I use MIRC and this is my goal, i'm sure it's simple! thanks guys.
on $*:text:*test*:#: { msg $chan "Entire message containing test" }
You dont need the $ after the on, it's only used when you use regex to match (see here).
And indeed it's quite simple, use $1- to match he whole message. $1 will match the first 'token'.
In your example sentence Entire message containing test, $1 will rerturn Entire assuming you did not use a tokenize before and because the default delimiter is a space in mSL. $2 will retrurn message and so on.
Here is a great article about token manipulation and in your mIRC client you can use the command /help $1- to learn more about remote identifiers.
Related
I basically want to check the incoming 'From' in the email received and then either
Keep it and make it deliver to the intended mailbox if the email matches a Specified MySQL/PostgreSQL
Database User (eg. select email from users where exists ('from email address') )
If the 'From' address is blank or it is not found in the database, the email should be discarded
Any way I can achieve this before the e-mail is delivered to the intended mailbox?
I am using Procmail + Virtualmin + Webmin + PostgreSQL
PS: I want to apply this filter not to the wole server but to some specified mailboxes/users (i'm assuming 1 user = 1 mailbox here)
Procmail can easily run an external command in a condition and react to its exit status. How exactly to make your particular SQL client set its exit code will depend on which one you are using; perhaps its man page will reveal an option to make it exit with an error when a query produces an empty result set, for example? Or else write a shell wrapper to look for empty output.
A complication is that Procmail (or rather, the companion utility formail) can easily extract a string from e.g. the From: header; but you want to reduce this to just the email terminus. This is a common enough task that it's easy to find a canned solution - generate a reply and then extract the To: address (sic!) from that.
FROM=`formail -rtzxTo:`
:0
* FROM ?? ^(one#example\.com|two#site\.example\.net|third#example\.org)$
{
:0
* ? yoursql --no-headers --fail-if-empty-result \
--batch --query databasename \
--eval "select yada yada where address = '$FROM'"
{ }
:0E
/dev/null
}
The first condition examines the variable and succeeds if it contains one of the addresses (my original answer simply had the regex . which matches if the string contains at least one character, any character; I'm not convinced this is actually necessary or useful; there should be no way for From: to be empty). If it is true, Procmail enters the braces; if not, they will be skipped.
The first recipe inside the braces runs an external command and examines its exit code. I'm imagining your SQL client is called yoursql and that it has options to turn off human-friendly formatting (table headers etc) and for running a query directly from the command line on a specific database. We use double quotes so that the shell will interpolate the variable FROM before running this command (maybe there is a safer way to pass string variables which might contain SQL injection attempts with something like --variable from="$FROM" and then use that variable in the query? See below.)
If there is no option to directly set the exit code, but you can make sure standard output is completely empty in the case of no result, piping the command to grep -q . will produce the correct exit code. In a more complex case, maybe write a simple Awk script to identify an empty result set and set its exit status accordingly.
Scraping together information from
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/app-psql.html,
How do you use script variables in psql?,
Making an empty output from psql,
and from your question, I end up with the following attempt to implement this in psql; but as I don't have a Postgres instance to test with, or any information about your database schema, this is still approximate at best.
* ? psql --no-align --tuples-only --quiet \
--dbname=databasename --username=something --no-password \
--variable=from="$FROM" \
--command="select email from users where email = :'from'" \
| grep -q .
(We still can't use single quotes around the SQL query, to completely protect it from the shell, because Postgres insists on single quotes around :'from', and the shell offers no facility for embedding literal single quotes inside single quotes.)
The surrounding Procmail code should be reasonably self-explanatory, but here goes anyway. In the first recipe inside the braces, if the condition is true, the empty braces in its action line are a no-op; the E flag on the next recipe is a condition which is true only if any of the conditions on the previous recipe failed. This is a common idiom to avoid having to use a lot of negations; perhaps look up "de Morgan's law". The net result is that we discard the message by delivering it to /dev/null if either condition in the first recipe failed; and otherwise, we simply pass it through, and Procmail will eventually deliver it to its default destination.
The recipe was refactored in response to updates to your question; perhaps now it would make more sense to just negate the exit code from psql with a ! in front:
FROM=`formail -rtzxTo:`
:0
* FROM ?? ^(one#example\.com|two#site\.example\.net|third#example\.org)$
* ! ? psql --no-align --tuples-only --quiet \
--dbname=databasename --username=something --no-password \
--variable=from="$FROM" \
--command="select email from users where email = :'from'" \
| grep -q .
