Related
I have the following output from a web activity .
{
"value": [
{
"id": "/subscriptions/xy_csv",
"name": "xy_csv",
"type": "Microsoft.code",
"etag": "6200",
"properties": {
"folder": {
"name": "samplecodes"
},
"content": {
"query": "select * from table 1",
"metadata": {
"language": "sql"
},
"currentConnection": {
"databaseName": "demo",
"poolName": "Built-in"
},
"resultLimit": 5000
},
"type": "SqlQuery"
}
},
{
"id": "/subscriptions/ab_csv",
"name": "ab_csv",
"type": "Microsoft.code",
"etag": "6200",
"properties": {
"folder": {
"name": "livecode"
},
"content": {
"query": "select * from table 2",
"metadata": {
"language": "sql"
},
"currentConnection": {
"databaseName": "demo",
"poolName": "Built-in"
},
"resultLimit": 5000
},
"type": "SqlQuery"
}
}
]
I would like to create filter activity after the web activity just to filter out items that are saved under the folder name "livecode".
On the filter activity item field I have -#activity('Web1').output.value
On the condition field I have -- #startswith(item().properties.folder.name,'livecode')
The web activity is successful but the filter activity is failed with this error.
{
"errorCode": "InvalidTemplate",
"message": "The execution of template action 'FilterFilter1' failed: The evaluation of 'query' action 'where' expression '#startswith(item().properties.folder.name,'sql')' failed: 'The expression 'startswith(item().properties.folder.name,'sql')' cannot be evaluated because property 'folder' doesn't exist, available properties are 'content, type'.",
"failureType": "UserError",
"target": "Filter1",
"details": ""
}
it feels like I am going wrong on how i have written the Condition Dynamic Content filter to navigate to properties.folder.name. I am not sure what is missing in my condition. Can anyone help? thanks Much appreciated.
The error is because of the web activity output's properties object might not contain the folder sometimes.
I have taken the following json and got the same error:
{
"value":[
{
"id":"/subscriptions/xy_csv",
"name":"xy_csv",
"type":"Microsoft.code",
"etag":"6200",
"properties":{
"content":{
"query":"select * from table 1",
"metadata":{
"language":"sql"
},
"currentConnection":{
"databaseName":"demo",
"poolName":"Built-in"
},
"resultLimit":5000
},
"type":"SqlQuery"
}
},
{
"id":"/subscriptions/ab_csv",
"name":"ab_csv",
"type":"Microsoft.code",
"etag":"6200",
"properties":{
"folder":{
"name":"livecode"
},
"content":{
"query":"select * from table 2",
"metadata":{
"language":"sql"
},
"currentConnection":{
"databaseName":"demo",
"poolName":"Built-in"
},
"resultLimit":5000
},
"type":"SqlQuery"
}
}
]
}
So, you have to modify the filter condition to check whether it contains a folder key or not using the following dynamic content. I have taken your web activity output as a parameter value and took out folder key from properties object:
#startswith(if(contains(item().properties,'folder'),item().properties.folder.name,''),'livecode')
When I debug the pipeline, we get desired result:
I need to validate incoming request to the camel rest service based on some schema. for example.
In request as given below
{
"routeId" : "fileBatchRoute",
"action" : "start",
"sourceLocation" : "sourceDirectory",
"destinationLocation" : "destinationDirectory"
}
Above request should be validated based on below conditions
1. It must contain action element and format should be above.
2. RouteId should be present.
You can use json-validator component.
With schema generation can help you tool JSONschema.net.
With your requirements (routeId is required, action is required and is one of "start", "stop", "suspend", "resume") could schema be something like:
routeSchema.json:
{
"definitions": {},
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-04/schema#",
"type": "object",
"required": [
"routeId",
"action"
],
"properties": {
"routeId": {
"type": "string"
},
"action": {
"type": "string",
"enum": [
"start",
"stop",
"suspend",
"resume"
]
},
"sourceLocation": {
"type": "string"
},
"destinationLocation": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
Route definition:
.to("json-validator:routeSchema.json")
So I just used 2 working days trying to figure this out. We are automatic rendering process for maps. All the data is given in SQL base and my job is to write "wrapper" so we can implement this in our in-house framework. I managed all but one needed requests.
