I are running Umbraco 7.4.5 with Dialogue 1.1 fanoe starter kit and Forms 4.3.3.
I have created a contact form and tested. all works great.
Now created and entire new form gathering entirely different information and put it on its own page. Are calling this for Dialogues when a user is not permitted to access to a topic.
Now I get this error when ever I try to submit either form.
An item with the same key has already been added.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.ArgumentException: An item with the same key has already been added.
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
Stack Trace:
[ArgumentException: An item with the same key has already been added.]
Umbraco.Core.Cache.HttpRuntimeCacheProvider.GetCacheItem(String cacheKey, Func1 getCacheItem, Nullable1 timeout, Boolean isSliding, CacheItemPriority priority, CacheItemRemovedCallback removedCallback, CacheDependency dependency) +963
Umbraco.Core.Cache.HttpRuntimeCacheProvider.GetCacheItem(String cacheKey, Func1 getCacheItem, Nullable1 timeout, Boolean isSliding, CacheItemPriority priority, CacheItemRemovedCallback removedCallback, String[] dependentFiles) +107
Umbraco.Core.Cache.DeepCloneRuntimeCacheProvider.GetCacheItem(String cacheKey, Func1 getCacheItem, Nullable1 timeout, Boolean isSliding, CacheItemPriority priority, CacheItemRemovedCallback removedCallback, String[] dependentFiles) +114
Umbraco.Forms.Core.Cache.CacheProviderExtensions.GetCacheItem(IRuntimeCacheProvider provider, String cacheKey, Func1 getCacheItem, Nullable1 timeout, Boolean isSliding, CacheItemPriority priority, CacheItemRemovedCallback removedCallback, String[] dependentFiles) +225
Umbraco.Forms.Data.StringHelper.ParseMemberPlaceholders(String value, Object memberKey) +1600
Umbraco.Forms.Data.StringHelper.ParsePlaceHolders(HttpContext context, Record record, String value) +390
Umbraco.Forms.Data.StringHelper.ParsePlaceHolders(Record record, String value) +61
........
If I delete the secound form in the backoffice (under Forms) the contact form works.
Has anyone got any surgestions where I start.
Related
We have deployed our DotNetCore Api to OpenShift after containerizing it.
Recently we observed that few POST requests are throwing 500 error. Below is the stack trace
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core.BadHttpRequestException: Reading the request body timed out due to data arriving too slowly. See MinRequestBodyDataRate.
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core.BadHttpRequestException.Throw(RequestRejectionReason reason)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core.Internal.Http.Http1ContentLengthMessageBody.ReadAsyncInternal(CancellationToken cancellationToken)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core.Internal.Http.HttpRequestStream.ReadAsyncInternal(Memory`1 buffer, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
at System.Text.Json.JsonSerializer.ReadAsync[TValue](Stream utf8Json, Type returnType, JsonSerializerOptions options, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.SystemTextJsonInputFormatter.ReadRequestBodyAsync(InputFormatterContext context, Encoding encoding)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Formatters.SystemTextJsonInputFormatter.ReadRequestBodyAsync(InputFormatterContext context, Encoding encoding)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ModelBinding.Binders.BodyModelBinder.BindModelAsync(ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ModelBinding.ParameterBinder.BindModelAsync(ActionContext actionContext, IModelBinder modelBinder, IValueProvider valueProvider, ParameterDescriptor parameter, ModelMetadata metadata, Object value)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Controllers.ControllerBinderDelegateProvider.<>c__DisplayClass0_0.<<CreateBinderDelegate>g__Bind|0>d.MoveNext()
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ControllerActionInvoker.<InvokeInnerFilterAsync>g__Awaited|13_0(ControllerActionInvoker invoker, Task lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ResourceInvoker.<InvokeNextResourceFilter>g__Awaited|24_0(ResourceInvoker invoker, Task lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ResourceInvoker.Rethrow(ResourceExecutedContextSealed context)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ResourceInvoker.Next(State& next, Scope& scope, Object& state, Boolean& isCompleted)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ResourceInvoker.<InvokeFilterPipelineAsync>g__Awaited|19_0(ResourceInvoker invoker, Task lastTask, State next, Scope scope, Object state, Boolean isCompleted)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Infrastructure.ResourceInvoker.<InvokeAsync>g__Awaited|17_0(ResourceInvoker invoker, Task task, IDisposable scope)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Routing.EndpointMiddleware.<Invoke>g__AwaitRequestTask|6_0(Endpoint endpoint, Task requestTask, ILogger logger)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization.AuthorizationMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext context)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.AuthenticationMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext context)
at Serilog.AspNetCore.RequestLoggingMiddleware.Invoke(HttpContext httpContext
Few solutions from StackOverflow show to update Program.cs with UseKestral with setting MinRequestBodyDataRate.
