I want to clone an existing collection, including data and indexes, to a new collection with another name within the same database, using mongodb JSON interface (not the command-line interface).
I've tried:
cloneCollection - didn't work. is for cloning across databases.
aggregate with an $out operator - that copies just the data but not the indexes.
The aggregate command I've tried:
{"aggregate":"orig_coll", "pipeline":[{"$out":"orig_clone"}]}
There is no way to do this in one JSON query.
So, two solutions here :
Using mongodump/mongorestore as proposed in What's the fastest way to copy a collection within the same database?
Using two queries : one to create the destination table with the index and the aggregate query that you already have. I understand that it's not a perfect solution as you need to maintain the query to create the index on the destination table and the index on the source table but there's no other way to do this.
What you need to understand is that, the JSON interface as you told it is not a database interface but a database JavaScript query language. So you can pass query to it not command. In fact, it's not an interface just a query DSL. The interface is the mongo shell or any of the mongo drivers (java, perl, ...) or any of the mongo admin tools ...
Related
I consider using mongo db triggers for some data maintenance.
I will need to:
rename collection
create new collection
copy index from one collection to another
Is it possible using triggers?
I couldn't find it yet in the documentation.
Does mongodb have some analogue of SHOW CREATE TABLE in mysql which shows create query for collection?
Or can I create another collection like existing one with all settings?
There no analogs for SHOW CREATE TABLE.
But maybe you will find a some usufull functions there https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/reference/command/nav-administration/
For example the information about indexes you can retrieve with getIndexes function.
Create the indexes you can via createIndexes function.
Example:
var indexes = db.collection.getIndexes();
db.collection.createIndexes(indexes);
Use MongoDB compass : Visualize, understand, and work with your data through an intuitive GUI.
https://www.mongodb.com/products/compass?_bt=208952627176&_bk=mongodb%20compass&_bm=e&_bn=g&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=Americas_US_CorpEntOnly_Brand_Alpha_FM&utm_keyword=mongodb%20compass&utm_device=c&utm_network=g&utm_medium=cpc&utm_creative=208952627176&utm_matchtype=e&_bt=208952627176&_bk=mongodb%20compass&_bm=e&_bn=g&jmp=search&gclid=Cj0KCQiAmITRBRCSARIsAEOZmr6S3Hw_plZO3dbZS7UGwhU2hS-EGz2vB1SR5tAuMOGd-6j82FkQunIaAgDQEALw_wcB
There is no good answer to this question because the schema involved when dealing with schema-less databases like MongoDB is dictated by the application, not the database.
The database will shove in whatever it is given as there is nothing enforcing a consistent document structure within a given collection, even though all access to the database should be controlled through some kind of wrapper. In conclusion, the only place you should look at for the schema is your model classes.
Is there a way to switch off the ability of mongo to sporadically create dbs and collections as soon as it sees one in a query. I run queries on the mongo console all the time and mistype a db or collection name, causing mongo to just create one. There should be a switch to have mongo only explicitly create dbs and collections. I can't find one on the docs.
To be clear, MongoDB does not auto create collections or databases on queries. For collections, they are auto created when you actually save data to them. You can test this yourself, run a query on a previously unknown collection in a database like this:
use unknowndb
db.unknowncollection.find()
show collections
No collection named "unknowncollection" shows up until you insert or save into it.
Databases are a bit more complex. A simple "use unknowndb" will not auto create the database. However, if after you do that you run something like "show collections" it will create the empty database.
I agree, an option to control this behavior would be great. Happy to vote for it if you open a Jira ticket at mongoDB.
No, implicit creation of collections and DBs is a feature of the console and may not be disabled. You might take a look at the security/authorization/role features of 2.6 and see if anything might help (although there's not something that exactly matches your request as far as I know).
I'd suggest looking through the MongoDB issues/bug/requests database system here to and optionally add the feature request if it doesn't already exist.
For people who are using Mongoose, a new database will get created automatically if your Mongoose Schema contains any form of index. This is because Mongo needs to create a database before it can insert said index.
Is there a way to switch off the ability of mongo to sporadically create dbs and collections as soon as it sees one in a query. I run queries on the mongo console all the time and mistype a db or collection name, causing mongo to just create one. There should be a switch to have mongo only explicitly create dbs and collections. I can't find one on the docs.
To be clear, MongoDB does not auto create collections or databases on queries. For collections, they are auto created when you actually save data to them. You can test this yourself, run a query on a previously unknown collection in a database like this:
use unknowndb
db.unknowncollection.find()
show collections
No collection named "unknowncollection" shows up until you insert or save into it.
Databases are a bit more complex. A simple "use unknowndb" will not auto create the database. However, if after you do that you run something like "show collections" it will create the empty database.
I agree, an option to control this behavior would be great. Happy to vote for it if you open a Jira ticket at mongoDB.
No, implicit creation of collections and DBs is a feature of the console and may not be disabled. You might take a look at the security/authorization/role features of 2.6 and see if anything might help (although there's not something that exactly matches your request as far as I know).
I'd suggest looking through the MongoDB issues/bug/requests database system here to and optionally add the feature request if it doesn't already exist.
For people who are using Mongoose, a new database will get created automatically if your Mongoose Schema contains any form of index. This is because Mongo needs to create a database before it can insert said index.
I am currently evaluating mongodb for a project I have started but I can't find any information on what the equivalent of an SQL view in mongodb would be. What I need, that an SQL view provides, is to lump together data from different tables (collections) into a single collection.
I want nothing more than to clump some documents together and label them as a single document. Here's an example:
I have the following documents:
cc_address
us_address
billing_address
shipping_address
But in my application, I'd like to see all of my addresses and be able to manage them in a single document.
In other cases, I may just want a couple of fields from collections:
I have the following documents:
fb_contact
twitter_contact
google_contact
reddit_contact
each of these documents have fields that align, like firstname lastname and email, but they also have fields that don't align. I'd like to be able to compile them into a single document that only contains the fields that align.
This can be accomplished by Views in SQL correct? Can I accomplish this kind of functionality in MongoDb?
The question is quite old already. However, since mongodb v3.2 you can use $lookup in order to join data of different collections together as long as the collections are unsharded.
Since mongodb v3.4 you can also create read-only views.
There are no "joins" in MongoDB. As said by JonnyHK, you can either enormalize your data or you use embedded documents or you perform multiple queries
However, you could also use Map-Reduce.
or if you're prepared to use the development branch, you could test the new aggregation framework though maybe it's too much? This new framework will be in the soon-to-be-released 2.2, which is production-ready unlike 2.1.x.
Here's the SQL-Mongo chart also, which may be of some help in your learning.
Update: Based on your re-edit, you don't need Map-Reduce or the Aggregation Framework because you're just querying.
You're essentially doing joins, querying multiple documents and merging the results. The place to do this is within your application on the client-side.
MongoDB queries never span more than a single collection as there is no support for joins. So if you have related data you need available in the results of a query you must either add that related data to the collection you're querying (i.e. denormalize your data), or make a separate query for it from another collection.
I am currently evaluating mongodb for a project I have started but I
can't find any information on what the equivalent of an SQL view in
mongodb would be
In addition to this answer, mongodb now has on-demand materialized views. In a nutshell, this feature allows you to use aggregate and $merge (in 4.2) to create/update a quick view collection that you can query from faster. The strategy is used to update the quick view collection whenever the main collection has a record change. This has the side effect unlike SQL of increasing your data storage size. But the benefits can be huge depending on your querying needs.