That request is POST featuretype since this is a way of creating a layer that can later be rendered.
I have all requests saved in postman for pre-testing on example data given by geoserver itself. I can't even get response with status code 201 and always get 500 internal server error. This status is described as possible syntax error in sytax. But I actually just copied and pasted exampled and used geoserver provided data.
This is the requst: http://127.0.0.1:8080/geoserver/rest/workspaces/tiger/datastores/nyc/featuretypes
and its body:
{
"name": "poi",
"nativeName": "poi",
"namespace": {
"name": "tiger",
"href": "http://localhost:8080/geoserver/rest/namespaces/tiger.json"
},
"title": "Manhattan (NY) points of interest",
"abstract": "Points of interest in New York, New York (on Manhattan). One of the attributes contains the name of a file with a picture of the point of interest.",
"keywords": {
"string": [
"poi",
"Manhattan",
"DS_poi",
"points_of_interest",
"sampleKeyword\\#language=ab\\;",
"area of effect\\#language=bg\\;\\#vocabulary=technical\\;",
"Привет\\#language=ru\\;\\#vocabulary=friendly\\;"
]
},
"metadataLinks": {
"metadataLink": [
{
"type": "text/plain",
"metadataType": "FGDC",
"content": "www.google.com"
}
]
},
"dataLinks": {
"org.geoserver.catalog.impl.DataLinkInfoImpl": [
{
"type": "text/plain",
"content": "http://www.google.com"
}
]
},
"nativeCRS": "GEOGCS[\"WGS 84\", \n DATUM[\"World Geodetic System 1984\", \n SPHEROID[\"WGS 84\", 6378137.0, 298.257223563, AUTHORITY[\"EPSG\",\"7030\"]], \n AUTHORITY[\"EPSG\",\"6326\"]], \n PRIMEM[\"Greenwich\", 0.0, AUTHORITY[\"EPSG\",\"8901\"]], \n UNIT[\"degree\", 0.017453292519943295], \n AXIS[\"Geodetic longitude\", EAST], \n AXIS[\"Geodetic latitude\", NORTH], \n AUTHORITY[\"EPSG\",\"4326\"]]",
"srs": "EPSG:4326",
"nativeBoundingBox": {
"minx": -74.0118315772888,
"maxx": -74.00153046439813,
"miny": 40.70754683896324,
"maxy": 40.719885123828675,
"crs": "EPSG:4326"
},
"latLonBoundingBox": {
"minx": -74.0118315772888,
"maxx": -74.00857344353275,
"miny": 40.70754683896324,
"maxy": 40.711945649065406,
"crs": "EPSG:4326"
},
"projectionPolicy": "REPROJECT_TO_DECLARED",
"enabled": true,
"metadata": {
"entry": [
{
"#key": "kml.regionateStrategy",
"$": "external-sorting"
},
{
"#key": "kml.regionateFeatureLimit",
"$": "15"
},
{
"#key": "cacheAgeMax",
"$": "3000"
},
{
"#key": "cachingEnabled",
"$": "true"
},
{
"#key": "kml.regionateAttribute",
"$": "NAME"
},
{
"#key": "indexingEnabled",
"$": "false"
},
{
"#key": "dirName",
"$": "DS_poi_poi"
}
]
},
"store": {
"#class": "dataStore",
"name": "tiger:nyc",
"href": "http://localhost:8080/geoserver/rest/workspaces/tiger/datastores/nyc.json"
},
"cqlFilter": "INCLUDE",
"maxFeatures": 100,
"numDecimals": 6,
"responseSRS": {
"string": [
4326
]
},
"overridingServiceSRS": true,
"skipNumberMatched": true,
"circularArcPresent": true,
"linearizationTolerance": 10,
"attributes": {
"attribute": [
{
"name": "the_geom",
"minOccurs": 0,
"maxOccurs": 1,
"nillable": true,
"binding": "com.vividsolutions.jts.geom.Point"
},
{},
{},
{}
]
}
}
So it is example case and I can't get any useful response from the server. I get the code 500 with body name (the first item in json). Similarly I get same code with body FeatureTypeInfo when trying with xml body(first tag).