/dev/null
Tangentially, perhaps notice how Procmail's syntax exploits the fact that a leading ? or a doubled ?? are not valid in regular expressions. So the parser can unambiguously tell that these conditions are not regular expressions; they compare a variable to the regex after ??, or examine the exit status of an external command, respectively. There are a few other special conditions like this in Procmail; arguably, all of them are rather obscure.
Newcomers to shell scripting should also notice that each shell command pipeline has two distinct results: whatever is being printed on standard output, and, completely separate from that, an exit code which reveals whether or not the command completed successfully. (Conventionally, a zero exit status signals success, and anything else is an error. For example, the exit status from grep is 0 if it finds at least one match, 1 if it doesn't, and usually some other nonzero exit code if you passed in an invalid regular expression, or you don't have permission to read the input file, etc.)
For further details, perhaps see also http://www.iki.fi/era/procmail/ which has an old "mini-FAQ" which covers several of the topics here, and a "quick reference" for looking up details of the syntax.
I'm not familiar with Virtualmin but https://docs.virtualmin.com/Webmin/PostgreSQL_Database_Server shows how to set up Postgres and as per https://docs.virtualmin.com/Webmin/Procmail_Mail_Filter I guess you will want to use the option to put this code in an include file.
I need to use Perl-compatible regex to match several strings which appear over multiple lines in a file.
The matches need to appear in any order (server servernameA.company.com followed by servernameZ.company.com followed by servernameD.company.com or any order combination of the three). Note: All matches will appear at the beginning of each line.
In my testing with grep -P, I haven't even been able to produce a match on simple string terms that appear in any order over new lines (even when using the /s and /m modifiers). I am pretty sure from reading I need a look-ahead assertion but the samples I used didn't produce a match for me even after analyzing each bit of the regex to make sure it was relevant to my scenario.
Since I need to support this in Production, I would like an answer that is simple and relatively straight-forward to interpret.
Sample Input
irrelevant_directive = 0
# Comment
server servernameA.company.com iburst
additional_directive = yes
server servernameZ.company.com iburst
server servernameD.company.com iburst
# Additional Comment
final_directive = true
Expectation
The regex should match and return the 3 lines beginning with server (that appear in any order) if and only if there is a perfect match for strings'serverA.company.com', 'serverZ.company.com', and 'serverD.company.com' followed by iburst. All 3 strings must be included.
Finally, if the answer (or a very similar form of the answer) can address checking for strings in any order on a single line, that would be very helpful. For example, if I have a single-line string of: preauth param audit=true silent deny=5 severe=false unlock_time=1000 time=20ms and I want to ensure the terms deny=5 and time=20ms appear in any order and if so match.
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Regarding the main issue [for the secondary question see Casimir et Hippolyte answer] (using x modifier): https://regex101.com/r/mkxcap/5
(?:
(?<a>.*serverA\.company\.com\s+iburst.*)
|(?<z>.*serverZ\.company\.com\s+iburst.*)
|(?<d>.*serverD\.company\.com\s+iburst.*)
|[^\n]*(?:\n|$)
)++
(?(a)(?(z)(?(d)(*ACCEPT))))(*SKIP)(*F)
The matches are now all in the a, z and d capturing groups.
It's not the most efficient (it goes three times over each line with backtracking...), but the main takeaway is to register the matches with capturing groups and then checking for them being defined.
You don't need to use the PCRE features, you can simply write in ERE:
grep -E '.*(\bdeny=5\b.*\btime=20ms\b|\btime=20ms\b.*\bdeny=5\b).*' file
The PCRE approach will be different: (however you can also use the previous pattern)
grep -P '^(?=.*\bdeny=5\b).*\btime=20ms\b.*' file
For those that are experts in lexing and parsing... I am attempting to write a series of programs in perl that would parse out IBM mainframe z/OS JCL for a variety of purposes, but am hitting a roadblock in methodology. I am mostly following the lexing/parsing ideology put forth in "Higher Order Perl" by Mark Jason Dominus, but there are some things that I can't quite figure out how to do.
JCL has what's called inline data, which is very similar to "here" documents. I am not quite sure how to lex these into tokens.
The layout for inline data is as follows:
//DDNAME DD *
this is the inline data
this is some more inline data
/*
...
Conventionally, the "*" after the "DD" signifies that following lines are the inline data itself, terminated by either "/*" or the next valid JCL record (starting with "//" in the first 2 columns).
More advanced, the inline data could appear as such:
//DDNAME DD *,DLM=ZZ
//THIS LOOKS LIKE JCL BUT IT'S ACTUALLY DATA
//MORE DATA MASQUERADING AS JCL
ZZ
...
