In BBEdit (v11.6), when I search for the "\r" character in a txt file previoulsy saved as "Unix (LF)" from the "Save as..." dialog, the result is the end of each individual line of the file.
Why?
The BBEdit hex dump correctly shows that no CR (OD) chars are present in the file.
From the 11.6 release notes:
BBEdit now uses the line feed (ASCII decimal 10) as line breaks in its internal representation for text in open documents, instead of the carriage return (ASCII decimal 13) that was the standard Mac format for many years. This (theoretically) reduces the time required to open documents, since in the normal case, no conversion is necessary; it also eliminates conversion logic when copying and pasting text, since LF-delimited text is also the standard interchange format on the Clipboard.
As before, you may use \n and \r interchangeably in search strings and Grep patterns. (The latter usage is for compatibility with old versions of BBEdit.)
Related
In a mapping editor, the display is correct after the legacy to unicode conversion for DEVANAGARI text shown using a unicode font (Arial Unicode MS). However, in MS-WORD, the display isn't as expected for the same unicode text in the unicode font (Arial Unicode MS) or any other Devanagari unicode fonts. The expected sequence of unicodes are provided as per the documentation. The sequence can be seen on the left-hand side table.
Please let me know where I am going wrong.
Thanks for your help!
Does your map have to insert the zero_width_joiner? The halant (virama) by itself is enough to get the half-consonant (for some combinations) and in particular, it may be that Word is using the presence of the ZWJ to keep them separate.
If getting rid of the ZWJ doesn't help, another possibility is that Word may be treating the individual characters of the text string as individual "runs" of text.
If those first 4 characters are not in a single run, this can happen.
[aside: the way to tell if it's being treated as a single run, is to save the document as an xml file and then open it with something like notepad++ and look at the xml "w:t" element (IIRC) associated with these characters. If they're all in separate w:t elements, it means they're in separate runs. In that case, you might need to copy the text from Word to some other tool (e.g. Notepad++) and then copy it from there and paste it back in Word -- that might cause it to be imported into Word in a single run.
So this web page is rendering with these symbols and they are found throughout this website/application but on no other sites. Can anyone tell me
What this symbol is?
Why it is showing up only in one browser?
That character is U+2028 Line Separator, which is a kind of newline character. Think of it as the Unicode equivalent of HTML’s <br>.
As to why it shows up here: my guess would be that an internal database uses LSEP to not conflict with literal newlines or HTML tags (which might break the database or cause security errors), and either:
The server-side scripts that convert the database to HTML neglected to replace LSEP with <br>
Chrome just breaks standards by displaying LSEP as a printing (visible) character, or
You have a font installed that displays LSEP as a printing character that only Chrome detects. To figure out which font it is, right click on the offending text and click “Inspect”, then switch to the “Computed” tab on the right-hand panel. At the very bottom you should see a section labeled “Rendered Fonts” which will help you locate the offending font.
More information on the line separator, excerpted from the Unicode standard, Chapter 5.8, Newline Guidelines (on p. 12 of this PDF):
Line Separator and Paragraph Separator
A paragraph separator—independent of how it is encoded—is used to indicate a
separation between paragraphs. A line separator indicates where a line break
alone should occur, typically within a paragraph. For example:
This is a paragraph with a line separator at this point,
causing the word “causing” to appear on a different line, but not causing
the typical paragraph indentation, sentence breaking, line spacing, or
change in flush (right, center, or left paragraphs).
For comparison, line separators basically correspond to HTML <BR>, and
paragraph separators to older usage of HTML <P> (modern HTML delimits
paragraphs by enclosing them in <P>...</P>). In word processors, paragraph
separators are usually entered using a keyboard RETURN or ENTER; line
separators are usually entered using a modified RETURN or ENTER, such as
SHIFT-ENTER.
A record separator is used to separate records. For example, when exchanging
tabular data, a common format is to tab-separate the cells and to use a CRLF
at the end of a line of cells. This function is not precisely the same as line
separation, but the same characters are often used.
Traditionally, NLF started out as a line separator (and sometimes record
separator). It is still used as a line separator in simple text editors such as
program editors. As platforms and programs started to handle word processing
with automatic line-wrap, these characters were reinterpreted to stand for
paragraph separators. For example, even such simple programs as the Windows
Notepad program and the Mac SimpleText program interpret their platform’s NLF
as a paragraph separator, not a line separator. Once NLF was reinterpreted to
stand for a paragraph separator, in some cases another control character was
pressed into service as a line separator. For example, vertical tabulation VT
is used in Microsoft Word. However, the choice of character for line separator
is even less standardized than the choice of character for NLF. Many Internet
protocols and a lot of existing text treat NLF as a line separator, so an
implementer cannot simply treat NLF as a paragraph separator in all
circumstances.
