I'm using NuGet tool in order to create a .nuspec using my .csproj.
The problem is always is generating me a file with a placeholders template:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<package >
<metadata>
<id>$id$</id>
<version>$version$</version>
<title>$title$</title>
<authors>$author$</authors>
<owners>$author$</owners>
<licenseUrl>http://LICENSE_URL_HERE_OR_DELETE_THIS_LINE</licenseUrl>
<projectUrl>http://PROJECT_URL_HERE_OR_DELETE_THIS_LINE</projectUrl>
<iconUrl>http://ICON_URL_HERE_OR_DELETE_THIS_LINE</iconUrl>
<requireLicenseAcceptance>false</requireLicenseAcceptance>
<description>$description$</description>
<releaseNotes>Summary of changes made in this release of the package.</releaseNotes>
<copyright>Copyright 2016</copyright>
<tags>Tag1 Tag2</tags>
</metadata>
</package>
I don't know why is dumping me the same content.
Any ideas?
If you look at the NuGet source code this is how it is currently implemented. It always adds those place holders.
You are supposed to replace them.
There is no way for the nuget.exe spec command to determine what they should be and it adds placeholders for values that you probably want to specify.
not sure if you've already answered this yourself, but I was thinking the same thing. I had some values in my AssemblyInfo.cs file and was baffled about why they weren't being injected into the .nuspec file. I think we were expecting the same thing: running nuget spec or nuget pack [csproj file] would generate a new nuspec file with the parameters injected.
Turns out Matt is exactly right, it's just not how it works.
The key answer is that actually, the values are injected into the package. Later, when you try importing the package you will find that the values from AssemblyInfo are correctly injected, according to this table. (Note also that some elements are NOT injectable this way!)
Personally I find it somewhat baffling why they would do that, where the .nuspec sometimes contains literals that totally comprise the file, while other times contains templating that must be processed to produce another 'true' nuspec file (that is internal to the .pkg and can't be easily read, mind you).
Cheers!
Related
I have multiple .nuspec files generating similar but different packages. All of these .nuspec files that contains 95% the same content.
I want to have all the files that is used in all packages in a external xml file that gets included in the .nuspec and only unique files are then directly specified in the .nuspec.
My idea is something like below:
<files>
<!-- generic stuff -->
<include file="common.xml"/>
<!-- specific stuff -->
<file src="client1\*" target="config\data"/>
</files>
Where common.xml contains something like <file src="common\*" target="config\data"/>.
The above obviously does not work with nuget. I see nothing in the documentation that will get me there. Any ideas how to bend nuget to my will?
I am trying to build a NuGet package that includes native DLLs which are to be placed in the output folder when a project uses the package. I have tried to use the several suggestions from this question, but I am always running in the same problem.
My current NuGet package layout is like this:
\build
packageId.targets
file1.dll
file2.dll
\lib
\netstandard1.4
assembly.dll
The contents of packageId.targets is:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<ItemGroup>
<NativeLibs Include="$(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)\*.dll"/>
<None Include="#(NativeLibs)" Link="$(RecursiveDir)$(Filename)$(Extension)">
<CopyToOutputDirectory>PreserveNewest</CopyToOutputDirectory>
</None>
</ItemGroup>
</Project>
This should, according to the answers of the other questions, lead to my DLLs being placed in the bin\Debug directory of the project using the package. However, they are not. Instead, they are placed in bin\Debug\packages\packageId\build.
Now I have experimented a lot, and I noticed more and more strange behavior which I cannot make any sense of:
If I move the DLLs to the root of the NuGet package (like one answer suggests) and change the .targets file accordingly, they are not copied at all. There also is no error message.
If I change the .targets file to only reference file1.dll in both Include= and Link=, both files get copied anyway.
So I wondered if some policy just ignores the .targets file and copies whatever is in build to that path in the output folder, but when I remove the .targets file, the DLL files will not get copied anymore.
Now I understand even less what's happening.
What do I need to change to get the DLLs copied right into bin\Debug?
The new way to handle runtime-specific assents in NuGet is to use the runtimes folder to place native assets:
\lib
\netstandard2.0
ManagedWrapper.dll
\runtimes
\win-x86
\native
NativeThing.dll
\win-x64
\native
NativeThing.dll
\linux-x64
\native
libNativeThing.so
\osx-x64
\native
libNativeThing.dylib
If the package is consumed from a .NET Framework project, you may need to add a reference to the Microsoft.NETCore.Platforms package wich provides the runtime graph (runtimes.json) for NuGet to provide proper RID mappings if you don't use base RIDs (e.g. win10-x64 falls back to win-x64 resources).