we are unable to reproduce this error when we run the Docekr Image in our local, is there a hack to reproduce this error.
The other way I tried it from Postman I have the content-length as some value 1000 and gave the post request body less than 1000, rather than calculating at when the request is sent. In that case Iam able to see the error "Reading the request body timed out".
How can I determine if this issue is because of Content-Length Header. I tried to see the request headers using Serilog, but not able to see them. Below is my SeriLog Configuration
options.EnrichDiagnosticContext = (diagnoticsContext, httpContext) =>
{
var request = httpContext.Request;
diagnoticsContext.Set("Custom Header Value", request.Headers["Content-Length"].ToString());
};
Other thing I found was for the POST Request that are showing the timed our errors have logged the time greater than 5 seconds
Did anyone face this error, any ideas on how to fix this ?
Using mirth version 3.8.1. I've set up an alert for a channel's errors. When errors come from the destination transformer (which is Javascript), the alert is able to access the {messageId} variable and pull the correct id. However, when an error originates in the Javascript-based database writer, the alert just returns '{messageId}' instead of the value.
I tried a bunch of things...
The global map is accessible from the alert, but putting a message id in there would get overwritten by another processing thread.
Other destination types - http sender, tcp sender, channel writer, and even a non-javascript-based database writer destination all work.
I even stripped the database writer code down to just:
var dbConn;
dbConn = DatabaseConnectionFactory.createDatabaseConnection('com.mysql.cj.jdbc.Driver','jdbc:mysql://host:port/dbname','','');
Do I just have to raise specific exceptions within the db writer code and raise alerts when those exceptions are hit, and send the message id in the error string?
You stumbled across a bug. I opened an issue and a fix.
If not for another bug that also neglects to provide the messageId, you should be able to use alerts.sendAlert('Custom Error Message'). alerts is an instance of AlertSender from the User API that mirth creates for you. I created a fix for that as well.
The only workaround I know of at this time to manually send an alert that includes the messageId is to call the EventController directly. The caveat is that this is technically not supported as part of a public API and usage could break in future versions without notice.
com.mirth.connect.server.controllers.ControllerFactory
.getFactory()
.createEventController()
.dispatchEvent(new com.mirth.connect.donkey.server.event.ErrorEvent(
connectorMessage.getChannelId(),
connectorMessage.getMetaDataId(),
connectorMessage.getMessageId(),
com.mirth.connect.donkey.model.event.ErrorEventType.USER_DEFINED_TRANSFORMER,
connectorMessage.getConnectorName(),
null, /* connectorType */
'A TEST ERROR MESSAGE',
null /* throwable */
)
);
This will work as written from a filter, transformer, Javascript Writer, or Database Writer in javascript mode. In other contexts, connectorMessage won't be defined and you'll have to provide some of those values in a different way. If you don't need the messageId and don't want to throw an exception, just use alerts.sendAlert(errorMessage) since that doesn't require calling unsupported internal classes.
