I have two "documents" that I inserted into my MongoDB database.
questionsList.insert({question: "When was the War of 1812", answer: "1812", answers: ["1811", "1812", "1813", "1814"]})
questionsList.insert({question: "What year did the US land on the moon?", answer: "1969", answers: ["1969", "1970", "1971", "1972"]})
I simply want to access the answer value from the second document. I have been reading the documentation and it doesn't seem to work. I can retrieve the answer value from the first document without issue: var str = questionsList.findOne({}, {question: 1}).answer; I presume that since I am using findOne I can't find any other matches. The problem is that I can't seem to pull up the second document and its corresponding answer. I have tried many different ways:
questionList.find({}, {answer: 1})
questionList.find({answer: 1})
questionList.find({}).answer
My ultimate goal is to compare this answer with one of the click one answers from choices What am I missing?
If I understood your scenario correctly, you are trying to retrieve a document based on the document index (Which is not the right thing to do, since MongoDB does not store documents in specific order).
The reason why findOne works is, because it just returns the first document in your collection.
What I believe you should do instead is retrieve the answer based on the question. Something like:
db.questionsList.find({question:"What year did the US land on the moon?"},{answer:1})
Update:
In the case of meteor.js
questionsList.find({question:"What year did the US land on the moon?"}).fetch()[0].answer
The reason whey we need to give [0] is fetch() returns an array of objects. (Since there can be multiple documents with same key)
The final step is:
questionsList.find({"question": "You are human"}, {"answer": 1}).fetch()[0].answer
We are treating it as any other object (i.e. the first within a list of objects and using dot-notation)
Related
Looking for a way to view the results of a query where the displayed fields in the doc are ordered (lexicographically in my case).
Example:
I'm getting back from a query one document, which is what I need. This document has 30 fields and I'm looking to see the value in one of them. My issue is that the order of the fields is, well, kinda random. Not sorted in any way I'm aware of.
Desired result
I am trying to query my collection and obtain every unique combination of a batch and entry code. I don't care about anything other than these fields, the parent objects do not matter to me.
What I have tried
I tried running:
db.accountant_ledgers.aggregate( [ {"$group": { "_id": { entryCode: "$actions.entry.entryCode", batchCode: "$actions.entry.batchCode" } } } ]);
Problem
I get unexpected results when I run that query. I'm looking for a list of every unique combination of batch and entry codes, but instead I get a list of arrays? Perhaps these are the results I'm looking for, but I have no idea how to read them if they are.
Theory
I think perhaps this could have to do with the fact that these fields are nested. Each object has several actions, each action has several entries. I believe that the result from that query is just the aggregated entry and batch codes found in each object. I don't know how long the list of results is, but I'd guess it's the same number as the total number of objects in my collection (~90 million).
EDIT: I found out that there are only 182 results from my query, which is clearly significantly smaller than 90 million. My new theory is that it has found all unique objects, with the criteria for "uniqueness" being the list of the batch and entry codes that appear in their actions, which makes sense. There should be a lot of repetition in the collection.
Question
How can I achieve the result I'm looking for? I'm expecting something like:
FEE, MG
EXN, WT
ACH, 9C
...etc
Notes
I apologize if this is a bad question, I'm not sure how else to frame it. Let me know if I can improve my question at all.
Picture below shows the results of the query.
EDIT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
I can't share any sample documents, but the general structure of the data is shown (crudely) in the below image. Each Entity has several Actions, each Action has one Entry and each Entry has one Batch code and one Entry code.
List item
You are getting a list of documents (each is a map or a hash), not a list of arrays.
The GUI you are using is trying to show you the contents of each document on the top level which is maybe what is confusing.
If you run the query in mongo shell you should see a list of documents.
It looks like your inputs are documents where entry code and batch code are arrays, if so:
Edit your question to include sample documents you are querying as text
You could use $unwind to flatten those arrays before using $group.
I want to get a single Observable from a collection, but I want to get it from a different field that is not the id. It is possible?
I do not want to do a query and limit to 1. I need to get a Single Observable not an array Observable.
Schema:
Code:
this.afs.doc<Credit>('credits/uid/'+ uid).valueChanges();
Error:
Invalid document reference. Document references must have an even number of segments, but credits/uid/d1Zt8sozYqb6H27lhoJgF1Gx2Cc2 has 3
I am not sure if I understand correctly, but I guess that you want to get document with particular uid field value, not using document id.
This particular error is related with common feature of Firestore, that every document has to be in collection not in document. So path values for documents, (nested as well) are always checked, if the segments (devided by /) number is even ex. collection1/doc1/collection2/doc2/collection3/doc3
As results in your code we have 3 segments (like credits/uid/<uid_value>) so this is the error.
I am not very familiar with angularFire2 itself, but I have done it in JS. The approach is normally to query collection and than use method on the results, which in classic JS returns Query object on which the same methods can be used as on CollectionReference (which extends 'Query' btw - reference 1).
Combining this approach with those references: querying and collection I propose following solution:
this.afs.collection('credits', ref => ref.where('uid', '==', <uid_value>)).valueChanges()
If uid_value will be unique you should get your doc.
Unfortunately I do not have any playground to test the solution so please let me know how it works - or if there will be any additional errors.
I hope it will help! Good Luck!
I have a dictionary. I need to insert column 2 into mongodb corresponding to column 1(key).
Say this is the dictionary:
values = {'a':['1','2','3'],
'b':['1','2'],
'c':['3','4'] }
Right now I am doing this:
for k,v in values.items():
col4.update({"name":k},{"$set":{"fieldName":v}})
But this takes 3 accesses to the db. Is it possible to do it one go like the way $in works.
In your code you are finding each document by name field and set its fieldName to v. There is no update operation in Mongo that can do such thing in one shot for multiple documents.
However there is a bulk insert statement which can be more efficient than multiple inserts or updates. http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/core/bulk-inserts/.
I thinks I previously didn't quite understand what you were asking and wrote the answer below, but I'm still not sure what you mean by $in. Perhaps you can provide example of data before and after update in DB, that way it will be absolutely clear what you are trying to achieve.
OLD answer ... (I'll edit it soon)
You need to restructure your loop. Build up a query (not running) by adding {field: newValue} to $set clause. After the loop is done you will have an analog of {$set:{"a": 1, "b": 1, "c": 3}}. Then you will update all fields in one shot.
Here is official documentation:
http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/reference/operator/update/set/
i would like to get a collection of documents with a specific one included (i have the _id field of this document).
The difficulty is to also get the 3 documents which precede and follow this document (in the inserting order).
I really doubt it is possible in one request because if i use the where rule to match the id of the document i want to get, i don't know how i could also match the other ones.
So i know i could do one find for the document and get the 3 oldest and newest with another find refering the date of the created_at field, but i am interesting to know if i can improve this treatment.