I already tried the request in new instance of geoserver in Docker (changed the port) and still no success.
I check if datastore, workspace is available and that layer "poi" doesn't yet exists.
Here are also some logs of request (similar for xml body):
2018-08-03 07:35:02,198 ERROR [geoserver.rest] -
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.CannotResolveClassException: name at
com.thoughtworks.xstream.mapper.DefaultMapper.realClass(DefaultMapper.java:79)
at .....
Does anyone know the solution to this and got it working. I am using GeoServer 2.13.1
So i was still looking for the answer and using this post (https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/12970/create-a-layer-in-geoserver-using-rest) got to the right content to POST featureType and hence creating a layer in GeoServer.
The documentation is off in REST API docs.
Using above link I found out that when using JSON there is a missing insertion in JSON. For API to work here we need to add:
{featureType:
name: "...",
nativeName: "...",
.
.
.}
So that it doesn't start with "name" attribute but it is contained in "featureType".
I didn't try that for XML also but I guess it could be similar.
Hope this helps someone out there struggling like I did.
Blaz is correct here, you need an outer object of FeatureType and then an inner object with your config. So;
{
"featureType": {
"name": "layer",
"nativeName": "poi",
"your config": "stuff"
}
I find though that using a post request I get very little if any response and its not obvious if the layer creation worked. But you can call http://IP:8080/geoserver/rest/layers.json to check if your new layer is there.
It costs me a lot of time to create FeatureTypes using REST API. Use Json like this really works:
{
"featureType": {
"name": "layer",
"nativeName": "poi"
"otherProperties...":"values..."
}
And use Json below to create Workspace:
{
"workspace": {
"name": "test_workspace"
}
}
The REST API is out of date now. That's disappointing. Is there anyone knows how to get the lastest REST API document?
I'm trying to implement a simple app for Google Assistant.
All works fine, but now I have a problem with the "permission" helper :
https://developers.google.com/actions/assistant/helpers#helper_intents
I have an intent connected with webhook to my java application. When an user types a sentence similar to "near to me", I want to ask to him his location and then use lat/lon to perform a search.
es: Brazilian restaurant near to me
my intent "searchRestaurant" is fired
I receive the webhook request and I parse it
if I find a parameter that is connected to a sentence like "near to me", so instead to response with a "Card" or a "List" I return a JSON that represent the helper request :
{
"conversationToken": "[]",
"expectUserResponse": true,
"expectedInputs": [
{
"inputPrompt": {
"initialPrompts": [
{
"textToSpeech": "PLACEHOLDER_FOR_PERMISSION"
}
],
"noInputPrompts": []
},
"possibileIntents": [
{
"intent": "actions.intent.PERMISSION",
"inputValueData": {
"#type": "type.googleapis.com/google.actions.v2.PermissionValueSpec",
"optContext": "Posso accedere alla tua posizione?",
"permission": [
"NAME",
"DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"
]
}
}
]
}
]
}
but something seems to be wrong, and I receive an error:
"{\n \"responseMetadata\": {\n \"status\": {\n \"code\": 10,\n \"message\": \"Failed to parse Dialogflow response into AppResponse because of empty speech response\",\n \"details\": [{\n \"#type\": \"type.googleapis.com/google.protobuf.Value\",\n \"value\": \"{\\"id\\":\\"1cc45c5e-c398-4ea7-98a5-408f31ce142d\\",\\"timestamp\\":\\"2018-08-02T14:45:05.752Z\\",\\"lang\\":\\"it\\",\\"result\\":{},\\"alternateResult\\":{},\\"status\\":{\\"code\\":206,\\"errorType\\":\\"partial_content\\",\\"errorDetails\\":\\"Webhook call failed. Error: Failed to parse webhook JSON response: Cannot find field: conversationToken in message google.cloud.dialogflow.v2.WebhookResponse.\\"},\\"sessionId\\":\\"1533221100163\\"}\"\n }]\n }\n }\n}"
The "conversationToken" is filled, so I don't understand the error message.
