is java.lang.IllegalAccessError:
class org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.AbstractCacheConfiguration$$Lambda$679/0x00000008010306b8
tried to access protected method 'boolean org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.support.AbstractAnnotationConfigSupport.hasValue(java.lang.Number)'
(org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.AbstractCacheConfiguration$$Lambda$679/0x00000008010306b8
and org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.support.AbstractAnnotationConfigSupport are in unnamed module of loader 'app')
What is there to tell me the dependency missing for the UnsatisfiedDependencyException for 'cacheManager'?
Thanks
UPDATE The App is run like Spring Boot #ComponentScan finds candidate component class but does not inject #Configuration beans but more specifically
#SpringBootApplication
#ComponentScan({"api", "rsocket", "pricing", "listeners", "dealing", "web"}) // scans packages for # components
#EnableLogging(logLevel="debug", logFile="geodeApi.log")
public class Api {
private static final Logger log = LogManager.getLogger(Api.class);
public static void main(String[] args) {
log.info("In Main");
SpringApplication app = new SpringApplication(Api.class);
app.setWebApplicationType(WebApplicationType.REACTIVE);
SpringApplication.run(Api.class, args);
log.info("Out Main");
}
}
The component scan finds various #Component annotated classes for example
#Component
#EnableClusterDefinedRegions(clientRegionShortcut=ClientRegionShortcut.PROXY)
public class ClientCache {
private static final Logger log = LogManager.getLogger(ClientCache.class);
#Resource
private Region<String, String> admin;
#Autowired
LQuote lQuote;
#Autowired
LReject lReject;
#Autowired
LDeal lDeal;
#Autowired
DealNumber dealNumber;
#Autowired
PriceService priceService;
#PreDestroy
public void onDestroy() throws Exception {
log.info("onDestroy");
String guid = UUID.randomUUID().toString().substring(0, 8).toUpperCase();
admin.put(guid, "API Shutdown");
// TODO: Cancel all open quote streams
log.traceExit();
}
#Bean
ApplicationRunner StartedUp(){
log.traceEntry("StartedUp");
return args -> {
String guid = UUID.randomUUID().toString().substring(0, 8).toUpperCase();
admin.put(guid, "API Started");
lQuote.addListener();
lReject.addListener();
lDeal.addListener();
// Get latest deal number
int currentId = dealNumber.readCurrentId();
// Set it + 1 in case the web server was reboot on the fly
priceService.setCurrentId(currentId + 1);
log.traceExit();
};
}
A lot of the problem was using Java JDK version 15.
The correct versions require Java 11.
// Geode client dependency
implementation 'org.springframework.geode:spring-geode-starter:1.2.8.RELEASE'
implementation 'org.springframework.data:spring-data-geode:2.2.8.RELEASE'
implementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-tomcat'
Technically, it is not necessary to explicitly declare the SDG dependency.
The SBDG dependency (i.e. org.springframework.geode:spring-geode-starter) already includes SDG (org.springframework.data:spring-data-geode). You can follow the dependency trail starting here, then here and finally, here.
As the Version Compatibility Matrix for SBDG specifies, SBDG 1.2.13.RELEASE specifically includes, and is based on, SDG 2.2.12.RELEASE (already), which is (technically) based on Apache Geode 1.9.2.
However, if you need to use Apache Geode 1.10, then you could (recommended) simply declare dependency management to enforce the use of Apache Geode 1.10 in your Gradle build:
plugins {
id 'org.springframework.boot' version '2.2.13.RELEASE'
id 'io.spring.dependency-management' version '1.0.10.RELEASE'
id 'java'
}
dependencyManagement {
dependencies {
dependency 'org.apache.geode:geode-core:1.10.0'
dependency 'org.apache.geode:geode-cq:1.10.0'
dependency 'org.apache.geode:geode-lucene:1.10.0'
dependency 'org.apache.geode:geode-wan:1.10.0'
}
}
dependencies {
implementation 'org.springframework.geode:spring-geode-starter:1.2.13.RELEASE`
implementation 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-tomcat'
}
...
