I have tested a few apps with enable-diego on Bluemix. They all broke because of this change. I could fix most, one I'm still struggling with. And none of which I actually wanted to make code changes in.
Instead of code changes being required to my apps, can I automate the mapping of the variables at container level (or any other solution)?
Not tried this but maybe you could create a user provided environment variable and set
VCAP_APP_PORT = $PORT
edit:
You can set user-provided environment variables using the Bluemix UI or using the cf set-env command.
Related
I want to automatically create different MSIX packages/installers for the same MAUI app, so that each one runs a specific code snippet according to a flag parameter.
The user does not have to interact with the app. An installer per flag value has to be created, an once the app is installed and the user double clicks the app icon, the specific piece of code has to be run.
So far, I've tried without success the following approach, trying to create a script that passes the possible values of the flag as installation parameters using the app installer and a protocol, and then trying to publish the different packages in a local path.
I would like to know whether that's feasible or there may be any other approach to get it done.
You can check this comment about .NET MAUI Windows target publishing/archiving.
In the article, the right way to set the MSIX is that you had to create a self-signed certificate and then You could add a couple of extra parameters to also add the sign the MSIX and then trust that cert manually.
I want to be able to talk with Google Assistant, but connect the Actions project directly to an NLP service I already have running on my server. In other words, NOT use dialogflow.
All the following examples show how to do this.
With Rasa
https://blog.rasa.com/going-beyond-hey-google-building-a-rasa-powered-google-assistant/
With LUIS
https://www.grokkingandroid.com/using-the-actions-sdk/
https://dzone.com/articles/using-the-actions-sdk-for-google-assistant-develop
With Watson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=no0R0bSkHXc
They use the actions.intent.MAIN as the invocation and actions.intent.TEXT for all other utterances from the talker.
This is what I need. I don’t want to create a load of intents, with utterance phrases, inside the Action because I just want all the phrases spoken by the talker to be passed to my server, and for my NLP service to deal with them.
So I set up a new Action project, install the Actions CLI and then spend 3 days trying all possible combinations without success, because all these examples are using gactions cli 2.1.3 and Google have now moved on to gactions cli 3.1.0.
Not only have the commands changed, but so too has the file formats and structure.
It appears there is also a new Google Actions Console, and actions.intent.TEXT is no longer available.
My Action is webhook connected to my server, but I cannot figure out how to get the action.intent.TEXT included and working.
Everything I find, even here
Publishing Actions on google without Dialogflow
is pre version update and follows the same pattern.
Can anyone point to an up-to-date, v3.1.0, discussion, tutorial or example about how to send all talker phrases through to an NLP that isn’t dialogflow, or has Google closed that avenue?
Is it possible to somehow go back and use the 2.1 CLI either with the new Console or revert the console back. (I have both CLI versions, I can see how different their commands are)
Is it possible to go back and use 2.1?
There is no way to go back to AoG 2. You probably also don't want to do so - newer features aren't available with v2 and are only available with v3.
Can I use my own NLP with v3?
Yes, although it isn't as obvious, and there are some changes in semantics.
As an overview, what you'll need to do is:
Create a Type that can accept "Free form text". I usually call this type "Any".
In the console, it looks something like this:
Create a Custom Intent that has a single parameter of this Any Type and at least one phrase that captures everything for this parameter. (So you should add one training phrase, highlight the entire phrase, and set it for the parameter. Sometimes I also add additional phrases that includes words that I don't want to capture.) I usually call the Intent "matchAny" and the parameter "any".
In the console, it could be something like this:
Finally, you'll have a Scene that you transition to from the Main invocation. When it matches the "matchAny" Intent, it should call your webhook with a handler name. Your webhook will be called with the "any" parameter set with the user utterance. (Note that the JSON has also changed.
Again, the console might have it looking something like this:
That seems like a lot of work. Isn't there just some way to do all that from the command line?
Yes. You can do all of that in the configuration files that the CLI accesses and then upload it. (You can then also use the console to review the configuration, if necessary, to make sure they're configured as you expect. You can shift back and forth between them as appropriate.)
