So there are some great examples on the net of how to use Mailkit to send an email via SMTP.
Typically ending with :
client.Authenticate(theSMTPUsername,theSMTPPassword);
client.Send(emailMessage);
client.Disconnect(true);
However this is no good if async is needed :
client.Authenticate(theSMTPUsername,theSMTPPassword);
client.SendAsync(emailMessage);
client.Disconnect(true);
However, what I would like to know is when an async Send has completed, or if it does not succeed. Under .Net native libraries this is achieved with a callback (event handler).
Is it possible to define a 'Completed' callback handler for a MailKit SendAsync, and if not what is best practise to discover if it succeeded or not.
Thanks
You don't want to have code like this:
client.Authenticate(theSMTPUsername,theSMTPPassword);
client.SendAsync(emailMessage);
client.Disconnect(true);
This will disconnect before the async send operation completes.
Instead, you want to do this:
client.Authenticate(theSMTPUsername,theSMTPPassword);
await client.SendAsync(emailMessage);
client.Disconnect(true);
Of course, once you await an async task... now you don't need a Completed event :)
That said, there is a MessageSent event that you can connect to:
http://www.mimekit.org/docs/html/E_MailKit_MailTransport_MessageSent.htm
Related
While I use .onDisconnect() I tried to then use remove() to delete a DatabaseReference, to remove the user from waiting room from database,
here is my code example:
lastOnlineRef
.onDisconnect()
.set(ServerValue.timestamp)
.then(firebaseController.removeThisRoom());
but it seems after onDisconnect() nothing can be sent to the server, do we have a better solution for this? thanks a lot!
The onDisconnect handler (set(ServerValue.timestamp)) runs when the client is no longer connected to the server, so there is no way for the server to notify the client at that point that it has completed the write operation.
I have created a basic REST API where a user can ask for an acronym, and the web-page will return the meaning of the acronym via a POST call.
The majority of my end-users don't use the Internet as much as they use the Microsoft Lync application.
Is it possible for me to create a Lync account, and have it pass questions to my API, and return the answers to the user? Meaning the user just needs to open a new chat in Lync rather than a new web-page.
I'm sure this is possible, but I can't find any information on Google or on the web. How can this be accomplished?
Thanks very much.
Edit :
Adding a bounty in the hopes of someone creating a simple example as I believe it would be very useful for a large number of devs :).
Yep, absolutely. UCMA (the Unified Communications Managed API) would be my choice of API to use here, and a good place to start - UCMA apps are "normal" .net applications, but also expose an application endpoint, which can be added to a user's contact list. When users send messages, that can trigger events in your application so you can take the incoming IM, do the acronym translation and return the full wording.
I have a bunch of blog posts about UCMA, but as of yet no defined collection of "useful" posts to work through, but coming soon! In the meantime, feel free to browse the list.
-tom
To elaborate on Tom Morgan's answer, it would be easy to create an UCMA application for this.
Create an UCMA application
Now this doesn't have to be complicated. Since all you want is to receive an InstantMessage and reply to it, you don't need the full power of a trusted application. My choice would be to use a simple UserEndpoint. As luck would have it, Tom has a good example of that online: Simplest example using UCMA UserEndpoint to send an IM.
Make it listen to incoming messages
Whereas the sample app sends a message when it is connected, we need to listen to messages. On the UserEndpoint, set a message handler for instant messages:
endpoint.RegisterForIncomingCall<InstantMessagingCall>(HandleInstantMessagingCall);
private void HandleInstantMessagingCall(object sender, CallReceivedEventArgs<InstantMessagingCall> e)
{
// We need the flow to be able to send/receive messages.
e.Call.InstantMessagingFlowConfigurationRequested += HandleInstantMessagingFlowConfigurationRequested;
// And the message should be accepted.
e.Call.BeginAccept(ar => {
e.Call.EndAccept(ar);
// Grab and handle the toast message here.
}, null);
}
Process the message
There is a little complication here, your first message can be in the 'toast' of the new message argument, or arrive later on the message stream (the flow).
Dealing with the Toast message
The toast message is part of the conversation setup, but it can be null or not a text message.
if (e.ToastMessage != null && e.ToastMessage.HasTextMessage)
{
var message = e.ToastMessage.Message;
// Here message is whatever initial text the
// other party send you.
// Send it to your Acronym webservice and
// respond on the message flow, see the flow
// handler below.
}
Dealing with the flow
Your message flow is where the actual data is passed around. Get a handle on the flow and store it, because it's needed later to send messages.
private void HandleHandleInstantMessagingFlowConfigurationRequested(object sender, InstantMessagingFlowConfigurationRequestedEventArgs e)
{
// Grab your flow here, and store it somewhere.
var flow = e.Flow;
// Handle incoming messages
flow.MessageReceived += HandleMessageReceived;
}
And create a message handler to deal with incoming messages:
private void HandleMessageReceived(object sender, InstantMessageReceivedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.HasTextBody)
{
var message = e.TextBody;
// Send it to your Acronym webservice and respond
// on the message flow.
flow.BeginSendInstantMessage(
"Your response",
ar => { flow.EndSendInstantMessage(ar); },
null);
}
}
That would about sum it up for the most basic example of sending/receiving messages. Let me know if any parts of this need more clarification, I can add to the answer where needed.