WARNING: SDG 2.2.12.RELEASE is officially based on Apache Geode 1.9.2, and though it should work reasonably well with Apache Geode 1.10, there could expectedly be limitations in certain use cases.
This is not unlike what Spring Initializer conveniently generates for you. Of course, Spring Initializer now uses the new SBDG BOM that makes managing individual SBDG module dependencies even easier, which is not unlike how Spring Boot's dependency management manages transitive dependencies, including 3rd party libs.
Regarding the Exceptions...
It really seems to me like you are having configuration problems rather than dependency problems, actually.
Of course, it is hard to say for certain given you shared very minimal Gradle build configuration and no code snippets from your Spring Boot application configuration, only mentions and what I am able to derive from the Exception messages. So, for now, I'll proceed based on what you provided and what I know or could derive.
Looking at this part of the (first) Exception message:
Error creating bean with name 'ClusteredSpringSessions' defined in class path resource
[org/springframework/session/data/gemfire/config/annotation/web/http/GemFireHttpSessionConfiguration.class]:
Unsatisfied dependency expressed through method 'sessionRegion' parameter 0
And, specifically:
Unsatisfied dependency expressed through method 'sessionRegion' parameter 0
This message refers to the (Spring Java) configuration provided by SSDG and imported/auto-configured by SBDG.
The "Unsatisfied dependency", or "parameter 0", is the 1st method parameter in the sessionRegion(..) (Spring JavaConfig-based) #Bean definition method declared in SSDG's configuration. It is the dependency on the GemFire cache instance (e.g. ClientCache) required to create the "ClusteredSpringSessions" Region.
So now, the question becomes, how is the cache created?
Well, this is what the framework is trying to do next... resolve the cache bean dependency (instance reference), which necessary triggers the cache creation first (due to dependency order)...
Error creating bean with name 'org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.ClientCacheConfiguration':
Initialization of bean failed; nested exception is java.lang.IllegalAccessError
We see that an IllegalAccessError occurred (O.o) which already smells like a version problem to me, but...
The ClientCacheConfiguration is provided by SDG.
Finally, we arrive at the underlying cause...
class org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.AbstractCacheConfiguration$$Lambda$703/0x0000000801025d10
tried to access protected method 'boolean org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.support.AbstractAnnotationConfigSupport.hasValue(java.lang.Number)'
NOTE: ClientCacheConfiguration extends AbstractCacheConfiguration, which extends AbstractAnnotationConfigSupport, and therefore should have "access" to the protected hasValue(:Number) method.
The main Thread appears to be in one of these Lambdas where the AbstractAnnotationConfig.hasValue(:Number) method is used.
I am no entirely sure what this means...
org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.AbstractCacheConfiguration$$Lambda$703/0x0000000801025d10
and org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.support.AbstractAnnotationConfigSupport are in unnamed module of loader 'app'
Are you possibly using Spring Boot's new (Layered) Docker Image support by chance?
The 2nd Exception message (involving the cacheManager bean this time) leads to the same outcome, actually. It is no different, but simply involves another bean (i.e. cacheManager bean) with the same dependency on the cache instance:
Error creating bean with name 'cacheManager' defined in class path resource
[org/springframework/data/gemfire/cache/config/GemfireCachingConfiguration.class]
: Unsatisfied dependency expressed through method 'cacheManager' parameter 0;
nested exception is org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException:
Error creating bean with name 'org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.ClientCacheConfiguration':
Initialization of bean failed; nested exception is java.lang.IllegalAccessError:
class org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.AbstractCacheConfiguration$$Lambda$679/0x00000008010306b8
tried to access protected method 'boolean org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.support.AbstractAnnotationConfigSupport.hasValue(java.lang.Number)'
(org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.AbstractCacheConfiguration$$Lambda$679/0x00000008010306b8
and org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.support.AbstractAnnotationConfigSupport are in unnamed module of loader 'app')
And, specifically:
Initialization of bean failed; nested exception is java.lang.IllegalAccessError:
tried to access protected method 'boolean org.springframework.data.gemfire
.config.annotation.support.AbstractAnnotationConfigSupport
.hasValue(java.lang.Number)'
And:
(org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.AbstractCacheConfiguration$$Lambda$679/0x00000008010306b8
and org.springframework.data.gemfire.config.annotation.support.AbstractAnnotationConfigSupport
are in unnamed module of loader 'app')
I am not familiar with this error messages (basically, said class(es) "are in unnamed module of loader 'app'.") What?
