Does Eclipse provide (possibly via a plug-in) the ability to search the local history?
E.g, I have a lot of history files and don't want to have to trawl through them all because I know that the version I want is the most recent which contains the string "slithy toves".
[Update] people answering similar questions on this site have not read the question – or it was badly phrased.
I am not looking to go to the local history (which do know how to find) and manually search through every entry, version by version. I want a single search function which will do that for me.
[Update++] the referenced question does not contain an acceptable answer. The only solution offered there involves creating a dummy project, which is more overehad than I care for.
Note: if it helps anyone, I found that the local history can be found in
Workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.core.resources\.history\
from which, I can use any file search tool of my choice
Manualy search the local history
My answer to the question is "No, you cannot do that search from within Eclipse".
Nevertheless, in this answer to another question you can see the (linux) command line (and the explanation of what it does) to search the local history structure if you know specific code that was in the file you seek (like you indicated "slithy toves"):
fgrep -r -c "[slithy toves]" * | grep -v ":0" | cut -d : -f 1 | xargs ls -l
I found that the local history can be found in
Workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.eclipse.core.resources\.history\
from which, I can use any file search tool of my choice.
However, filenames all look like 001ad08cc7790016142da217e60cb1a5, so I can't search for widget.c :-(
There is also no index, since I searched for files containing 001ad08cc7790016142da217e60cb1a5, hoping to find maybe some XML which told me the original file name, with a reference to 001ad08cc7790016142da217e60cb1a5, but I found nothing :-(
Also, some of the saved files seem to be binary, and I can't see how to configure Eclipse to save only *.c and *.h
Related
there is an --exclude option but that to exclude the directories/files. I work on a big project and want to only include the directories that has source code and not build stuff.
How to do that? What should I include in my .ctags file?
I use:
find FILES | ctags -L -
where FILES is the appropriate arguments to make find return only the files I want to index.
Exuberant Ctags (5.8) is now old and unmaintained, though. It still works for me, so I've not switched; but the last time I checked "Universal Ctags" appeared to be the way forwards, so I would suggest starting there:
https://ctags.io
https://github.com/universal-ctags/ctags
n.b. I experienced a curious bug with Exuberant Ctags 5.8 whereby find . resulted in some corrupted tag entries, but find * did not; so you might want to use the latter if using this approach. I didn't need to index any dot files at the root level, so I'm not sure offhand what happens for .* -- I don't think I tried it. Absolute paths were also fine, but then the TAGS file isn't portable. Potentially not an issue in the newer fork.
I have searched Google and StackOverflow and still have no clear answer on an easy and automated way of doing this but here is the scenario:
I have an app with 1000 strings localized into en, fr, de, es, it.
I build a new feature that makes 10 distinctly new NSLocalizedString() keys.
I just want those 10 new strings appended onto the ends of the files:
en.lproj/Localizable.strings
fr.lproj/Localizable.strings
es.lproj/Localizable.strings
de.lproj/Localizable.strings
it.lproj/Localizable.strings
genstrings will retrieve all 1010 distinct strings. This is a pain since I'll need to "needle in a haystack" find those 10 strings every time I do an update.
UPDATE 19-SEP-2014 -- XCode 6 - Apple has finally released support for XLIFF export and import of your .strings files
Whats new in XCode 6? Localisation
Linguan (v1.1.3) whilst it is a lovely tool most of the time, it is starting to be a tool in the other sense. It merges the changes but some strings aren't matching correctly when it merges, so everytime it does a Scan Sources it creates 100 new duplicate keys as well as the 10 strings I am after so it is making more work.
FileMerge As suggested below try doing a diff between old and new versions of the genstrings output files. The genstrings output has the strings sorted alphabetically so 10 strings scattered throughout 1000 means that there are 200 differences to review. it keeps matching the /*...*/ and the "..." = "..." and saying that the ... has been updated. It hasn't been updated, just shifted to a new location in the file. More and more it is looking like I am going to have to write a custom tool.
MacHG + FileMerge on a side note, for some strange reason doesn't like doing diffs out of the repository with the working copy of Localizable.strings. Both the left and right panes appear empty.