Sometimes the inline data is itself JCL (perhaps to be pumped to a program or the internal reader, whatever).
But here's the rub. In JCL, the records are 80 bytes, fixed in length. Everything past column 72 (cols 73-80) is a "comment". As well, everything following a blank that follows valid JCL is likewise a comment. Since I am looking to manipulate JCL in my programs and spit it back out, I'd like to capture comments so that I can preserve them.
So, here's an example of inline comments in the case of inline data:
//DDNAME DD *,DLM=ZZ THIS IS A COMMENT COL73DAT
data
...
ZZ
...more JCL
I originally thought that I could have my top-most lexer pull in a line of JCL and immediately create a non-token for cols 1-72 and then a token (['COL73COMMENT',$1]) for the column 73 comment, if any. This would then pass downstream to the next iterator/tokenizer a string of the cols 1-72 text followed by the col73 token.
But how would I, downstream from there, grab the inline data? I'd originally figured that the top-most tokenizer could look for a "DD \*(,DLM=(\S*))" (or the like) and then just keep pulling records from the feeding iterator until it hit the delimiter or a valid JCL starter ("//").
But you may see the issue here... I can't have 2 topmost tokenizers... either the tokenizer that looks for COL73 comments must be the top or the tokenizer that gets inline data must be at the top.
I imagine that perl parsers have the same challenge, since seeing
<<DELIM
isn't necessarily the end of the line, followed by the here document data. After all, you could see perl like:
my $this=$obj->ingest(<<DELIM)->reformat();
inline here document data
more data
DELIM
How would the tokenizer/parser know to tokenize the ")->reformat();" and then still grab the following records as-is? In the case of the inline JCL data, those lines are passed as-is, cols 73-80 are NOT comments in that case...
So, any takers on this? I know there will be tons of questions clarifying my needs and I'm happy to clarify as much as is needed.
Thanks in advance for any help...
In this answer I will concentrate on heredocs, because the lessons can be easily transferred to the JCL.
Any language that supports heredocs is not context-free, and thus cannot be parsed with common techniques like recursive descent. We need a way to guide the lexer along more twisted paths, but in doing so, we can maintain the appearance of a context-free language. All we need is another stack.
For the parser, we treat introductions to heredocs <<END as string literals. But the lexer has to be extended to do the following:
When a heredoc introduction is encountered, it adds the terminator to the stack.
When a newline is encountered, the body of the heredoc is lexed, until the stack is empty. After that, normal parsing is resumed.
Take care to update the line number appropriately.
In a hand-written combined parser/lexer, this could be implemented like so:
use strict; use warnings; use 5.010;
my $s = <<'INPUT-END'; pos($s) = 0;
<<A <<B
body 1
A
body 2
B
<<C
body 3
C
INPUT-END
my #strs;
push #strs, parse_line() while pos($s) < length($s);
for my $i (0 .. $#strs) {
say "STRING $i:";
say $strs[$i];
}
sub parse_line {
my #strings;
my #heredocs;
$s =~ /\G\s+/gc;
# get the markers
while ($s =~ /\G<<(\w+)/gc) {
push #strings, '';
push #heredocs, [ \$strings[-1], $1 ];
$s =~ /\G[^\S\n]+/gc; # spaces that are no newlines
}
# lex the EOL
$s =~ /\G\n/gc or die "Newline expected";
# process the deferred heredocs:
while (my $heredoc = shift #heredocs) {
my ($placeholder, $marker) = #$heredoc;
$s =~ /\G(.*\n)$marker\n/sgc or die "Heredoc <<$marker expected";
$$placeholder = $1;
}
return #strings;
}
Output:
STRING 0:
body 1
STRING 1:
body 2
STRING 2:
body 3
The Marpa parser simplifies this a bit by allowing events to be triggered once a certain token is parsed. These are called pauses, because the built-in lexing pauses a moment for you to take over. Here is a high-level overview and a short blogpost describing this technique with the demo code on Github.
In case anyone was wondering how I decided to resolve this, here is what I did.
My main lexing routine accepts an iterator that pumps full lines of text (which can take it from a file, a string, whatever I want). The routine uses that to create another iterator, which examines the line for "comments" after column 72, which it will then return as a "mainline" token followed by a "col72" token. This iterator is then used to create yet another iterator, which passes the col72 tokens through unchanged, but takes the mainline tokens and lexes them into atomic tokens (things like STRING, NUMBER, COMMA, NEWLINE, etc).