I am using web form for marketer. Its working fine in my local and Dev Server but in CMS environment i am getting following issue :-
[InvalidOperationException: folder]
Sitecore.Form.Core.Configuration.ThemesManager.GetThemeName(Item form, ID fieldID) +434
Sitecore.Form.Core.Configuration.ThemesManager.GetThemeUrl(Item form, Boolean deviceDependant) +250
Sitecore.Form.Core.Configuration.ThemesManager.ScriptsTags(Item form, Item contextItem) +49
Sitecore.Form.Core.Configuration.ThemesManager.RegisterCssScript(Page page, Item form, Item contextItem) +184
Sitecore.Form.Web.UI.Controls.SitecoreSimpleFormAscx.OnInit(EventArgs e) +233
System.Web.UI.Control.InitRecursive(Control namingContainer) +186
System.Web.UI.Control.AddedControl(Control control, Int32 index) +189
Sitecore.Form.Core.Renderings.FormRender.OnInit(EventArgs e) +846
System.Web.UI.Control.InitRecursive(Control namingContainer) +186
System.Web.UI.Control.AddedControl(Control control, Int32 index) +189
Efocus.Sitecore.Renderers.SitecoreForm.AddedControl(Control control, Int32 index) +75
Efocus.Sitecore.Renderers.SitecorePlaceholder.OnInit(EventArgs e) +554
System.Web.UI.Control.InitRecursive(Control namingContainer) +186
System.Web.UI.Control.InitRecursive(Control namingContainer) +291
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +2098
This response comes a bit late, but I just saw the same issue on a CM environment today. I hope posting this saves somebody some time in the future.
If you look at the stack trace, the exception is thrown at
Sitecore.Form.Core.Configuration.ThemesManager.GetThemeName(Item form, ID fieldID)
This method looks at the Form ID that's configured as the Forms root ID in the site definition.
string formsRootForSite = SiteUtils.GetFormsRootForSite(Context.Site);
Item item = form;
if (form.TemplateID != IDs.FormFolderTemplateID)
{
item = form.Database.GetItem(formsRootForSite);
}
Assert.IsNotNull(item, "folder");
In my case, the configured ID did not match the actual item ID in Sitecore.
Based on the stack trace, it seems you have configured a theme for your site that is not available in your CMS environment.
If you have a scaled instance, make sure all nodes have WFFM installed, even the content delivery servers. Instructions for Content Delivery server installation are in the WFFM administrator's documentation.
If it is not a scaled instance, you may be missing a folder on the system for the Theme that you have specified.
I've started using the AspProviders code to store my session data in my table storage.
I'm sporadically getting the following error:
Description: Exception of type 'System.Web.HttpException' was thrown. INNER_EXCEPTION:Error accessing the data store! INNER_EXCEPTION:An error occurred while processing this request. INNER_EXCEPTION: ConditionNotMet The condition specified using HTTP conditional header(s) is not met. RequestId:0c4239cc-41fb-42c5-98c5-7e9cc22096af Time:2010-10-15T04:28:07.0726801Z
StackTrace:
System.Web.SessionState.SessionStateModule.EndAcquireState(IAsyncResult ar)
System.Web.HttpApplication.AsyncEventExecutionStep.OnAsyncEventCompletion(IAsyncResult ar) INNER_EXCEPTION:
Microsoft.Samples.ServiceHosting.AspProviders.TableStorageSessionStateProvider.ReleaseItemExclusive(HttpContext context, String id, Object lockId) in \Azure\AspProviders\TableStorageSessionStateProvider.cs:line 484
System.Web.SessionState.SessionStateModule.GetSessionStateItem()
System.Web.SessionState.SessionStateModule.PollLockedSessionCallback(Object state) INNER_EXCEPTION:
Microsoft.WindowsAzure.StorageClient.Tasks.Task1.get_Result()
Microsoft.WindowsAzure.StorageClient.Tasks.Task1.ExecuteAndWait()
Microsoft.WindowsAzure.StorageClient.TaskImplHelper.ExecuteImplWithRetry[T](Func`2 impl, RetryPolicy policy)
Microsoft.Samples.ServiceHosting.AspProviders.TableStorageSessionStateProvider.ReleaseItemExclusive(TableServiceContext svc, SessionRow session, Object lockId) in \Azure\AspProviders\TableStorageSessionStateProvider.cs:line 603
Microsoft.Samples.ServiceHosting.AspProviders.TableStorageSessionStateProvider.ReleaseItemExclusive(HttpContext context, String id, Object lockId) in \Azure\AspProviders\TableStorageSessionStateProvider.cs:line 480 INNER_EXCEPTION:
System.Data.Services.Client.DataServiceContext.SaveResult.d__1e.MoveNext()
Anyone run into this? The only useful information I've found is this, which I'm hesitant to do:
If you want to bypass the validation, you can open TableStorageSessionStateProvider.cs, find ReleaseItemExclusive, and modify the code from:
svc.UpdateObject(session);
to:
svc.Detach(session);
svc.AttachTo("Sessions", session, "*");
svc.UpdateObject(session);
from here
Thanks!