Maybe I'm trying to perform the operation in a wrong way.
So, which is the correct way to call this helper?
--> I've created a second intent "askGeolocation" that have "actions_intent_PERMISSION" as "Event", and ... if I understand correctly the documentation, should be trigger if the request for helper is correct.
How can I get this working?
UPDATE :
I find some example of the json response for ask permission and seems that it should be different from the one above that i'm using :
https://github.com/dialogflow/fulfillment-webhook-json/blob/master/responses/v2/ActionsOnGoogle/AskForPermission.json
{
"payload": {
"google": {
"expectUserResponse": true,
"systemIntent": {
"intent": "actions.intent.PERMISSION",
"data": {
"#type": "type.googleapis.com/google.actions.v2.PermissionValueSpec",
"optContext": "To deliver your order",
"permissions": [
"NAME",
"DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"
]
}
}
}
}
}
so, i've implemented it and now the response seems to be good (no more error on parsing it), but i still receive an error on it validation :
UnparseableJsonResponse
API Version 2: Failed to parse JSON response string with 'INVALID_ARGUMENT' error: "permission: Cannot find field."
so, a problem still persist.
Anyone know the cause?
Thanks
After some tests i found the problem.
I was returning a wrong json repsonse with "permission" instead of "permissions":
"permission**s**": [
"NAME",
"DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"
]
So the steps to ask for location are correct. I report them here as a little tutorial in order to help who is facing on it for the first time:
1) In DialogFlow, add some logic to your Intent, in order to understand when is ok to ask to user his location. In my case, i've added a "parameter" that identify sentences like "nearby" and so on.
2) When my Intent is fired i receive to my java application a request like this :
...
"queryResult": {
"queryText": "ristorante argentino qui vicino",
"action": "bycategory",
"parameters": {
"askgeolocation": "qui vicino",
"TipoRistorante": ["ristorante", "argentino"]
},
...
3) If "askgeolocation" parameter is filled, instead to return a "simple message" o other type of message, i return a json for ask the permission to geolocation :
{
"payload": {
"google": {
"expectUserResponse": true,
"systemIntent": {
"intent": "actions.intent.PERMISSION",
"data": {
"#type": "type.googleapis.com/google.actions.v2.PermissionValueSpec",
"optContext": "To deliver your order",
"permissions": [
"NAME",
"DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"
]
}
}
}
}
}
4) You MUST have a second Intent that is configured with "actions_intent_PERMISSION " event :
No training phrases
No Action and params
No Responses
But with Fulfillment active :
5) Once your response arrive to Google Assistant this is the message that appear :
6) Now, if user answer "ok" you receive this json on your webhook :
{
"responseId": "32cf46cf-80d8-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"queryResult": {
"queryText": "actions_intent_PERMISSION",
"action": "geoposition",
"parameters": {
},
"allRequiredParamsPresent": true,
"fulfillmentMessages": [{
"text": {
"text": [""]
}
}],
"outputContexts": [{
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}, {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"parameters": {
"PERMISSION": true
}
}, {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}, {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}, {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}, {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}],
"intent": {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"displayName": "geoposition"
},
"intentDetectionConfidence": 1.0,
"languageCode": "it"
},
"originalDetectIntentRequest": {
"source": "google",
"version": "2",
"payload": {
"isInSandbox": true,
"surface": {
"capabilities": [{
"name": "actions.capability.MEDIA_RESPONSE_AUDIO"
}, {
"name": "actions.capability.SCREEN_OUTPUT"
}, {
"name": "actions.capability.AUDIO_OUTPUT"
}, {
"name": "actions.capability.WEB_BROWSER"
}]
},
"requestType": "SIMULATOR",
"inputs": [{
"rawInputs": [{
"inputType": "KEYBOARD"
}],
"arguments": [{
"textValue": "true",
"name": "PERMISSION",
"boolValue": true
}],
"intent": "actions.intent.PERMISSION"
}],
"user": {
"lastSeen": "2018-08-03T08:55:20Z",
"permissions": ["NAME", "DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"],
"profile": {
"displayName": ".... full name of the user ...",
"givenName": "... name ...",
"familyName": "... surname ..."