Further reading:
Unicode Technical Report #13: Newline Guidelines
General Punctuation (U+2000–U+206F) chart PDF
SE: Why are there so many spaces and line breaks in Unicode?
SO: What is unicode character 2028 (LS / Line Separator) used for?
U+2028 on codepoints.net A misprint here says that U+2028 was added in v. 1.1 of the Unicode standard, which is false — it was added in 1.0
I found that in WordPress the easiest way to remove "L SEP" and "P SEP" characters is to execute this two SQL queries:
UPDATE wp_posts SET post_content = REPLACE(post_content, UNHEX('e280a9'), '')
UPDATE wp_posts SET post_content = REPLACE(post_content, UNHEX('e280a8'), '')
The javascript way (mentioned in some of the answers) can break some things (in my case some modal windows stopped working).
You can use this tool...
http://www.nousphere.net/cleanspecial.php
...to remove all the special characters that Chrome displays.
Steps:
Paste your HTML and Clean using HTML option.
You can manually delete the characters in the editor on this page and see the result.
Paste back your HTML in file and save :)
I recently ran into this issue, tried a number of fixes but ultimately I had to paste the text into VIM and there was an extra space I had to delete. I tried a number of HTML cleaners but none of them worked, VIM was the key!
9999years answers is great.
In case you use Symfony with Twig template I would recommend to check for an empty Twig block. In my case it was an empty Twig block with an invisible char inside.
The LSEP char was only displayed on certain device / browser.
On the other I had a blank space above the header and I could not see any invisible char.
I had to inspect the GET request to see that the value 1f18 was before the open html tag.
Once I removed an empty Twig block it was gone.
hope this can help someone one day ...
My problem was similar, it was "PSEP" or "P SEP". Similar issue, an invisible character in my file.
I replaced \x{2029} with a normal space. Fixed. This problem only appeared on Windows Chrome. Not on my Mac.
I agree with #Kapil Bathija - Basically you can copy & paste your HTML code into http://www.nousphere.net/cleanspecial.php and convert it.
Then it will convert the special characters for you - Just remove the spaces in between the words and you will realize you have to press backspace 2x meaning there is an invalid character that can't be translated.
I had the same issue and it worked just fine afterwards.
You can also copy the text, paste it into a HTML editor such as Coda, remove the linebreak, copy it and paste it back into your site.
Video here: https://www.loom.com/share/501498afa7594d95a18382f1188f33ce
Looks like my client pasted HTML into Wordpress after initially creating it with MS-Word. Even deleting the and visible spaces did not fix the issue. The extended characters became visible in vi/vim.
If you don't have vi/vim available, try highlighting from 2 chars before the LSEP to 2 chars after the LSEP; delete that chunk, and re-type the correct characters.
I am exporting some Access tables to txt files and there are a lot of problems with the txt file. One of those problems being line breaks not visible in the txt file itself. If I copy a line with a line break into Notepad++ from Notepad, it'll break into 2 lines.
So I believe this may be a code format problem, but I can't find the proper one to resolve this. I'm currently exporting to the default Western European, but should I export tot UTF, Unicode, ASCII or something else?
When exporting from MS Access (or VB/VBA in general), make sure you're using vbCrLf constant (Carriage Return plus Line Feed) for line breaks. That constant corresponds to HEX values 0D 0A.
In Windows, it is a convention to use the above 2 characters together as line breaks, while in many other platforms, such as Unix/Linux/MacOS/etc. typically just 0A is used.
That brings up an issue: Notepad, the standard Windows text file viewer, cannot deal with 0A alone and does not treat such symbols as line breaks. More advanced editors, such as Notepad++ or UltraEdit, display such files correctly, though.
The CSV export function in Microsoft Office applications (Excel, Access) terminate a data row with CR+LF and write for a line break within a data value (multi-line string) just LF into the file. (I think just CR was written into the CSV file for a line break in older versions of Office before Office 2007.)
Most text editors detect those LF without CR (respectively CR without LF) and convert them to CR+LF on loading the CSV file which results on viewing of the CSV file in text editor in supposed wrong CSV lines as number of data values is not correct on data rows with data values containing a line break.
However, newline characters within a double quoted value in a CSV file are correct according to CSV specification as described in Wikipedia article about Comma-separated values.
But most applications with support on import from CSV file do not support CSV files with newline characters within a double quoted value and therefore some data values are imported wrong. Also regular expression replaces can't be done on a CSV file with newline characters within a data value because the number of separator character is not constant on all lines.
