I'm new to using ObjectBox, so I've been trying to do some experimenting with its query system to familarize myself with it. One of the queries I've been unable to do is a query comparing two properties. Ignoring the errors they throw, these are some examples of what I'm looking to do:
// Get objects where first number is bigger than second number
boxA.query(ObjectA_.firstNumber.greaterThan(ObjectA_.secondNumber))
// Get parent objects where one of its children has a specific value from the parent
parentBox.query().linkMany(ParentObject_.children, ChildObject_.name.equals(ParentObject_.favoriteChild));
I know based on this question that it's possible in Java using filters, but I also know that query filters are not in ObjectBox for Dart. One of the workaround I've been testing is querying for one property, getting the values, and using each value to query for the second property. But that becomes unsustainable at even moderately sized amounts of data.
If anyone knows of a "proper" way to do this without the use of Java filters, that would be appreciated. Otherwise, if there's a more performant workaround than the one I came up with, that would be great too.
There is no query filter API for Dart in ObjectBox, because Dart already has the where API.
E.g. for a result list write results.where((a) => a.firstNumber >= a.secondNumber).
Using jqGrid free (version 4.15.6) to show very basic information about invoices (ie: date created, date due, client, total, status). The invoices grid only has a few pertinent columns that are displayed because it is just not needed to show more than that. In reality there are a lot of other invoice-related fields that are not shown. I would like to offer end-users the ability to filter the grid based on a lot of these other parameters that are simply not part of the grid contents.
I know jqGrid offers built-in searching, and you can easily just add hidden columns with all the data, but I feel this is not good for us--invoices contain a lot of data--data that is not necessarily present in just the invoices database table. We want the grid to provide many other filtering options outside of the base invoice data but we do NOT want to use the built-in filter options. Instead, I would like to use a separate HTML table with a bunch of search fields that our server-side code would know how to pull back). When one decides to invoke the external filter, we want the grid to load all invoices matching that combined filter. And if one chooses to navigate using the grid's paging buttons, we want the grid to continue using the original external filtering parameters.
Hope this makes sense. Maybe I am just overthinking this but I am fairly certain the grid is designed to use it's built in filtering/searching tools/dialog and I have not found anyway to override this behavior. Actually I have using an older jqGrid but that involved using jQuery to completely REPLACE the default pager with custom HTML and event handling. I never could figure this out with older jqGrid so I chose to write it myself. But that code is less than optimum and even I know it is subject to much criticism. Having upgraded to 4.15.6, I want to do this the best way and I want to keep it logical and practical.
I have tried using beforeRequest() and onPaging() events to change the 'url' parameter, thinking that if I modified the url, I could change the GET to include all of our custom filtering fields. It seems that does not work as the url NEVER changes from the originally defined value. Console logging does show the events firing but no change to url. On top of that, the grid ALWAYS passes its own page field, _search field, etc. to the server so the server NEVER sees the filter request.
How does one define their own custom filtering coupled with paging loader and still take advantage of the built-in paging events? What am I missing?
**** DELETED CODE THAT WAS ADDED TO QUESTION THAT DID NOT PERTAIN TO ORIGINAL QUESTION ISSUE *********
It's difficult to answer on your question because you didn't posted code fragments, which shows how you use jqGrid and because the total number of data, which could be needed to display in all pages isn't known.
In general there are two main alternatives implementing of custom filtering:
server side filtering
client side filtering
One can additionally use a mix from both filtering. For example, one can load from the server all invoices based on some fixed filters (all invoices of specific user or all invoices of one organization, all invoices of the last month) and then use loadonce: true, forceClientSorting: true options to sort and to filter the returned data on the client side. The user could additionally to filter the subset of data locally using filter toolbar of searching dialog.