So I decided to change this:
svc.UpdateObject(session);
svc.SaveChangesWithRetries();
to this:
try
{
svc.UpdateObject(session);
svc.SaveChangesWithRetries();
}
catch
{
svc.Detach(session);
svc.AttachTo("Sessions", session, "*");
svc.UpdateObject(session);
svc.SaveChangesWithRetries();
}
So, I'll see how that works...
I've encountered this problem as well and after some investigation it seems to happen more often when you have more than one instance and you try to make calls in rapid succession in the same session. (e.g. if you had an auto complete box and making ajax calls on each key press)
This occurs because when you try to access the session data, first of all the web server takes out a lock on that session. When the request is complete, it releases the lock. With the table service provider, it updates this lock status by updating a field in the table. What I think is happening is that Instance1 loads the session row, then Instance2 loads the session row, Instance1 saves down the updated lock status and when Instance2 attempts to save the lock status it gets an error because the object isn't in the same state as when it loaded it (the ETag doesn't match any more).
This is why the fix that you found will stop the error from occurring, because by specifying the "*" in the AttachTo, when Instance2 attempts to save the lock it will turn off ETag checking (and over write the changes made by Instance1).
In our situation we have altered the provider so that we can turn off session for certain paths (the ajax call that was giving us our problems didn't need access to session data, neither did the loading of images) which may be an option for you depending on what is causing your problem.
Unfortunately the TableStorageSessionStateProvider is part of the sample projects and so isn't (as far as I'm aware, but I'll happily be told otherwise) officially supported by Microsoft. It does have other issues, like the fact that it doesn't clean up it's session data once a session expires, so you will end up with lots of junk in the session table and blob container that you'll have to clean up some other way.
alt text http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~pkolodzi/Capture.PNG
I have created the IAdder interface with two methods: PassA and PassB. My workflow starts with webServiceInputActivity1 which is activated by PassA remote call. Another element in my workflow is another webServiceInputActivity2 element. This time the "IsActivating" property is set to false. I expect my workflow to be persisted after first activity finishes (which does return void). The workflow should be reactivated by calling PassB web method.
After publishing workflow as web service and invoking PassA here is what I get:
System.InvalidOperationException: Workflow with id "b0c5f9dd-57f3-427f-b172-17d4663f7eaf" not found in state persistence store.
at System.Workflow.Runtime.Hosting.PersistenceDBAccessor.RetrieveInstanceState(Guid instanceStateId, Guid ownerId, DateTime timeout)
at System.Workflow.Runtime.Hosting.SqlWorkflowPersistenceService.LoadWorkflowInstanceState(Guid id)
at System.Workflow.Runtime.WorkflowRuntime.InitializeExecutor(Guid instanceId, CreationContext context, WorkflowExecutor executor, WorkflowInstance workflowInstance)
at System.Workflow.Runtime.WorkflowRuntime.Load(Guid key, CreationContext context, WorkflowInstance workflowInstance)
at System.Workflow.Runtime.WorkflowRuntime.GetWorkflow(Guid instanceId)
at System.Workflow.Activities.WorkflowWebService.Invoke(Type interfaceType, String methodName, Boolean isActivation, Object[] parameters)
at PersistanceWebServiceWorkflow.Workflow1_WebService.PassA(Int32 a) in C:\Users\djpiter\AppData\Local\Temp\2dnwfnsn.cs:line 39
Do you have any ideas what I do wrong?
ps:( The database is properly set. I tested it on workflow hosted in console app and delay activity .I also added necessary line to web.config file. )
Kind Regards
PK
If one of your activities would throw an exception, the workflow state information would be deleted from the database. Run your workflow debugger with "break when exception is throw" configured in Debug - Exceptions - Common Language Runtime Exceptions