How is this Spring Boot app being run?
Definitely providing a sample app, one or more tests, your configuration, logs, Stack Traces in addition to Exception messages, setup, runtime environment, etc, etc, will go along way in trying to understand the context of this problem.
At this point, I am really trying to point you in a direction to start untangling the problem.
Sorry, I cannot (currently) be of more help in this case.
I'm getting Error creating bean with name 'scopedTarget.scopedTarget.processVlsCasesJob': Scope 'job' is not active for the current thread; consider defining a scoped proxy for this bean if you intend to refer to it from a singleton from a job factory class. The factory is where the job and step beans are created in the correct job/step scopes from a bean invoked during main application start up.
#Component("processVlsCasesJobFactory")
public class ProcessVlsCasesJobFactoryImpl
extends BatchJobFactoryAncestorImpl
implements ProcessVlsCasesJobFactory {
...
#Bean
#Scope(scopeName = "job", proxyMode = ScopedProxyMode.INTERFACES)
public ProcessVlsCasesJob processVlsCasesJob() {
return new ProcessVlsCasesJobImpl();
}
...
#Bean
#Scope(scopeName = "step", proxyMode = ScopedProxyMode.INTERFACES)
public ProcessVlsCasesProcessCases processVlsCasesProcessCases() {
return new ProcessVlsCasesProcessCasesImpl();
}
...
// other bean methods creating the step objects
Any attempt to allow Spring to auto-register any bean in the Job/Steps scope fails with that type of error. If those scopes are only available when (I guess) a job is running, how do I "create" the bean in the scope from the thread of the main MVC application running in Tomcat?
Why isn't JobScope and StepScope available from an MVC thread?
Those are custom scopes specific to Spring Batch, they are not part of Spring MVC. You need to specifically register them (or use #EnableBatchProcessing to have them automatically registered)
how do I "create" the bean in the scope from the thread of the main MVC application running in Tomcat?
The main thread (processing the web request) should call a JobLauncher configured with an asynchronous TaskExecutor so that the batch job is executed in a separate thread. Please see the Running Jobs from within a Web Container section which provides more details and a code example of how to do that.
I finally found the answer: #EnableBatchProcessing doesn't work within an MVC application context. In the #Configuration bean I created to configure SB (with DB2) and set up all the SB beans (like jobLauncher), I added:
jobScope = new JobScope();
jobScope.setAutoProxy(Boolean.FALSE);
jobScope.setName(JobScoped.SCOPE_NAME);
((ConfigurableBeanFactory)applicationContext.getAutowireCapableBeanFactory())
.registerScope(JobScoped.SCOPE_NAME, jobScope);
stepScope = new StepScope();
stepScope.setAutoProxy(Boolean.FALSE);
stepScope.setName(StepScoped.SCOPE_NAME);
((ConfigurableBeanFactory)applicationContext.getAutowireCapableBeanFactory())
.registerScope(StepScoped.SCOPE_NAME, stepScope);
Then the two scopes were finally available at run time and the job/step scoped beans were registered at deployment and ran properly.
Was #EBP added as part of Spring Boot? Is it only supposed to be used via a command line tool?
Although there already are quite some StackOverflow questions, blog entries, etc. on the web, I still cannot figure out a solution to the problem stated below.