UltraEdit has for editing such CSV files with only LF (or CR) for a line break within a data value a special configuration setting. At Advanced - Configuration - File Handling - DOS/Unix/Mac Handling the option Never prompt to convert files to DOS format or Prompt to convert if file is not DOS format with clicking on button No if this prompt is displayed must be selected and additionally Only recognize DOS terminated lines (CR/LF) as new lines for editing must be enabled.
The CSV file with CR+LF for end of data row and only LF (or CR) for a line-break within a data value is loaded with those settings in UltraEdit with number of lines equal the number of data rows. And the line-feeds without carriage return (respectively the carriage returns without line-feed) in the CSV file are displayed as character in the lines with a small rectangle as no font has a glyph for a carriage return or line-feed defined because they are whitespace characters with no width. A Perl regular expression find searching for \r(?!\n)|\n(?<!\r) can be used now to find those line breaks within data values and replace them with something different like a space character or remove them.
Which character encoding (ASCII, ANSI, Unicode (UTF-16), UTF-8) to use on export depends on which characters can exist in string values. A Unicode encoding is necessary if string values can have also characters not included in local code page.
My CSS files have become contaminated with "file separator" characters (AKA "INFORMATION SEPARATOR FOUR" or ALT/028 characters). How can I get rid of them?
This is the character:
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1c/index.htm
Background
I manage a number of .CSS text files that are fairly similar. Unfortunately a number of these file have somehow got "file separator" characters pasted into them. Although they do still seem to work in browsers any file that has one of these characters anywhere within it can not be indexed by my desktop search utility (X1 Search). And this is making them extremely hard for me to manage because I need to compare CSS files contantly.
[Bizarrely X1 Search ignores the character if the filename extension is .TXT but files to index the entire file if the filename extension is .CSS]
Worse this "file separator" character is almost invisible within my text editor (TextPad 7.2). The only way I can detect it is to make spaces and carriage returns visible and then it appears as blank space. Worse still it appears to be impossible to search for using text search.
To make it clear what I mean an example that I have pasted into this page. The "file separator" character is on LineB below
LineA
LineB
LineC
LineD
Is there any way to remove this character from multiple text (in this case CSS) files at once?
NB I do NOT want to remove the whole line, just the one character(!)
Thanks
J
P.S. I am running on Windows7 (x64). I am using TextPad 7.3.
I have eventually managed to answer my own question.
Text Crawler and the use of a regular expression of "\x1c" appears to be the answer.
Fwiw, both Agent Ransack and FileLocator Pro filter out any characters in the ASCII range 0-31 (excluding 0x09 - tab) from the input field.
How are \r and \n different? I think it has something to do with Unix vs. Windows vs. Mac, but I'm not sure exactly how they're different, and which to search for/match in regexes.
They're different characters. \r is carriage return, and \n is line feed.
On "old" printers, \r sent the print head back to the start of the line, and \n advanced the paper by one line. Both were therefore necessary to start printing on the next line.
Obviously that's somewhat irrelevant now, although depending on the console you may still be able to use \r to move to the start of the line and overwrite the existing text.
More importantly, Unix tends to use \n as a line separator; Windows tends to use \r\n as a line separator and Macs (up to OS 9) used to use \r as the line separator. (Mac OS X is Unix-y, so uses \n instead; there may be some compatibility situations where \r is used instead though.)
For more information, see the Wikipedia newline article.
EDIT: This is language-sensitive. In C# and Java, for example, \n always means Unicode U+000A, which is defined as line feed. In C and C++ the water is somewhat muddier, as the meaning is platform-specific. See comments for details.
In C and C++, \n is a concept, \r is a character, and \r\n is (almost always) a portability bug.
Think of an old teletype. The print head is positioned on some line and in some column. When you send a printable character to the teletype, it prints the character at the current position and moves the head to the next column. (This is conceptually the same as a typewriter, except that typewriters typically moved the paper with respect to the print head.)
When you wanted to finish the current line and start on the next line, you had to do two separate steps:
move the print head back to the beginning of the line, then
move it down to the next line.
ASCII encodes these actions as two distinct control characters:
\x0D (CR) moves the print head back to the beginning of the line. (Unicode encodes this as U+000D CARRIAGE RETURN.)
\x0A (LF) moves the print head down to the next line. (Unicode encodes this as U+000A LINE FEED.)
In the days of teletypes and early technology printers, people actually took advantage of the fact that these were two separate operations. By sending a CR without following it by a LF, you could print over the line you already printed. This allowed effects like accents, bold type, and underlining. Some systems overprinted several times to prevent passwords from being visible in hardcopy. On early serial CRT terminals, CR was one of the ways to control the cursor position in order to update text already on the screen.
But most of the time, you actually just wanted to go to the next line. Rather than requiring the pair of control characters, some systems allowed just one or the other. For example:
Unix variants (including modern versions of Mac) use just a LF character to indicate a newline.
