I want to get result matches with all nodes contains property 'abc' value as 'xyz' or 'pqr'.
I am trying in below ways:
http://localhost:4502/bin/querybuilder.json?path=/content/campaigns/asd&property=abc&property.1_value=/%xyz/%&property.2_value=/%pqr/%property.operation=like&p.limit=-1&orderby:path
http://localhost:4502/bin/querybuilder.json?path=/content/campaigns/asd&property=abc&property.1_value=/%xyz/%&property.2_value=/%pqr/%&property.1_operation=like&property.2_operation=like&p.limit=-1&orderby:path
http://localhost:4502/bin/querybuilder.json?path=/content/campaigns/asd&1_property=abc&1_property.1_value=/%xyz/%&1_property.1_operation=like&2_property=abc&1_property.1_value=/%xyz/%&2_property.1_operation=like&p.limit=-1&orderby:path
But none of them served my purpose. Any thing that I am missing in this?
The query looks right and as such should work. However if it is just xyz or pqr you would like to match in the query, you may not need the / in the values.
For eg.
path=/content/campaigns/asd
path.self=true //In order to include the current path as well for searching
property=abc
property.1_value=%xyz%
property.2_value=%abc%
property.operation=like
p.limit=-1
Possible things which you can check
Check if the path that you are trying to search contains the desired nodes/properties.
Check if the property name that you are using is right.
If you want to match exact values, you can avoid using the like operator and remove the wild cards from the values.
You can actually use the 'OR' operator in your query to combine two or more values of a property.
For example in the query debug interface : http:///libs/cq/search/content/querydebug.html
path=/content/campaigns/asd
property=PROPERTY1
property.1_value=VALUE1
property.2_value=VALUE2
property.operation=OR
p.limit=-1
It worked with below query:
http://localhost:4502/bin/querybuilder.json?orderby=path
&p.limit=-1
&path=/content/campaigns
&property=jcr:content/par/nodeName/xyz
&property.1_value=pqr
&property.2_value=%abc%
&property.operation=like
&type=cq:Page
Note: property name should be fully specified form the type of node we are expecting.
Ex: jcr:content/par/nodeName/xyz above instead of just xyz
Related
I am setting a Variable in Grafana.
I want to create a Query, that only returns a subset of the labels with value app the ones I want to return are those ending in dev
My Query so far, returns all of the labels with value app successfully. However, I have been unable to successfully filter the values so that only a-dev b-dev and c-dev are returned.
How do I successfully apply regex (or alternative) to this query so that I can see the desired values?
Any help on this would be greatly appreciated!
I eventually figured out what I needed to do. Originally I was trying to use | to run regex on the results from label_values.
However, this format worked:
label_values({app=~".*-dev$"}, app)
and returned only a-dev b-dev c-dev as expected.
I'm trying to write a prometheus query in grafana that will select visits_total{route!~"/api/docs/*"}
What I'm trying to say is that it should select all the instances where the route doesn't match /api/docs/* (regex) but this isn't working. It's actually just selecting all the instances. I tried to force it to select others by doing this:
visits_total{route=~"/api/order/*"} but it doesn't return anything. I found these operators in the querying basics page of prometheus. What am I doing wrong here?
May be because you have / in the regex. Try with something like visits_total{route=~".*order.*"} and see if the result is generated or not.
Try this also,
visits_total{route!~"\/api\/docs\/\*"}
If you want to exclude all the things that has the word docs you can use below,
visits_total{route!~".*docs.*"}
The main problem with your original query is that /api/docs/* will only match things like /api/docs and /api/docs//////; i.e. the * in your query will match 0 or more / characters.
I think what you meant to use was /api/docs/.*.
I have a custom index for my products and I am using the Subset Analyzer. This Analyzer works great, but if you do field searches, it does not work.
For example, I have a document with the following fields:
"documentname", "My-Document-Name"
"tags", "1234,5678,9101"
"documentdescription", "This is a great Document, My-Document-Name."
When I just search "name AND tags:(1234)", I get this document in my results because it searches +_content:name.
-- However:
When I search "documentname:(name)^3.0 AND tags:(1234)", I do not get this document in my results.
Of course, when I do "documentname:(*name*)^3.0" I get a parse error saying: '*' or '?' not allowed as first character in WildcardQuery.
How can I either enable wildcard query in my custom CMS.Search webpart?
First of all you have to make sure that a field you checking is in the index with proper name. documentname might not be in the index it can be called _title, depends how you index is set up. Get lukeall and check your index (it should be in \CMS\App_Data\CMSModules\SmartSearch\YourIndexName). You can use luke to test your searches as well.
For examples there is no tags but there is documenttags field.
P.S. Wildcards are working and you are right you can't use them as a first character by default (lucene documentation says: You cannot use a * or ? symbol as the first character of a search), but there is a way to set it up in lucene.net, although i dont know if there are setting for that in Kentico. But i dont think you need wildcards, so your query should be (assuming you have documentname and documenttags in the index):
+(documentname:"My-Name" AND documenttags:"tag1")
I'm trying to create filters for a search on an Android app where a specific field in Algolia must exactly match the given String in order to come up as a hit. For example if Algolia has a field like "foo" and I only want to return hits where "foo" is equal to "bar", then I would expect that I would have to use a line of code like this:
query.setFilters("foo: \"bar\"");
Any guesses as to why this isn't working like I see in the examples or how to do so?
Ah, I thought that attributesForFaceting was done by setting what was searchable or not. It was on a different page within the dashboard than I was previously using. Thanks #pixelastic.
Normally a whereIn in Eloquent compares a value from a field to an array with options. I like to reverse that and compare a option to multiple options in the field:
field contains 'option1,option2,option3'
Model::whereIn('field', 'option1')->get();
Is this possible?
You can make your query using LIKE:
Model::where('field', 'LIKE', '%option1%')->get();
Documentation on the syntax is available here: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/pattern-matching.html
If you always add a comma , even after the last choice, like option1,option2,option3, you can use a bit of a more robust filter:
Model::where('field', 'LIKE', '%option1,%')->get();
And a comma at the start (or any other separator if that matters) would make it even better:
Model::where('field', 'LIKE', '%,option1,%')->get();
Otherwise you can have issues if one of your option is similar to another one at the end (if you have fish and goldfish as possible categories, using LIKE ',fish,' will guarantee that you don't match goldfish, while LIKE 'fish,' would match both fish and goldfish).
I'd recommend to store your categories like that: /fish/goldfish/water/ and then filter using LIKE '%/yourcategory/%'