Similar to this question (Injecting EJB within JAX-RS resource on JBoss7) I'd like to inject a EJB instance into a JAX-RS class. I tried with JBoss 5, JBoss 7, and WildFly 8. I either get no injection at all (field is null), or the server does not deploy (as soon as I try to combine all sorts of annotations).
Adding #Stateless to the JAX-RS makes the application server know both classes as beans. However, no injection takes place.
Is there a way to inject EJBs into a REST application? What kind of information (in addition to that contained in the question linked to above) could I provide to help?
EDIT: I created a Github project showing code that works (with Glassfish 4.0) and does not work (with JBoss 5).
https://github.com/C-Otto/beantest
Commit 4bf2f3d23f49d106a435f068ed9b30701bbedc9d works using Glassfish
4.0.
Commit 50d137674e55e1ceb512fe0029b9555ff7c2ec21 uses Jersey 1.8, which does not work.
Commit 86004b7fb6263d66bda7dd302f2d2a714ff3b939
uses Jersey 2.6, which also does not work.
EDIT2:
Running the Code which I tried on JBoss 5 on Glassfish 4.0 gives:
Exception while loading the app : CDI deployment failure:WELD-001408 Unsatisfied dependencies for type [Ref<ContainerRequest>] with qualifiers [#Default] at injection point [[BackedAnnotatedParameter] Parameter 1 of [BackedAnnotatedConstructor] #Inject org.glassfish.jersey.server.internal.routing.UriRoutingContext(Ref<ContainerRequest>, ProcessingProviders)]
org.jboss.weld.exceptions.DeploymentException: WELD-001408 Unsatisfied dependencies for type [Ref<ContainerRequest>] with qualifiers [#Default] at injection point [[BackedAnnotatedParameter] Parameter 1 of [BackedAnnotatedConstructor] #Inject org.glassfish.jersey.server.internal.routing.UriRoutingContext(Ref<ContainerRequest>, ProcessingProviders)]
at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.Validator.validateInjectionPointForDeploymentProblems(Validator.java:403)
EDIT3: The crucial information might be that I'd like a solution that works on JBoss 5
If you don't want to make your JAX-RS resource an EJB too (#Stateless) and then use #EJB or #Resource to inject it, you can always go with JNDI lookup (I tend to write a "ServiceLocator" class that gets a service via its class.
A nice resource to read about the topic:
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS71/Remote+EJB+invocations+via+JNDI+-+EJB+client+API+or+remote-naming+project
A sample code:
try {
// 1. Retreive the Home Interface using a JNDI Lookup
// Retrieve the initial context for JNDI. // No properties needed when local
Context context = new InitialContext();
// Retrieve the home interface using a JNDI lookup using
// the java:comp/env bean environment variable // specified in web.xml
helloHome = (HelloLocalHome) context.lookup("java:comp/env/ejb/HelloBean");
//2. Narrow the returned object to be an HelloHome object. // Since the client is local, cast it to the correct object type.
//3. Create the local Hello bean instance, return the reference
hello = (HelloLocal)helloHome.create();
} catch(NamingException e) {
} catch(CreateException e) {
}
This is not "injecting" per-se, but you don't use "new" as-well, and you let the application server give you an instance which is managed.
I hope this was useful and I'm not telling you something you already know!
EDIT:
This is an excellent example: https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/AS72/EJB+invocations+from+a+remote+client+using+JNDI
EDIT 2:
As you stated in your comment, you'd like to inject it via annotations.
If the JNDI lookup is currently working for you without problems, and
If you're using Java EE 6+ (which I'm guessing you are), you can do the following:
#EJB(lookup = "jndi-lookup-string-here")
private RemoteInterface bean;
I already have a integration-test phase, when I ran the selenium tests. I also want to run some unit tests in this phase, because the app is too much complex and have a lot of dependencies between his modules (a hell), so, after a week fighting against OpenEJB and Arquillian, I believe that this would be easier.
The thing is: how do I made it work?
I have the instance already running, if I instantiate an InitialContext and try to lookup some bean, I got an exception telling me that I have not set the java.naming.initial.factory, and I don't know what to put in there.