The performance of client side is essentially improved last years and loading relatively large JSON data from the server could be done very quickly. Because of that Client-Side-Filtering is strictly recommended. For better understanding the performance of local sorting, filtering and paging I'd recommend you to try the functionality on the demo. You will see that the timing of local filtering of the grid with 5000 rows and 13 columns is better as you can expect mostly from the round trip to the server and processing of server side filtering on some very good organized database. It's the reason why I recommend to consider to use client side sorting (or loadonce: true, forceClientSorting: true options) as far it's possible.
If you need to filter data on the server then you need just send additional parameters to the server on every request. One can do that by including additional parameters in postData. See the old answer for additional details. Alternatively one can use serializeGridData to extend/modify the data, which will be set to the server.
After the data are loaded from the server, it could be sorted and filtered locally before the first page of data will be displayed in the grid. To force local filtering one need just add forceClientSorting: true additionally to well known loadonce: true parameter. It force applying local logic on the data returned from the server. Thus one can use postData.filters, search: true to force additional local filtering and sortname and sortorder parameter to force local sorting.
One more important remark about using hidden columns. Every hidden column will force creating DOM elements, which represent unneeded <td> elements. The more DOM elements you place on the page the more slow will be the page. If local data will be used (or if loadonce: true be used) then jqGrid hold data associated with every row twice: once as JavaScript object and once as cells in the grid (<td> elements). Free jqGrid allows to use "additional properties" instead of hidden columns. In the case no data will be placed in DOM of the grid, but the data will be hold in JavaScript objects and one able to sort or filter by additional properties in the same way like with other columns. In the simplest way one can remove all hidden columns and to add additionalProperties parameter, which should be array of strings with the name of additional properties. Instead of strings elements of additionalProperties could be objects of the same structures like colModel. For example, additionalProperties: [{ name: "taskId", sorttype: "integer"}, "isFinal"]. See the demo as an example. The input data of the grid can be seen here. Another demo shows that searching dialog contains additional properties additionally to jqGrid column. The commented part columns of searching shows more advanced way to specify the list and the order of columns and additional properties displayed in searching dialog.
Forgive my answering like this but this question started out on one subject related to filtering and paging but with using an external filtering source. Oleg actually has several demos over many threads that I was able to use to accomplish the custom filtering and maintain default built-in paging. So his answer will be the accepted answer for the original question topic.
But in the solution of original, I encountered another issue with loading the grid initially. I wanted to have the grid load with default filtering values should no other filter already be in place. That really should have been a different question because it really did not affect the first.
I found yet another Oleg reply on a completely different question:
jqGrid - how to set grid to NOT load any data initially?.
Oleg answered that question and that answer solved our second need to load one way, then allow another way.
So, on initial load, we look for the filter params server-side. None given? We pull records using default filtering. Params present? We use initial provided params. The difference with initial loading we do not AJAX exit. We instead json_encode the data and place it in the grid definition as follows:
$('#grd_invoices').jqGrid(
...
url: '{$modulelink}&sm=130',
data: {$json_encoded_griddata},
datatype: 'local',
...
});
Since the datatype is set to 'local', the grid does NOT go to server initially, so the data parameter is used by the grid. Once we are ready to filter, we use Oleg's solution from yet another answer on yet another question to dynamically apply the filter as follows:
var myfilter = { groupOp: 'AND', rules: []};
myfilter.rules.push({field:'fuserid',op:'eq',data:$('#fuserid').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'finvoicenum',op:'eq',data:$('#finvoicenum').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'fdatefield',op:'eq',data:$('#fdatefield').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'fsdate',op:'eq',data:$('#fsdate').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'fedate',op:'eq',data:$('#fedate').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'fwithin',op:'eq',data:$('#fwithin').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'fnotes',op:'eq',data:$('#fnotes').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'fdescription',op:'eq',data:$('#fdescription').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'fpaymentmethod',op:'eq',data:$('#fpaymentmethod').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'fstatus',op:'eq',data:$('#fstatus').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'ftotalfrom',op:'eq',data:$('#ftotalfrom').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'ftotal',op:'eq',data:$('#ftotal').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'fmake',op:'eq',data:$('#fmake').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'fmodel',op:'eq',data:$('#fmodel').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'fserial',op:'eq',data:$('#fserial').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'fitemid',op:'eq',data:$('#fitemid').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'ftaxid',op:'eq',data:$('#ftaxid').val()});
myfilter.rules.push({field:'fsalesrepid',op:'eq',data:$('#fsalesrepid').val()});
var grid = $('#grd_invoices');
grid[0].p.search = myfilter.rules.length>0;
$.extend(grid[0].p.postData,{filters:JSON.stringify(myfilter)});
$('#grd_invoices').jqGrid('setGridParam',{datatype:'json'}).trigger('reloadGrid',[{page:1}]);
This allows us to have the grid show initial data loaded locally, and then subsequent filtering changes the grid datatype to 'json', which forces the grid to go to server with new filter params where it loads the more specific filtering.