Google also has a github repository that contains most of the files pre-configured for this sort of setup.
You will need to update the configuration from the repository to handle the webhook correctly (it includes code to illustrate what is happening using the inline code editor) and to add your project ID.
I have a custom sails.js hook which implements a Websocket server (we can't use the built-in socket.js hook because we needed to match an old API).
I also have a custom sails run script that does background processing.
Right now, when the sails run -name-of-my-script command is run, it also runs my hook which makes extra listeners for all of the events used by this hook.
I would like to make it that the hook only starts on a main application startup (sails lift or the equivalent node app.js), not on sails run ....
I have looked through the code and the documentation, but I can't seem to see any official way to do this.
I can think of two options:
In the hook, check for whether a script is being run and don't initialize.
In the script, disable the hook.
Is there any way to do either of those things?
Right now, there is no built-in way to do this because Sails scripts have no way to modify configuration - they use the default sails instance with its default settings.
Here is the hack that I used to make it work:
Add a check for a configuration option in the hook's initialize method:
if (app.config.notifier.active === false) {
sails.log.verbose('Notifier disabled');
return cb();
}
// Continue with notifier hook setup here
Add setting an environment variable to the top of the script (before the module.exports:
process.env.sails_notifier__active = false;
(Note: Step 1 is based on this answer but the package linked there no longer uses this technique. That question and answer are also extremely old -- at least as Sails.js answers go -- from before sails run existed.)
I am currently working on with a solution that would be able to clone/copy/backup my existing rep:policy. 'Cause when we do some jobs it accidentally removed. I am trying to apply this kind of fix, but am failing to. It says it is an invalid path.
javax.jcr.security.AccessControlException: OakAccessControl0006: Isolated policy node. Parent is not of type [rep:AccessControllable]
final Workspace ws = session.getWorkspace();
ws.copy("/etc/commerce/products/abccompany/TvPackChannelMap/rep:policy","/tmp/nxt/TvPackChannelMap/rep:policy");
Are there other ways that I can be able to take the rep:policy thru code?
You need to make sure that your job does not touch the permissions or the rep:policy, this is the best way forward for you.
The exception could be because of /etc/commerce/products/abccompany/TvPackChannelMap/rep:policy does not exist or the user whose session you are using does not have read access to the node.
Make sure the path is correct, copy paste it to your CRX/DE to make sure it exists.
I have tried to use your code to copy a rep:policy from one node to another, works fine. But I would not* recommend copying permissions that way. The best practice is to use the Access Control Management API for all things permissions.
You can check, install and use the access control tool from netcentric. It offers a jmx interface for exporting AC entries and maybe also some APIs you could use to implement your custom solution.
The Other approach is to retrieve the ACL permissions through the query language.
For example, SELECT * FROM [rep:ACL] or SELECT * FROM [rep:ACE] where [rep:principalName] is not null should give you the results.
For more information, I would recommend you to check the ACS commons ACL Packager Implementation which is available on GitHub.
Reference Link - https://github.com/Adobe-Consulting-Services/acs-aem-commons/blob/master/bundle/src/main/java/com/adobe/acs/commons/packaging/impl/ACLPackagerServletImpl.java
We are using Firebase to setup different toggle-able features based of whether the app is currently pointing at Beta, Staging or Live so we can test gradually without fully going live with a feature.
We do this by setting 3 conditions inside Remote Config based on how the user property 'ios_environment' is set within the app.
Inside the Development version of the app we can switch between the environments easily which calls the following code to switch which condition the app is currently running under:
Analytics.setUserProperty(environment.rawValue, forName: "ios_environment")
Which sets it to either, "beta", "staging" or "live".
What happens in the app is for a particular Remote Config parameter it only ever decides to go with whatever the Default value is and never seems to pickup on the condition that is set:
So for the Parameter in the image above, we want it to be true only for the Beta environment but it only takes whatever the Default says.
I hope I've made my issue clear, it's hard to get what is wrong across.
It's an issue that's recently fixed in v4.2.0. https://firebase.google.com/support/release-notes/ios
Is your Firebase version early than that?