},
"locale": "it-IT",
"userId": "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
},
"device": {
"location": {
"coordinates": {
"latitude": 45.xxxxxx,
"longitude": 9.xxxxxx
}
}
},
"conversation": {
"conversationId": "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"type": "ACTIVE",
"conversationToken": "[]"
},
"availableSurfaces": [{
"capabilities": [{
"name": "actions.capability.SCREEN_OUTPUT"
}, {
"name": "actions.capability.AUDIO_OUTPUT"
}, {
"name": "actions.capability.WEB_BROWSER"
}]
}]
}
},
"session": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}
that contains, name/surname and latitude/longitude. This information can be saved in your application, in order to not perform again this steps.
I hope this helps.
Davide
In your intent, you can ask for a parameter with a custom Entity. This you can do like this:
entity you can define as "near"
put all the synonyms for near for which you want to trigger location permission in this entity
do not mark this parameter as "required"
do not put any prompt
in the training phrases, add some phrases with this parameter
in your webhook, keep a check on the parameter, if present ask for permission if not continue.
add a permission event to another intent
do your post permission processing in that intent
Entity
Intent
I hope you get it.
There are samples on this topic specifically that guide you through exactly what's needed for requesting permissions in Node and Java.
Note: There are helper intents samples available in Node and Java as well.
I am using the swagger tool for documenting my Jersey based REST API (the swaggerui I am using was downloaded on June 2014 don't know if this issue has been fixed in later versions but as I made a lot of customization to its code so I don't have the option to download the latest without investing lot of time to customize it again).
So far and until now, all my transfer objects have one level deep properties (no embedded pojos). But now that I added some rest paths that are returning more complex objects (two levels of depth) I found that SwaggerUI is not expanding the JSON model schema when having embedded objects.
Here is the important part of the swagger doc:
...
{
"path": "/user/combo",
"operations": [{
"method": "POST",
"summary": "Inserts a combo (user, address)",
"notes": "Will insert a new user and a address definition in a single step",
"type": "UserAndAddressWithIdSwaggerDto",
"nickname": "insertCombo",
"consumes": ["application/json"],
"parameters": [{
"name": "body",
"description": "New user and address combo",
"required": true,
"type": "UserAndAddressWithIdSwaggerDto",
"paramType": "body",
"allowMultiple": false
}],
"responseMessages": [{
"code": 200,
"message": "OK",
"responseModel": "UserAndAddressWithIdSwaggerDto"
}]
}]
}
...
"models": {
"UserAndAddressWithIdSwaggerDto": {
"id": "UserAndAddressWithIdSwaggerDto",
"description": "",
"required": ["user",
"address"],
"properties": {
"user": {
"$ref": "UserDto",
"description": "User"
},
"address": {
"$ref": "AddressDto",
"description": "Address"
}
}
},
"UserDto": {
"id": "UserDto",
"properties": {
"userId": {
"type": "integer",
"format": "int64"
},
"name": {
"type": "string"
},...
},
"AddressDto": {
"id": "AddressDto",
"properties": {
"addressId": {
"type": "integer",
"format": "int64"
},
"street": {
"type": "string"
},...
}
}
...
The embedded objects are User and Address, their models are being created correctly as shown in the json response.
But when opening the SwaggerUI I can only see:
{
"user": "UserDto",
"address": "AddressDto"
}
But I should see something like:
{
"user": {
"userId": "integer",
"name": "string",...
},
"address": {
"addressId": "integer",
"street": "string",...
}
}
Something may be wrong in the code that expands the internal properties, the javascript console doesn't show any error so I assume this is a bug.
I found the solution, there is a a line of code that needs to be modified to make it work properly:
In the swagger.js file there is a getSampleValue function with a conditional checking for undefined:
SwaggerModelProperty.prototype.getSampleValue = function(modelsToIgnore) {
var result;
if ((this.refModel != null) && (modelsToIgnore[this.refModel.name] === 'undefined'))
...
I updated the equality check to (removing quotes):
modelsToIgnore[this.refModel.name] === undefined
After that, SwaggerUI is able to show the embedded models.