UPDATE: Turns out variations in some changesets being saved as UTF-16 and some as UTF-8 are screwing with it being able to do a proper diff.
Bash Script + FileMerge I have written the following script to help maintain my english reference file after each time I add new NSLocalizedString entries:
#LOCALISATION UPDATE SCRIPT
#
#This will create a temporary copy of the current 'en' reference file then generate the
#latest reference file using the 'genstrings' tool. Finally forcing FileMerge to launch
#and diff the changes.
#
#Last Updated: 2014-JAN-06
#Author(s): Josh Wilson
clear
#assuming this script is run from $SRCROOT
#Backup Existing 'en' reference
cp "en.lproj/Localizable.strings" "en.lproj/Localizable-src.strings"
#Scan source files for 'NSLocalizableString' macros
genstrings -q -u -o en.lproj Classes/*.{m,mm}
genstrings -q -u -a -o en.lproj Classes/iPad/*.{m,mm}
genstrings -q -u -a -o en.lproj Classes/iPhone/*.{m,mm}
#Force FileMerge to launch and diff the update (NOTE: piping to cat forces GUI to open)
opendiff "en.lproj/Localizable-src.strings" "en.lproj/Localizable.strings" | cat
#Cleanup up temporary file
rm "en.lproj/Localizable-src.strings"
But this only updates the EN file and I am lacking a way of having the other language files updated with the new keys. This one has been good for instances where I don't have an english word as the key and genstrings bombs my
"welcome_message" = "Welcome!" with "welcome_message" = "welcome_message"
POEditor http://poeditor.com/. This is an online tool and subscription based after 1000 strings. Seems to work well but it would be good if there was a non subscription based tool.
Traducto Pro Seems to do an alright job of integrating with XCode and extracting the strings and merging things together. But it is impossible to get anything back out of it until it is fully translated so you are coerced into using their translation services.
Surely this functionality has been implemented before. How does Apple keep their Apps localised?
Script junkies, I call upon thee! iOS development has been going on for some time now and localisation is kind of common, surely there is a mature solution to this by now?
Python Script update_strings.py: Stackoverflow finally recommended a related question and the python script in this answer Best practice using NSLocalizedString looks promising...
Tested it and in its current form (31-MAY-2013) it doesn't handle multiline comments if you have duplicate comments entries (expects single line comments).
Might just need to tweak the regex's a bit.
Checkout BartyCrouch, it perfectly solves your problem. Also it is open source, actively maintained and can be easily installed and integrated within your project.
Install BartyCrouch via Homebrew:
brew install bartycrouch
Alternatively, install it via Mint:
mint install Flinesoft/BartyCrouch
Incrementally update your Localizable.strings files:
$ bartycrouch update
This will do exactly what you were looking for.
In order to keep your Storyboards/XIBs Strings files updated over time I highly recommend adding a build script (instructions on how to add a build script here):
if which bartycrouch > /dev/null; then
bartycrouch update -x
bartycrouch lint -x
else
echo "warning: BartyCrouch not installed, download it from https://github.com/Flinesoft/BartyCrouch"
fi
In addition to incrementally updating your Storyboards/XIBs Strings files this will also make sure your Localizable.strings files stay updated with newly added keys in code using NSLocalizedString and show warnings for duplicate keys or empty values.
Make sure to checkout BartyCrouch on GitHub for additional information.
if you have the genstrings for the previous version, just a "diff" between new and old could do the tricks
EDIT: best use vimdiff to deal with utf-16 files
You can check out this Xcode Plugin I built for OneSky, it aims to improve the localization work flow for iOS/Mac OSX developers.
The string generation feature of the plugin runs genstrings and ibtool --export-strings-file to the selected source/IB files, new files will be added the project and target automatically, new strings will be merged into existing files with comments.
It will only generate/update strings for the base language, but you can make use of other features of the plugin to automate translation export and import with OneSky platform, which is free for crowdsource projects.
