Call XSJS Service from SAPUI5 Application in webide - sapui5

I am trying to make an ajax call to XSJS service. With the new webide, we need to use the destination to make a call to the desired service. I have already setup a destination for my HANA System and exposed an XSJS service. What's the process to call the service from my controller file (in SAPUI5 App)?
Note: I have added the destination created in cockpit to my neo-app.json file as below:
{
"path": "/TestDest",
"target": {
"type": "destination",
"name": "TestDest"
},
"description": "Test Destination"
}

I would use JQuery.ajax as it is stated here

Check this link : https://blogs.sap.com/2016/04/13/sapui5-application-consuming-odata-service-with-sap-web-ide/
or configure the service url in component.js or manifest.json

Related

Create Azure Data factory linked service or integration runtime directly in git mode wit rest api

I am trying to create linkedservices with restapi in gitmode but the linked service is still created in live mode. My API code was
PUT https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.DataFactory/factories/{factoryName}/linkedservices/{linkedServiceName}?api-version=2018-06-01&versionType=branch&version=test_branch
with a body
"properties": {
"annotations": [],
"type": "AzureKeyVault",
"typeProperties": {
"baseUrl": "https://xxxxxxxxx.vault.azure.net/"
}
Please is there a way to reference the branch and create this service in git mode
As per official documentation, Changes made via PowerShell or an SDK are published directly to the Data Factory service, and are not entered into Git.
Refer - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-factory/source-control

Deploy hosting only to custom domain?

I have my custom domain in Firebase as well as the pre-generated domains:
myproject-cb169.web.app
myproject-cb169.firebaseapp.com
www.myproject.ca
Now via CLI I want to deploy my website but only to my custom domain (www.myproject.ca). How do I edit the rules/targets for this?
My current/default firebase.json hosting settings:
"hosting": {
"public": "public",
"rewrites": [{
"source": "**",
"destination": "/index.html"
}],
The URLs you specify are all pointing to the same instance of the exact same data. There is no way to make the change only available on your custom domain.
If you want people to use only your custom domain, be sure to promote that one and not either of the default generated ones.

SAP Cloud Platform : Basic Authentication showing when accessing service in WEB IDE app. Why?

I'm using a the same destination on a number of apps, which are connecting fine.
Created a new app (using the same SAP WEB IDE template).
The Service is retrieved fine when selecting New/OData service from the project menu, proving my Destination credentials are fine.
Now, when I run the app. I'm getting a basic authentication window. Cancelling this means I can't connect to the metadata of the service and therefore can't retrieve any data.
https://webidetesting0837185-s0015641139trial.dispatcher.hanatrial.ondemand.com/SAPUI5-ABAP-SFI/sap/opu/odata/sap/ZSV_SURVEY_SRV/$metadata?sap-language=EN 401 (Unauthorized)
My username and password is not being accepted even though it's correct.
Any ideas?
If you User/Password is not accepted I think you missing some configuration in the backend, check the logs like ST22 or SLG1 for authorization issues. Also check if your destinations in Cloud Connector work properly.
To solve this in generell not using basic authentication, you need to work with SAP CP's destination service. Retrieving from onPremise or via AppToAppSSO as Type/Mode of the destination OR work with API Service on SAP CP. For first way change (destination service) reference in your SAPUI5 instead of relative paths in neo-app.json like this:
{
"routes": [
{
"path": "/destinations/SFSF_ODATA_PROXY",
"target": {
"type": "destination",
"name": "sap_hcmcloud_core_odata"
},
"description": "SFSF Proxy OData"
}
],
"cacheControl": [
{
"directive": "public",
"maxAge": 0
}
]
}
Make sure you enter the credentials for your backend (and not for your CP account for example). You can also try and maintain the credentials in the destination itself by setting AuthenticationType as BasicAuthentication.
I have already solved this issue with change Authentication as Basic Authentication

Kubernetes about secrets and how to consume them in pods

I am using GCP Container Engine in my project and now I am facing some issue that I don't know if it can be solved via secrets.
One of my deployments is node-js app server, there I use some npm modules which require my GCP service account key (.json file) as an input.
The input is the path where this json file is located. Currently I managed to make it work by providing this file as part of my docker image and then in the code I put the path to this file and it works as expected. The problem is that I think that it is not a good solution because I want to decouple my nodejs image from the service account key because the service account key may be changed (e.g. dev,test,prod) and I will not be able to reuse my existing image (unless I will build and push it to a different registry).
So how could I upload this service account json file as secret and then consume it inside my pod? I saw it is possible to create secrets out of files but I don't know if it is possible to specify the path to the place where this json file is stored. If it is not possible with secrets (because maybe secrets are not saved in files...) so how (and if) it can be done?
You can make your json file a secret and consume in your pod. See the following link for secrets (http://kubernetes.io/docs/user-guide/secrets/), but I'll summarize next:
First create a secret from your json file:
kubectl create secret generic nodejs-key --from-file=./key.json
Now that you've created the secret, you can consume in your pod (in this example as a volume):
{
"apiVersion": "v1",
"kind": "Pod",
"metadata": {
"name": "nodejs"
},
"spec": {
"containers": [{
"name": "nodejs",
"image": "node",
"volumeMounts": [{
"name": "foo",
"mountPath": "/etc/foo",
"readOnly": true
}]
}],
"volumes": [{
"name": "foo",
"secret": {
"secretName": "nodejs-key"
}
}]
}
}
So when your pod spins up the file will be dropped in the "file system" in /etc/foo/key.json
I think you deploy on GKE/GCE, you don't need the key and it's going to work fine.
I've only tested with Google Cloud Logging but it might be the same for other services as well.
Eg: i only need the below when deploying app on gke/gce
var loggingClient = logging({
projectId: 'grape-spaceship-123'
});

Azure Resource Group Template for App Services "Mobile App"

I'm trying to find the correct template to use for the App Service "Mobile App" for deployment via New-AzureRmResourceGroupDeployment
I've had a look at the template for Web App but doesn't appear to be anything to specify a type or kind for Mobile App
https://github.com/Azure/azure-resource-manager-schemas/blob/master/schemas/2015-08-01/Microsoft.Web.json
You can just add the "kind" property to a website resource, e.g.
{
"name": "[parameters('siteName')]",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"apiVersion": "2014-06-01",
"kind": "mobileapp" ...