How to Edit the Pub/Sub url after publishing the application - publish-subscribe

We published the wrong Pub/Sub url by mistake. How can we edit the Pub/Sub url after publishing the application?

To change a URL for a published app, please email apisupport # jawbone.com for assistance.
When an app is published, any UP user can connect to that app. For this reason, Jawbone chooses to err on the side of security for the user's data and requires a manual review of any app changes.

Related

Facebook periodic review is unclear

in order to approve your app’s continued operation on our platform.
Platforms affected: Connect URL.
Developer Policy 1.2: Build an app that is stable and easily navigable.Some common violations of this policy include:
- Broken Facebook integration (e.g. broken share, like or comment functionality)
- Broken user experience in the app (e.g. app has broken links or user interface failures)
My app:
Using https://www.npmjs.com/package/hellojs v1.18.8 to query user info from facebook.
The request URL:
https://graph.facebook.com/v2.9/me?fields=email,first_name,last_name,name,timezone,verified&access_token=.....
calling out hello.js
hello(auth.network).api('me').then(function (json) {
App has no share, like, comment functionality and not really any user interface. Just our page offers ability to fill some data with facebook and then it remembers you with cookie.
Anyone has similar e-mail and what to do?
Our app does not use share, like or comment functionality neither do we provide any user interface for users (only the o. We are using Facebook to prefill some user data on our site.
Have the same unclear message "Platform affected: Connect Url".
I asked for a more detailed answer and received an answer the next day:
Thank you for your response.
Facebook periodically reviews the websites and applications which are on it. Your application is in its review process currently. We are required to test the Facebook login functionality in order to conclude the review in totality. However, we are unable to do so.
Unfortunately, we have not been able to locate a Facebook integration (Login, Share and Like) on your submitted platform. To help us conclude the review process, could you kindly share the details regarding the location of a Facebook integration and how to navigate to it on your website URL.
This review is essential to Facebook as we want to offer the best experience to users as well as developers like yourself. Please help us in bringing your application into compliance by working with us.
Alternatively, you could aid us by sending us credentials of a test user which is already registered and connected to an FB account within the app. You can get all the information related to creating a test user here - https://developers.facebook.com/docs/apps/test-users.
Please feel free to get in touch with us regarding any doubts or queries you might have.
Thank you for your patience and cooperation.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
My app contains the functionality of a facebook login. I made an instruction and a test user of the application so that Facebook employees could test the functionality used in my application.
Normally they write down what is wrong and explain how to fix it. If you are not sure you can reply them back and ask how to fix it. I manage to fix my issue which was similar to the one explain below by emailing facebook.
https://technuisance.com/facebook/facebook-policy-warning-for-app-solved.html
I got the same message from Facebook two months ago. In my case, I didn't find a solution in time and Facebook penalize me by deactivating the app.
Therefore, you must attend to it if you do not want the same to happen to you. Facebook uses software similar to this to check for failures on your site and assigns a score according to its performance. That's why they send you such a generic message.
I suggest you use PageSpeed Insights to receive a report on the performance of your website. In addition, the platform gives you suggestions for optimization and improvement; Surely there you will find some clue of what may be failing.

Azure Web App Bot Webhook Text With Facebook Always Drop On V4

I got a sample echo bot hosted on Azure Web App Bot, and link up with facebook messenger.
Every configuration setup correctly, when I type message in FB Messenger, some of my text were actually not receiving in /api/messages endpoint.
I used ngrok on Azure bot web app to replace it api endpoint with my local url and found out that some messages did actually fail to delivered to the endpoint.
I had setup my web app to be always on mode, and server location put in Central US. But it still has this performance issue.
Because our bot starting migrate to V4, and found out that the suggested action card always not responding after user click in Messenger (sometime it's works), it's normally reply with local bot emulator.
Any ways can improve this or minimize user lost their action in conversation due to the dropping message?
OK finally found out that delay/random reply caused was single FB page subscribed to multiple FB app.
Just try to make sure you only have a single page subscribe to a single FB app , else it will randomly send the webhook message to one of your subscribed app and cause the performance issue.

App review is required to get Facebook Webhook working. How to develop?

I'm developing an app which must interact with Facebook API Graph and also use webhooks to get live updates. Now I'm facing a problem I can't receive a live webhook updates until my app is reviewed and is not in development mode.
I've found a thread on a Fecebook for developers site describing the same problem and it got official answer - it is not possible. Use Test button in app dashboard to test your webhook implementation they said.
The problem is the Test button sends only one predefined data packet for each of possible subscription with predefined set of fields with fake values, but documentation defines much more fields and little to none information about which fields are sent in different situations (i.e. post added, comment deleted, comment edited).
I'm wondering how other devs solving this? May be there are some community driven reference for a different webhook interaction cases or else.
For now I can't find any information on detailed webhook format except official documentation on available fields (but not supported payload shapes).
Our current workflow looks this way:
create test app
implement webhook handler using only documentation
prepare test payload and check it is working
create a screencast of the app functionality using test payloads
go through the review process
when app is approved
make it live and check your implementation against real webhook payloads
You need to create a test app for your existing Facebook app
Once you do this, just accept the permissions for your app and set the webhooks on your own Facebook account.
Since you are an admin of the test app, you will be able to set webhooks on yourself without having to get your app approved.

Google assistant notification

Refer me to some ready made example of google assistant notification, I'm a tech guy I have already developed app with dialogflow(donot support notification yet), I have both google home and mobile assistant, just want to see google action notification in action.
There's this very detailed guide by Google with ready made code that you can easily adapt to your needs.
It offers code for Dialogflow as well as for the plain ActionsSDK.
Basically the steps are:
Ask for permission
React to it in your fulfillment code (confirming the user's decision)
Notifying Google's backend when it should send a notification to the user (you need a JSON web token). This last step has to be done on some backend which knows about when to send notifications
Those steps are outlined in more detail on the linked site and there's also described how to obtain the token.

Azure Logic App - Authorization Issue

In Azure Logic App, I added a Twitter connector, even after Authorizing the same, the Authorize button doesn't go away and I am not able to proceed.
Sajad,
Currently the default application associated with Logic Apps for Twitter is broken -- we are looking to fix it. In the meantime, if you associate the Twitter API App with your own Twitter App information (you can set one up for free), the logic app will run and authorize successfully. Here's some details on how you can do that. Let me know if you have any questions or issues, and apologies for the inconvenience
http://aka.ms/oauth_connectors