You may want to check out my solution here: SwiftyLocalization
With few steps to setup, you will have a very flexible localization in Google Spreadsheet (comment, custom color, highlight, font, multiple sheets, and more).
In short, steps are: Google Spreadsheet --> CSV files --> Localizable.strings
Moreover, it also generates Localizables.swift, a struct that acts like interfaces to a key retrieval & decoding for you (You have to manually specify a way to decode String from key though).
Why is this great?
You no longer need have a key as a plain string all over the places.
Wrong keys are detected at compile time.
Xcode can do autocomplete, so you can do something like this:
// It's defined as computed static var, so it's up-to-date every time you call.
// You can also have your custom retrieval method there.
button.setTitle(Localizables.login.button_title_login, forState: .Normal)
The project uses Google App Script to convert Sheets --> CSV Python script to convert CSV files --> Localizable.strings
You can have a quick look at this example sheet to know what's possible.
I am interested in looking at a list of directories and comparing the previous list with a current list of directories and setting up a script to do so. Maybe in perl or as a shell script.
Should I use something like diff? Programatically, what would be an ideal way to do this? For example let say I output the diff to an output file, if there is no diff then exit, if there is results, I want to see it.
Let's for example I have the following directories today:
/foo/bar/staging/abc
/foo/bar/staging/def
/foo/bar/staging/a1b2c3
Next day would look like this where a directory is either added, or renamed:
/foo/bar/staging/abc
/foo/bar/staging/def
/foo/bar/staging/ghi
/foo/bar/staging/a1b2c4
There might be better ways, but the way I typically do something like this is to run a find command in each directory root, and pipe the output to separate files. You can then diff the files using the diff tool of your choice. If you want to filter out certain directories or files, you can throw in some grep or grep -v commands in the pipeline, or you can experiment with options on the find command.
The other main option is to find a diff tool that offers directory/folder comparisons. Most of the goods ones support this, but I like the command line method, because you get more control over what you're diffing.
cd /my/directory/one
find . -print | sort > /temp/one.txt
cd /my/directory/two
find . -print | sort > /temp/two.txt
diff /temp/one.txt /temp/two.txt
also check the inotifywait command. it allows you to monitor files in RT.
You might also consider the find command using the -newer switch.
The usage is:
find . -newer timefile.txt -print
The -newer switch makes find return a list of files that are created or updated after the specified file's modification time. In the example above, any file created or updated after timefile.txt would be returned. You'd have to create a timefile.txt file, most likely once per day. Some versions of find have variations of newer that compare against other time stamps for a file (last modified, last accessed, last created, etc.)
This technique would not report a file that was deleted, however. A daily diff of the file listings could report that.
I've looked through several similar questions, but either I didn't understand their answer or my question is different than theirs. So, I have a project contains many subdirecties and different type of files. I would like to search a function name among those .C files only.
Some information on the web suggest to use "Esc x dired-do-query-replace-regexp". However, this will search not just C files, but also other file like .elf which isn't helpfule in my case. Other people sugget to use TAG function, but it will require me to type "etags *.c" for every subdirectory which is also impossible.
How should I do this while working on those large scale software project?
Thanks
Lee
Use ack-grep on linux
ack-grep "keyword" -G *.c
My favorite: igrep-find, found in the package igrep.el. Usage is:
M-x igrep-find some_thing RET *.C
There's the built in grep-find, docs here, but I find it awkward to use.
For a more general answer, see this similar question: Using Emacs For Big Big Projects.
if you're on linux, you can use grep to find files with a certain text in them. you would then do this outside of emacs, in your shell/command prompt. here's a nice syntax:
grep --color=auto --include=*.c -iRnH 'string to search for' /dir/to/search/
the directory to search can be specified relative, so if you're in the directory you want to use as the root directory for your recursive search, you can just skip the whole directory address and specify a single dot.
grep --color=auto --include=*.c -iRnH 'string to search for' .
the part --color=auto makes some text highlighted. --include=*.c is the part that specifies what files to search. in this case, only files with the c-extension. the flag i makes stuff case insensitive, the flag R makes the search recursive, the flag n adds the line number to the report, and the flag H adds the file path to the report.