I'm also complaining about the annotated beans.
Suppose a Bean like this:
#Stateless
public class ABeanImpl implements ABean {
#EJB
private BBean;
}
Will the container automatically get right the BBean?
Thanks in advance
How to connect to JBoss 7.1 remote JNDI:
Here is the code snippet that I use for JBoss 7.1:
Properties props = new Properties();
String JBOSS_CONTEXT = "org.jboss.naming.remote.client.InitialContextFactory";
props.put("jboss.naming.client.ejb.context", true);
props.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, JBOSS_CONTEXT);
props.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, "remote://localhost:4447");
props.put(Context.SECURITY_PRINCIPAL, "jboss");
props.put(Context.SECURITY_CREDENTIALS, "jboss123");
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext(props);
Resolution of ambiguous ejb references:
According to JBoss EJB 3 reference, if at any level of your EJB environment (EJB/EAR/Server) are duplicates in used interfaces, exception will be thrown during resolution of injected beans.
Based on above, if you have got a reference to EJB bean which interface:
has two implementations in your EJB module (JAR/WAR) - exception will be thrown
has two implementations in your application (other EJB JAR's in same EAR) - exception will be thrown
has two implementations, one in module with bean ABeanImpl, second somewhere else - implemetation from current module is used.
I am new to EJB3 and am missing something when it comes to accessing a #Remote #Stateless bean deployed as an ejb module inside an ear file. I want to access a remote bean in lima.ear from soup.ear.
Here is what I am doing now (somewhat abbreviated):
//deployed under lima.ear
#Remote
#Stateless
public interface LimaBean {
String sayName();
}
I want to put LimaBean in the Soup:
//deployed in soup.ear
#Stateless
public class Soup implements SoupLocal {
#EJB
private LimaBean limaBean;
public String taste() {
return limaBean.sayName();
}
}
When I start JBoss I get the following error:
java.lang.RuntimeException: could not resolve global JNDI name for #EJB for container Soup: reference class: com.example.LimaBean ejbLink: not used by any EJBs
I have had a hard time finding out what this ejbLink is about, if that is the right path to go down.
If I deploy LimaBean as a jar file in jboss then everything works great!
I ran accross an article that had a section called "2.5.3. References between beans in different jars and different ears"
(http://jonas.ow2.org/doc/howto/jboss2_4-to-jonas3_0/html/x111.html)
Example of jboss.xml file for SB_BrowseRegions:
<jboss>
<session>
<ejb-name>SB_BrowseRegions</ejb-name>
<ejb-ref>
<ejb-ref-name>ejb/Region</ejb-ref-name>
<jndi-name>protocol://serverName/directory/RegionHome</jndi-name>
</ejb-ref>
</session>
</jboss>
If I touch the soup.ear, after JBoss starts up then it deploys fine, so I am assuming I need to specify a dependency like the above article says.
But even after it deploys then I get an error when accessing the remote LimaBean:
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Can not set com.soup.LimaBean field com.soup.Soup.limaBean to $Proxy147
at sun.reflect.UnsafeFieldAccessorImpl.throwSetIllegalArgumentException(UnsafeFieldAccessorImpl.java:146)
at sun.reflect.UnsafeFieldAccessorImpl.throwSetIllegalArgumentException(UnsafeFieldAccessorImpl.java:150)
at sun.reflect.UnsafeObjectFieldAccessorImpl.set(UnsafeObjectFieldAccessorImpl.java:63)
at java.lang.reflect.Field.set(Field.java:657)
at org.jboss.injection.JndiFieldInjector.inject(JndiFieldInjector.java:115)
... 49 more
I have tried a few things but, if anyone can point me in the right direction about this I would appreciate it.
It looks like the JNDI properties need to be set as if it were a remote client outside of the app server because of the ear isolation we have setup.
properties.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, url);
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext(properties);
Just specify the URL for the InitialContext and that should do the trick.