Credit goes to Oleg because I used many of his posts from many questions to reach the end result. Thank you #Oleg!
I am working on Access 2007. I have a table with some fields in it. I had created a form from the table and one of the fields of the table is a concatenation of 2 fields from the same table.
There are 2 fields OppNo and Material in the table. I had created a form with these (and others in the table) fields. There is another field OppMat which is blank in the table. However, I had got the data into OppMat field populated as a concatenation of OppNo and Material fields in the form. I am now looking at having the table updated with the data of OppMat from the form to the same corresponding field in the table.
Kindly advise as how I could achieve this.
Thanks and regards,
This might be possible if these cases are met:
The field OppMat ALWAYS has the same structure and you can assure that it does.
Users will not be able or very unlikely to deviate from this structure.
Notably you should use something like Left(), Right(), Mid() and so on. Whatever works best for your structure. You can use the string modifiers: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd789093.aspx
On the other hand I must admit that I am sceptical if your solutions is the best. Here are my reasons:
Users are unpredictable and will continously deviate from your intended way to use the application.
Using the string functions and fixating on one structure makes your code construction inflexible, hard to maintain if changes occur and prone to errors.
The alternatives seem to be better with little drawback.
My suggestions for alternatives:
Use one textbox for each field so that you have two textboxes. You can even position them that way that it almost looks like it is continous text. But not too much otherwise the user will beconfused.
You can add a label that shows your concatenated fields. But for input you use two different textboxes.
Cheers!
I had a question as to the best way to hook some specific functionality into my Gravity Form.
I have a situation where I want to show a different set of dropdown options based on several different possible ranges of postcodes entered into a field.
One way I've tried to achieve this was with Conditional Statements, but the only problem I'm encountering there is that there are quite broad ranges for the postcodes that aren't super easy to work with, plus a few exceptions.
e.g.
New South Wales post codes can be:
1000, 1999,
2000, 2599,
2619, 2898,
2921, 2999
I could code this as a PHP function to validate and return a state, is there a way to hook that into the functions.php file? Or is there a better way to handle this?
Thanks!
Alright, I managed to come up with a solution for this by using a hidden select field as my conditional and then using on page javascript to check for entries to the postcode field and update the hidden conditional field manually.
I have an OpenOffice Calc spread sheet that I'm using to track some data. I have three charts made from the data. I periodically add more data to the spreadsheet. My current way to propagate this to the chart is to alter the data ranges manually of each chart. I'd like to automate this, or at least not have to redundantly change each chart separately.
My current idea was to do something like $A$1:$A{$F$1} for the ranges where $F$1 holds the current last line. Unfortunately, OpenOffice doesn't recognize this, but I thought there might be a function or work around for it. I haven't been able to find one yet.
So, is there a way to execute my idea, or perhaps a better way to do it?
There is a very similar question to this, but the asker asked for many more features and the answer was to use something other than a spreadsheet. It was never answered whether this specific feature was possible.
Also:
First method is to extend the range of the graph way down, with lots of empty space.
Second method is to include only one extra line of data in the graph and when you add data, always insert it above that line.