But here's the crux... the lexing routine has the ORIGINAL ITERATOR still... so when it receives a token that indicates there is a "here" document, it continues processing tokens until it hits a NEWLINE token (meaning end of the actual line of text) and then uses the original iterator to pull off the here document data. Since that iterator feeds the atomic tokens iterator, pulling from it then prevents those lines from being atomized.
To illustrate, think of iterators like hoses. The first hose is the main iterator. To that I attach the col72 iterator hose, and to that I attach the atomic tokenizer hose. As streams of characters go in the first hose, atomized tokens come out the end of the third hose. But I can attach a 2-way nozzle to the first hose that will allow its output to come out the alternate nozzle, preventing that data from going into the second hose (and hence the third hose). When I'm done diverting the data through the alternate nozzle, I can turn that off and then data begins flowing through the second and third hoses again.
Easy-peasey.
I've noticed a big lack in documentation from mIRC scripting abilities so I apologize if I've missed something but I've been searching everwhere.
Basically, I have an on event when someone says something, I need to get there entire message, how is this possible? I've managed to discover $1- however this only grabs the text from what the event triggered from to the end, I need the entire message, is this possible?
This is actually pretty simple, although maybe you're on an earlier version of mirc, if the documentation is lacking:
on *:TEXT:*I need help with*:#channel: {
msg $chan $1-
}
$1- will always contain the full message. $# are space-delimited identifiers, so if your message is john: I need help with etc, $1 will contain john:, and $2 will contain I, and so on and so-forth. Adding the dash means 'this and everything onwards'. Since your match text is 'everything before I need help with and everything after, this code will always contain the full text.
The code above, in case it is not obvious, will message the channel the event triggered on with the full message text. Whatever you do with the text is up to you; it's just an example.
/dbg
alias dbg {
if !$debug { debug -i d dbg }
if $regex($1-,/.+!.+#.+.PRIVMSG.#.+:.+/g) {
echo 4 -s $*
}
}
$1- or $1
I am trying to create my first zsh completion script, in this case for the command netcfg.
Lame as it may sound I have stuck on the first hurdle, disclaimer, I know how to do this crudely, however I seek the "ZSH WAY" to do this.
I need to list the files in /etc/networking but only the files, not the directory component, so I do the following.
echo $(ls /etc/network.d/*(.))
/etc/network.d/ethernet-dhcp /etc/network.d/wireless-wpa-config
What I wanted was:
ethernet-dhcp wireless-wpa-config
So I try (excuse my naivity) :
echo ${(s/*\/)$(ls /etc/network.d/*(.))}
/etc/network.d/ethernet-dhcp /etc/network.d/wireless-wpa-config
It seems that this doesn't work, I'm sure there must be some clever way of doing this by splitting into an array and getting the last part but as I say, I'm complete noob at this.
Any advice gratefully received.
General note: There is no need to use ls to generate the filenames. You might as well use echo some*glob. But if you want to protect the possible embedded newline characters even that is a bad idea. The first example below globs directly into an array to protect embedded newlines. The second one uses printf to generate NUL terminated data to accomplish the same thing without using a variable.
It is easy to do if you are willing to use a variable:
typeset -a entries
entries=(/etc/network.d/*(.)) # generate the list
echo ${entries#/etc/network.d/} # strip the prefix from each one
You can also do it without a variable, but the extra stuff to isolate individual entries is a bit ugly:
# From the inside, to the outside:
# * glob the entries
# * NUL terminate them into a single string
# * split at NUL
# * strip the prefix from each one
echo ${${(0)"$(printf '%s\0' /etc/network.d/*(.))"}#/etc/network.d/}
Or, if you are going to use a subshell anyway (i.e. the command substitution in the previous example), just cd to the directory so it is not part of the glob expansion (plus, you do not have to repeat the directory name):
echo ${(0)"$(cd /etc/network.d && printf '%s\0' *(.))"}
Chris Johnsen's answer is full of useful information about zsh, however it doesn't mention the much simpler solution that works in this particular case:
echo /etc/network.d/*(:t)
This is using the t history modifier as a glob qualifier.
Thanks for your suggestions guys, having done yet more reading of ZSH and coming back to the problem a couple of days later, I think I've got a very terse solution which I would like to share for your benefit.
echo ${$(print /etc/network.d/*(.)):t}
I'm used to seeing basename(1) stripping off directory components; also, you can use echo /etc/network/* to get the file listing without running the external ls program. (Running external programs can slow down completion more than you'd like; I didn't find a zsh-builtin for basename, but that doesn't mean that there isn't one.)
Here's something I hope will help:
haig% for f in /etc/network/* ; do basename $f ; done
if-down.d
if-post-down.d
if-pre-up.d
if-up.d
interfaces