To breed find and grep there is find-grep function, there you can change the invocation string to find . -name *.c etc. Make it a function, if You like. Then You use eg. C-x` et al. to navigate the results.
To search among the files in one directory i use lgrep, it prompts you in which files to search.
You can use cscope and xcscope.el : http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/CScopeAndEmacs
Try with dired: place the cursor on the directory name to search, type A and in the minibuffer the text to find.
I've been playing around with git and hg lately and then suddenly it occurred to me that this kind of thing will be great for documents.
I've a document which I edit in DOCX and export as PDF. I tried using both git and hg to version control it and turns out with hg you end up tracking only binary and diff-ing isn't meaningful. Although with git I can meaningfully diff DOCX (haven't tried on PDF yet) I was wondering if there is a better way to do it than I'm doing it right now. (Ideally, not having to leave Word to diff will be the best solution.)
There are two different concepts here - one is "can the version control system make some intelligent judgements about the contents of files?" - so that it can store just delta information between revisions (and do things like assign responsibility to individual parts of a file).
The other is 'do I have a file comparison tool which is useful for the types of files I have in the version control system'. Version control systems tend to come with file comparison tools which are inferior to dedicated alternatives. But they can pretty much always be linked to better diff programs - either for all file types or specific ones.
So it's common to use, for example, Beyond Compare as a general compare tool, with Word as a dedicated Word document comparer.
Different version control systems differ as to how good people perceive them to be at handling 'binaries', but that's often as much to do with handling huge files and providing exclusive locking as it is to do with file comparison.
http://tortoisehg.bitbucket.io/ includes a plugin called docdiff that integrates Word and Excel diff'ing.
You can use Beyond Compare as external diff tool for hg. Add to/change your user mercurial.ini as:
[extdiff]
cmd.vdiff = c:/path/to/BCompare.exe
Then get Beyond Compare file viewer rule for docx.
Now you should be able to compare two versions of docx in Beyond Compare.
This article outlines the solution for Docx using Pandoc
While this post outlines solution for PDF using pdf2html.
Only for docx, I compiled instructions for multiple places here: https://gist.github.com/nachocab/6429893
# download docx2txt by Sandeep Kumar
wget -O docx2txt.pl http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~kinzler/home/binp/docx2txt
# make a wrapper
echo '#!/bin/bash
docx2txt.pl $1 -' > docx2txt
chmod +x docx2txt
# make sure docx2txt.pl and docx2txt are your current PATH. Here's a guide
http://shapeshed.com/using_custom_shell_scripts_on_osx_or_linux/
mv docx2txt docx2txt.pl ~/bin/
# set .gitattributes (unfortunately I don't this can't be set by default, you have to create it for every project)
echo "*.docx diff=word" > .git/info/attributes
# add the following to ~/.gitconfig
[diff "word"]
binary = true
textconv = docx2txt
# add a new alias
[alias]
wdiff = diff --color-words
# try it
git init
# create my_file.docx, add some content
git add my_file.docx
git commit -m "Initial commit"
# change something in my_file.docx
git wdiff my_file.docx
# awesome!
It works great on OSX
If you happen to use a Mac, I wrote a git merge driver that can use Microsoft Word and tracked changes to merge and show conflicts between any file types Word can read & write.
http://github.com/jasmas/wordMerge
I say 'if you happen to use a Mac' because the driver I wrote uses AppleScript, primarily to accomplish this task.
It'd be nice to add a vbscript version to the project, but at the moment I don't have a Windows environment for testing. Anyone with some basic scripting knowledge should be able to take a look at what I'm doing and duplicate it in vbscript, powershell or whatever on Windows.
I used SVN (yes, in 2020 :-)) with TortoiseSVN on Windows. It has a built-in function to compare DOCX files (it opens Microsoft Word in a mode where your screen is divided into four parts: the file after the changes, before the changes, with changes highlighted and a list of changes). Screenshot below (sorry for the Polish version of MS Word). I also checked TortoiseGIT and it also has this functionality. I've read that TortoiseHG has it as well.