Old (pre-OSX) Macintosh files used just a CR character to indicate a newline.
VMS, CP/M, DOS, Windows, and many network protocols still expect both: CR LF.
Old IBM systems that used EBCDIC standardized on NL--a character that doesn't even exist in the ASCII character set. In Unicode, NL is U+0085 NEXT LINE, but the actual EBCDIC value is 0x15.
Why did different systems choose different methods? Simply because there was no universal standard. Where your keyboard probably says "Enter", older keyboards used to say "Return", which was short for Carriage Return. In fact, on a serial terminal, pressing Return actually sends the CR character. If you were writing a text editor, it would be tempting to just use that character as it came in from the terminal. Perhaps that's why the older Macs used just CR.
Now that we have standards, there are more ways to represent line breaks. Although extremely rare in the wild, Unicode has new characters like:
U+2028 LINE SEPARATOR
U+2029 PARAGRAPH SEPARATOR
Even before Unicode came along, programmers wanted simple ways to represent some of the most useful control codes without worrying about the underlying character set. C has several escape sequences for representing control codes:
\a (for alert) which rings the teletype bell or makes the terminal beep
\f (for form feed) which moves to the beginning of the next page
\t (for tab) which moves the print head to the next horizontal tab position
(This list is intentionally incomplete.)
This mapping happens at compile-time--the compiler sees \a and puts whatever magic value is used to ring the bell.
Notice that most of these mnemonics have direct correlations to ASCII control codes. For example, \a would map to 0x07 BEL. A compiler could be written for a system that used something other than ASCII for the host character set (e.g., EBCDIC). Most of the control codes that had specific mnemonics could be mapped to control codes in other character sets.
Huzzah! Portability!
Well, almost. In C, I could write printf("\aHello, World!"); which rings the bell (or beeps) and outputs a message. But if I wanted to then print something on the next line, I'd still need to know what the host platform requires to move to the next line of output. CR LF? CR? LF? NL? Something else? So much for portability.
C has two modes for I/O: binary and text. In binary mode, whatever data is sent gets transmitted as-is. But in text mode, there's a run-time translation that converts a special character to whatever the host platform needs for a new line (and vice versa).
Great, so what's the special character?
Well, that's implementation dependent, too, but there's an implementation-independent way to specify it: \n. It's typically called the "newline character".
This is a subtle but important point: \n is mapped at compile time to an implementation-defined character value which (in text mode) is then mapped again at run time to the actual character (or sequence of characters) required by the underlying platform to move to the next line.
\n is different than all the other backslash literals because there are two mappings involved. This two-step mapping makes \n significantly different than even \r, which is simply a compile-time mapping to CR (or the most similar control code in whatever the underlying character set is).
This trips up many C and C++ programmers. If you were to poll 100 of them, at least 99 will tell you that \n means line feed. This is not entirely true. Most (perhaps all) C and C++ implementations use LF as the magic intermediate value for \n, but that's an implementation detail. It's feasible for a compiler to use a different value. In fact, if the host character set is not a superset of ASCII (e.g., if it's EBCDIC), then \n will almost certainly not be LF.
So, in C and C++:
\r is literally a carriage return.
\n is a magic value that gets translated (in text mode) at run-time to/from the host platform's newline semantics.
\r\n is almost always a portability bug. In text mode, this gets translated to CR followed by the platform's newline sequence--probably not what's intended. In binary mode, this gets translated to CR followed by some magic value that might not be LF--possibly not what's intended.
\x0A is the most portable way to indicate an ASCII LF, but you only want to do that in binary mode. Most text-mode implementations will treat that like \n.
"\r" => Return
"\n" => Newline or Linefeed
(semantics)
Unix based systems use just a "\n" to end a line of text.
Dos uses "\r\n" to end a line of text.
Some other machines used just a "\r". (Commodore, Apple II, Mac OS prior to OS X, etc..)
\r is used to point to the start of a line and can replace the text from there, e.g.
main()
{
printf("\nab");
printf("\bsi");
printf("\rha");
}
Produces this output:
hai
\n is for new line.
In short \r has ASCII value 13 (CR) and \n has ASCII value 10 (LF).
Mac uses CR as line delimiter (at least, it did before, I am not sure for modern macs), *nix uses LF and Windows uses both (CRLF).
In addition to #Jon Skeet's answer:
Traditionally Windows has used \r\n, Unix \n and Mac \r, however newer Macs use \n as they're unix based.
\r is Carriage Return; \n is New Line (Line Feed) ... depends on the OS as to what each means. Read this article for more on the difference between '\n' and '\r\n' ... in C.
in C# I found they use \r\n in a string.
\r used for carriage return. (ASCII value is 13)
\n used for new line. (ASCII value is 10)