I created a Gist with a full solution. Sadly it is not tested because I'm currently not near a Lync development environment. See UCMA UserEndpoint replying to IM Example.cs.
I never used Lync but while I was looking at the dev doc, I stumble upon a sample which could be what you're looking for.
Lync 2013: Filter room messages before they are posted
Once you have filtered the messages, you just need to catch the acronym and call your custom code that calls your API.
Unless I'm missing something, I think you could do it with a simple GET request as well. Just call your API like this yoursite.com/api/acronym/[the_acronym_here].
You can use UCWA (Microsoft Unified Communications Web API),is a REST API.For detail , can reference as the following..
https://ucwa.lync.com/documentation/what-is-lync-ucwa-api
I am trying to setup some ServiceListeners, in particular two:
zeroConf.addServiceListener("100.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa.", myListener);
zeroConf.addServiceListener("_workstation._tcp.local.", myListener);
Whenever I do this, I get callbacks for myListener on serviceResolved() and serviceAdded() for all services that match "_workstation._tcp.local." However, I get no callbacks for "100.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa." ... despite the fact that jmDns sends out the queries, and a response comes back! I've attached a tcpdump of the request packets that jmdns sends out, and the response that comes back for it. However, the callbacks are not called so I never see the response in my application.
Does anyone know why this might be happening?
http://users.ece.cmu.edu/~gnychis/jmdns_nocallback.pcap
After some debugging of the actual event type that comes in, the event type resolves to "_tcp.in-addr.arpa." Adding this to my service listeners triggers the call back.
My code is for sending Emails to multiple users.User will click on send button,and rpc will be called. Now if user clicks on Cancel button .Ongoing rpc should be cancelled. . Can anyone help ?
I googled a lot, they have introduced the concept of Request Builder. But I am not getting any perfect idea.
Make your async method return a Request instead of void so you can call cancel() on it.
For the same reason, asynchronous methods do not have return types; they generally return void. Should you wish to have more control over the state of a pending request, return Request instead.
— Source: https://developers.google.com/web-toolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideServerCommunication#DevGuideCreatingServices
FYI, you can also use RequestBuilder as the return type, you'll then have to call the send() method by yourself (after possibly customizing the request, e.g. adding headers) to actually make the request to the server.
And of course, if you need to tell the server to abort the processing, you'll have to make another RPC call.
The request is asynch, so the client side can do anything it wants.
All you need to do is add a flag to indicate that the request should be cancelled, and then change the onSuccess method to check the flag and do nothing if it is set.
You should clear the requestCancelled flag each time you make a request - or else after the first request is cancelled, you won't be able to make another one...
e.g.
boolean requestCancelled = false;
void onSuccess(...)
{
if (!requestCancelled) {
// actual response handing code
}
}
If you really want to cancel the request on the server side, it is a lot more complicated. You could do this by sending a second request - one where the fuinctionality is to cancel a request.
To make this work, the "cancel request" has to set a field somewhere the "email request" can read. The "email request" needs to check if the "cancel field" has been set.
// server side Impl
void cancelRequest()
{
// You need to implement this class and ensure it really is a singleton
// and thread safe.
RequestStatusSingleton.setCancelled(true);
}
void serverSideEmailFunc()
{
while(modeEmailAddrs && ! RequestStatusSingleton.getCancelled()) {
// get next address and send email
}
}
Obviously this is a lot of work. Have you considered:
Not having a cancel button on your GUI?
Getting the server to process emails a few at a time (i.e. client sends multiple requests until server tells the client all emails are done).
I totally understand your user. No one wants to wait for 15 seconds.
There is no standard way to "kill" the request, because there is no way to know where your server/datastore is in implementing it. Unless you deal with a process that can be put in a single transaction that can be rolled back, you will have to implement your own logic. For example, if you asked the server to save an entity, you will have to tell the server to save this entity again, but this time without the changes.
Also, think again about your use case. Why a user wants to kill the request? May be he simply wants to go to another place in the app. Then there is no need to kill the request: when the response arrives, check if the user is still in the same place patiently waiting. If not, do not execute onSuccess().
I'm using OpenFire server for instant messaging and JSJaC JavaScript library on the client. I'm new in XMPP technology.
What I want is on load I want to send a list of users and receive status for each. Something like
$(function(){
var UserList = ["Isis", "Jackob", "Oybek"];
con.send(UserList, OnComplete);
});
function OnComplete(myList){
for (el in myList)
if (el.IsOnline) {
// Do DOM Stuff
}
}
Is it possible?
I've been looking for the documentation, examples and other similar responses but didn't find anyting.
You can't query for presence. You can subscribe to presence. If you send your own presence in, the server will send you the current presence of everyone you have subscribed to, as well as every change they make to their presence from there on in. There's no way to tell when you're "done" getting presence, because you're never done. Just set up a callback to do something interesting whenever you get a presence change from the person you are subscribed to, and you'll be in good shape:
con.registerHandler('presence_in', function(p) {
var from = p.getFromJID()
// do something interesting with p, from, etc.
});