What is the proper way to search a table for every record that starts in a similar way? I have tried:
"THESE. WORDS" IN {example_one.job_title} and {example_two.status} = "A"
But I need all combinations, including "THESE. WORDS*" Adding the asterisk doesn't work, I guess because of how IN works.
To summarize information in the comments,
to limit job_title by the list of values in these. words, you need your field on the left hand side and the values on the right.
you may want {example_one.job_title} LIKE 'keyword*'
If you found this information helpful, you can upvote and/or accept the answer.
Related
I want to find a list of people that are missing at least one of these properties: Title, DisplayName, FirstName,LastName, Id, Email.
I have tried the below but get an error
"java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException"
If I only run the first three lines, I am getting results for people that do not have a DisplayName with empty values for that property, however there is no property column for Title.
g.V().hasLabel('people').hasNot('Title')
.or().hasLabel('people').hasNot('DisplayName')
.or().hasLabel('people').hasNot('FirstName')
.or().hasLabel('people').hasNot('LastName')
.or().hasLabel('people').hasNot('Id')
.or().hasLabel('people').hasNot('Email')
Why do you overcomplicate the query? Who not just this:
g.V().hasLabel('people').not(
has('Title').has('DisplayName').
has('FirstName').has('LastName').
has('Id').has('Email'))
However, it's not really clear to me what your expectation is (the statement "however there is no property column for Title" is kinda confusing), but maybe the rewritten query will already help you (if not, then please provide some sample data and the expected result, that always makes it much easier to answer traversal-related questions).
I am trying to get the price items for performance block storage that are generic (not specific to a certain datacenter). I can see that these have the locationGroupId set to blank or null, but I can't seem to get the objectFilter to work with that, the query returns nothing. If I omit the locationGroupId filter I get a result that contain both location-specific and non-location specific prices.
GET /rest/v3.1/SoftLayer_Product_Package/759/getItemPrices.json?objectMask=mask[locationGroupId,id,categories,item]&objectFilter={"itemPrices":{"categories":{"categoryCode":{"operation":"performance_storage_space"}},"item":{"keyName":{"operation":"$=GBs"}},"locationGroupId":{"operation":"is null"}}}
I am guessing there is something wrong with the object filter, any ideas?
If I filter on locationGroupId 509 it works:
/rest/v3.1/SoftLayer_Product_Package/759/getItemPrices.json?objectMask=mask[locationGroupId,id,categories,item]&objectFilter={"itemPrices":{"categories":{"categoryCode":{"operation":"performance_storage_space"}},"item":{"keyName":{"operation":"$=GBs"}},"locationGroupId":{"operation":509}}}
The reason it the first query didn't work while the second did was that I used the command "curl -sg" to do the request. While that eliminates the need to escape the {}[] characters - it also turns off escaping other characters correctly in the URL - like the space in "is null". Changing that to "is%20null" solves the issue.
I am posting this as the answer as I find it likely for others to encounter this problem.
If you search for an airport (aeroway=aerodrome) around brescia, italy, you will also receive a hit for a military airfield, which happens to be tagged as an aerodrome also (it's taggged: aeroway=aerodrome, landuse=military, military=airfield). To avoid this I want to search for aeroway=aerodrome but exclude [military]. I've tried [! military] and [military~"^$"]. Any suggestions?
This particular case may be rare, I realize, but the concept of negating multi-classed elements is useful. And multi-classed elements is not a rare occurance. In general, they seem to be complimentary, not conflicting, so it's not an issue. I also realize that I can weed out conflicting hits with some back-end processing. I wasn't expecting a military airfield to appear with a commercial aerodrome.
In any case, here is a shortened version of my query. I include node, way and relation in full query:
http://overpass-api.de/api/interpreter?
data=[out:json][timeout:25][bbox:45.400861,9.868469,45.641408,10.542755];
(node[aeroway~%22aero|term|heli%22][! military]; ... ) out etc
or:
http://overpass-api.de/api/interpreter?
data=[out:json][timeout:25][bbox:45.400861,9.868469,45.641408,10.542755];
(node[aeroway~%22aero|term|heli%22][military~%22^$%22]; ... ) out etc
If you try to run it, you'll need to include way and relation.
Also, as you can see I don't exactly ask for aeroway=aerodrome. I include terminal and variations on heliport. My experience has been that some aerodromes are tagged only as "terminal", so if you're looking for an airport, asking for "aerodrome" isn't enough.
The correct syntax for negation is as follows:
[military !~ ".*"]
Please see the documentation on the OSM wiki for details.
I need to filter issues by id. For instance, I have #1, #2, #3, #4 issues, and I need to show only 2nd and 3rd issues (#2, #3). Is it possible?
To show a special issue, for example issue #4, you could just write the ID in the URL like this:
https://github.com/unknown-horizons/unknown-horizons/issues/4
I would like to share a full example of how to filter by issues id
As previously mentioned you just need to type in the numbers of ID as e.g. issue: 1 2 3 and it will filter those tickets.
Expanding on Jana's answer above, you can also type the issue's ID (or several IDs) into the Filters' search bar without the hash symbol (#). For example if you want to see issues #66 #42 #17, you can just enter 66 42 17 to show only those issues.
GitHub provides many ways to search for issues, but no way directly to filter by a list of numbers. That's probably because in most cases it doesn't make much sense.
Instead of trying to see just issues #2 and #3, ask yourself what those issues have in common. Why are you trying to see them together, and hide the others? The answer to this question should point you in the right direction.
For example,
if the answer is "they are both assigned to the same person", search by assignee:
assignee:Alex
if the answer is "they are both labelled as important bugs", search by label:
label:bug label:important
There are many other ways that you can search. Finding the commonalities between the issues is the key to effective searching.
If those two issues have something else in common that isn't yet reflected in the issue tracker, you can always add a label to them and then search by label as above.
Could you please explain what is the difference between doc.Content.Text and doc.Range(start, end).Text
Actually, if I extract a string like
doc.Content.Text.SubString(start, lenofText)
and if I do the same with
doc.Range(start, start + lenofText)
I get correct result for doc.Content.Text but incorrect result with doc.Range ... do you know the reason? I need to find a text and then convert it to a Hyper LINK but the doc.Range does not give the me the correct results...
Your description is a little vague (for instance, how is it not the correct results?) but a document is actually comprised of as many as 17 story parts (which includes things like the main story [the document area], footers, headers, footnotes, and comments). 'Content' refers specifically to the main text story. ‘Doc.Range’ is broader and can include more than one story. If the results are not correct because it looks like the text is offset by a certain number of characters, it may be counting other stories. If you want to limit the results to the body text, specify one of the following:
doc.Content
doc.StoryRanges(wdMainTextStory)