I have a nuspec template file (template.nuspec.pp) in the content folder of a Nuget package. When the package is installed, I modify the name of the nuspec file using an install.ps1 script to match the targeted assembly. I want the contents of the nuspec file to remain unchanged:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<package>
<metadata>
<id>$rootnamespace$</id>
<version>$version$</version>
<title>$rootnamespace$</title>
<authors>$author$</authors>
<!--<iconUrl></iconUrl>-->
<requireLicenseAcceptance>false</requireLicenseAcceptance>
<description>$rootnamespace$</description>
<copyright>$copyright$</copyright>
<tags></tags>
</metadata>
</package>
The replacement tokens are replaced immediately on installation, however - I was under the impression this should happen only when nuget pack is called. Why is this happening, and what need I do to prevent it?
In case folks wonder, my install.ps1 file is not touching the contents of the nuspec template.
Looks like the whole point of the .pp suffix is to denote that any variable enclosed by $ is replaced on package install. When I removed the .pp suffix, the files were then ignored by Nuget and not added to the content folder. In order to circumvent this, I had to add a non .pp suffix to the file (I used .txt) and then renamed it using an install.ps1 script in my tools folder.
I have a nuget package with content that I want to be copied to the build output when users install my package. There is support for this: NuGet ContentFiles Demystified in NuGet v3.3. However, it only works in projects that use project.json. The contentFiles are not copied to my build output when I have a project that uses packages.config.
Is there an alternative or workaround I could use in order to make my NuGet package work on projects that use either a project.json or packages.config?
A quick search on StackOverflow reveals the following question which I think covers what you are asking for:
Set content files to "copy local : always" in a nuget package
You can put your files inside a Content directory inside the NuGet package.
In your .nuspec file:
<file src="css\mobile\*.css" target="content\css\mobile" />
When you install that into your project it will add the css\mobile directory to your project and the files inside that directory.
However that only adds the files to the project. In order to get them to be copied to your output directory you would either need to use a PowerShell script to modify the project item's copy local information.
An alternative, possibly a better way, would be to use a custom MSBuild .targets file. This will be added as an import to your project and then inside your .targets file you can add the files you want and specify the copy to output information directly as though it was part of your project. NuGet .nupkg file content:
\build
\Net45
\MyPackage.targets
\Foo.txt
MyPackage is the id of the NuGet package above.
Inside the .targets file you specify the files (e.g. Foo.txt).
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project DefaultTargets="Build" ToolsVersion="4.0" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<ItemGroup>
<None Include="Foo.txt">
<CopyToOutputDirectory>PreserveNewest</CopyToOutputDirectory>
</None>
</ItemGroup>
</Project>
I'm wondering if I can suppress warning messages in the output from the nuget.exe pack command? Specific messages would be awesome, but I can live with suppressing all of them.
The nuget command line documentation mentions a Verbosity flag, but never really specifies what the valid values for that are. I've tried the following:
nuget pack mypackage.nuspec -Verbosity Quiet
But doesn't seem to do anything.
Here is an example of the nuspec I'm trying to pack:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<package xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/packaging/2010/07/nuspec.xsd">
<metadata>
<id>MyPackage</id>
<version>1.0.0</version>
<authors>Administrator</authors>
<requireLicenseAcceptance>false</requireLicenseAcceptance>
<description>My package description.</description>
</metadata>
<files>
<file src="mysourcepath\foo.dll" target="mytargetpath\foo.dll" />
</files>
</package>
The warning message I get is this:
WARNING: 1 issue(s) found with package 'MyPackage'.
Issue: Assembly outside lib folder.
Description: The assembly 'mytargetpath\foo.dll' is not inside the 'lib' folder and hence it won't be added as a reference when the package is installed into a project.
Solution: Move it into the 'lib' folder if it should be referenced.
I'm creating a nuget package that will be deployed as an application via an Octopus server. The assemblies in this dll do NOT need to be referenced by anything - this package should never be referenced as part of a build (we have other more logical packages for that).
I want to suppress this warning because the actual package I'm creating has thousands of files, none of which are in the lib folder. The output noise from this one warning is making it difficult to see any other legitimate warnings I might be interested in.
UPDATE: This package is packed from a custom nuspec file - it consists of the output of hundreds of projects, so specifying a project file is not a viable option for eliminating the warning. FWIW, specifying a project file does eliminate the warning, because it ends up putting the project output into a lib folder - which is what I'm trying to avoid.
TIA for any input.
First of all, nuget reference clearly specifies what the valid values are for Verbosity.In the link you have provided under the pack command section:
Display this amount of details in the output: normal, quiet, (v2.5) detailed.
Try packing your project file instead of .nuspec file if possible, use lowercase for quiet flag and use -NoPackageAnalysis:
nuget pack myproject.proj -Verbosity quiet -NoPackageAnalysis
The -nopackageanalysis flag will suppress the warning, even when using a .nuspec file.
You might also consider using Octopack, if it's an option. Octopack was designed to create packages specifically for Octopus Deploy (i.e., no lib folder, no spurious warning messages, etc.) It uses NuGet under the hood so you can still use it with a .nuspec file as well.
You can pass specific properties into the NuGet CLI, including "NoWarn":
nuget.exe pack package.nuspec -Properties NoWarn=NU5104
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/reference/cli-reference/cli-ref-pack#suppressing-pack-warnings